Pope Benedict’s XVI’s longtime aide and confidant, who Pope Benedict tapped to run the Congregation for Divine Worship and whose name was used as cover for the USCCB’s desire to proceed with debate on the Eucharistic Coherence document, Archbishop Gus DiNoia, OP, states that traditionalists used JPII/BENEDICT “to their ends.”
I don’t want to say everyone who attends the 1962 Missal Mass is this way, but many are. On this blog I have had to delete or not publish many right wing heterodox comments that are far from the fidelity of pre-Vatican II Catholics to the Holy Father and the Magisterium of the Church.
The way forward is the 2007 Latin Edition of the post Vatican II Mass and the use of the 1974 Roman Gradual for the propers of the Mass and the Liturgy of the Word in the vernacular. John Nolan can correct me on this, but I believe the Roman Gradual has the gradual instead of the Responsorial Psalm available to be chanted.
The 2007 Latin Missal with the Liturgy of the Eucharist celebrated ad orientem and kneeling at the altar railing for Holy Communion is certainly an option to be considered and allowed.
I would recommend to Archbishop DeNoia that the options allowed in the Ordinariate’s Missal, Divine Worship be given to the normative Roman Rite as well. After all, Pope Francis’ name and authorization of this missal in printed in their post- Vatican II Roman Missal.
This is an important article that can’t simply be dismissed
“Many people with a desire for Latin in the liturgy would have been better served by the ‘novus ordo’ (the modern Mass) in Latin than by the repristination of the pre-conciliar liturgy.”