Translate

Saturday, October 3, 2026

BISHOP GUIDO MARINI DOES NOT SEEM TO BE OUT OF THE RUNNING TO TAKE OVER SAINT PETER’S BASILICA…

 Infovaticano seems to think that Cardinal Parolin may take over Saint Peter’s Basilica and Archbishop Gallagher as Secretary of State. 

But they don’t think Bishop Marini is out of the running.

It would be fantastic if Marini is the new head of St. Peter’s! 

Somehow I think for Parolin to take that position would be seen as a demotion, especially as he was in the running to be the next pope. Just my two outdated and suppressed US cents worth. 

Google translation of Infovaticano’s Spanish musings:

The Empty Seat and Parolin’s Name

The day’s most significant aspect lies in what is missing. The Archpriestship of St. Peter’s—linked since 2005 to the Vicariate General for Vatican City and the presidency of the Fabric of St. Peter—is one of the few top-tier posts allowing a Pope to honorably reposition a cardinal of the highest rank without creating a custom-made dicastery. And that is precisely the profile Leo XIV needs to accommodate if he decides, as has been rumored in Rome since the summer, to reshuffle the Secretariat of State.

*Il Giornale d’Italia* has put forward the most concrete hypothesis: Cardinal Pietro Parolin—aged 71, with thirteen years at the helm of Vatican diplomacy and a major rival to Prevost in the May 2025 conclave—would move from the Secretariat of State to the Vatican Basilica, with Monsignor Paul Richard Gallagher, the current Secretary for Relations with States, taking his place. The newspaper presents this as a rumor, but today’s move lends it plausibility: the seat Gambetti is vacating is exactly the one required for this maneuver, and it would offer Parolin an honorable exit, much like those granted to other cardinals at the end of their Curial careers in the past.

There are variations to this scenario. In August, *Korazym* suggested that Parolin might replace Cardinal Filoni—now an octogenarian—as Grand Master of the Order of the Holy Sepulchre, an international role fitting his diplomatic background, while placing Monsignor Guido Marini—Bishop of Tortona and former Master of Ceremonies for Benedict XVI—at the head of St. Peter’s. Either combination would represent the most significant change in the Curia since the election of Leo XIV, and in both scenarios, Gallagher appears as the man tapped to lead the Secretariat of State.

HAS AMORIS LAETITIA CHANGED ANYTHING ANYWHERE?

 


Press title for Associated Press take on the closed door meeting Pope Leo will have concerning Amoris Laetitia:

Pope Leo seeks status update of Francis’s divisive look at divorced and remarried Catholics

|Associated Press

My Comments:

To be honest with you, apart from that viral footnote, I thought Pope Francis’ Amoris Laetitia was very good. 

However, apart from the footnote controversy, I don’t think Amoris Laetitia has been implemented in any noticeable way anywhere in the world or at least in the Province of Atlanta. Am I wrong?

The viral footnote, though, eclipsed all the good in the document. This was typical of Pope Francis’ reign. His Holiness would go on beautiful pilgrimages and do great things and say great things and then on the way home gave his famous “high altitude” off-the-cuff press conferences, often disjointed and incoherent and always controversial which then eclipsed all the good that happened on the pilgrimage. 

I think the bottom line of the “footnote” was that Catholics in what is considered to be an adulterous sexual relationship could be accompanied by the pastoral ministry of the Church and in the process of that they could be admitted to the Sacraments of the Church, in particular Holy Communion, if that adulterous relationship is “good” apart from the adultery. 

But!

That has been going on for decades. It’s called the “Internal Forum.” Often the “internal forum” was used illicitly by priests. It could only be used if the external forum was non-conclusive (meaning there wasn’t sufficient evidence to declare a previous bond as annulled, not because there wasn’t sufficient evidence for an annulment but there were no witnesses apart from the spouses to corroborate what was being said. Maybe witnesses had died or refused to cooperate). 

In those cases, within the context of Confession, and the spouse in an illicit marital union initiating it, not the priest, the priest could give them a pastoral solution—if in good conscience they believed that their first marriage was illicit and the illicit marriage they are now in isn’t, they could go to Holy Communion apart from an annulment. But no formal blessing of that union was to take place.

That’s an art and not a science and the onus is on the penitent. They have to accept the punishment due their sin if in fact they are in an adulterous relationship in the eyes of God and are unrepentant about it and also making sacrilegious Communions.

But, the abuse of the internal forum went further at times. Priests and deacons would preside at a ceremony to “validate” an illicit marriage without an external, formal annulment decree. That is forbidden but it was/is done nonetheless. 

Pope Francis was not advocating in Amoris Laetitia, convalidating illicit marriages without a formal external annulment decree.

Of course, today, with civil same sex “marriages” and the LGTBQ+++ ideologies demanding that the Church bless same sex marriages too, Amoris Laetitia’s viral footnote creates new challenges and certainly there are priests giving permission to those in illicit homosexual sexual unions, civil marriages, to receive Holy Communion or not refusing Holy Communion to those in these unions. There are also formal blessings given in Church that resemble weddings, also forbidden. 

The other way around opening Holy Communion to anyone in an illicit “marriage, is if the couple is living together in a sibling relationship, i.e. not having any kind of sex, they may receive Holy Communion. And yes, this is common that so-called spouses are no longer having sex but support each other and care for each other by living and sleeping together. 

Finally, those in a state of mortal sin, non repentant and never going to confession, are coming up to receive Holy Communion any time, even if infrequently, they attend Mass. That’s a whole “nother” can of worms that no one is addressing and it happens at almost every Mass everywhere in the world. 

Why are we so worried about one segment of those receiving Holy Communion sacrilegiously and not the majority? 

 

IS IT OKAY TO BREAK A PONTIFICAL SECRET? I’VE BEEN PLACED UNDER IT A COUPLE OF TIMES AND NEVER BROKE IT. SHOULD I HAVE?

Given the fact that Pope Francis refused to elevated bishops of historically cardinalate sees, am I the only one who finds it scandalous that Pope Francis elevated Cardinal Gambetti to the rank of bishop/archbishop on November 22, 2020 and then on November 28th of the same year, less than a week later, named him a cardinal? 

Fortunately the good Cardinal’s meteoric rise is match by a similar demise. 

This is the headline from Sileri non possum:

Leo XIV ousts Gambetti from the Vatican. The friar breaches pontifical secrecy

Leo XIV ousts Gambetti from the Vatican. The friar breaches pontifical secrecy

The cardinal leaves St Peter’s and the Fabric for Chieti-Vasto. After months of gradually diminishing influence, the Pope brings one of the most controversial chapters of the Francis era to a close.

 And this is Pope Leo’s headline the next day despite the pontifical secret being broken:

Resignations and Appointments, 03.10.2026

Resignation and appointment of the Archbishop of Chieti-Vasto (Italy)

The Holy Father has accepted the resignation from the pastoral governance of the Metropolitan Archdiocese of Chieti-Vasto (Italy) presented by H.E. Msgr. Bruno Forte.

The Holy Father has appointed His Most Reverend Eminence Cardinal Mauro Gambetti, O.F.M. Conv., as Metropolitan Archbishop of Chieti-Vasto (Italy), transferring him from the offices of Vicar General of His Holiness for Vatican City, Archpriest of the Papal Basilica of Saint Peter in the Vatican, and President of the Fabbrica di San Pietro.

Curriculum vitae

H.E. Card. Mauro Gambetti, O.F.M. Conv., was born on October 27, 1965, in Castel San Pietro Terme (Bologna). After obtaining a degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Bologna, he began his journey in the Order of Friars Minor Conventual in 1992. He made his temporary vows in 1995 and his perpetual vows in 1998. After completing a Baccalaureate in Theology at the Theological Institute of Assisi (Perugia), he obtained a Licentiate in Theological Anthropology from the Theological Faculty of Central Italy in Florence.

He was ordained a priest on January 8, 2000, in Longiano (Forlì-Cesena). He held the following positions: coordinator of youth and vocation ministry for Emilia-Romagna (2000–2009) and head and animator of the religious community (Guardian) (2005–2009) at the Friary of the Most Holy Crucifix; Provincial Minister of the Bolognese Province of Saint Anthony of Padua (2009–2013); and Custos General of the General Custody of the Sacred Convent of Saint Francis in Assisi (2013–2017). Concurrently, the Bishop of Assisi-Nocera Umbra-Gualdo Tadino appointed him Episcopal Vicar for the pastoral care of the Papal Basilica of Saint Francis and other places of worship administered by the Conventual Franciscan Friars within the same diocese.

In 2017, he was elected President of the Inter-Mediterranean Federation of Provincial Ministers of the Conventual Franciscan Friars. He was subsequently reconfirmed as Custos General of the General Custody of the Sacred Convent of Saint Francis in Assisi for the 2017–2021 term, a role he held until October 31, 2020.

On October 30, 2020, he was assigned the titular see of Tisiduo with the personal title of Archbishop, and he received episcopal ordination on November 22, 2020, at the Basilica of Saint Francis in Assisi. Pope Francis created him a Cardinal—assigning him the deaconry of the Most Holy Name of Mary at the Trajan Forum—during the Consistory of November 28, 2020, and on February 20, 2021, appointed him Vicar General of His Holiness for Vatican City, Archpriest of the Papal Basilica of St. Peter in the Vatican, and President of the Fabric of St. Peter. Furthermore, on June 2, 2023—effective January 1, 2024—Pope Francis appointed him a Judge of the Court of Cassation of Vatican City State.

He is a member of the Dicastery for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life.

Friday, October 2, 2026

MICHAEL SEAN WINTERS OF THE NcR HAS FOUND SOMETHING IN POPE LEO THAT HE DIDN’T FIND IN POPE FRANCIS: CLARITY AND PRECISION AND AUGUSTINIAN THEOLOGY!


French President Emmanuel Macron, right, listens to Pope Leo XIV delivering his speech at the meeting At the Roots of Europe for Peace and Unity, Monday, Sept. 28, 2026, in Metz, France. (AP/Gregorio Borgia)

French President Emmanuel Macron, right, listens to Pope Leo XIV delivering his speech at the meeting At the Roots of Europe for Peace and Unity, Monday, Sept. 28, 2026, in Metz, France. (AP/Gregorio Borgia)

Below are excerpts from an article in the National catholic Reporter by Michael Sean Winters. You can read the full article here!

I am glad the grace of God is breaking through to Michael Sean and he’s exhibiting growth in his Catholic Faith as he moves away from the NcR’s more schismatic-fomenting ways. 

Here are the excerpts: 

Catholics are still processing Pope Leo XIV's amazing trip to France. The images of the crowds lining the Champs-Élysées, of the excited young people at the Stade de France and the thousands singing the "Salve Regina" outside Notre Dame cathedral, of the Holy Father at the grotto in Lourdes, all these form a profound impression of the continued significance of Catholicism to French culture and of this pope's ability to harness that 

Leo's religious sermons emphasized spiritual themes. At the huge Mass at the Place de la Concorde, the Holy Father's theme was a very Augustinian one: God as the answer to human restlessness and desire. 

"What is my deepest thirst? What am I really seeking in life? We all long for happiness, love and fulfillment. But from what source do we seek to quench our thirst?" the pope asked. "Are we content with material goods, immediate satisfactions, the countless little idols that promise us everything but leave our hearts empty? We have been baptized and received the living water of which the Gospel speaks, but have we truly encountered Christ personally? In essence, the human person is a being of desire, and only God can fill the emptiness within us."

In his sermon at Lourdes, Leo highlighted another side of his Augustinian roots. In speaking of the promise of eternal life of which the Blessed Mother spoke to St. Bernadette, Leo said, "For the obstacle to grace and eternal life — the only obstacle to this love — is sin, whereby we turn in upon ourselves, refusing God and shutting ourselves up in our own darkness. … We must therefore use our freedom to say yes to Christ, relying on his grace, like Mary. This is a yes that we renew until our final breath — 'now and at the hour of our death' — as we say in the Hail Mary." He devoted several paragraphs to the theme of repentance, but always linked it to the ongoing call to conversion and the hope of eternal life. 

When Leo spoke about assisted suicide, which was recently legalized in France, his words were strong and condemnatory, rightly labeling the practice an example of "false compassion." One wishes he had been in Paris before the vote to legalize assisted suicide. He might have tipped the balance against it.

The crowds were massive and the excitement palpable. Leo was never an actor, like his predecessor St. John Paul II, and he lacks the Polish pontiff's dramatic sense of timing and connecting with a crowd. Yet connect he did. Why? As one Parisian said to my colleague Justin McLellan at the Mass in Paris: "He is a pope who is young, 71, and he moves the young people forward; he is calm, a good listener and he has very precise ideas and is able to express them clearly and in an engaging way — all the young people and the crowds here show that." 

In a noisy and confusing culture, Leo's clarity and precision, as well as his obvious authenticity, break through. The response he received in France gives hope at a time when the world so desperately needs hope.

BISHOP OLSON OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS LIMITS THE USE OF THE COMMON CHALICE AT MASS—THANK YOU VERY MUCH

 The only thing I wish that the good bishop would have highlighted is that the common chalice shared with multiple communicants, many of whom allow backwash from their mouth to pour forth into the chalice, as well as deadly germs and viruses, like the herpes virus, can be left on the rim of the chalice and thus can be an epidemic and, of course, a pandemic creating event, should no longer be allowed.

Rather, the use of intinction, described in the GIRM of the 2012 Reform of the Reformed 1970 Roman Missal, indicates that intinction is perfectly acceptable. And it lessens all the concerns about epidemics and pandemics of the common chalice, as well as abuse of the Precious Blood as described in Bishop Olson letter.


Pastoral Letter on the Distribution of Communion Under Both Species


To the Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, Religious, and Lay Faithful of the Diocese of Fort Worth
October 1, 2026

Dear Friends in Christ,

In recent years, the Church in the United States has given renewed attention to the mystery of the
Most Holy Eucharist. As your Bishop, I write to you to reflect briefly on this great sacrament and
to provide clear direction regarding the distribution of Holy Communion under both species
within the Diocese of Fort Worth. The Eucharist is the heart of the Church’s life, and it is my
responsibility to ensure that it is celebrated with reverence, doctrinal clarity, and fidelity to the
Church’s discipline.

The Mystery of the Eucharist


The Most Holy Eucharist is the Church’s greatest treasure. In it, Christ Himself is truly present—
Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity—under the appearances of bread and wine. In every celebration
of the Mass, the one sacrifice of Christ in his passion, death, and resurrection is made present
sacramentally so that his saving grace may be given to us here and now.
The Eucharist is also the sacred banquet in which the faithful are nourished with the Body and
Blood of the Lord. In receiving Holy Communion, we are united more closely to Christ and with
each other in the bonds of charity. It must be clearly understood that, by the doctrine of
concomitance, Christ is received whole and entire under either species alone. For this reason,
nothing is lacking when Holy Communion is received under the species of bread alone or the
species of wine alone.

The Eucharist and the Unity of the Church

The Eucharist is the sacrament of unity. It both signifies and brings about communion with
Christ and with one another as members of His Body, the Church. Each celebration of the Mass
is not a private act but an act of the whole Church, Head and members, offered in communion
with the diocesan bishop and the Roman Pontiff.

Since the Eucharist expresses the unity of the Church, its celebration must also reflect that unity
in both faith and discipline. The Church’s liturgical norms serve this purpose. They are not
arbitrary but exist to safeguard the dignity of the sacrament and to ensure that what we celebrate
truly reflects what we believe.

The Responsibility of the Bishop

As the Bishop of the Diocese of Fort Worth, I have been entrusted with the responsibility to
regulate the celebration of the sacred liturgy. This responsibility includes determining when Holy
Communion may be distributed under both species (See GIRM #283).
The Church permits the faithful to receive under both species in certain circumstances as a fuller
sign of the Eucharistic banquet. At the same time, she teaches clearly that this is not the ordinary
manner of reception. The faithful must always remember that reception under one species alone
is complete participation in the Eucharist.
In exercising this responsibility, I must ensure that the Eucharist is treated with the reverence it
deserves and that its distribution does not give rise to confusion or diminish its dignity.

The Times When Communion Under Both Species Is Permitted

After consultation and careful consideration of the Church’s norms, I have determined that
within the Diocese of Fort Worth the distribution of Holy Communion under both species will be
limited to specific occasions.
Accordingly, Communion under both species may be offered only on the following occasions:

• Priestly or Diaconal Ordinations
• The Chrism Mass
• The Mass of the Lord’s Supper on Holy Thursday
• The Easter Vigil.

At Mass where adults are confirmed and receive first Eucharist (for the newly confirmed)

• The Mass of Holy Matrimony (only for the Catholic bride and Catholic groom)
• Masses of Religious Profession
• The Solemnity of the Most Holy Body and Blood of Christ (Corpus Christi)
• Masses at convents and retreat centers within the Diocese
• 
At newly ordained priests’ first Mass

• Other celebrations of similar solemnity only with my explicit approval

Even on these occasions, the distribution of the Precious Blood is to take place only when it can
be done reverently, when there are sufficient ministers, and when there is no danger of
profanation or disorder. If these conditions cannot be met, Communion is to be distributed under
the species of bread alone. Outside of these occasions, Holy Communion is to be distributed
under one species. Deacons assisting at Mass should receive the Precious Blood from the Chalice
(See GIRM 160-164).

The Church’s discipline regarding the manner of distribution is to be observed in all cases. The
Precious Blood is to be administered by an ordinary minister, if sufficient number are not
available, then by extraordinary ministers. Practices such as self-service, passing the chalice, or
self-intinction are not permitted. In keeping with the rubrics and norms for the Liturgy, only
priests, deacons, and instituted acolytes are to purify the vessels. Deacons and instituted acolytes
are to purify vessels away from the altar and at the credence table only. Vessels are not to be
purified in the sacristy even if purification takes place after Mass (See GIRM 160-164, Norms
for the Distribution and Reception of Holy Communion #28).

Catechesis and Formation

Proper catechesis is essential. Clear teaching and instruction on the doctrine of the Real
Presence, on the meaning sacramental character conferred at priestly ordination, the meaning of
the Eucharist as sacrifice and banquet, and the truth that Christ is fully received under either
species is to take place at all parishes.
Please remember that reception from the chalice is not required and that no one should feel
obliged to receive under both species. Additionally, catechesis is to lead to reverence due to the
Blessed Sacrament, both during the liturgy and outside of it.
Those who assist in the distribution of Holy Communion, especially extraordinary ministers,
must be properly formed so that their service is carried out with care, dignity, and fidelity to the
Church’s norms.

Conclusion
The Eucharist is the source and summit of our Christian life. In it, Christ gives Himself to us
completely. Our response must be one of faith, reverence, and gratitude.
As we continue to deepen our devotion to the Blessed Sacrament, let us remain faithful to the
Church’s teaching and discipline so that the dignity of this Sacred Mystery is preserved and the
Communion of the Church is strengthened.

Entrusting you to the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary, I am,
Sincerely yours in Christ,

Most Reverend Michael F. Olson, STD, MA
Bishop of Fort Worth

POPE FRANCIS APPOINTED CARDINAL GAMBETTI OUT AT SAINT PETER’S BASILICA AND MY CLAIRVOYANCE BASED UPON EVIDENCE ABOUT WHO THE NEW CARDINAL AT ST. PETER’S WILL BE—HINT: I’VE ALREADY APPOINTED HIM IN A PREVIOUS POST

A couple of weeks ago Pope Leo met with Cardinal Rolandas Makrickas. 

Thus, with evidence, I predict Cardinal Rolandas Makrickas will be replacing Cardinal Gambetti. Do I hear an Amen?

He is the head of the Major Basilica of Saint Mary Major in Rome and is very friendly to private Masses celebrated there as well as the TLM. In fact the Summorum Pontificum Pilgrimage in Rome in a couple of weeks will have its Mass there on the main altar, which, of course, and everyone knows, has the Mass celebrated ad orientem since the time of Constantine—meaning when the celebrant celebrates at the altar, although facing the nave, he is facing the geographical east as does every major basilica in Rome except for the Basiilica of St. Paul outside the wall which has the celebrant facing toward the papal altar in St. Peter’s, which itself faces the geographical east. 

This is a google translation of Infovaticana’s article printed in Spanish on Pope Leo’s ouster of Cardinal Gambetti to a practically unknown lesser See in Abruzzo:

On Friday, Cardinal Mauro Gambetti informed the canons of the Vatican Chapter—during a meeting he himself convened—that the Holy See would announce his appointment as archbishop of a diocese the following day, Saturday, October 3. The cardinal, who appeared with a noticeable bandage on his head following a minor recent procedure to remove a mole, declined to name the see "out of respect for protocol and the Holy Father," though no one in Rome has the slightest doubt: it is the Abruzzo archdiocese of Chieti-Vasto. Nor did he mention who would succeed him as Archpriest of St. Peter's Basilica—details reported by *Il Tempo* Vatican correspondent Francesco Capozza on his X account and echoed by the Abruzzo press, such as *Abruzzo Popolare*.

The news puts an end to months of rumors and confirms what Capozza himself had long been predicting. On Tuesday, September 30, the Roman journalist stated on X that Gambetti’s removal as Archpriest of the Vatican basilica was a "matter of hours" and that his destination was the one Capozza had revealed months earlier: Chieti-Vasto, which might also be united *in persona episcopi* with the archdiocese of Lanciano-Ortona. This morning, hours before the meeting with the canons, Capozza reiterated his claims with an unequivocal message: the appointment would be announced on Saturday "barring surprises or further attempts to cling to the seat," adding that the Pope has decided to send the current Vicegerent of Rome, Monsignor Renato Tarantelli Baccari, to Pescara. What *Il Tempo* has been reporting since the summer of 2025

The Rome-based newspaper was the first to publicly link Gambetti to the new pontiff's dissatisfaction. In an extensive analysis published on August 25, 2025, titled "Pope Leo: The Prevost Era Begins (Now) with a Silent Revolution," Capozza described Leo XIV's intention to dismantle the network of Jesuits and Franciscans that Francis had installed in the Vatican. This process began with the Archpriest of St. Peter's—"summoned to Rome directly from Assisi and having transitioned with lightning speed from the humble habit to the cardinal's purple." The article noted that the Franciscan—"widely criticized for his lackluster management of the most important church in the Catholic world"—had been under the Pope's scrutiny since the very first ceremonies held in the basilica. It further stated that after the replacement of his protégé, Father Enzo Fortunato, as head of the Committee for World Children's Day, Gambetti himself would be the next to go. A telling message arrived from Assisi, the Vatican expert concluded: "We do not want Gambetti back here."

Criticism intensified in October 2025, when a man managed to bypass basilica security and urinate on the Altar of the Confession, which is reserved for the Pope. *Il Tempo* reported at the time that Leo XIV had met privately with Gambetti to express his "dismay" over the incident and had ordered him to hold a penitential rite of reparation as soon as possible. This was just one of several sacrilegious episodes during his tenure, a period in which the basilica became associated with security lapses and a management style more concerned with administrative reorganization than with preserving the temple's sacred and traditional character—as *InfoVaticana* had reported the previous July.

Wednesday, September 30, 2026

I THINK THE NEW PREFECT OF THE DICASTERY FOR LEGISLATIVE TEXTS, ARCHBISHOP ANTHONY RANDAZZO, IS THE ONLY ONE, LET ME EMPHASIZE THAT, THE ONLY ONE WHO MAKES ANY SENSE WHEN SPEAKING ABOUT SYNODALITY IN THE MODERN CONTEXT—NO WORD SALAD OR LEAVING JESUS OUT OF IT FROM HIS EXCELLENCY…

Refreshing moneybyte:

When the world presents new challenges, our response remains the same: to proclaim Christ faithfully, to serve his Church wisely, and to ensure that the law remains an instrument of communion, justice and, above all, the salvation of souls. That is our modus operandi. That is our mission.

THE NEXT POPE?

FROM VOX CANONICA, READ FULL ARTICLE HERE

Randazzo

Pictured: Monsignor Anthony Randazzo, Prefect of the Dicastery for Legislative Texts

My COMMENTS IN RED EMBEDDED IN THE TEXT.

What contribution can the Code offer in this ecclesial season, in which the synodal style is at the heart of the Church’s mission?”

The synodal style has always been at the heart of the Church’s mission. I suspect that, in some places, at certain moments, and for some people, this has been lost, obscured, or forgotten. Seen positively, this ecclesial season can be understood as a new springtime: a moment of renewal, growth, and deeper awareness of what it means to walk together as the People of God. (I would caution the good Archbishop from using the term, “new springtime” to promote synodality. It was used over and over again and again to describe what Vatican II would do for the Church and just the opposite has happened by those who carried out the so-called regeneration of the Church, what they called reformed, but not observing the letter of the law of Vatican II but some corrupted spirit of Vatican II they preferred and promoted. The same will happen with the implementation of synodality, just think Germany and many other places.)

Allow me to offer the analogy of an ancient tree. In this season, the old wood can put forth new green shoots; the tree does not cease to be what it is, but rather it blossoms anew and bears abundant fruit. However, some over-enthusiastic interpretations of synodality may view this moment as an opportunity simply to cut away what is perceived to be dead wood. The danger is that, without careful discernment, what is intended as renewal can become unnecessary damage, weakening the tree rather than allowing it to flourish. (Most sane Catholics who have witnessed what has transpired with all the chatter involved in synodality under Pope Francis, know that the goal is to cut down the tree of the Church and create a different Church. I’m glad the good archbishop knows this!)

Therefore, what is needed is careful, thoughtful, intelligent, and faithful cultivation of the tree. The Church does not renew herself by abandoning her roots, but by allowing those roots to nourish new growth.

In this context, the Code of Canon Law has an important contribution to make. The Code is not static; it is dynamic because it reflects the life of the Church, the rights and duties of her members, and the essential nature of the many relationships that exist within the one Body of Christ. The Code is not separate from the Church’s life; it serves that life by giving juridical expression to the Church’s communion, mission, and order.

In my experience, many people have never read the Code, and some are not even aware of its existence. At another level, there can also be a temptation among some canonists, both lay and clerical, to approach the Code as though it were primarily an instrument for demonstrating how the Church ought to be sanctified, taught, and governed according to their own particular vision. Such an approach risks reducing Canon Law to a means of control rather than recognizing it as a service to communion.

When this happens, opposing positions can become entrenched, and discussions about the Church’s life can descend into conflicts of words rather than encounters marked by charity, justice, and a sincere search for truth.

Pope Francis repeatedly reminded the Church that synodality is not a parliament. It is not a political process of competing interests. Rather, it is an ecclesial expression of participation in the communion and mission of Jesus Christ. (Indeed, Pope Francis did say that but the beast of synodality chatter, think Fr. James Martin and his cohorts, is precisely to make the Church cut down the tree of Holy Orders and Marriage as well as Humanae Vitae to create something altogehter different for all three—this goes way beyond the LGBTQ+++ agenda—it’s about ordaining women priests, sex without procreation for any and everyone and a whole lot more.)

For this reason, a healthy reading of the Code, an intelligent study of the Code and its sources, and a charitable dialogue regarding its application will be a great contribution in this ecclesial season. The Code can help the Church live synodality faithfully because it protects both communion and responsibility, both participation and order, both the rights of the faithful and the mission entrusted to the Church by Christ. (Protecting the true mission of the true Church, not some kind of different Church is grand to hear from this Prefect!)

WHICH ORIENTATION IN THE MINDS OF MOST CATHOLICS POINTS TO CHRIST SACRIFICED AND RISEN IN THE PASCHAL BANQUET—WHICH HAS THE BEST FOCUS ON THAT, ON THE ALTAR AND ON CHRIST?

 Which pope is that first pope? Do we have to see the pope’s face, the bishop’s face, the priest’s face when that cleric is celebrating the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass’s Liturgy of the Most Holy Eucharist? 

Where is your eye drawn in the first photo and where is your eye drawn in the second one? 

Holy Father, bring common sense back to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass as it regards its proper focus and orientation!


Tuesday, September 29, 2026

THE IDEOLOGY OF HOW THE SANCTUARY SHOULD BE SITUATED OFTEN HAS MADE THE BUGNINI POST-VATICAN II MASS APPEAR NOT AS IMPORTANT AS THE TLM



I watched the beautiful Mass, with wonderful music and chants, of Pope Leo at the ancient St. Stephen’s Cathedral in Metz France.

But I also saw, and I wonder if others noticed, that the post-Vatican II reconfiguration of the sanctuary does not help post-Vatican II Catholics appreciate the link between the Bugnini Mass and the Tridentine Mass, their continuity with each other. 

And it is all symbolic, what your eyes tell you and what you sense. 

In the photos above, one notices right away the difference in the new altar which is much, much lower than the old high altar, which continues to have its pre-Vatican II look and decorations—magnificent and clearly the most important piece of liturgical furnishing in this Cathedral. It is higher than the bishop’s throne/chair and the pulpit or ambo. The new altar in it lower placement and design makes it look quite unimportant. Keep in mind the altar is a sacramental sign of Christ.

The new altar is much  lower than the Bishop’s throne/chair and all the bishops towering high above it. And look at the design. Apart from appreciating art in the secular sense, what is the symbolism of the altar’s look and external lines? The same question can be asked of the decoration on Pope Leo’s chasuble and miter—is there any religious symbolism apart from, let’s say, decorations in a secular sense? 

To the naked eye and human sensibilities, the new altar sanctuary is a dumbing down from the old and makes it appear that the bishop and the concelebrants placed much higher than the altar are more important than the altar itself which is towered over by the bishops and other clergy! What the heck?

In the pre-Vatican II arrangement of this sanctuary and even of my Cathedral in Savannah, the pre-Vatican II altar is at the highest point in the sanctuary. The Bishop’s throne is lower, at my cathedral almost two steps lower. The clergy who might be in the sanctuary during the celebration of the Mass, are at an even lower point in the sanctuary, never above the altar!

The post-Vatican II Bugnini Mass celebrated in the vernacular in a church or cathedral that did not revamp its sanctuary at all, would have shown quite a bit of continuity in the hierarchy of what is most important in that sanctuary—and it isn’t the bishop who towers over the altar! 

Monday, September 28, 2026

POPE LEO’S MESSAGE TO THE FRENCH BISHOPS ABOUT UNITY—NOT FLAT UNITY (WHAT DOES THAT MEAN AND MY DECIPHERING OF IT)…

This unity is not a flat uniformity, but rather allows every sensibility that is authentically Catholic to converge naturally in a common profession of faith, through obedience to the legitimate Pastors and especially to the Successor of Peter, who is the “lasting and visible source and foundation of the unity both of faith and of communion”

The money quote above from Pope Leo’s longer paragraph on unity tells me a couple of things. He is acknowledging how the SSPX schism has affected the Church in France with a disunifying spirit. 

But Pope Leo also says that our unity isn’t a flat unity with no diversity or pluralism. Here I point out the obvious, the Catholic Church throughout the ages has had a variety of “Catholic” spiritualities, devotions and styles of celebrating the Liturgy both in the East and the West. 

I think Pope Leo is trying to find a way forward that allows the celebration of the Traditional Latin Mass Roman Missal of 1962 by making sure there are no ideological movements to replace the Modern Missal by those who ridicule the modern Missal as somehow bogus, an unfortunate term that many so-called traditionalists use against the post-Vatican II Bugnini Mass and all things Vatican II. I have said for the entire period of Pope Francis papacy that once faithful Catholics to the Holy Father were shooting themselves in the foot by the contempt and disrespect they showed to Pope Francis borrowing the heterodox left’s expertise on being opposed to the papacies of Paul VI, John Paul II and Benedict XVI. 

Here’s the entire moneybyte: 

In addition to these issues, another which could give cause for concern about the future is that of unity.  In this regard, allow me to recall how essential it is for Jesus’ disciples to be united in charity, as Jesus asked of his Father, “that they may all be one… so that the world may believe that you have sent me” (Jn 17:21).  The Church in France is a little flock that must gather her strength for the mission. Ideological divisions would render her witness in vain.  Throughout the history of the Church there have always been tensions, but when they arise they can also help us appreciate more deeply the gift of unity.  This unity is not a flat uniformity, but rather allows every sensibility that is authentically Catholic to converge naturally in a common profession of faith, through obedience to the legitimate Pastors and especially to the Successor of Peter, who is the “lasting and visible source and foundation of the unity both of faith and of communion” (SECOND VATICAN ECUMENICAL COUNCIL, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen Gentium, 18).  This is a dynamic unity, nourished by the tradition of the Church — from the Fathers to the Second Vatican Council— and by the post-conciliar Magisterium.  At the same time, it is a unity that is enriched through reciprocal dialogue, rooted in faith and expressed in the synodal style that we have been seeking to deepen in recent times.

Saturday, September 26, 2026

HOW TO CELEBRATE THE POST-VATICAN II BUGNINI MASS WITH DIGNITY AND REVERENCE AS POPE LEO REQUESTS….

 If Episcopalians know this, why don’t Catholics??? Especially Catholic bishops and priests???


Once again Pope Leo has requested that the post-Vatican II Bugnini Mass be celebrated properly. This is what His Holiness said at Vespers at Notre Dame Cathedral (for those who don’t understand French, that is Our Lady’s Cathedral):

To you who celebrate the Eucharist each day, I ask you to ensure that the liturgical celebrations are always carried out with dignity and reverence, even where smaller communities gather. Be conscious heirs of the Church Fathers and saints who, over the centuries, have handed down to us the profound meaning and beauty of the liturgy, always giving an example of great humility before the Mystery that is celebrated. 

This is how I interpret Pope Leo’s multiple requests for properly celebrated post-Vatican II Bugnini Masses:

1. Read the black and do the red!

2. Make sure the propers are not substituted with someone’s so-called better choice and that the Propers are chanted beautifully in Latin from the Roman Gradual!

3. Use the Jubialtio Deo Mass settings for the Gloria, Credo, Sanctus and Agnus Dei.

4. The celebrant chants the parts proper to him

5. Lay Lectors are steeped in how to read the Scriptures at Mass while wearing their Sunday Best as understood in the 1950’s. Coat and tie for men and very modest dresses for women with below the knee hems and fully covered shoulders and arms. In lieu of risking various styles that may not exude Catholic modesty, a beautiful white alb for men and women is recommended.

6. Only trained and formally installed Acolytes may assist the priest as “extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion” using the proper liturgical garb , alb or cassock and surplice, for this ministry.

7. Holy Communion distributed to kneeling communicants.

8. If the Precious Blood is included in distributing the One Lord, it is done by intinction by the Eucharistic Minister as described in the General Instructions of the Roman Missal.

9. The sanctuary is to be arranged and decorated with noble simplicity with the so-called Benedictine altar arrangement for Mass facing in whatever direction, the east or liturgical east preferably. No floral arrangements in front of the altar, ambo and celebrant’s chair!

10. Special attention is given to proper liturgical chant and instrumentation using the organ as the primary liturgical instrument and also including chanting without instrumentation. Piano, drums and guitar should be excluded but classical acoustical guitars and strings allowed but sober in instrumentation. 

Thank you very much! 


Friday, September 25, 2026

OUR LADY…MAGNIFICENT COPE, DALMATICS AND SINGING 🎶

 Magnificent Vespers in Notre Dame…

To you who celebrate the Eucharist each day, I ask you to ensure that the liturgical celebrations are always carried out with dignity and reverence, even where smaller communities gather. Be conscious heirs of the Church Fathers and saints who, over the centuries, have handed down to us the profound meaning and beauty of the liturgy, always giving an example of great humility before the Mystery that is celebrated. 


CELEBRATION OF VESPERS WITH THE BISHOPS, PRIESTS, 
DEACONS,  CONSECRATED MEN AND WOMEN AND SEMINARIANS

HOMILY OF POPE LEO XIV

Notre-Dame de Paris Cathedral
Friday, 25 September 2026

___________________________________

Dear brothers and sisters,

We are gathered for Evening Prayer in this place which, more than any other, has invited the people of Paris for centuries to lift their eyes towards heaven. Seven years have passed since the whole world, holding its breath, watched as the cathedral was engulfed in a terrible fire. At that time, we also watched anxiously, conscious of how powerless humans are in the face of the unforeseen. That pain was felt not only by Catholics, nor only by believers. Indeed, in that tragic moment we came to realize that Notre-Dame is more than a monument. The collective effort to rebuild it, and the splendour of the result reveal that the heart of a people beats here, and that here we stand at the living center of a civilization, where past and future embrace, where heaven and earth meet.

It was my wish to meet you here, in this symbolic place of the Church in France. It is a joy for me to have crossed its threshold a short while ago, as thousands of brothers and sisters do each day, coming here from every corner of the world. Simply entering this place brings us face to face with a beauty that speaks to our restless hearts and calls them to peace. Following the restoration of this sacred space for all humanity, it is rightly recognized how each visitor can be renewed by what he or she sees, hears and experiences. The public, private and ecclesial institutions involved in the restoration of Notre-Dame have each contributed, in their own way, to reawakening the cultural, existential and spiritual journeys that the cathedral opens up before us. In this context, the Church has understood her mission not only in terms of preservation but also of creativity, by keeping tradition alive with the boldness of those who have faith and are guided by hope. I wish to thank the Archbishop, his co-workers and the diocesan community of Paris, who have also developed a pastoral pathway of initial proclamation and Christian initiation open to all. The baptismal font is a sign of this, situated at the entrance as a blessing and an invitation.

The rebuilding of the Cathedral was an opportunity for an encounter that has expanded horizons of welcome and participation beyond the boundaries of ecclesial affiliation. Dear bishops, priests, deacons, consecrated men and women, seminarians of France, let yourselves be inspired by what has happened here! Make the vision of Evangelii Gaudium your priority, namely the missionary conversion which Pope Francis spoke of in his first Apostolic Exhortation.

In the Letter to the Galatians, we heard the reason why we should not be afraid: “God sent forth his Son” (Gal 4:4). He sent him among us, into our world. In Saint Paul’s words, the verb describes a real, historical event, not some ideal set of circumstances. Christians do not flee from complexity, for God himself has called them to follow his Son in a world that is already inhabited, already in motion, already marked by both human misery and goodness. The way of the Cross certainly reveals the darkness that runs through our world, but even more profoundly, it reveals the love of God that triumphs over death.

The Cathedral’s cruciform layout, where stone and light come together, evokes the meeting of earth and heaven. It gathers and orders the events of history, woven with human joys and sufferings. It holds them together in a symbolic dynamic that transforms these diverse expressions into a living language, uniting them into a whole.

Dear friends, it is from the Incarnation — “God sent forth his Son” — that the identity of the Church flows, for she is called always to be a Church “going forth”. As disciples of Christ, you know well that the Christian community is not a refuge into which we withdraw in order to protect ourselves from our age. On the contrary, like the cathedrals of old, the Church is a place of welcome, respect, revelation and meaning for everyone. The strength of a living Church lies in welcoming those on the peripheries who already have a place in her heart; welcoming those who are far away but in reality are already near; welcoming the stranger, in whom Christ is already knocking at the door.

If Notre-Dame is a sign of this encounter at the heart of Paris, then the other cities and regions of France, even the most remote and rural, can be transformed all the more by a simple and welcoming missionary presence. Such a presence can help to bring cultural differences into harmony and to heal the wounds present in our societies. From the northern coasts to the Mediterranean, from the inland regions to the overseas departments, be a living, diverse and close Church. A lack of material resources does not prevent mission, for it is the grace of God that gives rise to interior freedom and simplicity of life, enabling us to reflect an evangelical way of life. In all this, confidently value the missionary presence of the lay faithful, who are the living front line of the Church at the crossroads of everyday life.

At the same time, brothers and sisters, we must not forget that this Cathedral, like every other church, was built for the purpose of prayer and the worship of God. It is the place where the Christian community celebrates the highest form of prayer and worship, renewing in the Eucharist the redemptive sacrifice of Christ. This Cathedral is not merely a stone structure to be admired; instead, it lives by the sacred mystery celebrated within it. Without the liturgy, it would lose its soul. Here at Notre-Dame, this truth is made evident by the placement of the altar at its center. The community gathered to praise the Lord thus stands at the heart of the building, while visitors, even during celebrations, walk around it and observe it. Here the Church appears for what she is, namely a living organism, a believing community that gathers into its praise everything that culture and tradition have handed down to her. She is a body which, through her celebration, tells each person the reason for her existence.

Today, more than ever, we live in an age that seems deprived of fullness, depth and promise. The noble simplicity of song, spoken word and liturgical gesture can be for many a glimmer of hope, an oasis of peace in a hyper-connected and noisy society, where we can experience the presence of the Author of the greatest love: “When the time had fully come, God sent forth his Son” (Gal 4:4). The celebration of the liturgical year, of Sundays and feasts, also makes us companions of Christ, attentive to the different moments of his life, which he gave entirely to the Father for the sake of the world. In this way, we become more sensitive and more open to the signs of the times. Indeed, our prayer and listening together to the Scriptures enable us to see the events of history in the light of God, making us more aware of our responsibilities, allowing us to unmask unjust relations of power and sow the seeds of justice and peace. It is hope that drives us therefore, not resignation. And from this arise bonds of greater fraternity and networks of solidarity, the fruit of communion in the one Sacrifice of Christ.

To you who celebrate the Eucharist each day, I ask you to ensure that the liturgical celebrations are always carried out with dignity and reverence, even where smaller communities gather. Be conscious heirs of the Church Fathers and saints who, over the centuries, have handed down to us the profound meaning and beauty of the liturgy, always giving an example of great humility before the Mystery that is celebrated. The Second Vatican Council, whose richness owes much to France, gathered up and deepened this heritage in an eminent way, recognizing the liturgy’s central role in the life of the Church (cf. Sacrosanctum Concilium, 10). I therefore exhort all of you, bishops, priests, deacons and consecrated persons, to cultivate an authentic love for the liturgy and to be witnesses and servants of the prophetic, priestly and kingly vocation of the entire People of God.

In this respect, the liturgy remains a reflection of life. Eucharistic joy takes root and spreads wherever harmony is restored, wherever dignity is renewed, wherever authority becomes service, and wherever freedom is able to flourish again. This is the greatest gift we can share. Therefore, place communion with the successor of Peter and with the Church before your personal preferences, so as to foster the unity of God’s people. Thus, together, we will bear prophetic witness to the possibility of a reconciled world.

Dear bishops, priests, seminarians and consecrated persons, you who have been called to follow Christ, I thank you for your response and your fidelity to the Lord. Never neglect this friendship desired by the Lord, which must be cultivated in personal prayer, and is the foundation of every vocation. As Madeleine Delbrêl said: “Without prayer, we would not love the God of love. We might perhaps be his servants, his warriors, or even his disciples; but we would be neither the loving children of our Father nor the friends… of Jesus Christ” (Notre vie, Œuvres complètes vol. XV, Nouvelle Cité, 2017, p. 41). Nurture, then, your interior life with the Lord, following the example of the many saints who have gone before you, always drawing from the source of God’s infinite love in silent prayer. Your mission flows above all from this intimate relationship with the Lord, who awaits you there.

At the heart of the city, the open Cathedral is a sign of a community that praises the Lord and lives hospitality not as an occasional gesture, but as the very form of its existence, so that all may feel at home, no longer dominated or marginalized in a changing world. “God sent forth his Son, born of a woman, […] so that we might receive adoption as sons” (Gal 4:4-5). And “if a son, then you are also an heir” (ibid 4:7). Heirs by grace, brothers and sisters gathered here, it is now up to each of you, this praying and living assembly, to become the flesh and voice of this promise. Clergy and consecrated persons of France, you are called to be the first guardians of this open house, the living stones of a Church that hopes and does not fear the future. This Cathedral has been reborn so that you too may be reborn with it in a new impetus towards holiness and daily mission. In the midst of your people, be a clear expression of the divine motherhood of the Church, who, by bearing witness to God’s love, restores and heals the human family.

Let us lift our eyes towards the fourteenth-century statue of the Virgin and Child, which was untouched by the fire and now shines once again before us. May Mary, who carried the Word in her womb, keep you faithful, and may she be the star that guides the mission of the Church in France. Holy Mary, Our Lady of Paris and Mother of the Church, pray for the French people, sustain their pastors, and walk always at our side.