Translate

Friday, October 2, 2026

MICHAEL SEAN WINTERS OF THE NcR HAS FOUND SOMETHING IN POPE LEO THAT HE DIDN’T FIND IN POPE FRANCIS: CLARITY AND PRECISION AND AUGUSTINIAN THEOLOGY!


French President Emmanuel Macron, right, listens to Pope Leo XIV delivering his speech at the meeting At the Roots of Europe for Peace and Unity, Monday, Sept. 28, 2026, in Metz, France. (AP/Gregorio Borgia)

French President Emmanuel Macron, right, listens to Pope Leo XIV delivering his speech at the meeting At the Roots of Europe for Peace and Unity, Monday, Sept. 28, 2026, in Metz, France. (AP/Gregorio Borgia)

Below are excerpts from an article in the National catholic Reporter by Michael Sean Winters. You can read the full article here!

I am glad the grace of God is breaking through to Michael Sean and he’s exhibiting growth in his Catholic Faith as he moves away from the NcR’s more schismatic-fomenting ways. 

Here are the excerpts: 

Catholics are still processing Pope Leo XIV's amazing trip to France. The images of the crowds lining the Champs-Élysées, of the excited young people at the Stade de France and the thousands singing the "Salve Regina" outside Notre Dame cathedral, of the Holy Father at the grotto in Lourdes, all these form a profound impression of the continued significance of Catholicism to French culture and of this pope's ability to harness that 

Leo's religious sermons emphasized spiritual themes. At the huge Mass at the Place de la Concorde, the Holy Father's theme was a very Augustinian one: God as the answer to human restlessness and desire. 

"What is my deepest thirst? What am I really seeking in life? We all long for happiness, love and fulfillment. But from what source do we seek to quench our thirst?" the pope asked. "Are we content with material goods, immediate satisfactions, the countless little idols that promise us everything but leave our hearts empty? We have been baptized and received the living water of which the Gospel speaks, but have we truly encountered Christ personally? In essence, the human person is a being of desire, and only God can fill the emptiness within us."

In his sermon at Lourdes, Leo highlighted another side of his Augustinian roots. In speaking of the promise of eternal life of which the Blessed Mother spoke to St. Bernadette, Leo said, "For the obstacle to grace and eternal life — the only obstacle to this love — is sin, whereby we turn in upon ourselves, refusing God and shutting ourselves up in our own darkness. … We must therefore use our freedom to say yes to Christ, relying on his grace, like Mary. This is a yes that we renew until our final breath — 'now and at the hour of our death' — as we say in the Hail Mary." He devoted several paragraphs to the theme of repentance, but always linked it to the ongoing call to conversion and the hope of eternal life. 

When Leo spoke about assisted suicide, which was recently legalized in France, his words were strong and condemnatory, rightly labeling the practice an example of "false compassion." One wishes he had been in Paris before the vote to legalize assisted suicide. He might have tipped the balance against it.

The crowds were massive and the excitement palpable. Leo was never an actor, like his predecessor St. John Paul II, and he lacks the Polish pontiff's dramatic sense of timing and connecting with a crowd. Yet connect he did. Why? As one Parisian said to my colleague Justin McLellan at the Mass in Paris: "He is a pope who is young, 71, and he moves the young people forward; he is calm, a good listener and he has very precise ideas and is able to express them clearly and in an engaging way — all the young people and the crowds here show that." 

In a noisy and confusing culture, Leo's clarity and precision, as well as his obvious authenticity, break through. The response he received in France gives hope at a time when the world so desperately needs hope.

BISHOP OLSON OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS LIMITS THE USE OF THE COMMON CHALICE AT MASS—THANK YOU VERY MUCH

 The only thing I wish that the good bishop would have highlighted is that the common chalice shared with multiple communicants, many of whom allow backwash from their mouth to pour forth into the chalice, as well as deadly germs and viruses, like the herpes virus, can be left on the rim of the chalice and thus can be an epidemic and, of course, a pandemic creating event, should no longer be allowed.

Rather, the use of intinction, described in the GIRM of the 2012 Reform of the Reformed 1970 Roman Missal, indicates that intinction is perfectly acceptable. And it lessens all the concerns about epidemics and pandemics of the common chalice, as well as abuse of the Precious Blood as described in Bishop Olson letter.


Pastoral Letter on the Distribution of Communion Under Both Species


To the Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, Religious, and Lay Faithful of the Diocese of Fort Worth
October 1, 2026

Dear Friends in Christ,

In recent years, the Church in the United States has given renewed attention to the mystery of the
Most Holy Eucharist. As your Bishop, I write to you to reflect briefly on this great sacrament and
to provide clear direction regarding the distribution of Holy Communion under both species
within the Diocese of Fort Worth. The Eucharist is the heart of the Church’s life, and it is my
responsibility to ensure that it is celebrated with reverence, doctrinal clarity, and fidelity to the
Church’s discipline.

The Mystery of the Eucharist


The Most Holy Eucharist is the Church’s greatest treasure. In it, Christ Himself is truly present—
Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity—under the appearances of bread and wine. In every celebration
of the Mass, the one sacrifice of Christ in his passion, death, and resurrection is made present
sacramentally so that his saving grace may be given to us here and now.
The Eucharist is also the sacred banquet in which the faithful are nourished with the Body and
Blood of the Lord. In receiving Holy Communion, we are united more closely to Christ and with
each other in the bonds of charity. It must be clearly understood that, by the doctrine of
concomitance, Christ is received whole and entire under either species alone. For this reason,
nothing is lacking when Holy Communion is received under the species of bread alone or the
species of wine alone.

The Eucharist and the Unity of the Church

The Eucharist is the sacrament of unity. It both signifies and brings about communion with
Christ and with one another as members of His Body, the Church. Each celebration of the Mass
is not a private act but an act of the whole Church, Head and members, offered in communion
with the diocesan bishop and the Roman Pontiff.

Since the Eucharist expresses the unity of the Church, its celebration must also reflect that unity
in both faith and discipline. The Church’s liturgical norms serve this purpose. They are not
arbitrary but exist to safeguard the dignity of the sacrament and to ensure that what we celebrate
truly reflects what we believe.

The Responsibility of the Bishop

As the Bishop of the Diocese of Fort Worth, I have been entrusted with the responsibility to
regulate the celebration of the sacred liturgy. This responsibility includes determining when Holy
Communion may be distributed under both species (See GIRM #283).
The Church permits the faithful to receive under both species in certain circumstances as a fuller
sign of the Eucharistic banquet. At the same time, she teaches clearly that this is not the ordinary
manner of reception. The faithful must always remember that reception under one species alone
is complete participation in the Eucharist.
In exercising this responsibility, I must ensure that the Eucharist is treated with the reverence it
deserves and that its distribution does not give rise to confusion or diminish its dignity.

The Times When Communion Under Both Species Is Permitted

After consultation and careful consideration of the Church’s norms, I have determined that
within the Diocese of Fort Worth the distribution of Holy Communion under both species will be
limited to specific occasions.
Accordingly, Communion under both species may be offered only on the following occasions:

• Priestly or Diaconal Ordinations
• The Chrism Mass
• The Mass of the Lord’s Supper on Holy Thursday
• The Easter Vigil.

At Mass where adults are confirmed and receive first Eucharist (for the newly confirmed)

• The Mass of Holy Matrimony (only for the Catholic bride and Catholic groom)
• Masses of Religious Profession
• The Solemnity of the Most Holy Body and Blood of Christ (Corpus Christi)
• Masses at convents and retreat centers within the Diocese
• 
At newly ordained priests’ first Mass

• Other celebrations of similar solemnity only with my explicit approval

Even on these occasions, the distribution of the Precious Blood is to take place only when it can
be done reverently, when there are sufficient ministers, and when there is no danger of
profanation or disorder. If these conditions cannot be met, Communion is to be distributed under
the species of bread alone. Outside of these occasions, Holy Communion is to be distributed
under one species. Deacons assisting at Mass should receive the Precious Blood from the Chalice
(See GIRM 160-164).

The Church’s discipline regarding the manner of distribution is to be observed in all cases. The
Precious Blood is to be administered by an ordinary minister, if sufficient number are not
available, then by extraordinary ministers. Practices such as self-service, passing the chalice, or
self-intinction are not permitted. In keeping with the rubrics and norms for the Liturgy, only
priests, deacons, and instituted acolytes are to purify the vessels. Deacons and instituted acolytes
are to purify vessels away from the altar and at the credence table only. Vessels are not to be
purified in the sacristy even if purification takes place after Mass (See GIRM 160-164, Norms
for the Distribution and Reception of Holy Communion #28).

Catechesis and Formation

Proper catechesis is essential. Clear teaching and instruction on the doctrine of the Real
Presence, on the meaning sacramental character conferred at priestly ordination, the meaning of
the Eucharist as sacrifice and banquet, and the truth that Christ is fully received under either
species is to take place at all parishes.
Please remember that reception from the chalice is not required and that no one should feel
obliged to receive under both species. Additionally, catechesis is to lead to reverence due to the
Blessed Sacrament, both during the liturgy and outside of it.
Those who assist in the distribution of Holy Communion, especially extraordinary ministers,
must be properly formed so that their service is carried out with care, dignity, and fidelity to the
Church’s norms.

Conclusion
The Eucharist is the source and summit of our Christian life. In it, Christ gives Himself to us
completely. Our response must be one of faith, reverence, and gratitude.
As we continue to deepen our devotion to the Blessed Sacrament, let us remain faithful to the
Church’s teaching and discipline so that the dignity of this Sacred Mystery is preserved and the
Communion of the Church is strengthened.

Entrusting you to the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary, I am,
Sincerely yours in Christ,

Most Reverend Michael F. Olson, STD, MA
Bishop of Fort Worth

POPE FRANCIS APPOINTED CARDINAL GAMBETTI OUT AT SAINT PETER’S BASILICA AND MY CLAIRVOYANCE BASED UPON EVIDENCE ABOUT WHO THE NEW CARDINAL AT ST. PETER’S WILL BE—HINT: I’VE ALREADY APPOINTED HIM IN A PREVIOUS POST

A couple of weeks ago Pope Leo met with Cardinal Rolandas Makrickas. 

Thus, with evidence, I predict Cardinal Rolandas Makrickas will be replacing Cardinal Gambetti. Do I hear an Amen?

He is the head of the Major Basilica of Saint Mary Major in Rome and is very friendly to private Masses celebrated there as well as the TLM. In fact the Summorum Pontificum Pilgrimage in Rome in a couple of weeks will have its Mass there on the main altar, which, of course, and everyone knows, has the Mass celebrated ad orientem since the time of Constantine—meaning when the celebrant celebrates at the altar, although facing the nave, he is facing the geographical east as does every major basilica in Rome except for the Basiilica of St. Paul outside the wall which has the celebrant facing toward the papal altar in St. Peter’s, which itself faces the geographical east. 

This is a google translation of Infovaticana’s article printed in Spanish on Pope Leo’s ouster of Cardinal Gambetti to a practically unknown lesser See in Abruzzo:

On Friday, Cardinal Mauro Gambetti informed the canons of the Vatican Chapter—during a meeting he himself convened—that the Holy See would announce his appointment as archbishop of a diocese the following day, Saturday, October 3. The cardinal, who appeared with a noticeable bandage on his head following a minor recent procedure to remove a mole, declined to name the see "out of respect for protocol and the Holy Father," though no one in Rome has the slightest doubt: it is the Abruzzo archdiocese of Chieti-Vasto. Nor did he mention who would succeed him as Archpriest of St. Peter's Basilica—details reported by *Il Tempo* Vatican correspondent Francesco Capozza on his X account and echoed by the Abruzzo press, such as *Abruzzo Popolare*.

The news puts an end to months of rumors and confirms what Capozza himself had long been predicting. On Tuesday, September 30, the Roman journalist stated on X that Gambetti’s removal as Archpriest of the Vatican basilica was a "matter of hours" and that his destination was the one Capozza had revealed months earlier: Chieti-Vasto, which might also be united *in persona episcopi* with the archdiocese of Lanciano-Ortona. This morning, hours before the meeting with the canons, Capozza reiterated his claims with an unequivocal message: the appointment would be announced on Saturday "barring surprises or further attempts to cling to the seat," adding that the Pope has decided to send the current Vicegerent of Rome, Monsignor Renato Tarantelli Baccari, to Pescara. What *Il Tempo* has been reporting since the summer of 2025

The Rome-based newspaper was the first to publicly link Gambetti to the new pontiff's dissatisfaction. In an extensive analysis published on August 25, 2025, titled "Pope Leo: The Prevost Era Begins (Now) with a Silent Revolution," Capozza described Leo XIV's intention to dismantle the network of Jesuits and Franciscans that Francis had installed in the Vatican. This process began with the Archpriest of St. Peter's—"summoned to Rome directly from Assisi and having transitioned with lightning speed from the humble habit to the cardinal's purple." The article noted that the Franciscan—"widely criticized for his lackluster management of the most important church in the Catholic world"—had been under the Pope's scrutiny since the very first ceremonies held in the basilica. It further stated that after the replacement of his protégé, Father Enzo Fortunato, as head of the Committee for World Children's Day, Gambetti himself would be the next to go. A telling message arrived from Assisi, the Vatican expert concluded: "We do not want Gambetti back here."

Criticism intensified in October 2025, when a man managed to bypass basilica security and urinate on the Altar of the Confession, which is reserved for the Pope. *Il Tempo* reported at the time that Leo XIV had met privately with Gambetti to express his "dismay" over the incident and had ordered him to hold a penitential rite of reparation as soon as possible. This was just one of several sacrilegious episodes during his tenure, a period in which the basilica became associated with security lapses and a management style more concerned with administrative reorganization than with preserving the temple's sacred and traditional character—as *InfoVaticana* had reported the previous July.

Wednesday, September 30, 2026

I THINK THE NEW PREFECT OF THE DICASTERY FOR LEGISLATIVE TEXTS, ARCHBISHOP ANTHONY RANDAZZO, IS THE ONLY ONE, LET ME EMPHASIZE THAT, THE ONLY ONE WHO MAKES ANY SENSE WHEN SPEAKING ABOUT SYNODALITY IN THE MODERN CONTEXT—NO WORD SALAD OR LEAVING JESUS OUT OF IT FROM HIS EXCELLENCY…

Refreshing moneybyte:

When the world presents new challenges, our response remains the same: to proclaim Christ faithfully, to serve his Church wisely, and to ensure that the law remains an instrument of communion, justice and, above all, the salvation of souls. That is our modus operandi. That is our mission.

THE NEXT POPE?

FROM VOX CANONICA, READ FULL ARTICLE HERE

Randazzo

Pictured: Monsignor Anthony Randazzo, Prefect of the Dicastery for Legislative Texts

My COMMENTS IN RED EMBEDDED IN THE TEXT.

What contribution can the Code offer in this ecclesial season, in which the synodal style is at the heart of the Church’s mission?”

The synodal style has always been at the heart of the Church’s mission. I suspect that, in some places, at certain moments, and for some people, this has been lost, obscured, or forgotten. Seen positively, this ecclesial season can be understood as a new springtime: a moment of renewal, growth, and deeper awareness of what it means to walk together as the People of God. (I would caution the good Archbishop from using the term, “new springtime” to promote synodality. It was used over and over again and again to describe what Vatican II would do for the Church and just the opposite has happened by those who carried out the so-called regeneration of the Church, what they called reformed, but not observing the letter of the law of Vatican II but some corrupted spirit of Vatican II they preferred and promoted. The same will happen with the implementation of synodality, just think Germany and many other places.)

Allow me to offer the analogy of an ancient tree. In this season, the old wood can put forth new green shoots; the tree does not cease to be what it is, but rather it blossoms anew and bears abundant fruit. However, some over-enthusiastic interpretations of synodality may view this moment as an opportunity simply to cut away what is perceived to be dead wood. The danger is that, without careful discernment, what is intended as renewal can become unnecessary damage, weakening the tree rather than allowing it to flourish. (Most sane Catholics who have witnessed what has transpired with all the chatter involved in synodality under Pope Francis, know that the goal is to cut down the tree of the Church and create a different Church. I’m glad the good archbishop knows this!)

Therefore, what is needed is careful, thoughtful, intelligent, and faithful cultivation of the tree. The Church does not renew herself by abandoning her roots, but by allowing those roots to nourish new growth.

In this context, the Code of Canon Law has an important contribution to make. The Code is not static; it is dynamic because it reflects the life of the Church, the rights and duties of her members, and the essential nature of the many relationships that exist within the one Body of Christ. The Code is not separate from the Church’s life; it serves that life by giving juridical expression to the Church’s communion, mission, and order.

In my experience, many people have never read the Code, and some are not even aware of its existence. At another level, there can also be a temptation among some canonists, both lay and clerical, to approach the Code as though it were primarily an instrument for demonstrating how the Church ought to be sanctified, taught, and governed according to their own particular vision. Such an approach risks reducing Canon Law to a means of control rather than recognizing it as a service to communion.

When this happens, opposing positions can become entrenched, and discussions about the Church’s life can descend into conflicts of words rather than encounters marked by charity, justice, and a sincere search for truth.

Pope Francis repeatedly reminded the Church that synodality is not a parliament. It is not a political process of competing interests. Rather, it is an ecclesial expression of participation in the communion and mission of Jesus Christ. (Indeed, Pope Francis did say that but the beast of synodality chatter, think Fr. James Martin and his cohorts, is precisely to make the Church cut down the tree of Holy Orders and Marriage as well as Humanae Vitae to create something altogehter different for all three—this goes way beyond the LGBTQ+++ agenda—it’s about ordaining women priests, sex without procreation for any and everyone and a whole lot more.)

For this reason, a healthy reading of the Code, an intelligent study of the Code and its sources, and a charitable dialogue regarding its application will be a great contribution in this ecclesial season. The Code can help the Church live synodality faithfully because it protects both communion and responsibility, both participation and order, both the rights of the faithful and the mission entrusted to the Church by Christ. (Protecting the true mission of the true Church, not some kind of different Church is grand to hear from this Prefect!)

WHICH ORIENTATION IN THE MINDS OF MOST CATHOLICS POINTS TO CHRIST SACRIFICED AND RISEN IN THE PASCHAL BANQUET—WHICH HAS THE BEST FOCUS ON THAT, ON THE ALTAR AND ON CHRIST?

 Which pope is that first pope? Do we have to see the pope’s face, the bishop’s face, the priest’s face when that cleric is celebrating the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass’s Liturgy of the Most Holy Eucharist? 

Where is your eye drawn in the first photo and where is your eye drawn in the second one? 

Holy Father, bring common sense back to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass as it regards its proper focus and orientation!


Tuesday, September 29, 2026

THE IDEOLOGY OF HOW THE SANCTUARY SHOULD BE SITUATED OFTEN HAS MADE THE BUGNINI POST-VATICAN II MASS APPEAR NOT AS IMPORTANT AS THE TLM



I watched the beautiful Mass, with wonderful music and chants, of Pope Leo at the ancient St. Stephen’s Cathedral in Metz France.

But I also saw, and I wonder if others noticed, that the post-Vatican II reconfiguration of the sanctuary does not help post-Vatican II Catholics appreciate the link between the Bugnini Mass and the Tridentine Mass, their continuity with each other. 

And it is all symbolic, what your eyes tell you and what you sense. 

In the photos above, one notices right away the difference in the new altar which is much, much lower than the old high altar, which continues to have its pre-Vatican II look and decorations—magnificent and clearly the most important piece of liturgical furnishing in this Cathedral. It is higher than the bishop’s throne/chair and the pulpit or ambo. The new altar in it lower placement and design makes it look quite unimportant. Keep in mind the altar is a sacramental sign of Christ.

The new altar is much  lower than the Bishop’s throne/chair and all the bishops towering high above it. And look at the design. Apart from appreciating art in the secular sense, what is the symbolism of the altar’s look and external lines? The same question can be asked of the decoration on Pope Leo’s chasuble and miter—is there any religious symbolism apart from, let’s say, decorations in a secular sense? 

To the naked eye and human sensibilities, the new altar sanctuary is a dumbing down from the old and makes it appear that the bishop and the concelebrants placed much higher than the altar are more important than the altar itself which is towered over by the bishops and other clergy! What the heck?

In the pre-Vatican II arrangement of this sanctuary and even of my Cathedral in Savannah, the pre-Vatican II altar is at the highest point in the sanctuary. The Bishop’s throne is lower, at my cathedral almost two steps lower. The clergy who might be in the sanctuary during the celebration of the Mass, are at an even lower point in the sanctuary, never above the altar!

The post-Vatican II Bugnini Mass celebrated in the vernacular in a church or cathedral that did not revamp its sanctuary at all, would have shown quite a bit of continuity in the hierarchy of what is most important in that sanctuary—and it isn’t the bishop who towers over the altar! 

Monday, September 28, 2026

POPE LEO’S MESSAGE TO THE FRENCH BISHOPS ABOUT UNITY—NOT FLAT UNITY (WHAT DOES THAT MEAN AND MY DECIPHERING OF IT)…

This unity is not a flat uniformity, but rather allows every sensibility that is authentically Catholic to converge naturally in a common profession of faith, through obedience to the legitimate Pastors and especially to the Successor of Peter, who is the “lasting and visible source and foundation of the unity both of faith and of communion”

The money quote above from Pope Leo’s longer paragraph on unity tells me a couple of things. He is acknowledging how the SSPX schism has affected the Church in France with a disunifying spirit. 

But Pope Leo also says that our unity isn’t a flat unity with no diversity or pluralism. Here I point out the obvious, the Catholic Church throughout the ages has had a variety of “Catholic” spiritualities, devotions and styles of celebrating the Liturgy both in the East and the West. 

I think Pope Leo is trying to find a way forward that allows the celebration of the Traditional Latin Mass Roman Missal of 1962 by making sure there are no ideological movements to replace the Modern Missal by those who ridicule the modern Missal as somehow bogus, an unfortunate term that many so-called traditionalists use against the post-Vatican II Bugnini Mass and all things Vatican II. I have said for the entire period of Pope Francis papacy that once faithful Catholics to the Holy Father were shooting themselves in the foot by the contempt and disrespect they showed to Pope Francis borrowing the heterodox left’s expertise on being opposed to the papacies of Paul VI, John Paul II and Benedict XVI. 

Here’s the entire moneybyte: 

In addition to these issues, another which could give cause for concern about the future is that of unity.  In this regard, allow me to recall how essential it is for Jesus’ disciples to be united in charity, as Jesus asked of his Father, “that they may all be one… so that the world may believe that you have sent me” (Jn 17:21).  The Church in France is a little flock that must gather her strength for the mission. Ideological divisions would render her witness in vain.  Throughout the history of the Church there have always been tensions, but when they arise they can also help us appreciate more deeply the gift of unity.  This unity is not a flat uniformity, but rather allows every sensibility that is authentically Catholic to converge naturally in a common profession of faith, through obedience to the legitimate Pastors and especially to the Successor of Peter, who is the “lasting and visible source and foundation of the unity both of faith and of communion” (SECOND VATICAN ECUMENICAL COUNCIL, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen Gentium, 18).  This is a dynamic unity, nourished by the tradition of the Church — from the Fathers to the Second Vatican Council— and by the post-conciliar Magisterium.  At the same time, it is a unity that is enriched through reciprocal dialogue, rooted in faith and expressed in the synodal style that we have been seeking to deepen in recent times.

Saturday, September 26, 2026

HOW TO CELEBRATE THE POST-VATICAN II BUGNINI MASS WITH DIGNITY AND REVERENCE AS POPE LEO REQUESTS….

 If Episcopalians know this, why don’t Catholics??? Especially Catholic bishops and priests???


Once again Pope Leo has requested that the post-Vatican II Bugnini Mass be celebrated properly. This is what His Holiness said at Vespers at Notre Dame Cathedral (for those who don’t understand French, that is Our Lady’s Cathedral):

To you who celebrate the Eucharist each day, I ask you to ensure that the liturgical celebrations are always carried out with dignity and reverence, even where smaller communities gather. Be conscious heirs of the Church Fathers and saints who, over the centuries, have handed down to us the profound meaning and beauty of the liturgy, always giving an example of great humility before the Mystery that is celebrated. 

This is how I interpret Pope Leo’s multiple requests for properly celebrated post-Vatican II Bugnini Masses:

1. Read the black and do the red!

2. Make sure the propers are not substituted with someone’s so-called better choice and that the Propers are chanted beautifully in Latin from the Roman Gradual!

3. Use the Jubialtio Deo Mass settings for the Gloria, Credo, Sanctus and Agnus Dei.

4. The celebrant chants the parts proper to him

5. Lay Lectors are steeped in how to read the Scriptures at Mass while wearing their Sunday Best as understood in the 1950’s. Coat and tie for men and very modest dresses for women with below the knee hems and fully covered shoulders and arms. In lieu of risking various styles that may not exude Catholic modesty, a beautiful white alb for men and women is recommended.

6. Only trained and formally installed Acolytes may assist the priest as “extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion” using the proper liturgical garb , alb or cassock and surplice, for this ministry.

7. Holy Communion distributed to kneeling communicants.

8. If the Precious Blood is included in distributing the One Lord, it is done by intinction by the Eucharistic Minister as described in the General Instructions of the Roman Missal.

9. The sanctuary is to be arranged and decorated with noble simplicity with the so-called Benedictine altar arrangement for Mass facing in whatever direction, the east or liturgical east preferably. No floral arrangements in front of the altar, ambo and celebrant’s chair!

10. Special attention is given to proper liturgical chant and instrumentation using the organ as the primary liturgical instrument and also including chanting without instrumentation. Piano, drums and guitar should be excluded but classical acoustical guitars and strings allowed but sober in instrumentation. 

Thank you very much! 


Friday, September 25, 2026

OUR LADY…MAGNIFICENT COPE, DALMATICS AND SINGING 🎶

 Magnificent Vespers in Notre Dame…

To you who celebrate the Eucharist each day, I ask you to ensure that the liturgical celebrations are always carried out with dignity and reverence, even where smaller communities gather. Be conscious heirs of the Church Fathers and saints who, over the centuries, have handed down to us the profound meaning and beauty of the liturgy, always giving an example of great humility before the Mystery that is celebrated. 


CELEBRATION OF VESPERS WITH THE BISHOPS, PRIESTS, 
DEACONS,  CONSECRATED MEN AND WOMEN AND SEMINARIANS

HOMILY OF POPE LEO XIV

Notre-Dame de Paris Cathedral
Friday, 25 September 2026

___________________________________

Dear brothers and sisters,

We are gathered for Evening Prayer in this place which, more than any other, has invited the people of Paris for centuries to lift their eyes towards heaven. Seven years have passed since the whole world, holding its breath, watched as the cathedral was engulfed in a terrible fire. At that time, we also watched anxiously, conscious of how powerless humans are in the face of the unforeseen. That pain was felt not only by Catholics, nor only by believers. Indeed, in that tragic moment we came to realize that Notre-Dame is more than a monument. The collective effort to rebuild it, and the splendour of the result reveal that the heart of a people beats here, and that here we stand at the living center of a civilization, where past and future embrace, where heaven and earth meet.

It was my wish to meet you here, in this symbolic place of the Church in France. It is a joy for me to have crossed its threshold a short while ago, as thousands of brothers and sisters do each day, coming here from every corner of the world. Simply entering this place brings us face to face with a beauty that speaks to our restless hearts and calls them to peace. Following the restoration of this sacred space for all humanity, it is rightly recognized how each visitor can be renewed by what he or she sees, hears and experiences. The public, private and ecclesial institutions involved in the restoration of Notre-Dame have each contributed, in their own way, to reawakening the cultural, existential and spiritual journeys that the cathedral opens up before us. In this context, the Church has understood her mission not only in terms of preservation but also of creativity, by keeping tradition alive with the boldness of those who have faith and are guided by hope. I wish to thank the Archbishop, his co-workers and the diocesan community of Paris, who have also developed a pastoral pathway of initial proclamation and Christian initiation open to all. The baptismal font is a sign of this, situated at the entrance as a blessing and an invitation.

The rebuilding of the Cathedral was an opportunity for an encounter that has expanded horizons of welcome and participation beyond the boundaries of ecclesial affiliation. Dear bishops, priests, deacons, consecrated men and women, seminarians of France, let yourselves be inspired by what has happened here! Make the vision of Evangelii Gaudium your priority, namely the missionary conversion which Pope Francis spoke of in his first Apostolic Exhortation.

In the Letter to the Galatians, we heard the reason why we should not be afraid: “God sent forth his Son” (Gal 4:4). He sent him among us, into our world. In Saint Paul’s words, the verb describes a real, historical event, not some ideal set of circumstances. Christians do not flee from complexity, for God himself has called them to follow his Son in a world that is already inhabited, already in motion, already marked by both human misery and goodness. The way of the Cross certainly reveals the darkness that runs through our world, but even more profoundly, it reveals the love of God that triumphs over death.

The Cathedral’s cruciform layout, where stone and light come together, evokes the meeting of earth and heaven. It gathers and orders the events of history, woven with human joys and sufferings. It holds them together in a symbolic dynamic that transforms these diverse expressions into a living language, uniting them into a whole.

Dear friends, it is from the Incarnation — “God sent forth his Son” — that the identity of the Church flows, for she is called always to be a Church “going forth”. As disciples of Christ, you know well that the Christian community is not a refuge into which we withdraw in order to protect ourselves from our age. On the contrary, like the cathedrals of old, the Church is a place of welcome, respect, revelation and meaning for everyone. The strength of a living Church lies in welcoming those on the peripheries who already have a place in her heart; welcoming those who are far away but in reality are already near; welcoming the stranger, in whom Christ is already knocking at the door.

If Notre-Dame is a sign of this encounter at the heart of Paris, then the other cities and regions of France, even the most remote and rural, can be transformed all the more by a simple and welcoming missionary presence. Such a presence can help to bring cultural differences into harmony and to heal the wounds present in our societies. From the northern coasts to the Mediterranean, from the inland regions to the overseas departments, be a living, diverse and close Church. A lack of material resources does not prevent mission, for it is the grace of God that gives rise to interior freedom and simplicity of life, enabling us to reflect an evangelical way of life. In all this, confidently value the missionary presence of the lay faithful, who are the living front line of the Church at the crossroads of everyday life.

At the same time, brothers and sisters, we must not forget that this Cathedral, like every other church, was built for the purpose of prayer and the worship of God. It is the place where the Christian community celebrates the highest form of prayer and worship, renewing in the Eucharist the redemptive sacrifice of Christ. This Cathedral is not merely a stone structure to be admired; instead, it lives by the sacred mystery celebrated within it. Without the liturgy, it would lose its soul. Here at Notre-Dame, this truth is made evident by the placement of the altar at its center. The community gathered to praise the Lord thus stands at the heart of the building, while visitors, even during celebrations, walk around it and observe it. Here the Church appears for what she is, namely a living organism, a believing community that gathers into its praise everything that culture and tradition have handed down to her. She is a body which, through her celebration, tells each person the reason for her existence.

Today, more than ever, we live in an age that seems deprived of fullness, depth and promise. The noble simplicity of song, spoken word and liturgical gesture can be for many a glimmer of hope, an oasis of peace in a hyper-connected and noisy society, where we can experience the presence of the Author of the greatest love: “When the time had fully come, God sent forth his Son” (Gal 4:4). The celebration of the liturgical year, of Sundays and feasts, also makes us companions of Christ, attentive to the different moments of his life, which he gave entirely to the Father for the sake of the world. In this way, we become more sensitive and more open to the signs of the times. Indeed, our prayer and listening together to the Scriptures enable us to see the events of history in the light of God, making us more aware of our responsibilities, allowing us to unmask unjust relations of power and sow the seeds of justice and peace. It is hope that drives us therefore, not resignation. And from this arise bonds of greater fraternity and networks of solidarity, the fruit of communion in the one Sacrifice of Christ.

To you who celebrate the Eucharist each day, I ask you to ensure that the liturgical celebrations are always carried out with dignity and reverence, even where smaller communities gather. Be conscious heirs of the Church Fathers and saints who, over the centuries, have handed down to us the profound meaning and beauty of the liturgy, always giving an example of great humility before the Mystery that is celebrated. The Second Vatican Council, whose richness owes much to France, gathered up and deepened this heritage in an eminent way, recognizing the liturgy’s central role in the life of the Church (cf. Sacrosanctum Concilium, 10). I therefore exhort all of you, bishops, priests, deacons and consecrated persons, to cultivate an authentic love for the liturgy and to be witnesses and servants of the prophetic, priestly and kingly vocation of the entire People of God.

In this respect, the liturgy remains a reflection of life. Eucharistic joy takes root and spreads wherever harmony is restored, wherever dignity is renewed, wherever authority becomes service, and wherever freedom is able to flourish again. This is the greatest gift we can share. Therefore, place communion with the successor of Peter and with the Church before your personal preferences, so as to foster the unity of God’s people. Thus, together, we will bear prophetic witness to the possibility of a reconciled world.

Dear bishops, priests, seminarians and consecrated persons, you who have been called to follow Christ, I thank you for your response and your fidelity to the Lord. Never neglect this friendship desired by the Lord, which must be cultivated in personal prayer, and is the foundation of every vocation. As Madeleine Delbrêl said: “Without prayer, we would not love the God of love. We might perhaps be his servants, his warriors, or even his disciples; but we would be neither the loving children of our Father nor the friends… of Jesus Christ” (Notre vie, Œuvres complètes vol. XV, Nouvelle Cité, 2017, p. 41). Nurture, then, your interior life with the Lord, following the example of the many saints who have gone before you, always drawing from the source of God’s infinite love in silent prayer. Your mission flows above all from this intimate relationship with the Lord, who awaits you there.

At the heart of the city, the open Cathedral is a sign of a community that praises the Lord and lives hospitality not as an occasional gesture, but as the very form of its existence, so that all may feel at home, no longer dominated or marginalized in a changing world. “God sent forth his Son, born of a woman, […] so that we might receive adoption as sons” (Gal 4:4-5). And “if a son, then you are also an heir” (ibid 4:7). Heirs by grace, brothers and sisters gathered here, it is now up to each of you, this praying and living assembly, to become the flesh and voice of this promise. Clergy and consecrated persons of France, you are called to be the first guardians of this open house, the living stones of a Church that hopes and does not fear the future. This Cathedral has been reborn so that you too may be reborn with it in a new impetus towards holiness and daily mission. In the midst of your people, be a clear expression of the divine motherhood of the Church, who, by bearing witness to God’s love, restores and heals the human family.

Let us lift our eyes towards the fourteenth-century statue of the Virgin and Child, which was untouched by the fire and now shines once again before us. May Mary, who carried the Word in her womb, keep you faithful, and may she be the star that guides the mission of the Church in France. Holy Mary, Our Lady of Paris and Mother of the Church, pray for the French people, sustain their pastors, and walk always at our side.

SAVOIR-FAIRE

Savoir-Faire is the smooth, French-Canadian mouse antagonist from the 1960s animated television series Klondike Kat.Here are the key details about the character:
Role: He is the main rival to the feline Mountie, Klondike Kat, constantly stealing food around Fort Frazzel.
Catchphrase: He is famous for saying, "Savoir-Faire eez everywhere!"
Companionship: He travels with a versatile sled dog named Malamutt who can play the piano and violin. 

 

Full speech of Leo XIV before the French authorities

Mr. President,
distinguished Authorities and members of the Diplomatic Corps,
ladies and gentlemen:

It is a great joy for me to be among you today. I am particularly grateful to you, Mr. President, for your cordial invitation to visit France, and I thank you for the words of welcome you have addressed to me. Through you, I also greet all those who inhabit this country of vast cultural and religious heritage. Together they form a people in which the diversity of origins contributes to enlivening and enriching coexistence and democratic life. I also wish to assure you, Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen, that France is very often at the center of the Pope’s prayers, who does not forget his Norman and Béarnese family origins.

My journey to France begins in the capital of your country, Paris, frequently defined as the Ville lumière. For centuries France has shone as a cultural, artistic and spiritual beacon, not only in Europe, but also in the world. Strengthened by its cathedral schools, its universities and its academies, essential places for the search for truth, France has contributed to forging the intelligence of peoples far beyond its own borders. The enlightenment of exceptional French minds, who were at the same time great Catholics, underlines to what extent the sciences, the arts, literature and philosophy can contribute to the good of humanity when they are oriented toward the search for the beautiful, the good and the true, so that the world may have life.

French savoir-faire is synonymous with excellence in numerous fields. It has distinguished itself in a particular way in the great work of restoration of the cathedral of Notre-Dame de Paris, in which numerous institutions, both private and public, participated from the beginning, and to which you, Mr. President, have dedicated particular attention, for which I thank you. I gratefully pay homage to all the artisans and professional categories who have dedicated their efforts to it. The recent reopening of the cathedral for divine worship, as well as for visitors from all over the world, is not only the culmination of a technical enterprise, but the symbol of a recovered hope, the proof that what was believed to be destroyed forever can be reborn thanks to the collaboration of all and the testimony of a unity achieved in common effort. Such a beautiful result should inspire all actors in the political, social and religious life of the country with a new impulse to work unceasingly in a spirit of unity, with the strength of a living hope.

France is also a land of rich Christian roots. Since the times of Saint Irenaeus and the baptism of Clovis, the soul of your homeland has developed by taking from Christianity a spiritual, cultural, intellectual, artistic and missionary genius that today shines throughout the world. Thus, in sixteenth-century France, humanism flourished, seeking to unify the Greco-Roman heritage and the Christian faith. The celebrated thinkers of the Renaissance, and later of the Grand Siècle, were followed by those of the Enlightenment, and France then brought to the world true conquests; among them, the recognition of the rights of man inherent in the nature of the human person, in particular religious freedom. This constant attention to the intrinsic dignity of every human person finds an echo in your national motto. Liberty, equality and fraternity are not simple words engraved on the pediments of your public buildings, but refer to universal ethical demands that also find in the Gospel message an inexhaustible source of inspiration and realization.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, proclaimed in this city of Paris —and in whose elaboration the French jurist and Nobel Peace Prize winner René Cassin played a leading role— had the purpose of creating a general awareness of the inalienable dignity of the human person. Saint John Paul II, who considered this document «a true milestone on the path of moral progress of humanity,» was aware that «every threat to human rights, both in the sphere of material goods and in that of spiritual goods, is equally dangerous for peace, because it always affects man in his integrity.»

The question of respect for human dignity and the fundamental rights and freedoms that derive from human nature arises in every age and must accompany the evolution of society and technical progress. Indeed, «technological development has contributed over the centuries to a significant improvement in the living conditions of humanity; at the same time, each phase of progress has also shown the ambiguous face of instruments capable of causing harm when they are not oriented toward the good» (Encyclical Letter Magnifica humanitas, 4). Already in his time, Georges Bernanos intuited the risk of seeing blind obedience and irresponsibility become masters of a «Paradise of Machines.» He emphasized how, to escape from it, French civilization had worked for centuries in the formation of free men, fully responsible for their actions.

For this reason, it seemed indispensable to me to address, in my first Encyclical Letter, the theme of Artificial Intelligence, in order to return the human person to the center of all reflection. So as not to lose our humanity in the midst of the «paradise of machines» that invades and conditions our daily life, it is urgent to form minds for an ethical discernment capable of recognizing what is morally good. This requirement is fundamental for recognizing the true good that makes man grow according to his primordial vocation, respecting unconditionally his interior freedom and his sacred dignity. In this regard, I would like to recall that «an authentically free society does not impose uniformity, but protects the diversity of consciences, preventing authoritarian drifts and promoting an ethical dialogue that enriches the social fabric» (Address to the Diplomatic Corps, January 9, 2026). This dialogue is even more urgent in the context of present-day France, where people of different cultural and religious backgrounds are called to live together and contribute to the construction of society.

It is precisely thanks to the richness of its social fabric that, for centuries, France has distinguished itself by its attention to diversity and a strong desire for solidarity. Thanks to the illustrious work of men and women who remained faithful to their humanity and the values of the Gospel, the Catholic Church in France has never ceased to work for the good of the most needy, becoming the living face of God’s tenderness and compassion. Let us think of the works of Saint Vincent de Paul, of the charitable renewal of the seventeenth century and, still today, of the numerous Catholic institutions in which health workers accompany brothers and sisters weakened by suffering. Their testimonies of attention and service constitute a true school of humanity on the greatness of care and a vibrant reminder of the unique and irreplaceable value of every human being. They are also an invitation to renewed fraternity that requires learning to welcome life without conditions, to sustain fragility with tenderness, to accompany with respect and mutual trust each stage of existence and to defend with courage and compassion those who have no voice or do not feel sufficiently supported. Therefore, I reiterate «with force that the protection of the right to life constitutes the indispensable foundation of any other human right» (ibid.).

Today there exists the temptation to expect from science a solution and a consolation for all our sufferings. The risk is often to fall into illusion. When science and technology are not guided by conscience, they can propose immediate solutions that seem to respond to the desires and sufferings of men and women, but which in reality can seriously distance them from the good to which they deeply aspire. Sometimes I note with concern the current drifts of societies that run the risk of distorting science and technology by transforming them into lucrative enterprises that favor genetic manipulations, surrogacy, the purchase of organs or the offer of a programmed death. Let us not forget that mutual respect and the protection of the life of every human person are a responsibility of each and all, which begins with a conversion of the intellect and the heart and requires a real and disinterested commitment toward our brothers and sisters.

How can we not see in such a commitment also the expression of the just secularism of the earthly city? The Christian committed to public life, who acts in the light of his conscience illuminated by faith, cannot be considered a proselytizer or a threat to the unity of the homeland. Indeed, true secularism does not exclude the religious dimension, but on the contrary knows how to take advantage of it as an educational resource (cf. Address to participants in the national meeting of Catholic religion teachers, April 25, 2026).

Precisely for this reason, Catholic schools occupy a prominent place in the educational landscape of a country like France. «This is part, moreover, of a broader attitude, indispensable for all dialogue, both in school and in society: to know and love what one is, in order to know how to meet the other with respect and openness» (ibid.).

A just secularism does not therefore consist in excluding religion from the public sphere or from education, but in committing ourselves so that the State and religious institutions dialogue with each other and unite their forces in the service of the common good, so that the world may have life. In this regard, I express my appreciation for the work carried out within the framework of the Dialogue Instance between the Holy See, the Catholic Church in France and the French Government. Indeed, the tireless work of the Catholic Church, through the richness of its expressions and institutions, is certainly precious and worthy of praise for the well-being of the entire society. These exchanges illustrate in a very positive way that healthy complementarity reaffirmed during the Second Vatican Council, in the sense that «[the political community and the Church], although by different title, are at the service of the personal and social vocation of the same men. This service they will carry out all the more effectively, for the good of all, the healthier and better the cooperation between them» (Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, Past. Const. Gaudium et spes, 76).

I also note with joy that this same will to serve together each person, regardless of their origin, has for centuries inspired cooperation between France and the Catholic Church in the service of Christians of the East. The educational, social, cultural and humanitarian action developed in the countries of the Middle East, in collaboration with various associations such as Aid to the Church in Need or Œuvre d’Orient, constitutes a valuable contribution to dialogue between peoples and to the protection of the rights of each person.

This is an eloquent testimony in which culture and faith present themselves as the pillars that favor harmony between different peoples and religions in the service of peace and mediation among men. Also in this field, education constitutes a particularly important challenge. It remains, in fact, one of the main sectors of cooperation, finding especially a concrete and fruitful expression through the Fund for Schools of the East. In this regard, I wish to express my gratitude to all the people committed to this project which, since its foundation in 2021, has made it possible to provide support to more than two hundred and sixty educational centers in the Middle East, including seven universities in Lebanon and Bethlehem University.

But how can we evoke this region of the world, where two thousand years ago the Prince of Peace was born, without also thinking of all the populations struck by the consequences of conflicts and of all those who suffer the scourge of war? We cannot remain indifferent to these sufferings that wound human dignity and cry out for justice to God. The gravity of these situations must challenge us and calls each one, wherever he may be, to a true conversion of heart and a change of attitude. Recognizing humbly the need we have for one another, we will be able to commit ourselves together more intensely to the construction of the civilization of love at the heart of our world, which has become so complex and interdependent (cf. Encyclical Letter Magnifica humanitas, 182). At the same time, as my holy predecessor John XXIII already affirmed in his time, «justice, right reason and the sense of human dignity urgently demand that the arms race cease; that, on one side and the other, the nations that possess them reduce them simultaneously; that atomic weapons be prohibited; that, finally, all peoples, by virtue of an agreement, arrive at a simultaneous disarmament, controlled by mutual and effective guarantees» (Encyclical Letter Pacem in terris, 60). Indeed, the erroneous conviction is spreading more and more that the possession of nuclear weapons constitutes a guarantee of security, fueling a new arms race that is difficult to control (cf. Encyclical Letter Magnifica humanitas, 194). In reality, peace is not a balance of forces, but is built every day through dialogue and justice.

I therefore exhort you never to resign yourselves to the perspective of war considering it «inevitable,» but to tirelessly promote dialogue and diplomacy, in order to preserve peaceful societies, respectful of the dignity and rights of the person and of peoples. Faced with rumors of war and the multiple crises that shake our world, France has the vocation to continue being an untiring artisan of peace and multilateralism, particularly within our beloved Europe. May France, faithful to its own values, open the furrow of an unarmed and disarming peace and responsibly offer its irreplaceable contribution in favor of peace. May its freedom grow unceasingly in commitment to the common good; may its fraternity embrace all humanity; and may the equality to which they aspire always be founded on the foundations of justice and charity, without eliminating the differences between persons, but making them bear fruit harmoniously for the benefit of the entire society.

Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen, I wish to express to you once again my gratitude for this meeting which, taking up the —significant for each one— words pronounced by Your Excellency to the bishops of France in 2018, makes manifest how «a Church that pretended to be disinterested in temporal questions would not fully fulfill its vocation; and a President of the Republic who pretended to be disinterested in the Church and Catholics would fail in his duty.» Be assured of my fervent prayer for your beautiful nation.

May God grant it peace, unity and prosperity so that the world may have life. I entrust these desires to the maternal intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Principal Patroness of France.

God bless France and all the French!