Translate

Tuesday, January 20, 2026

WOW! CONFRONTING THE GERMAN SCHISM AND ITS WORLDWIDE CONTAGION—IS THIS THE WORK OF HIS HOLINESS, POPE LEO XIV????

 THIS IS GOOD NEWS! Below the copied news story I reprint from Catholic News World, I print an Artificial Intelligence summary that makes clear Pope Leo has initiated this stunningly good news! 

BREAKING Head of Germany's Catholic Bishops' Conference Resigns - Bishop Georg Bätzing to Step Down

Bishop Georg Bätzing to Step Down as Head of German Bishops' Conference

BONN – In a move that has surprised the Catholic community, Bishop Georg Bätzing has announced he will not seek a second term as chairman of the German Bishops' Conference (DBK). The German Bishops' Conference needs a new chairman. Bishop Georg Bätzing is not seeking a second term. A successor will be sought by the end of February.

Bätzing, age 64, has led the conference since March 2020, when he succeeded Cardinal Reinhard Marx. His decision means the DBK will elect a new leader during its upcoming plenary assembly in Würzburg, scheduled for February 23–26, 2026.


A Call for New Leadership

In a personal letter addressed to his fellow bishops, the Bishop of Limburg explained that his decision came after "careful consideration." He chose to announce his departure now to allow the conference sufficient time to deliberate on a successor before the February vote.

Key highlights from his statement:

  • The Transition: Bätzing believes it is time to place the leadership of the DBK into "other hands" to ensure a sustainable future for the Church.

  • Reflecting on Tenure: He described his six years in office as "intense," noting that significant progress was made alongside the "people of God."

  • Hopes for the Future: He encouraged the conference to maintain "courage for open dialogue" and a "willingness to reach out to one another."

What Happens Next?

The election for the next chairman, who will serve a six-year term, will be the central focus of the assembly in Würzburg at the end of next month.

Bätzing’s tenure was marked by a period of significant reform efforts and internal dialogue within the German Church. His successor will inherit the task of navigating these ongoing developments while maintaining unity with the global Catholic Church.

FROM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE:

There are strong indications and reports from January 2026 suggesting Pope Leo XIV is pressing German Bishop Georg Bätzing, head of the German Bishops' Conference, to resign due to conflicts over the German Church's "Synodal Way," with fears of schism rising, and some social media posts even claimed Bätzing already stepped down, though official confirmation needs verification, as Bätzing's leadership and the Synodal Path's direction clash with Vatican expectations
. 
Key Points of the Situation:
  • Pope Leo XIV's Stance: Pope Leo XIV, reportedly receiving support from cardinals, sees the German Synodal Conference as a potential schism and wants to intervene, potentially suspending the process.
  • Bätzing's Position: Bishop Bätzing is the leader of the contentious German "Synodal Way," a reform movement that Rome views with suspicion, especially regarding its moves toward decision-making bodies with lay involvement.
  • Pressure for Resignation: Sources suggest Pope Leo is pushing Bätzing out, with some online posts even prematurely announcing his resignation on January 19, 2026, due to inner fatigue and disagreements over the Synodal Way's future.
  • Vatican Concerns: The Holy See has previously warned the German bishops against creating permanent bodies with decision-making powers, viewing them as contrary to Church law. 
In essence, the Pope is taking a strong stance against the German Church's direction, and Bishop Bätzing, as its leader, is at the center of this conflict, facing pressure to resign


INTERESTING, NO? THE OTHER SHOE 👞 DROPS

 The Holy Father has received shoes from Adriano Stefanelli, the Papal Shoe Maker for Pope Benedict XVI. Mr. Stefanelli notes in the comments on this post that the black shoes were specifically requested by Pope Leo…


WILL POPE LEO XIV BLESS THE LITTLE LAMBS ON WEDNESDAY’S FEAST OF SAINT AGNES (AGNUS) OR WILL HE CONTINUE POPE FRANCIS’ DISCONTINUATION OF THIS MARVELOUS LITTLE tRADITION?

 Pope Benedict XVI celebrated the blessing of the little lambs on the Feast of St. Agnus with great flair and humbly embracing, in the most humble way, great papal dignity in doing so.




Pope Francis offered a kind of variation to this blessing in his first year but then discontinued doing so for the rest of His Holiness’ papacy. 

Pope Francis was not humble in embracing papal protocol and easily dispensed of papal traditions in the most “PREPOTENZA” way. You’ll have to look up what the Italian word “prepotenza” means, but it his the opposite of humble, as a clue:

So, if we are to place wagers on what Pope Leo XIV will do, how much would you bet that he will recover this great tradition of blessing on the Feast of Saint Agnes (Agnus) on Wednesday?

And if he recovers this tradition, will His Holiness look more like Pope Benedict while offering this blessing or more like Pope Francis?

Time will tell by tomorrow!

This is what AI says about this blessing and Pope Francis:

Every January 21, on the 
Feast of St. Agnes, the Pope historically blesses two lambs in a centuries-old Vatican tradition. While Pope Francis participated in this ceremony during the early years of his pontificate, recent reports indicate that he discontinued the specific ritual of personally blessing the lambs in the Vatican a few years into his leadership. 
Tradition and Symbolism
  • The Pallium: The wool from these lambs is shorn on Holy Week by the Benedictine nuns of St. Cecilia in Trastevere. It is then woven into palliums—white wool stoles decorated with six black crosses—which the Pope bestows upon newly appointed Metropolitan Archbishops on the Feast of Sts. Peter and Paul (June 29).
  • St. Agnes: The martyr’s name sounds like the Latin word for lamb (agnus), and she is often depicted with one to symbolize her purity and chastity.
  • Floral Crowns: Traditionally, one lamb is adorned with a red floral wreath(symbolizing her martyrdom) and the other with white flowers (symbolizing her purity). 
Evolution of the Rite
Although the Pope no longer blesses them personally at the Vatican, the lambs are still brought to the Basilica of Saint Agnes Outside-the-Walls on the morning of January 21. They are placed on the altar over the martyr's tomb and blessed by a high-ranking cleric or the Abbot of the Lateran Canons before being entrusted to the nuns for weaving

THE MOTEL 6 AT THE VATICAN HAS LOST ITS MOST FAMOUS GUEST…

 After 13 long years and recent major renovations, Pope Leo XIV has moved into the Apostolic Palace! And to help the papacy make the transition from the most humble Vatican Motel 6, the Apostolic Palace left the lights on for the pope! 


Monday, January 19, 2026

A BISHOP APPOINTED BY POPE FRANCIS IN 2013 AND NAMED A CARDINAL BY POPE FRANCIS, ONLY TO REJECT THE CARDINALATE, APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN ASKED TO RESIGN AS BISHOP AT THE AGE OF 62 BY HIS HOLINESS, POPE LEO XIV…


 FROM THE PILLAR, PRESS TITLE FOR FULL STORY:

Bishop who declined red hat resigns at 63 


Bishop Syukur stepped down citing ‘obedience’ to the Holy See


MONEY BYTE

The Vatican announced Jan. 19 that Pope Leo XIV had accepted the resignation of Bishop Paskalis Bruno Syukur, O.F.M., as head of the Diocese of Bogor.

The Vatican did not give a reason for Syukur’s highly unusual resignation at the age of 63, 12 years after he was appointed to lead the Bogor diocese and 12 years before he would be expected to tender his resignation to the pope. There have been no public reports that Syukur is suffering from health issues.

that he would be among 21 new cardinals created in December that year.

But the Vatican said on Oct. 22, 2024, that Syukur had asked not to be created a cardinal.

“Pope Francis has accepted the request of His Excellency Bishop Paskalis Bruno Syukur of Bogor, Indonesia, not to be created cardinal in the upcoming consistory,” the Holy See press office said.

LET’S GET POLITICAL, POLITICAL, POLITICAL…FROM THE ITALIAN PERSPECTIVE


 Silere non possum
provides an English translation of their Italian commentary on the Trump administration in the USA. Keep in mind, that Italy and all of Europe, if not the entire world, are concerned about certain elements of the Trump Administration’s chaos and saber rattling, as well as actual military action already used in some countries, threatened for other countries and for some citizens of a particular state in the USA.

Silere non possum praises the three most progressive cardinals in the USA for using Pope Leo’s recent long elocution to ambassadors accredited to the Vatican.

Here is the Silere non possum English commentary. Press the title for their full English commentary:

Cardinals Cupich, McElroy and Tobin challenge the drift towards bellicosity: US foreign policy judged in the light of the Pope’s words

WHAT DO YOU DO WITH THE PROBLEM OF THE TLM? CREATE A TLM ORDINARIATE AND START WITH THE FSSP!

IS THAT ROBERT CARDINAL PREVOST CELEBRATING THE TLM AND USING ROMAN VESTMENTS AND HIS GRANDMOTHERS LACE OF AN ALB?????


 It seems to me that maybe a TLM Ordinariate using the existing FSSP is one option for Pope Leo to create in dealing with the problem of the TLM and he could name bishops from the priests of the FSSP or the other orders which primarily celebrate the TLM.

Then His Holiness could allow them entry into any part of the world to set up parishes under a bishop of the TLM Ordinariate as it is done with the Anglican Ordinariate and also with the Eastern Rites, which are in Latin Rite Dioceses, but not under the Latin Rite bishop.


A TALE OF TWO GREEN LITURGIES…IN TWO CITIES…

Yesterday at two liturgical expressions of the one Roman Rite, I wore green for the first time since Christ the King Sunday in the revised Roman Calendar. 

This is the green vestment I wore for the 9 AM Bugnini Mass at Saint Gregory the Great Church in Bluffton, South Carolina. It is a parish vestment made by Holy Rood out of Massachusetts. The quality is excellent, although they take gothic vestments to an extreme and they go far over my arms and I find myself constantly pulling the vestment up so my wrists and hands are not constantly covered by it.

The 9 am Bugnini Mass was all sung, with a deacon, and as high as you can get in the Bugnini Mass, although incense wasn’t used. It is reserved for the 11 AM Bugnini Mass there. 

It was beautiful, reverent and organized. But there were no Propers chanted in Latin (which would follow what Vatican II actually taught, there wasn’t any ad orientem or kneeling for Holy Communion except for a handful of young Catholics who knelt on the hard concrete floor). But otherwise, it was a reverent, grand celebration.

The lavish use of Scriptures, called for by Vatican II and fulfilled in the Vatican II three year lectionary which adds an Old Testament readings was negated by the elimination of the Sacred Scriptures of the official Entrance Chant, and Offertory and Communion propers. 

Then I drove to Savannah, Georgia, about 30 minutes away, and a tale of two Masses concluded my Tale of Two Cities Green Day!

As you can see, it is a gothic green vestment but not swallowing the celebrant as Holy Rood vestments are wont to do or is it want to do?


There was no vernacular, except for the Scripture readings, very Vatican II, but the Propers were chanted in magnificent complicated Gregorian Chant, following what Vatican II desired for the Mass.  The laity actually participated, actual participation and everyone, except for those unable to do so, knelt at the altar railing to receive Holy Communion and did so by receiving on the tongue. No one attempted to receive in the hand and no nuns were stationed nearby with rulers to hit on the knuckles those attempting to receive in the hand!

The Mass was as high as a high Mass in the Ancient Rite allows, including the use of incense, but compared to the Solemn Sung Mass with deacon and subdeacon or the variety of pontifical Masses there are, there was just as much noble simplicity in the Ancient Mass I celebrated on Sunday as the Bugnini Mass I celebrated earlier, thus both Masses fulfilled Vatican II’s call for “noble simplicity!” Praise God from Whom all noble simplicity flows!

And of course, even though the Ancient one year Lectionary was used that excludes an additional Scripture Reading at the Liturgy of the Word, aka, Mass of Catechumens, the lavish use of Scripture, asked by Vatican II was maintained by not eliminating the Propers, which are Sacred Scripture! The elimination of the Scriptures of the Propers occurred earlier at my Bugnini Green Mass, failing to follow what Vatican II taught about the lavish use of Sacred Scriptures!

We did sing a vernacular hymn as the recessional and no one left the church until the last verse was completed. 

A TALE OF TWO GREEN MASSES IN DIFFERENT FORMS OF THE ONE ROMAN RITE!














AMEN TO Tm!


Below is a comment by Tm about his love of the Bugnini Mass but also his desire for it to be “refined/reformed” to recover the spiritual and reverential ethos of the TLM. 

I applaud his recommendations. I would also add that in the Church, most things are not either/or, but rather, both/and. 

It is for the health of the Church, her relationship with her Master, that we have both forms of the one Roman Rite and both celebrated well and in continuity with each other in Substance, style and the ethos of reverence. There is no need for a discontinuity in Catholic devotion and reverence when it comes to the two forms of the one Roman Rite. 

God willing Pope Leo will recognize this, as did his great “doctor of the Church/doctor of the liturgy” predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI.

This is TM’s comment from another post:

I grew up with the “New Mass”. The Mass was in the midst of being changed/revised when I was born so I don’t know anything different. I’m comfortable with it, it comforts me, it fortifies me. I just wish that the communion rails would come back, I wish the Mass were celebrated as written and NOT how some priest thinks he can improve it. I wish beautiful vestments and incense would be used. I wish the sanctuaries were uncluttered. I wish the priest would celebrate with more reverence. And the Latin…I wish that certain parts would always be in Latin….Sanctus, Angus Dei, Gloria, and the Pater Noster when sung. And the altar servers need to actually know what they are doing. Liturgical abuse MUST be addressed and stopped. If these small things were done it would go a long way in ending the liturgy wars.

Sunday, January 18, 2026

MY FIRST GREEN SUNDAY SINCE CHRIST THE KING!

 Almost ready for the 9 AM Bugnini Mass at Saint Gregory the Great Church, Bluffton, South Carolina…




WHERE IS THE NEED FOR THE REAL IRON FIST TO PREVENT AN ACTUAL SCHISM IN THE CHURCH? HINT: IT ISN’T THOSE WHO WANT THE TLM OR IN THE BUGNINI RITE, KNEELING FOR HOLY COMMUNION AND MASS AD ORIENTEM!



So much smoke screen, faux-hysteria is directed towards TLM communities and those parishes that celebrate the Bugnini Mass by the book, ad orientem and kneeling for Holy Communion. We already know how harshly Pope Francis treated these Catholics and in my own province of Atlanta, the Conventual Franciscan bishop in Charlotte is using Orwellian measures to crush traditional minded Catholics, who are orthodox by the way, and force them into a uniformity in the most rigid pre-Vatican II authoritarian way possible. 

But the Italian journal, “Il Giornale” hits the nail on the head about the true schism in the Church that needs more than Orwellian means to crush it but no crushing thus far has taken place. Pope Francis called them out but coddled them at the same time and things continue to spiral toward schism. 

Yet, the harshest measures are taken against orthodox traditionalists, an Orwellian smoke screen to mask the real problem. One wonders if the harshest measures against traditionalists is to neutralize grassroots pushback against heterodox/heretical Catholics, in high places, who want the Catholic Church to be a different Church. 

Where are we talking about? GERMANY, the home of the Protestant Reformation in the 1500’s is fomenting another world-wide schism, much nastier than their first one, as nasty as that was. 

For many in the Vatican, the German Synodal Church was moving too fast but in the right direction. Pope Francis wanted the synod on synodality to move in a more stealthy way, beginning processes that would eventually lead to where Germany arrived way too quickly. The Pope Francis’ synodlalty, while feigning orthodoxy, created so many cracks in the dam of orthodoxy that everyone knew what the end point would be—the Church would be like Germany’s Church about to become. Germany is more honest in arriving at the logical conclusion of synodality. 

While the FSSPX and even sedevacantists are in an irregular union with the pope, or, outright schism, they are not heretical unlike the looming German schism which is as heterodox and heretical, not to mention, schismatic, as you can get! 

Yet, you have heterodox left leaning Catholics around the world screaming at traditional minded Catholics and demonizing them. It really is a smokescreen, no? And that smoke—it’s the smoke of Satan. 

This is the “Il Giornale” commentary:

Schism in Berlin, Leo’s High-Stakes Game

By Nico Spuntoni

The German nuncio meets the Pope. Unpublished letter from Ratzinger to Cardinal Marx.


Germany is where the most explosive dossier Leo XIV inherited from Francis is being played out. Neither the Jubilee year nor the conclave has halted what Cardinal Gerhard Müller has defined as the “process of Protestantization” of the Catholic Church in Germany. And while Rome has so far bided its time in the face of the continual steps forward from beyond the Rhine, now the knots are coming to a head.


In the coming hours the Pope is expected to receive Archbishop Nikola Eterović, apostolic nuncio to Berlin. It is inevitable that the conversation will be dominated by the imminent vote of the German Bishops’ Conference on the Statute of the Synodal Conference.


This is a project, already approved by the highly powerful Central Committee of German Catholics, that will give rise to a permanent body in which lay people will be placed on an equal footing with bishops. This Synodal Conference will have decision-making power and will be able to introduce changes to doctrine by majority vote, forcing those who dissent to provide a public justification. Moreover, the Conference will take over the management of the financial resources of the extremely wealthy German Church.


All this is exactly what the Holy See feared would happen in 2019, when the contested Synodal Path was launched in Germany and the current prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops, Archbishop Filippo Iannone, wrote to the then head of the German Bishops’ Conference, Cardinal Reinhard Marx, warning that issues such as ordained ministries for women, the separation of powers between laity and clergy, and priestly celibacy “do not concern the Church in Germany but the universal Church and, with few exceptions, cannot be the object of deliberations or decisions by a particular Church.”


Over these years the German bishops have repeatedly ignored Rome’s warnings. Their objective, however, appears to go further and would seek to trigger a German “contagion” in the rest of the Church. This is demonstrated by the recent consistory in the Vatican in which — as we can reveal — Cardinal Marx intervened to express the hope of arriving very soon at the female diaconate. The cardinal is the principal architect of the German synodal process and has retained his leadership even after being replaced at the head of the Bishops’ Conference.


Today Il Giornale can reveal an unprecedented episode involving Marx: in 2021, in fact, Benedict XVI made himself heard by his successor as Archbishop of Munich and Freising to express his “great concern” about the synodal process in Germany. Vatican sources confirm to us that in his final years Ratzinger was deeply skeptical about the direction taken by the German Church and was convinced that “this Path will do harm and will end badly if it is not stopped.” Marx ignored the appeal of the Pope emeritus, who a few months later was heavily discredited in his homeland because of a report on abuses commissioned precisely by the Archdiocese of Munich, without being defended by his successor in office.


Now it is Leo XIV’s turn. He receives support from the report presented by Cardinal Mario Grech to the consistory, which states that “it always belongs to the Bishop of Rome, if necessary, to suspend the synodal process.” Prevost shares Benedict XVI’s misgivings, but if he does not have the strength to say “no” to the Synodal Conference project, the risk is that the German landslide may become, for the universal Church, an avalanche called schism.