A Tale of Two Cardinals, well, right now, one Cardinal and one layman:
This horrible scandal, which continues to give, of perversion and sexual abuse of minors by clergy and religious is so sad and disedifying. It continues to erode the clergy and laity’s confidence in the post-Vatican II Church and now the synodal process that seems to accept sin as good and accompanying sinners by not calling out sin and seeking Divine Truth and conversion, but enabling sin as a virtue which exacerbates the concupiscence of the weakest among us.
I predict that the lax morality promoted by the synodal process which confirms sinners in their mortal sins, and calls sin, virtue, will increase the disease of abuse we are already seeing.
But, let me ask this question or make an observation. The more left-leaning laicized priest, bishop and cardinal McCarrick never has come clean about his serial abuse. He has not confessed it or taken responsibility for it.
Compare that to the still Cardinal Riccard of France, a Cardinal friendly toward Tradition and the Traditional Mass and Sacraments. He has confessed and taken responsibility for his mortal sins, which I think in France is also a crime.
Are Catholics who love Tradition more honest than synodal Catholics who think anything should go because they are influenced more by the lies of the culture rather than Divine Truth?
2 comments:
I would rather not seek the difference but try to model the right thing to do. Closing ranks to protect a priest or hide thetruth is not the right thing under any circumstances. Working make the deed acceptable is evil.
When will you learn that the sexual scandal among the clergy was not about sex with minors? That was the press release and that is where the bishops want the spotlight (see what I did there?) to shine. The scandal is active homosexuals in the clergy. When they are not having sex with vulnerable teens, they are having sex with each other or with gay prostitutes.
Post a Comment