Aug. 10, 2018
In the Midst of Clerical Misdeeds, a Crucial Moment for the Laity
It is hard to overestimate the storm that is brewing. Only penance and a complete housecleaning can restore credibility and trust.
The last four weeks in the Church have borne witness to a growing cauldron of sorrow and anger. God’s faithful are rightly disturbed at the latest explosion of sexual abuse allegations and the seeming lack of accountability that allowed years of rumors and allegations to go unaddressed by the hierarchy.
I am not sure how many of the bishops realize just how angry, disheartened and disturbed God’s people really are. Every day I receive calls and emails from faithful Catholics who struggle to adequately express their dismay in words. Each day there are new articles published that cannot be simply dismissed as rantings in an overheated “blogosphere.” These are the thoughtful essays of good Catholics, faithful writers, journalists and lay leaders who love the Church and have spent most of their energy building and defending the Church and the faith. However, they cannot defend the indefensible nor simply repeat Church-issued statements insisting that no one knew anything. Doing so strains credibility, and they, to whom many Catholics look for guidance and information, have had to say so. Thus, they have written with saddened hearts, justifiable anger and sober concern.
I hope our bishops, especially the highest ranking and those closest to the epicenter of the Archbishop McCarrick case, hear just how angry the faithful are. I think it is hard to overestimate the storm that is brewing. If any of our prelates think this latest storm will soon pass, they should ponder the more likely case that these are merely the outer bands of a Category 5 hurricane that is closing in and will likely make landfall in Baltimore at the November meeting of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB).
I have never seen people so serious and determined to take actions of their own. Frankly, as the faithful often remind us, their real power is the power of the purse—that and voting with their feet. I have usually dismissed plans to refuse to give to the Annul Bishop’s Appeal or other such collections as the threats of a few on the fringes, but I am now hearing such things from far more mainstream sources who say that it is the only way to get the bishops’ attention.
This is where we are today. As a Church hierarchy, we have worn on folks’ last nerve. We have come to a point where only penance and a complete housecleaning can restore credibility and trust. As a lower-ranking priest I cannot issue demands or send binding norms to those in wider and upper ranks of the hierarchy, but I do want to say to God’s faithful how powerfully aware I am of their justified anger and agree with their insistence that something more than symbolic action or promises of future reform is necessary.
I also would like to say to God’s faithful that this is a critical hour for you. I have learned from Church history that reform almost never comes from the top; it comes from religious life and from the grass roots, from among God’s people. Please stay faithful to the Lord and His Body the Church.
Pray as never before. Realize that the devil would like nothing more than for you to walk away from the sacraments. However, please also feel freer than ever to confront Church leadership and insist upon reform. There is at times an unhealthy deference to authority that leaves those in authority unaware of the impact of their action or lack thereof.
I encourage each of you to write personally to your bishop. It is not enough to sound off on social media or in comments sections on the internet. Be old-fashioned: write a physical letter to your bishop and request a written reply, at least acknowledging receipt. Be brief and charitable, but also be clear about the crisis of trust in episcopal and clerical authority and your deepening concerns over what this means if trust cannot be restored.
Remember, too, not every bishop or priest is equally to blame. Some are suffering as much as you are. However, no one, clergy or lay, should exempt himself from the task of summoning the Church to reform and greater holiness.
To those who are inclined to use financial withholding as an expression of concern, I ask that you remember that much of these collections go to help the poor. Please consider such a method as a kind of last recourse. Use it only if you must, and as a medicine not an expression of vengeance. I ask that you consider giving an equal amount directly to those who help the poor. Also, if you choose to do this, write to your bishop explaining what you are doing and why.
Yes, I have heard loud and clear the sincere and understandable anger of God’s faithful. Trust has been broken once again on a wide, institutional level. Many of our very structures and clerical culture are the cause of this. Significant reforms that result in accountability at all levels, including the highest ones, are needed and are worth insisting upon.
I am grateful that many lay faithful love the Church enough to be angry. Sometimes one must be angry enough to be willing to act for change and to persevere in that work. I hope you will honor your anger and use it to creative ends: to tirelessly demand real reform in all the ways God gives you to see. Be careful to target your anger and speak it in love and for the good of all.
So, this is a crucial moment for God’s people. As a member of His clergy, I want to say that we need you now more than ever and to remind you that you will be essential to reform by insisting on it and refusing to accept a return to business as usual. Let us pray for one another and work for the reform we all know is necessary and long overdue.
29 comments:
when these scandals became known I don't think many of us would ever dream they would reach the highest levels in the Church. McCarrick is just one, but there are some other cardinals who should be heading out the door, both here and in Europe
Thoughtfully written in a heartfelt way...the Msgr Charles Pope way. He is absolutely correct in his assessment of the faithful who are beaten down by years of this horror. But unlike him, I have no confidence that the episcopacy wants to hear us or even cares enough to respond.
There will be, apparently, a march on the USCCB in November. We are tempted to go, but getting too old I fear (ages 72 and 78). For what it’s worth, a letter to our Bishop is in the works.
And, Father, we are all fatigued...but This Is War. The brave must keep fighting or we each personally risk losing everything we love about our Church, and She risks losing our precious family members.
Bee here:
Msgr. Pope's article is like saying "circle the wagons" to survivors when almost everybody in the wagon train has been killed, and you have just found out some of the generals and lieutenants were in league with the enemy to orchestrate the massacre.
I respect Msgr. Pope to the highest degree, but this article seems like it comes a day late and a dollar short.
I have been praying for the Church since the 1980's. I lived under Bernardin. I saw very suspicious things up at Mundelien Seminary when I attended some seminars there. I saw first hand a priest in a parish I attended who was acting suspiciously around children, and nothing was done. I watched Cardinal George slap Fr. Pfleger's wrist, but not demand he take a new assignment. I watched Cardinal Cupich remove a pastor from his parish and suspend his priestly faculties for, from what the investigation found, nothing. (Oh, it was for something all right, but not for what he was accused of...)
I have felt like a beggar at the door of my own Church, with my cup out seeking just a morsel of spiritual food, and getting the boot in the face for it.
Poor Msgr. Pope and faithful clergy. There is no more heartening the laity. Put a fork in it. We're done.
Those of us who have lived in this heartless, cold and secular Church for a long time have cried out to God and He has answered. We carry Him with us always. We find Him. But usually not in church.
God bless.
Bee
I do think all the hand-ringing needs to come to an end from all of us clergy, be they bishops or priests who are writing, speaking or talking about this.
Sin, mortal sin, has always been a part of our Church. I know that sexual scandals happened all through the history of the Church. But the Church recovered its discipline and orientation by acts of God.
I would say that the Protestant Reformation made Catholic bishops act and clean up their acts of corruption as well as of the lower clergy.
I see what is happening now, with the potential of a new reformation, but this one away from any organized religion to the fierce individualism of secularism, will be the catalyst to actually restore what was lost in the Church in terms of clarity, moral clarity, doctrinal clarity, canon law clarity and the clarity of a strong Catholic identity for clergy, religious and laity.
I do think the current papacy and those Pope Francis has chosen to surround him as his closest advisors, many of them compromised on one level or anther, is showing a new generation of Catholics who want to be faithful to the true identity of the Church which Pope Benedict was restoring, what happens when the spirit of Vatican II is set loose to divide, conquer and destroy.
In other words, we may well be in the throws of an ACT OF GOD in all of this leading us to a productive Counter Reformation again!
Father McDonald,
As I write this, I am listening to a beautiful choral version of Mozart's Ave Verum and just want to on the one hand, weep, and on the other, wring the neck of the music director who tortures us with dreck like "Gather Us In." We have lost so much, and for what? Any clergyman who thinks Vatican Disaster II was a plus for the Church, is either a habitual liar or seriously in need of phsychiatric help. To keep my sanity I just tune out Santita and his assorted band of apostates. We are seeing the seeds of renewal and they are leading us right back to where we started, the EF. We will make it, eventually, when there are more Samples and less Cupich's
A couple of weeks ago at the end of Mass, the priest who offered said Mass offered a few comments in regard to "Cardinal" McCarrick.
The priest said that justice within the Church would be served. Beyond that, he said that he was not interested in additional discussion in regard to "Cardinal" McCarrick...that he needed to attend to the needs of parishioners...
...that he planned to "move on". So be it should others wish to dwell upon the McCarrick situation. He had better things to do...
The congregation clapped and clapped. Following Mass, many people conversed with each other. I didn't hear one comment in regard to "Cardinal" McCarrick.
I don't know any Catholic who is about to collapse in regard to McCarrick.
Pax.
Mark Thomas
"Gather Us in" is not rubbish. You may not like it, you may prefer Palestrina, but it is not rubbish.
It is precisely that kind of high-falutin', look down your nose at others elitism among the traditionalists that is so completely off-putting.
"Nourish us well and teach us to fashion
Lives that are holy and hearts that are true."
Anonyous Kavanaugh,
I am a talented musician, with over 50 years of experience playing the piano, the pipe organ, and singing in a myriad of choirs. Gather Us In is puerile, simpleton rubbish, only someone ascetically impoverished could appreciate. Ironically it was the "elites" who lectured we poor plebians that we couldn't possible appreciate chant or Palestrina and must settle for this sort of pablum.
MT,
You must attend a left-wing, left-wing, left-wing parish where sexual morals mean nothing. No grown up Catholic would share the attitude you just discussed. Your Pollyanish antics are beyond tedious
MT -
McCarrick is the tip of the iceberg in terms of institutional perversion and coverup. Unless and until the herd is thinned of this filth, nothing will change. The "I'm done with this" display by that priest followed by the 'group think' applause is just such a simplistic reaction akin to cutting off one wart and ignoring the others that remain.
But, feel free to put the blinders on so that you only see the blue skies, green fields and hills and perfect fluffy clouds of propaganda that will periodically float by.
We are not “hand-wringing”. We stopped doing that years ago, long before you even acknowledged the real problem, Father. We just kept on being practicing Catholics despite all the sin and betrayal. But We Are At War, and will not give up the fight for our beloved Church. Don’t expect a saccharin response to anyone who downplays the horror.
Blessings,
Anon 12:50
I just found out that my first pastor, that I went through RCIA with, is a fugitive. Women and altar boys have accused him of molestation and rape. One of the women fathered a child. He fled to Ireland, and a judge there refuses to extradite him back to the US.
On a brighter note, the FSSP had 11 ordinations to the priesthood this year, and have another 82 seminarians in formation. The future of the Church is there.
I am a talented musician as well, but I don't allow my personal preferences to turn me into something ugly and dismissive of the tastes of others.
"Gather Us In" isn't Palestrina - it was never meant to be. So if you find it lacking in that regard, then the fault is yours, not the music's.
My music collection, all of which I appreciate, stretches from Bach to Britten, from Mozart to Mussorgsky, from Corsican Chant to the Pentatonics. So don't think that your personal experience is the be-all and end-all of music appreciation.
Gather us in, the lost and forsaken
Gather us in, the blind and the lame
Call to us now and we shall awaken
We shall arise at the sound of our name.
I just found out that the incredible former Fr. Richard Sipe died two days ago. His research published in 2000 (with no attention paid by the hierarchy) was what first alerted me to the problems in the RC priesthood exposed in 2002, that have since been verified and recently expanded to include the hierarchy. May God grant him eternal rest, and may his soul now finally Rest In Peace.
haven't given to the Bishops collection for years, every since I politely asked what specifically it was used for and was told none of my business, come to find out some of it was used in conjunction with acorn, and also some very Alensky type organizing.
We here in the Cincinnati diocese were saddled with Bernadine and when he left here the damage really started. seamless garment, crap, how about whole cloth. At this point I have lost all faith in bishops period (with some exceptions) and it will take much reparation to earn it back. And that includes the Pope. Having them do any "investigation" is like the fox protecting the hen house, or the FBI investigating itself
How utterly sad that there are purported Catholics who yawn at the devastation of other peoples' lives, some of whom have committed suicide, and basically state, "Hey, it's the way the Church has always been, so deal with it," and then clap when they find out they're not going to have to hear about the suffering of others anymore.
I guess as long as it never happened to one of their loved ones, they're good with it. The lack of empathy is appalling.
In any event, apparently the satanic right wing bloggers are doing a bit of good. The cardinal archbishop of Boston just initiated an investigation of one of his seminaries as a direct result of information he received from one of them.
But I guess that would yield a yawn as well.
I am a talented Catholic music lover—in the 80s, part of a contemporary music group in my parish. We were good and much-appreciated at that Mass. “Gather Us In”: Ho, hum, even then...
Anonymous Kavanaugh,
No, YOU are ascetically impoverished and definitely NOT a talented musician if you think a whiney, grating piece of garbage, like Gather Us In, is quality Church music. Written by Marty Haugen, a former Lutheran, now a "United church of Christ" member. LOL
How embarrassing! Clearly, a woman did NOT father a child- she had a child fathered by the priest.
Anonymous @7:05 pm:
What silly words and jingle music for that "Gather Us In". Sounds like something composed for a group therapy session. Oh yes, by a non-Catholic if not anti-Catholic Marty H. who has a degree in psychology.
So if you are not lost and forsaken, get out?
If you are not blind and lame, find another place?
How do you know we are not awake and and want God already, because maybe we are already following God's call?
Maybe we are already on our way to finding God, so why arise?
What puerile poetry...always about us, us, us or the me, me, me. Definitely baby-boomer stuff.
What ever happened to real hymns of praise to God like Newman's "Praise to the Holiest in the Height" with R R Terry's melody? The last time I looked in a US "Catholic" hymnal I could not even find it (GIA). But there were plenty by theological liberals.
What hope is there for USA Novus Ordo churches when they emulate the songs of the UCC of which Marty H. is a member? Why not just join the UCC, the most liberal ecclesial community in USA?
Father Richard Sipe left the priesthood in the late ‘60’s as many priests in the relaxed spirit of Vatican II Church dated nuns who shed their habits and discovered secular life as professed religious with reckless abandon. The controlling pre-Vatican II orders would not allow this relaxed freedom for their nuns to live as secular women to the extent it happened in the mid to late 60’s in the relaxed post VII Church.
Sipe dated a solemnly professed Dominican nun at the university they both attended an married her. He was laicized and she released from her vows.
He taught me pastoral theology classes, a new kind of course, at St. Mary’s in Baltimore between 1976-80 as a married layman.
He was quite boring, repetitive, and whiny. He was very much a spirit of Vatican II Catholic, despised mandating celibacy, wanted priests once ordained to get married, as he wanted to return to the clerical state.
His whistle blowing is laudable, but make no mistake, there were hidden agendas in his work and he never disclosed his own peccadilloes that led to his marriage.
Father McDonald,
I have read some of Sipe's work and I think it provides some valuable insights. I do not believe he is opposed to celibacy per se, but he is highly critical of the lack of preparation that the typical seminary provides for entering into this state. I recall he thought there should be at least 6 semester courses dedicated to teaching about celibacy. I suspect he does believe secular clergy should be permitted to marry. His website contains a scathing condemndation of Cardinal Burke (although unfair, is actually kind of funny).
Father, I’m sure your seminary exposure to Richard Sipe was less than stellar. I can empathize, as my Philosophy 101 and 102 professor was a former priest married to a former nun. Boring and pedantic didn’t even begin to describe... but fortunately I loved the subject matter.
That being said, Sipe’s book “Sex, Priests, and Power” (1995) was a necessary, important first step in exposing the roots of what we are continuing to suffer all these years later.
Blessings
The only positive thing I can say about 'Gather Us In' (not very popular this side of the pond, but occasionally heard nonetheless) is that since it is sung at the beginning of a putative act of worship it is an accurate portent of what is to ensue; so in my case the only thing that would be gathering me in would be the local pub.
Sorry, Fr Kavanaugh, it might be 'skipping mass' in your book, but brain-dead priests and 'music directors' are providing us with the skipping-rope.
John Nolan - The celebration of mass is not a "putative" act of worship, your own predilections regarding art notwithstanding.
MJK
Since you're into your usual game of taking one word out of a comment and focusing on it, I will follow suit with your use of 'predilection'. The Church does not see sacred music as being a matter of personal preference. I am surprised you should think so; Sacrosanctum Concilium devotes a whole chapter to the subject, and there have been numerous directives both before and since.
John Nolan - I did not comment on whether the Church sees sacred music as being a matter of personal preference.
I commented on YOUR predilections.
MJK
'I did not comment on whether the Church sees sacred music as being a matter of personal preference'.
No, but I did. And there's no 'whether' about it.
'I commented on YOUR predilections.'
It might be useful to know what they are before commenting on them. An aversion to Marty Haugen (et operibus ejus et pompis ejus) does not prove a predilection for anything in particular.
Anything else, Mr Bean?
Post a Comment