Sunday, June 7, 2015


I just read this from the blog, Views From the Choir Loft, and it is very, very informative:

Eerie Silence After Cardinal Sarah’s Testimony

published 5 June 2015 by Jeff Ostrowski 
673 Cardinal Sarah T WOULD SEEM Cardinal Sarah has become persona non grata among “progressive” liturgists. As Fr. David Friel reported on Monday, a powerful letter by Cardinal Sarah was read during a liturgical conference in New York. During the letter, the head of the Church’s most powerful liturgical committee said:
When the Holy Father, Pope Francis, asked me to accept the ministry of Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments, I asked: “Your Holiness, how do you want me to exercise this ministry?” The Holy Father’s reply was clear. “I want you to continue to implement the liturgical reform of the Second Vatican Council,” he said “and I want you to continue the good work in the liturgy begun by Pope Benedict XVI.”
It would be difficult to distort these clear words, but I nevertheless expected various “progressive” magazines & blogs to try to spin his testimony. It hasn’t happened.
And the silence is eerie.

    * *  PDF DOWNLOAD Robert Cardinal Sarah Letter (Full)

THE PROGRESSIVE LITURGY CAMP may be accused of many things, but one thing is certain: they know how to spin. Consider what they did with the clear mandate of Vatican II regarding the use of Latin. Support for Sacrosanctum Concilium—the document which orders Latin to be preserved—was adopted by a nearly unanimous vote. When someone at the Council suggested caution in allowing the vernacular—lest Latin be abandoned—the Council fathers roared with laughter. Yet, certain parties 1 have “spun” the truth so successfully that 95% of Catholics believe Vatican II wanted to get rid of Latin—and those attempting to reintroduce it face tremendous opposition.

But how will they spin Cardinal Sarah’s testimony? Will they say Francis was coerced into making that statement? Our current pope doesn’t strike me as someone easily browbeaten. By the way, in terms of the appointment of Cardinal Sarah, for months certain parties got involved with irresponsible gossip from “anonymous sources” saying Bugnini’s former secretary was to be appointed CDW prefect. Our contributors refused to give such prattle any credence. 2

But the letter below is not based on “anonymous sources.” It’s legitimate, and perhaps the most powerful postconciliar letter since Sacrificium Laudis.

Here it is in its entirety:


I. It is my pleasure to greet all of you, gathered in New York City, for the inaugural conference of SACRA LITURGIA in the United States of America. In particular, I greet His Eminence, Timothy Cardinal Dolan, the Archbishop of New York, and thank him for his interest in and support of this event underlining the essential role of liturgical formation and celebration in the life and mission of the Church.

669 Cordileone I was very pleased to be present at the launch of the Italian and English editions of the proceedings of SACRA LITURGIA 2013 in Rome last November, and congratulate Bishop Dominique Rey and all who work with him on making this happy initiative a reality, now also in the United States of America.

I greet His Eminence, Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke, who will present the keynote address. And I greet all the bishops, priests, religious, and learned lay men and women who will make presentations as well as those who will celebrate the Sacred Liturgy and preach in the coming days. Your apostolate in promoting the Sacred Liturgy is a most important one in our time: I thank you for all that you do.

2. Because the Sacred Liturgy is truly the font from which all the Church’s power flows, as the Second Vatican Council insists (cf. Sacrosanctum Concilium, §10), we must do everything we can to put the Sacred Liturgy back at the very heart of the relationship between God and man, recognizing the primacy of Almighty God in this privileged and unique forum in which we—individually and ecclesially—encounter God at work in our world. One cannot encounter God, my brothers and sisters, without trembling, without awe, without profound respect and holy fear. This is why we must rank what Cardinal Ratzinger called “the right way of celebrating the Liturgy, inwardly and outwardly” first amongst our concerns (Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, The Spirit of the Liturgy, Ignatius Press, San Francisco 2000, p. 9).

3. When the Holy Father, Pope Francis, asked me to accept the ministry of Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments, I asked: “Your Holiness, how do you want me to exercise this ministry? What do you want me to do as Prefect of this Congregation?” The Holy Father’s reply was clear. “I want you to continue to implement the liturgical reform of the Second Vatican Council,” he said, “and I want you to continue the good work in the liturgy begun by Pope Benedict XVI.”

332 Father Christopher Smith My friends, I want you to help me in this task. I ask you to continue to work towards achieving the liturgical aims of the Second Vatican Council (cf. Sacrosanctum Concilium, §1) and to work to continue the liturgical renewal promoted by Pope Benedict XVI, especially through the Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation Sacramentum Caritatis of 22 February 2007 and the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum of 7 July 2007. I ask you to be wise, like the householder in St Matthew’s Gospel, who knows when to bring out of his treasure things both new and old (cf. Matthew 13:52), so that the Sacred Liturgy as it is celebrated and lived today may lose nothing of the inestimable riches of the Church’s liturgical tradition, whilst always being open to legitimate development (cf. Sacrosanctum Concilium, §23).

4. You have many days in which to consider these questions in depth. I would like to suggest two critical areas in which authentic liturgical renewal in the twenty-first century can be furthered. The first is by being utterly clear what Catholic liturgy is: it is the worship of Almighty God, the place where mankind encounters God alive and at work in His Church today. Please–never underestimate the importance of this. The liturgy is not some social occasion or meeting where we come first, where what is important is that we express our identity. No: God comes first. As Cardinal Ratzinger wrote in 2004:

If the Liturgy appears first of all as the workshop for our activity, then what is essential is being forgotten: God. For the Liturgy is not about us, but about God. Forgetting about God is the most imminent danger of our age. As against this, the Liturgy should be setting up a sign of God’s presence. (Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, Collected Works: The Theology of the Liturgy, Ignatius Press, San Francisco 2014, p. 593).
The Church’s liturgy is given to us in tradition—it is not for us to make up the rites we celebrate or to change them to suit ourselves or our own ideas beyond the legitimate options permitted by the liturgical books. That is why we must celebrate the Sacred Liturgy faithfully, with that reverence and awe of which I spoke earlier.

5. The second area in which I ask you to give of your time and expertise is in the promotion of sound liturgical formation. The Council’s Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy went so far as to say that “it would be futile to entertain any hopes of realizing” the liturgical renewal it desired “unless the pastors themselves, in the first place, become thoroughly imbued with the spirit and power of the liturgy, and undertake to give instruction about it” (n. 14). We cannot truly participate in the Sacred Liturgy—we cannot drink deeply from the source of Christian life—if we have not been formed in the spirit and power of the liturgy. As our Holy Father, Pope Francis, said last year:

Much remains to be done for a correct and complete assimilation of the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy on the part of the baptized and by ecclesial communities. I refer in particular to the commitment to a strong and organic initiation and liturgical formation of the lay faithful as well as the clergy and consecrated persons. (Message to the participants of the Roman Symposium on Sacrosanctum Concilium, 18 February 2014)
I hope and I pray that the different initiatives of SACRA LITURGIA can do much to meet this urgent and crucial need.

5. Dear brothers in the episcopate, dear priests, deacons and religious, dear lay men and women, your participation in this conference is a sign that you are already aware of the importance of the Sacred Liturgy in the life of the Church. I thank you for your willingness to give of your time to study and consider this reality further. I pray that these days may increase your wisdom and knowledge, that they will help you to grow in holiness, and that they will make you ever more zealous in promoting authentic liturgical renewal in the Church.

I hope I will be able to join you for the next SACRA LITURGIA Meeting of July 2016 in London.

Please pray for me that I may faithfully exercise the service to which I have been called. May God bless you always!


Cardinal Sarah mentioned the “good work” of Pope Benedict XVI. One of my favorite lines from Cardinal Ratzinger is as follows:
I shall never forget lying on the ground at the time of my own priestly and episcopal ordination. When I was ordained bishop, my intense feeling of inadequacy, incapacity, in the face of the greatness of the task was even stronger than at my priestly ordination. The fact that the Ecclesia Orans was calling upon all the saints—that the prayer of the Church really was enveloping and embracing me—was a wonderful consolation. In my incapacity, which had to be expressed in the bodily posture of prostration, this prayer, this presence of all the saints, of the living and the dead, was a wonderful strength—it was the only thing that could, as it were, lift me up.

1   One prominent reformer even made the following claim (and notice how he begins by knocking down a straw man argument about Latin being the “original” language—an argument never put forward by any serious person):

“Although it is not the original language of the Roman rite by any means, the Latin language is here acknowledged to have the first or principal place, and as such it is to be retained. It may be that in some areas the retention will simply mean employing the Latin texts as the basis for translating into the vernacular, at least in the case of those parts of the Roman rite which are themselves original, such as the collects.”
2   When Piero Marini was passed over in favor of Cardinal Sarah, these same gossipmongers changed their stories. The new story—again based on “anonymous sources in Rome”—was that Pope Francis wanted to appoint Bugnini’s secretary, but sinister forces prevented him. Such gossip is rather typical. We Americans are often enamored with anything foreign/exotic/Roman. I cannot tell you the number of times I’ve heard someone say, “The Pope is going to do such-and-such because my friend who studied at the Angelicum told me.”


Anonymous said...

The novus ordo needs to reinstate the 7 sacrament's in their original form,including most importantly holy orders.The mass is meaningless If you don't have valid priests/bishops!Quo Primum 1570 A.D.renders all arguments on any other mass besides the tridentine mass null & void!

Rood Screen said...


Please cite which canon or decree of which ecumenical council gives one pope authority to prevent further development of a liturgical rite by other popes.

John Nolan said...

Children, children! Popes and Councils never interfered with liturgy until Pius V and Trent, when the Church was faced with Protestant deformations (or, to use Vatican Two-speech, restorations) of the liturgy. Also the invention of printing (the most significant innovation in information technology of the last thousand years) was bound to lead to increased uniformity.

Popes did intervene to correct abuses, but it was not until the 20th century and Pius X that there was a determined attempt to regulate liturgical practice from the centre. Pius XII continued this trend and it reached its apogee in 1969 with the imposition of a completely different rite by Paul VI. The irony was that this new rite, while imposed from Rome, had been devised by those who disliked the Roman Rite which they had inherited and wanted to move away from it.

Anonymous said...

Someone on praytell mentioned it in a comment to a post on vox clara and everyone ignored it. At least we know they are aware of it.

MR said...

The day we went from being sure it was going to be Marini, to getting Cardinal Sarah instead, was a beautiful day. Thank God for Card Sarah!

George said...

Anonymous seems to be describing a Church in schism with itself -either that or I'm misconstruing his statement.

Rood Screen said...

The recent words of Cardinal Sarah have given me encouragement. I just hope he somehow manages to accomplish something that affects the average Catholic of the Latin Church.

A problem emerging in my diocese is the growing number of young priests who insist on reverent celebrations of the Holy Mass, but who are assigned to parishes where the laymen are determined to oppose such reverence "by any means necessary".

Angry Augustinian said...

Well, then, the lay people can literally step to Hell.

rcg said...

We had a guest priest today from Cameroon. He told us there were permanent deacons or altar girls there.

Anonymous said...

You all should take a look at the comment box over at the "Crux" website just very nasty and uneducated comments about His Grace Cardinal Burke and His Excellency Archbishop Cordelione about the "costumes" such as lace, the cappa magna, birettas, how the priests and seminarians tip thier birettas when the name of Jesus Christ is mentioned. Just very digusting and you would think these comments are being made by Evangelicals who hate the Holy Roman Church, but these are Novus Ordonarians and with these types of comments folks makes me even more strong in my belief how the TLM is very powerful and scares the living daylights out of Novus Ordonarians!!

Angry Augustinian said...

RCG, did you mean there were "no" permanent deacons or altar girls there?

rcg said...

Yes, JJ. iPhone autocorrects everything I do. I have been thinking of marrying it.

John Nolan said...

I visited the Crux combox. The comments are not much different from those at NCR, the Tablet or PrayTell. One in particular sums up the depths of ignorance which characterizes even practising Catholics. The priest should face the people because at Mass 'he is talking to his parishioners'. Well done Bugnini. Well done Novus Ordo. We certainly know what the Mass is about now. This must be the new ecclesiology Fr Kavanaugh is forever wittering on about.