Translate

Saturday, September 1, 2018

BOMBSHELL OR FIRECRACKER, I ASK, YOU ANSWER

 I will go out on a limb here, but this whole peculiar scandal has to do with the Catholic schism on homosexuality . The footnote in Amoris Laetitia, is a deceitful attempt to make heterodoxy look like orthodoxy and is meant to collapse Catholic moral teachings on sexuality and prepare the Catholic Church to embrace the Anglican Church’s modernism, not only on divorce and remarriage, but on homosexual marriage and female ordination. It is an attempt to subvert natural law as well.

Thus Archbishop Viganò’s new bombshell testimony connects more dots:

Remember them?

Featured Image

Lifesite reports this, this morning:

Here below is the official English text of Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò’s statement on Pope Francis private meeting with Kim Davis and what really happened. The English text may also be accessed in pdf form here, while a pdf of the Italian original may be read here. Emphasis not added.
***
Pope Francis met privately with Kim Davis: here is what really happened
by
His Excellency Carlo Maria Viganò
Titular Archbishop of di Ulpiana
Apostolic Nuncio
On August 28, 2018, the New York Times reported part of a conversation that Juan Carlos Cruz, the most well known Chilean sexual abuse victim of Father Karadima and Bishop Barros, allegedly had with Pope Francis. Inexplicably, in his conversation with Cruz, the Pope is said to have spoken about his meeting with Kim Davis during his visit to Washington on September 24, 2015, and to have said that he knew nothing about the case before the meeting.
Faced with the Pope’s reported statement, I feel obliged to recount the events as they really unfolded.
At the end of the dinner, at the Nunciature in Washington, on the evening of September 23, 2015, I told the Pope that I needed him to grant me a half hour, because I wished to bring to his attention, and possible approval, a delicate and easily achievable initiative; that is, to meet personally and in a completely confidential way, out of the media spotlight, with Kim Davis, a clerk in Rowan County, Kentucky, the first American citizen condemned and imprisoned for one week for having exercised her right to conscientious objection.
At the beginning of our meeting, on the evening of September 23, I gave the Pope a one-page memo summarizing the Davis case (here attached in Italian and English). The Pope immediately appeared in favor of such an initiative, but added that the meeting would have political implications, and said, “I don’t understand these things, so it would be good for you to hear Cardinal Parolin’s opinion.”
It was already 9:30 in the evening, so I went in person with two of the counselors of the Nunciature (an Italian and a Lithuanian) to the hotel not far away, where the Pope’s entourage was being hosted. Since I had called ahead to give advance notice of my arrival, His Excellency Archbishop Angelo Becciu (Substitute of the Secretary of State) and His Excellency Archbishop Paul Gallagher (Secretary for Relations with States, and Head of the Political Section of the Secretariat of State) were waiting for me in the hotel lobby. They immediately notified me that Cardinal Parolin had already retired to his room, and they did not consider it appropriate to disturb him, since they could easily make him aware of our meeting the following morning.
We then met in a small lounge of the hotel. As I said, there were five of us. I gave them the same memo that I had given to the Pope, setting forth its content and explaining the reason for my visit, which had been requested by the Pope. After considering the case, Archbishop Becciu was immediately in favor of the Pope receiving Davis privately before he left Washington for New York.
Archbishop Gallagher, while showing support for the idea given the importance of defending the right to conscientious objection, said that it was appropriate to verify from the point of view of common law whether there were any reasons that would render the meeting inadvisable; namely, whether the legal proceedings brought against Davis were concluded or were still open. I therefore had him speak by telephone with the canonist for the Nunciature, who before becoming a priest had been a judge in the American military courts and a professor of canon law. After the conversation with the canonist to clarify matters — he said there were no procedural obstacles — Bishop Gallagher gave an unconditionally favorable opinion that the Pope should receive Davis.
The following morning, after the Mass that the Pope concelebrated with us in the Nunciature, I informed the Pope of the positive opinion of his two principal collaborators, who had then told Cardinal Parolin about our meeting. The Pope then gave his consent, and I organized to have Davis come to the Nunciature without anyone noticing, by having her sit in a separate room. Everything was made much easier by the fact that Davis was already in Washington, where she was invited to receive a Cost of Discipleship Award from the Family Research Council.
Before the meeting took place, I alerted the photographer from L’Osservatore Romano that he should not release the photographs of the meeting without the permission of his superiors. He of course observed the orders, but took many photographs, which have never been published, and are currently kept in the photographic archive of L’Osservatore Romano. I also had Davis promise me in advance that she would not give any news to the media until after the Pope’s return to Rome, at the end of his pastoral visit to the USA. Davis faithfully kept her promise.
Early in the afternoon of September 24, before leaving for New York City, the Pope entered as planned into the sitting room where Davis and her husband were waiting for him. He embraced her affectionately, thanked her for her courage, and invited her to persevere. Davis was very moved and started crying. She was then taken back to her hotel in a car driven by a pontifical gendarme, accompanied by an American Monsignor and staff member of the Nunciature.
Once the Pope returned to Rome from Philadelphia after the World Meeting with the Families, the news of his meeting with Davis broke out in the media. An avalanche of phone calls, faxes and emails arrived at the Nunciature in Washington and the Vatican Press Office, many with insults and protests, but also many in favor of the Pope’s meeting with Davis. In an article of September 30, 2015, the New York Timesreported that “Vatican officials initially would not confirm that the meeting occurred, finally doing so on Wednesday afternoon, while refusing to discuss any details.” The Vatican Press Office then issued a statement — without their superiors in the Secretariat of State ever consulting me — stating that the Pope had never received Davis in a private audience, and that at most he may have greeted her among many other people before departing for New York. Father Rosica and Father Lombardi increased added to the lies, and were quoted as follows in the October 2, 2015 edition of the New York Times: “But the Rev. Thomas Rosica, a Vatican spokesman, said on Friday that the office of Archbishop Viganò had extended the invitation to Ms. Davis and that the Pope was probably not briefed about her case. And the Rev. Federico Lombardi, the chief Vatican spokesman, depicted the meeting as one meet-and-greet among many.” This is the transparency of the Holy See under Pope Francis!
The next morning, at about 6:00 a.m. in Washington — I remember it well because I had just entered the chapel at the Nunciature — I received a frantic telephone call from Cardinal Parolin, who told me “You must come immediately to Rome because the Pope is furious with you!” I left as soon as possible and was received by the Pope at the Domus Sanctae Marthae, around 7 o’clock in the evening on October 9, at the conclusion of one of the afternoon sessions of the Second Synod on the Family.
The Pope received me for almost an hour, and was very affectionate and paternal. He immediately apologized to me for troubling me with coming to Rome, and he lavished continuous praise on me for the way I had organized his visit to the USA, and for the incredible reception he received in America. He never expected such a welcome.
To my great surprise, during this long meeting, the Pope did not mention even once the audience with Davis!
As soon as my audience with the Pope was over, I immediately phoned Cardinal Parolin, and said to him, “The Pope was so good with me. Not a word of reproach, only praise for the success of his visit to the USA.”At which point Cardinal Parolin replied, “It’s not possible, because with me he was furious about you.”
This is a summary of the events.
As mentioned at the beginning, on August 28, 2018, the New York Times reported an interview with Juan Carlos Cruz, in which Cruz reported that during his meeting with the Pope, in April 2018, the Pope told him about the Davis case. According to Cruz, the Pope said: “I did not know who the woman was and he [Msgr. Viganò] snuck her in to say hello to me — and of course they made a whole publicity out of it. And I was horrified and I fired that Nuncio.”
One of them is lying: either Cruz or the Pope? What is certain is that the Pope knew very well who Davis was, and he and his close collaborators had approved the private audience. Journalists can always check, by asking the prelates Becciu, Gallagher and Parolin, as well as the Pope himself.
It is clear, however, that Pope Francis wanted to conceal the private audience with the first American citizen condemned and imprisoned for conscientious objection.
+ Carlo Maria Viganò
Titular Archbishop di Ulpiana
Apostolic Nuncio
August 30, 2018
Feast of Saint Jeanne Jugan and Blessed Alfredo Ildefonso Schuster
Official translation by Diane Montagna

5 comments:

Dan said...

Yes! This is exactly what The Francis was elected to do! The elite, including Francis, think they are smarter than all the saints and fathers of the Church. Indeed, I'll say they consider themselves smarter than Christ. They figure He was bound by those "limited conceptual resources" mentioned in “Gaudete et Exsultate."

I think the pride in this one is so great that even if the cardinals finally deposed him and declared his election to pope invalid, he would invite everyone who still wants to pretend he's pope to join him in a "new, more enlighted, "catholic" church.... and many would.

Anonymous said...

"...to meet personally and in a completely confidential way..."

Until I, Archbishop Vigano, decide that it is in my interest to violate the confidentiality.

"It is clear, however, that Pope Francis wanted to conceal the private audience with the first American citizen condemned and imprisoned for conscientious objection."

It is quite clear that Archbishop Viagno knows little or nothing about prisoners of conscience in the USA.

James Thomson Callender was imprisoned in the mid-1800's under the Sedition Act. His "crime?" He called President Adams a, "repulsive pedant, a gross hypocrite and an unprincipled oppressor."

There were several other prisoners of conscience convicted under similar circumstances.

Maybe he should read about the thousands of civil rights activists arrested and imprisoned for their peaceful opposition to racial oppression and segregation. You know, people like Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

He has obviously never heard of the Catonsville Nine who were imprisoned for their conscientious objection to American involvement in Vietnam.

Methinks the good Archbishop needs a good researcher on his staff.



Anonymous said...

It doesn't seem like a big deal to me. we know that Parolin is probably part of the problem in the Vatican so it seems possible that he was trying to get Vigano fired and got Francis on his side and brought Vigano over to Rome for the event only to be disappointed because by that time Francis had forgotten he was supposed to be mad.

From past events we know that Francis, as a good populist, tailors his message to flatter his audience. Most notably, his "don't breed like rabbits" speech was made on a plane to secular journalists who would all likely follow the Paul Ehrlich school of overpopulation. Then just a few days later he was before a conference of families and was all "I <3 big families!". So it's conceivable that Parolin was telling Francis "Vigano has to go! He's ideological! He's conservative!" and Francis was going along with it just to keep him happy, then when Vigano shows up Francis has to pander to a different audience and is "Great meeting! Hell of a time! Did you see those crowds!"

Parolin may be the problem here but unless it reveals Parolin's baleful influence on the McCarrick affair, I have a hard time getting too excited over it.

Henry said...

Not even a tiny firecracker. This is all trivia. Whatever he said, they said about this inconsequential incident makes no difference in the larger picture of homosexuality in the clergy and hierarchy and its effect on liturgy, dogma, and morality.

DJR said...

Anonymous said..."'...to meet personally and in a completely confidential way...' Until I, Archbishop Vigano, decide that it is in my interest to violate the confidentiality."

And then after I, Archbishop Vigano, violate the confidentiality, the authorities in the Vatican will shamelessly and openly lie about what happened, including the pope, who knew exactly what was going on beforehand and apparently changed his tune only when it became known to the outside world.

Methinks the people in the Vatican, including the pope, need to read the Gospels, paying particular attention to the portion where Our Lord speaks about who the father of lies is.