INTERREGNUM…
Fr. McD: Regarding your penultimate paragraph, do you mean to suggest that the Novus Ordo, unlike the Tridentine, strongly resembles a Protestant liturgy? Why, that's impossible. Everyone knows that there's nothing Protestant about the NO. ;-)
The Missa Cantata is not a sung Low Mass, since you don't start with a Low Mass and work upwards; you start with a Solemn Mass and work downwards. Paragraph 26 of Universae Ecclesiae (2011) clarifies the situation regarding vernacular readings:" ... lectiones Sanctae Missae quae in Missali anni 1962 continentur, proferri possunt aut solum Latine, aut Latine, vernacula sequente versione, aut in Missis lectis etiam solum vernacule".The option for having readings only in the vernacular therefore only applies to the "read Mass" (Missa lecta), the term used since 1960 for the Low Mass, which previously had been known as "Missa privata". Not to the sung Mass. Sorry.
It's not a matter of opinion or semantics subject to argument. Only the Church is competent to say what it means by terms like low Mass, sung Mass, etc. And in regard to the traditional Latin Mass, the Church has spoken officially many times, most recently (for the EF) in Musica Sacra (1958):3. There are two kinds of Masses: the sung Mass ("Missa in cantu"), and the read Mass ("Missa lecta"), commonly called low Mass.There are two kinds of sung Mass: one called a solemn Mass if it is celebrated with the assistance of other ministers, a deacon and a sub-deacon; the other called a high Mass if there is only the priest celebrant who sings all the parts proper to the sacred ministers.So that's it, the low Mass is one thing. The sung Mass, whether with or without deacon and subdeacon, is another thing. No form of low Mass is sung, and no sung Mass is a low Mass.Case closed. Nothing left to discuss. No contrary opinion is admissible.
This is our heritage! How can the people be edified if they aren't even taught their heritage? The written directives of the recent council are then utterly ignored! There are reasons music and rite developed as they did: side by side. Authentic Catholic music, entirely in line with the doctrine and Tradition of Holy Mother Church, has no better setting than in Most Holy Mass. By all means encourage the laity to involve themselves in Most Holy Mass, but not to the ignorance of Him at the altar stone. Change the prayer and you change the belief, the person. This is why Pope emeritus BXVI kept repeating that the reformed liturgy needed further reforming so as to correct the current status of Catholic formation. Do more than just restore the Propers - insist upon them!/rant
Post a Comment
4 comments:
Fr. McD: Regarding your penultimate paragraph, do you mean to suggest that the Novus Ordo, unlike the Tridentine, strongly resembles a Protestant liturgy? Why, that's impossible. Everyone knows that there's nothing Protestant about the NO. ;-)
The Missa Cantata is not a sung Low Mass, since you don't start with a Low Mass and work upwards; you start with a Solemn Mass and work downwards. Paragraph 26 of Universae Ecclesiae (2011) clarifies the situation regarding vernacular readings:
" ... lectiones Sanctae Missae quae in Missali anni 1962 continentur, proferri possunt aut solum Latine, aut Latine, vernacula sequente versione, aut in Missis lectis etiam solum vernacule".
The option for having readings only in the vernacular therefore only applies to the "read Mass" (Missa lecta), the term used since 1960 for the Low Mass, which previously had been known as "Missa privata". Not to the sung Mass. Sorry.
It's not a matter of opinion or semantics subject to argument. Only the Church is competent to say what it means by terms like low Mass, sung Mass, etc. And in regard to the traditional Latin Mass, the Church has spoken officially many times, most recently (for the EF) in Musica Sacra (1958):
3. There are two kinds of Masses: the sung Mass ("Missa in cantu"), and the read Mass ("Missa lecta"), commonly called low Mass.
There are two kinds of sung Mass: one called a solemn Mass if it is celebrated with the assistance of other ministers, a deacon and a sub-deacon; the other called a high Mass if there is only the priest celebrant who sings all the parts proper to the sacred ministers.
So that's it, the low Mass is one thing. The sung Mass, whether with or without deacon and subdeacon, is another thing. No form of low Mass is sung, and no sung Mass is a low Mass.
Case closed. Nothing left to discuss. No contrary opinion is admissible.
This is our heritage! How can the people be edified if they aren't even taught their heritage? The written directives of the recent council are then utterly ignored! There are reasons music and rite developed as they did: side by side. Authentic Catholic music, entirely in line with the doctrine and Tradition of Holy Mother Church, has no better setting than in Most Holy Mass. By all means encourage the laity to involve themselves in Most Holy Mass, but not to the ignorance of Him at the altar stone. Change the prayer and you change the belief, the person. This is why Pope emeritus BXVI kept repeating that the reformed liturgy needed further reforming so as to correct the current status of Catholic formation. Do more than just restore the Propers - insist upon them!
/rant
Post a Comment