I AM SURE THE GOOD BISHOP BELIEVES THAT VATICAN II OPENED PROCESSES THAT ALLOWS HIM TO DO THIS

 Headline from Lifesite News:

Mexican bishop ‘concelebrates’ Mass with lesbian Anglican in homosexual ‘marriage’ who received Eucharist

---

Bishop Raúl Vera López hosted lesbian ‘pastor’ Emilie Teresa Smith for a Mass where she whispered the words of consecration, elevated the chalice, and gave the homily in contradiction to Catholic teaching and canon law.

Please note the “married: Lesbian concelebrant’s arm tattoo too:

Another reason why Pope Leo needs to reform the Modern Mass and make it just like the TLM but allowing some vernacular:

Watch the Mercifully short “X” Video HERE.

Please note that the good Mexican bishop, perhaps old and senile, allows a lay Anglican Lesbian in a civil “marriage” with another woman and who herself claims to be a “priestess” is allowed to concelebrate this Catholic Mass with a Catholic bishop. 

Please note too, how the bishop gives his concelebrant the Host! Very reverent, no?

I have some canonical questions that I can’t answer, so you doctors of the canon law help me out?

1. Would this bishop incur automatic excommunication for profanation of the Holy Eucharist and the Mass itself? Is what he is doing, especially the manner in which he gives a non-Catholic invited to concelebrate the Mass (and without her Anglican vestments to boot) sacrilegious and thus leading to automatic excommunication?

2. We don’t know from the video, but if the good bishop allowed this Anglican lay person who has received an invalid ordination to the Anglican priesthood, to say some portions of the Eucharistic Prayer, would that invalidate the Mass? I know it is certainly illicit, but does her saying a part of the Eucharistic prayer invalidate that prayer? Hopefully it did and thus the Host that the bishop gives her in a flippant way isn’t really the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of the Glorified and Risen Christ?