Headline from Lifesite News:
Mexican bishop ‘concelebrates’ Mass with lesbian Anglican in homosexual ‘marriage’ who received Eucharist
Bishop Raúl Vera López hosted lesbian ‘pastor’ Emilie Teresa Smith for a Mass where she whispered the words of consecration, elevated the chalice, and gave the homily in contradiction to Catholic teaching and canon law.
Please note the “married: Lesbian concelebrant’s arm tattoo too:
Another reason why Pope Leo needs to reform the Modern Mass and make it just like the TLM but allowing some vernacular:
Watch the Mercifully short “X” Video HERE.
Please note that the good Mexican bishop, perhaps old and senile, allows a lay Anglican Lesbian in a civil “marriage” with another woman and who herself claims to be a “priestess” is allowed to concelebrate this Catholic Mass with a Catholic bishop.
Please note too, how the bishop gives his concelebrant the Host! Very reverent, no?
I have some canonical questions that I can’t answer, so you doctors of the canon law help me out?
1. Would this bishop incur automatic excommunication for profanation of the Holy Eucharist and the Mass itself? Is what he is doing, especially the manner in which he gives a non-Catholic invited to concelebrate the Mass (and without her Anglican vestments to boot) sacrilegious and thus leading to automatic excommunication?
2. We don’t know from the video, but if the good bishop allowed this Anglican lay person who has received an invalid ordination to the Anglican priesthood, to say some portions of the Eucharistic Prayer, would that invalidate the Mass? I know it is certainly illicit, but does her saying a part of the Eucharistic prayer invalidate that prayer? Hopefully it did and thus the Host that the bishop gives her in a flippant way isn’t really the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of the Glorified and Risen Christ?
5 comments:
No he got a slap on the wrist from the Nuncio, so no excommunication.
The mass is valid, the minimum needed is the words of consecration.
"I AM SURE THE GOOD BISHOP BELIEVES THAT VATICAN II OPENED PROCESSES THAT ALLOWS HIM TO DO THIS"
Bishop José Raúl Vera López, O.P., had grown up with the TLM...ordained by Pope Saint Paul VI...elevated by Pope Saint John Paul II to the rank of bishop...
...remained in communion with Popes Francis (requiescat in pace), Benedict XVI (requiescat in pace), as well as Leo XIV.
Given all of the above solid background, Bishop López, O.P., believes that Vatican II justified his actions in question? If that is correct, then that is beyond comprehension.
Pax.
Mark Thomas
Oh, we're still running with this stupid notion that 15 years of the TLM over half a century ago is more formative on these octogenarians than the 60 years of sloppified liturgy since then?
"remained in communion"
Apparently he's also in communion with a fake-ordained priestess who is part of a group of heretics and schismatics. Whoops! Does that mean the Pope is in union with the fake-ordained priestess? Talk about awkward!
Nick
Fine. Let us forget that Bishop José Raúl Vera López, O.P. had, for years, been formed by the TLM. That, as I had made clear, is just a part of his background.
He has been a priest since 1975 A.D. 50 years. He has served during six Pontificates. If "sloppified liturgy," rather than six Popes, have formed him liturgically/spiritually...
...if he has failed to comprehend Vatican II as interpreted/implemented by the six Popes in question, then the bishop is one very confused Catholic.
Pax.
Mark Thomas
MT,
Somehow, I suspect a priest's liturgical formation during seminary and by his direct ecclesial superiors and associates (his own bishop, pastors under which he was a vicar, his compadres) often has more to do with the oft-ignored documents of the popes on liturgy. I don't think we should count the number of papal directions widely ignored by the bishops and priests of the world, from Ecclesia Dei Adflicta to Summorum Pontificum to Redemptionis Sacramentum. We'd be here far too long.
Nick
Post a Comment