You can read the Washington Post essay in full by pressing the title:
The promise and peril of the Catholic Church
The conflict between obedience, hierarchy and social justice.
Excerpts:
(Sheen's) media platforms — “Life Is Worth Living,” his earlier radio program,
“The Catholic Hour,” and his dozens of books — to espouse a form of
social justice that emphasized the rights of the poor and workers.
Preaching at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City, Sheen called on
employers to pay their workers a living wage. Another sermon proposed
the formation of trade guilds whose members would share in the profits
of their factory. On “Life Is Worth Living,” Sheen celebrated the growth
of unions as a necessary counterweight to “the moneyed power of the
capitalist.”
The
Vatican II Council, convened from 1962 to 1965, engaged Sheen in an
international conversation about the Catholic Church’s future. He called
for mobile schools for the poor and the creation of chaplains to
minister to factory workers, while also suggesting that wealthy
Catholics be encouraged to give some of their possessions to the poor.
Vatican II changed the Catholic Church in ways that aligned with Sheen’s vision. The documents issued by the council, including Gaudium et Spes,
the most important, denounced “immense economic inequalities” and
“social discrimination.” But they also reaffirmed the importance of
authority within the church, especially obedience of priests to their
bishops.
Vatican II changed the Catholic Church in ways that aligned with Sheen’s vision. The documents issued by the council, including Gaudium et Spes,
the most important, denounced “immense economic inequalities” and
“social discrimination.” But they also reaffirmed the importance of
authority within the church, especially obedience of priests to their
bishops.
Sheen
believed that Rochester’s mixture of wealth and poverty made it the
perfect place to implement the vision of Vatican II. One observer noted,
“It appeared certain that many of the changes fostered by Vatican
Council II … will be instituted in the Rochester diocese.” And they
were: with all the contradictions and challenges that entailed.
Sheen
emphasized social justice, especially for Rochester’s African American
population. In a speech to the Rochester U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Sheen
chided the assembled business executives for ignoring the inner city’s
distress. The bishop also took action, appointing P. David Finks, a
priest who had worked with radical organizer Saul Alinsky, to the newly
created position of Vicar of Urban Ministry. He imposed a progressive
tax on church construction in the diocese, with the collected money to
be spent in the inner city. And he created an organization to raise money from the diocese to help families find adequate housing.
When change came from below, rather than from the bishop’s office, Sheen
reacted with hostility. He condemned the nontraditional “underground
masses” held by some Rochester Catholics as a “perversion of the holy.”
In the spirit of ecumenism, Sheen sought to merge the local Catholic
seminary with the Protestant Rochester-Colgate Theological Seminary —
but when members of Rochester-Colgate’s Black Student Caucus took over a
campus building to protest the lack of African American faculty, Sheen
killed the proposed merger.
Sheen’s
desire to seek social justice through top-down methods ultimately
proved fatal to his vision. In 1968, frustrated at his inability to
bridge the gap between suburban Catholics and Rochester’s inner city,
Sheen presented Robert Weaver, the secretary for Housing and Urban
Development, with a remarkable offer: The bishop would hand over an
entire parish, St. Bridget’s, to the government if the government
promised to use the property for public housing.
2 comments:
The Church has always been there to foster justice and help the materially and spiritually poor, performing countless acts of great spiritual and corporal mercy, such as by building hospitals, orphanages, etc. If social justice was something Vatican II brought about in the Church, and it seems to be so, then it shows that this Council was nothing more than a limited product of its times, being overwhelmingly influenced by the secular world of the 1960s in which social Marxism was ubiquitous.
I was surprised at the tone of the excerpts so clicked the link. When I saw it was the Washington Post, I thought "It figures."
Post a Comment