The Mass celebrated at the “pre-Vatican II Council of the Media” shows the splendor of externals of the Mass prior heretical and heterodox Catholics interpreting Vatican II and even Bugnini’s Mass.
But look at the box covered in a “wizard” sort of covering. If you asked a non-Catholic to compare that box to the altar where the ancient Mass is taking place, what would they say about it? What would Catholics think, immediately following Vatican II, to see that box replacing the glorious altar behind it?
What does that do to the Catholic psyche in terms of which is more important, more reverent, more splendid and more important?
Keep in mind, that if the Bugnini Mass were mandated to be celebrated in the way that the Ancient Mass was celebrated, that the Mass in the photo above could well be a Bugnini Mass and the box below that glorious altar would not be there.
4 comments:
Cranmer's Table looks so out of place. It is sad that so much treasure was spent on "renovating" sanctuaries to accommodate false scholarship.
A "wizard" covering... You mean the stars, very similar to the wizard wall painting the current pastor put all over the wall behind the tabernacle and crucifix at St. Anne, Richmond Hill?
That pretty much sums that kind of clutter up.
Is the ‘box’ in fact the crib and Altar?
Post a Comment