Pope Francis is the most pedestrian pope we've had and very pastoral, like a country pastor. This can be good or bad for the papacy depending on your ideologies.
There's so much to like here, except when the Holy Father is so judgemental about the doctors of the law who say "yes"and "no." This is problematic on many levels and is the cause of so much turmoil in the Church today as well as outright division and the possibility of schism.
So today's Gospel was about Jesus return marriage to what God intended for it in the first place and yes it is Jesus who calls those who divorce their spouse and marry another adulterers. He doesn't mince His words so I guess this makes Him a Doctor of the Law??????
There's so much to like here, except when the Holy Father is so judgemental about the doctors of the law who say "yes"and "no." This is problematic on many levels and is the cause of so much turmoil in the Church today as well as outright division and the possibility of schism.
So today's Gospel was about Jesus return marriage to what God intended for it in the first place and yes it is Jesus who calls those who divorce their spouse and marry another adulterers. He doesn't mince His words so I guess this makes Him a Doctor of the Law??????
5 comments:
Being a true pastor means speaking the truth plainly. We need to move past this era where “pastoral” is a euphemism for “heretic who tells people what they want to hear.”
I suppose the good is HH's emphasis on the beauty of the sacrament and what is questionable is focusing solely on the positive at the expense of the negative.
As for the accompanying photo, it is good to see HH "modeling" the liturgical richness of the Church by continuing to celebrate daily mass in a chapel with no clear delineation between the altar and the nave, with partly vested concelebrants and a temporary end table/telephone table with a table runner/doile for the reliquary.
Marc,
Bingo!
I am no Mark Thomas, but I cringe at the premise of looking through the Pope’s homily to judge what is good and what is questionable. Then I see one anyway. The translation has him saying that a misfortune results in the need for separation. I totally reject that idea. If the marriage is valid to start then it is there so that the couple help each other endure misfortune. If it is discovered that the marriage should never have been, then they can pursue annulment. The misfortune was the flawed marriage, not a subsequent circumstance.
r cg, what else would you expect from an “all about me” culture? Once you marry and have children, you are no longer free to choose, unless you are self-centered
Post a Comment