Tuesday, October 11, 2011


An excerpt: “The Diocesan Bishop is also given the faculty to permit Communion under both kinds whenever it may seem appropriate to the Priest to whom a community has been entrusted as its own shepherd, provided that the faithful have been well instructed and that there is no danger of profanation of the Sacrament or of the rite’s becoming difficult because of the large number of participants or for some other cause (Roman Missal, 283).

Most Rev. Robert C. Morlino
Bishop of Madison

October 10, 2011

Dear Brother Priests,

As I stated at the Presbyteral Assembly, and as I clarified in a letter to all of you, my chief intention in considering specific points in the liturgy, is simply to encourage throughout the diocese, a greater sense of reverence and a real truthfulness in what we say and do at the Mass. I still plan to send you some bullet points with regard to specific matters we discussed, but one individual point seems already to have drawn attention, and so I feel I must send and make public this letter to assist all of us in our teaching office.

There can be no doubt that the need for catechesis exists. There is also little doubt that some of these matters can be difficult to catechize. Without my issuing any public instruction other than a letter confirming my personal request to you to teach your people according to the General Instruction of the Roman Missal, the “blogosphere,” has begun speculation and, perhaps, innuendo that I have decreed communion under both species should be completely done away with. You and I both know, no such decree has been, or will be made. As you know, and as I hope you are telling those who wonder, all I’ve done is to ask you patiently, prudently, and practically, to begin instructing your people according to the Roman Missal and implementing the General Instruction.

Since there seems to be some confusion with regard to what the GIRM says, I’ll remind you that you can order the document on-line from the USCCB Office of Liturgy (making certain that it’s the third edition). Here, however I’ll mention a few germane points from the document and,
specifically, from the “Norms for the Distribution and Reception of Holy Communion under Both Kinds in the Dioceses of the United States of America (Norms),” which the USCCB document includes.

We’ll first go back as far as the Document of the Second Vatican Council, Sacrosanctum Concilium, which states:

“The dogmatic principles which were laid down by the Council of Trent remaining intact, Communion under both kinds may be granted when the bishops think fit, not only to clerics and religious, but also to the laity, in cases to be determined by the Apostolic See, as, for instance, to the newly ordained in the Mass of their sacred ordination, to the newly professed in the Mass of their religious profession, and to the newly baptized in the Mass which follows their baptism (SC, 55).”
Further Clarifications on Presbyteral Assembly - 2 Without here going into the “dogmatic principles laid down by the Council of Trent,” it is worth noting the examples that Vatican II considers when allowing communion under both kinds – newly ordained priests at their ordination, religious sisters and brothers at their profession, and
those coming into the Church at their baptism and first communion. With these examples given by the Council for the distribution of Communion under both species, it would be hard to argue that Vatican II envisioned communion under both forms every week. Now, with the issuance of the Roman Missal, the Church gets more specific in matters such as
these (thus the General Instruction which we are presently using as our guide). The Missal goes further than the Vatican II document, instructing that the Chrism Mass and Corpus Christi would
be good occasions for distributing Communion under both species, as might be the distribution to wedding couples at their marriage, to children receiving their First Communion, to
Confirmation candidates at their Confirmation, to consecrated religious at their conventual Mass, to women and men on retreat, and to deacons and seminarians at any Mass.

The document also allows the pastor to choose certain other days, such as the patronal feast of the parish, to distribute under both forms, so long as the reasons are good and so long as all other conditions are met. But it does warn pastors:

“In practice, the need to avoid obscuring the role of the Priest and the Deacon as the ordinary ministers of Holy Communion by an excessive use of extraordinary ministers might in some circumstances constitute a reason either for limiting the distribution of Holy Communion under both species…(Norms, 24)”

The Third Edition of the Roman Missal reinforces the right of bishops to make additional allowances for reception of Communion under both species, beyond that which the documents
already mention:

“The Diocesan Bishop is also given the faculty to permit Communion under both kinds whenever it may seem appropriate to the Priest to whom a community has been entrusted as its own shepherd, provided that the faithful have been well instructed and that there is no danger of profanation of the Sacrament or of the rite’s becoming difficult because of the large number of participants or for some other cause (Roman Missal, 283).”

This permission has been assumed, if not expressed directly in the past. I recognize this, and I understand fully that communion under both forms at every Mass has become common practice at some parishes.
However, I have been told of, and have personally experienced, the reality that the provision both that the faithful be well instructed and that there be no danger of profanation of the
Sacrament, is not being met. As such, while recognizing the need for patient, prudent and practical steps according to your individual parishes, I’ve asked you to move in this direction.
As I’ve said, over and over again, and as you know well, this requires catechesis.

So many do not understand the Eucharist as the memorial of Christ’s Sacrifice, his death and resurrection;
nor the real presence of Christ, body, blood, soul, and divinity, under both species of bread and Further Clarifications on Presbyteral Assembly - 3
wine; nor the role of the ordinary and, if necessary, extraordinary ministers of the Eucharist.

Most of all (and this has been my point from the start) so many of our people do not understand the kinds of reverence due at all times to the sacrament, whether within the Eucharistic Liturgy or outside the celebration.

This gets back to the need for the new translation, and every point I’ve attempted to make. What we say and do at the Mass, and what we do before the Lord present in the tabernacle matters.

Thus, I cannot in good conscience, allow us to go forward without addressing these matters. That’s specifically what I’ve asked you to do. Please help your people to know and understand
the beautiful gift we have in the Eucharist, to know our obligations of preparing for reception of the Sacrament, both in terms of our preparation through the Sacrament of Confession, our observance of the pre-communion fast, our attending to our attire as best we can, and the like.

Please help them to know of Christ’s presence, fully and entirely in the Sacred Host. Our people know well, the aspect of the Mass which is the Sacred banquet, but help them to know the Eucharist at the Memorial of Christ’s loving Sacrifice for them. Help them to understand your
role in laying down your own life as the minister of Christ’s Body and Blood, present in the Host.

Christ offers Himself, whole and entire, Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity at every Mass to every woman and man who is prepared to receive Him. At the end of the day, our goal should be to
help every, man, woman and child really to understand this, in a profound and life-changing way. If we recognized the gift that we already have, what an impact that would make upon us
and upon the world! So, let us tell out this Good News!

Faithfully yours in Christ,

Most Rev. Robert C. Morlino
Bishop of Madison


Anonymous said...

Kudos to Bp. Morlino!

Joseph Johnson said...

It may well be that the excerpted "loophole" will be how many Dioceses will deal with this issue by using this language to sanction the status quo.

Meanwhile, over at Father Zuhlsdorf's blog he refers to a "National Catholic Distorter" (ehem, "Reporter") article on this issue and Fr. Z comments that, "They (here I think he means Spirit of Vatican II "progressives") are also waking up to the fact that this issue of Communion under both kinds also has implications for their mobs of usually unnecessary Extraordinary Ministers." Meaning that an end to regular Sunday Communion under both kinds takes away the need for Extraordinary Ministers "of the Cup."

Speaking frankly, I don't think I'll be alone among regular commenters on this blog when I say that a lot of us just never have been comfortable or happy with whole idea of EMHC's nor with Communion under the form of the Consecrated Host being taken in the hand.

Many of us (even after Vatican II and the Novus Ordo) were reared to believe that the utmost of care should be used even for the smallest particle of the Holy Eucharist because the smallest visible particle is just as much truly Jesus as the whole Host. The same obtains for the smallest drop of the Precious Blood. We were also brought up to believe that, rightfully, only the ordained (Bishop, Priest or Deacon) should touch the Host or distribute Communion. Altar servers should assist by using hand patens to catch particles which would then be put in the Chalice to be consumed by the priest.

For many of us, the illegitimate (but sanctioned after the fact) change to Communion in the hand and the contemporaneous allowance of EMHC's just fly in the face of what we were brought up to believe about the most Sacred of All.

There's really more than one issue involved in Communion under both kinds (which really, in and of itself shouldn't be a problem for any Catholic even though Communion is still just as complete under one form).

Many of us who are advocates of the Reform of the Reform (as well as the EF) believe that the path back to reverence (and strong Eucharistic Faith) would be best served when we return to receiving Holy Communion (whether under both forms-maybe by intinction, or one form) to be distributed only by its Ordinary Ministers (OMHC's not EMHC's!)--that is, Bishops, Priests and Deacons (and hopefully at a Communion rail--even in the Ordinary Form)!

Templar said...

Joe Johnson hits it out of the park. We are asked (politely) to shut up and accept it, yet these things were brought about illictly. We are Catholic for Pete's sake...we're raised on sin results in penance. But in these situations (communion in the hand etc) it's sin results in acceptance. If it's good for them it's good for us....so just change the rules!! No, no, no, Hierarchy and obedience we are reminded, so great then enforce it on those things illictly brought to the Mass!!

And around and around we go. If the Church can not bring herself to practive what it preaches, how can we put any trust in her at all?