Translate

Tuesday, February 9, 2021

BOMBSHELL: BEGINNING ASH WEDNESDAY CATHOLICS WILL NO LONGER PRAY TO THE “ONE” GOD.

 

Committee on Divine Worship
3211 FOURTH STREET NE · WASHINGTON DC 20017 

Note on a change to the translation of Collect prayers

In May of 2020 the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments wrote to the English-speaking Conferences of Bishops regarding the concluding doxology of the Collects in the Roman Missal (which also appear in other liturgical books).

Specifically, the Congregation pointed out that the current translation – which concludes “[...] in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever” – is incorrect. There is no mention of “one” in the Latin, and “Deus” in the Latin text refers to Christ. Therefore, the correct translation, which is already reflected in the Missal in other languages (including our own USCCB Misal Romano) is simply: “[...] in the unity of the Holy Spirit, God, for ever and ever.” The Cardinal Prefect has pointed out the importance of affirming this Christological truth amid the religious pluralism of today’s world.

English translations of the Missal for use by the faithful prior to the Second Vatican Council reflected the correct translation, as for example the St. Joseph’s Missals of the 1950’s. However, when the post-conciliar texts were published in English, the word “one” was added.

It should be noted that when the translation of the Missal currently in use was in progress, ICEL pointed out the discrepancy to the Congregation in Rome, but was told to retain the use of “one God” in the new translation.

In light of the Congregation’s most recent direction in this matter, the Latin Rite Bishops of the USCCB have voted to amend no. 54 of the U.S. text of the General Instruction of the Roman Missal to reflect the change, and the Congregation has confirmed this decision, as it already has for the Episcopal Conferences of England and Wales, Ireland, and Canada.

This change to the concluding doxology of orations is to be implemented on Ash Wednesday, February 17, 2021. The words “one God, for ever and ever” are simply replaced

with “God, for ever and ever.”

_________________

• Is there a need to purchase a new Missal?

No. It should not be difficult for the celebrant simply to omit the word “one” when offering the prayer. However, publishers are being informed of this change, and any reprints or new editions of the Missal will reflect the new translation. Other publications, such as participation aids for the faithful, will begin to carry the new text as soon as possible. Many of these are printed well in advance, however, so it will take some time for the change to appear.

• Does this change apply to other liturgical books, besides the Roman Missal?

Yes. Any time the formula appears in a liturgical book the new translation should be used. Besides the Missal, the Liturgy of the Hours is the book where it is encountered most often. Note that the orations in the current breviary are an older translation than what is found in the Missal, but the final line is the same and the new conclusion is easy to apply.

February 4, 2021


Monday, February 8, 2021

THE YOUNG FACE OF THE TRADITIONAL LATIN MASS

 Meet Kansas City Chiefs Kicker Harrison Butker who regularly serves the altar at TLM!!



THIS NEEDS TO GO VIRAL! A NEW TRADITION FOR PENITENTS AFTER HAVING RECEIVED THEIR PENANCE AND ABSOLUTION!

M & M promotes a wonderful new tradition after Confession in its Super Bowl commercial. Once the penitent receives his penance and absolution, as the penitent departs, he offers the priest a bag of M&Ms, and concludes using this formula: “I wish you didn’t have to hear that” to which the Confessor responds “Amen”.

THE NATIONAL CHISMATIC REPORTER IS FUNNY! IT IS TO LAUGH!

Father Daffy:


The NCR’s Sean Winters makes me laugh too. He writes wild articles that are so biased you know why he works for NCR. He’s biased. He’s an NCRer. It is a Chismatic form of Catholicism he promotes and he doesn’t accept Vatican II. And we all know that we cannot show concessions to anyone who sins against Vatican II, no accompaniment whatsoever. Did Pope Francis really mean that?

I will acknowledge as I always have, that a Catholic is a person who is in union with the Church that Jesus Christ founded and named Peter to be her visible head on earth, and his successors. To be Catholic one has to be in union with the pope, the Deposit of Faith, and the Ordinary and Extraordinary Magisteriums of the Church, either the pope with the world’s bishops in an ecumenical council or the pope acting alone within the Tradition of continuity when he enunciates infallible teachings. 

Thus we have those who reject Vatican II outright. They break communion with the pope. And then there is a cafeteria approach to Vatican II which Sean Winters and the paper for which he writes follow. They accept its “spirit” that allows for all kinds of experimentation. It allows for a certain kind of dissent, progressive but not conservative. It allows for liturgical deformation based upon an ecumenical and interfaith point of view. It allows for pastoral accompaniment and communion for those in a state of manifest adultery, but not for those who are unfaithful to the NCR’s version of Vatican II. 

But it is they who truly reject Vatican II and no concessions or accompaniment should be afforded them.

This is what the NCR advocates:
1. Pro choice 
2. Gender ideology
3. Blessing homosexual unions and changing the teaching on the Sacrament of Marriage
4. Changing the teaching on the Sacrament of Holy Orders to allow women access to all three stages of it
5. Intercommunion
6. Communion to anyone of good will, baptized or not, human or animal
7. Other?

Just who rejects Vatican II more? SSPX or the editorial board of the NCR?

Read Chismatic Sean’s burp by pressing title:

Sunday, February 7, 2021

THE SECOND SUNDAY IN THE SEASON OF SEPTUAGESIMA

 



AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO WANTS TO YAWN ABOUT THESE FIVE POINTS CONCERNIG SYNODALITY??

It is presented as a bombshell that a woman,  Sr. Nathalie Becquart, is appointed as an under secretary for the Synods. But here in the United States there are crickets about this advancement. Why? Because for years in the USA nuns were the backbone of the local Church founding and staffing universities, schools, hospitals, social outreach charities and much, much more.  They were not under secretaries but principals, CEO's and much, much more.

After Vatican II, nuns and later lay women worked in parishes as pastoral associates, teaching, visiting the sick, coordinating other ministries in addition to the things they traditionally did so well prior to Vatican II.

They were leaders of various councils in the parishes, president of pastoral councils, finance councils and administrators in parishes (in the sense of operations). 

So what is the big deal about this, other than a bishop did it always in the past? Ordination is not required for these things.

But when I look over Sr. Nathalie Becquart's five points on synodality, written in 2019, my eyes glaze over and I think about 99% of active Catholics throughout the world have their eyes glaze over. This synodal process is for geeks or nerds similar to those who fix our computers or like those characters on the Big Bang Theory. It is a bouquet endeavor for a small fraction of the population of Catholics. In other words irrelevant.

And the synodal process has been a shipwreck up until now so much so that Pope Francis was angry with the imbeciles that derailed the one on the Amazon which these five points are about. So the next synod is on and guess what, synods!

Yawn, yawn, yawn. It is like counting how many of the choirs of angels can chant together on the tip of a pin. 

What say you. Are you enthralled with the synodal system and all the discerning?


By Sr. Nathalie Becquart

September 19, 2019 — The Synod on the Amazon, which will take place in Rome from October 6-27, is “our synod of urgency,” said Pope Francis. Amazonia: New Paths for the Church and for an Integral Ecology will focus on a strategic and vital region for the future of humanity, especially relevant and prophetic as record numbers of wildfires currently rage in Brazil’s rainforests.

I was recently named a member of the first group of women to serve as consultors for the secretariat of the Synod of Bishops and I am eagerly looking forward to the gathering in October. Here are five things to keep in mind as the Synod on the Amazon approaches.

1. The synod is focusing on the Amazon, but it concerns all of us no matter where we live.

The pope chose to focus on Amazonia because this huge region that includes territory belonging to nine nations is imperative to the survival of the planet. “Much of the oxygen we breathe comes from there. That’s why deforestation means killing humanity,” Pope Francis said. Thus, this synod concerns all of us — especially religious and Jesuits and their collaborators who have a long tradition of social commitment and are increasingly engaged in the care for our common home.

The working document for this upcoming synod was released in June and is the result of a strong listening process. It began with Pope Francis’ visit to Puerto Maldonado, Peru, in January 2018 and has continued with many consultations and gatherings throughout the Amazon region with a particular concern to listening to the indigenous populations.

2. Even though last October’s synod focused on young people and this year’s is centered on a geographic region, there is a great deal of continuity from year to year.

The synod on the Amazon will take place a year after the synod on Young People, the Faith and Vocational Discernment. If these two synods seem rather different in appearance — one focused on young people from 16 to 29 years old, the other concerns a specific geographical region — in fact many topics and issues are similar. Indeed, through these two major church event processes, we can discern the same call for an inclusive church, the same missionary challenge to be a creative, close presence among the people to answer the cry of the poor and the cry of the earth and the same primary issue of inculturation. (Inculturation is adapting the Catholic Church’s teachings to local cultures in ways that are compatible with the Gospel and introducing these cultures into the life of the church.)

I believe there is a true continuity between the two synods that one might call “missionary synodality”: We are called to be a church that listens, a church in dialogue, a missionary church, a welcoming church, a participatory church, a creative church, a harmonious church, an enculturated church, a church engaged with the poorest that fights against injustices.

3. Pope Francis sees synodality as a key to strengthening the reform of the church.

Synodality is a form of collegiality that involves a process of communal discernment — common listening to the Spirit in pursuit of consensus around mission-based goals. Since Pope Francis was elected, he has emphasized synodality as a strong call of the Spirit: “The world in which we live, and which we are called to love and serve, even with its contradictions, demands that the church strengthen cooperation in all areas of her mission.” In a way, synodality is a constitutive property of the church, deriving from the church’s nature as a communion that is rooted in the Trinitarian mystery.

The instrument of the Synod of the Bishops was created by Paul VI after the Second Vatican Council, but Pope Francis clearly wants to stress it as a key to strengthening the reform of the church. The aim is to implement the urgent missionary transformation of the church so that we might be more focused on reaching out to the peripheries.

4. Synodality is not about conversations that lead nowhere. It’s all about mission.

Synodality, because it is fundamentally missionary, is to be developed not primarily for reasons of internal organization but to respond to the calls coming from reading the “signs of the times” through a process of “see, judge, act.” Pope Francis says a synodal church is “like a standard lifted up among the nations (cf. Is 11:12) in a world which — while calling for participation, solidarity and transparency in public administration — often consigns the fate of entire peoples to the grasp of small but powerful groups. As a church which ‘journeys together’ with men and women, sharing the travails of history, let us cherish the dream that a rediscovery of the inviolable dignity of peoples and of the function of authority as service will also be able to help civil society to be built up in justice and fraternity, and thus bring about a more beautiful and humane world for coming generations.”

5. Due to their emphasis on communal discernment, Jesuits and their lay colleagues have a major role to play in promoting synodality across the church.

Being particularly attuned to these characteristics of the synodal church due to their charism that emphasizes communal discernment, Jesuits and their colleagues have a major role to play in the implementation of synodality at all levels of the church. It is not surprising that Jesuits have been called to take an active part in the recent synods’ processes. Every Ignatian partner is called to share the gift of discernment with the people of God so we might chart a course through these changing times and complex world.

By Sr. Nathalie Becquart, xmcj, Consultor to the General Secretariat of the Synod of Bishops

WHEREIN I AGREE BUT IN A SOBER WAY KNOWING NOTHING WILL CHANGE UNTIL THERE IS A CHANGE AT THE TOP IN MENTALITY

 I have said it before and I will write it again now. If nothing else changes in the manner in which the majority of Catholic priests and thus parishes celebrate the Ordinary Form of the Mass, there is one change that would enhance the mystery and reverence, in fact not enhance, but lead to a recovery of it, is kneeling for Holy Communion even if the option of receiving in the hand is maintained. I will opine though, that if a return to kneeling and receiving on the tongue would occur, a great stride forward in the magisterium of Pope Benedict’s renewal in continuity, would take place.

I place kneeling for Holy Communion above ad orientem in this renewal in continuity. 

Here is a good synopsis of a new book that is out, must reading for bishops and priests to include the Bishop of Rome: 

Book Review: The Holy Bread of Eternal Life by Professor Peter Kwasniewski

Book Review: The Holy Bread of Eternal Life by Professor Peter KwasniewskiI must say how genuinely impressed I was with reading The Holy Bread


THE BENEFITS OF THE PRE-LENTEN SEASON OF SEPTUAGESIMA FOR A BI-RITUAL PRIEST

 


Today, I am celebrating Sexagesima Sunday at our Cathedral Basilica of Saint John the Baptist in historic downtown Savannah located on Lafayette Square. Be there or be square.

I have celebrated a Septuagesima Sunday, at least one of them, every year since 2008 thanks be to Pope Benedict XVI. Prior to my re-awareness of this marvelous pre-Lenten season, Lent would sneak up on me and thus my parishioners. Before we knew it, it was Ash Wednesday. Of course what is different about Ash Wednesday and thus Easter Sunday is that these are movable feasts/commemorations. Unlike Advent and Christmas which always falls at the same time, four weeks prior to December 25th, Lent and Easter are variable and thus we are easily caught off-guard in our vigilance of the observing the Roman Calendar and the obligations associated with it, such as planning our fasts and feasts. 

Now, because of my re-awareness of Septuagesima, I remind my parish on Septuagesima Sunday that Lent is three weeks away, then two weeks away and then three days away, in my bulletin letters and pulpit announcements. 

We have many full time laity, priests, bishops and a Cardinal in the Congregation for Divine Worship. I like Cardinal Sarah and his perspective on the liturgy which is in continuity with Pope Benedict’s renewal in continuity magisterium. 

But what do they do all day long? How difficult would it be for them to recover the pre-Lenten season of Septuagesima for the Ordinary Form Liturgy of the Latin Rite, which, by the way, they have already done so, with Pope Francis’ ultimate promulgation, in the Ordinariate’s Divine Worship, the Missal!

There are two ways to do it, but of course both require a decree from the CDW and the pope:

1. Leave the three Sundays prior to lent alone in terms of the current OF Liturgical texts. Simply rename the three Sundays prior to Ash Wednesday the pre-Lenten season of Septuagesima (Septuagesima, Sexagesima and Quinquagesima). This is exactly what Pope Francis approved for the Ordinariate’s Divine Worship’s version of the Roman Missal.

2. Or, the CDW could get off their bottoms and go to the Liturgical texts for Septuagesima of the Extraordinary Form of the Mass and refashion them for the Ordinary Form Roman Missal. This would include the use of the EF’s Lectionary’s readings. An explanation for the logic of those readings for these three Sundays could be included and with the mandate that violet be used as the liturgical color. 

Perhaps another novelty should be included to show the distinctions between the two truly penitential seasons of the year, Advent and Lent,  with Advent a lesser penitential season and Lent a greater penitential season. And the color for Advent would take into account a Marian thrust for the season.

So my novelty is this.

1. For Advent and with a Marian thrust, a new liturgical color is introduced, the hues of blue.

2. For the pre-Lenten season of Septuagesima which is not a season of fasting and abstinence, the bluer hues of violet are used.

3. For the truly penitential season of Lent itself, the more reddish hues of violet are used. 

Saturday, February 6, 2021

LET’S TALK MORALITY AND PEACE AND WHICH IS THE WORSE MORTAL SIN AND HOW ABOUT THEM SPELLING AND GRAMER NAZIS?

 


Okay, this is what I did not like about President Trump:

1. His public lies or fake truths aka, personal truths, like a man saying he’s a woman or my conscience is better than God’s truth

2. The constant chaos and drama

3. His enablement through populism of fringe far right groups who are quite dangerous 

4. His disparaging remarks of those close and distant from him and the name calling

5. Compulsive activity with his twitter account 

What I liked about President Trump:

1. He was pro-life, engaged the Catholic Church and other pro-lifers and inspired them to help create laws to shut down abortion clinics and limit abortions if not to make it almost entirely illegal. This may have changed many pro-choice minds to become pro-life

2. I liked that he was not a Catholic and thus could not be held to Catholic moral standards but enabled Catholics to be pleased when he was Catholic in his outlook on unborn children. 

Okay, this is what I do not like about President Biden:

1. As a Catholic he is trying to normalize disobedience to the Magisterium of Vatican II of which Pope Francis recently said there could be no concessions to Catholics who do this. The disobedience is grave and a mortal sin—abortion on demand even to the 9th month and last moments of pregnancy, infanticide, gender ideology, redefining of marriage and other more subtle disobediences. 

2. I don’t like that he is a Catholic, it would not be as embarrassing as it concerns his disobedience to Vatican II’s Magisterium and what Pope Francis recently said that Catholics who do this should be shown no concessions. I would not expect him to be Catholic in this area if he wasn’t Catholic.

What I like about Joe Biden:

1. He is sleepy Joe and no drama Joe and no compulsive behavior on twitter and other social media and he seems like a pleasant great grandfatherly type who has a hard time staying awake

2. He is calm, cool and collected

3. His facelifts, Botox injections, hair transplants and workout routines and proper diet give the illusion of being much younger despite the fact that an aging brain will do its thing. The illusion of being Catholic, though, in the true sense of obedience to Vatican II’s Magisterium troubles me. 

And to the Nazis of grammar and spelling—I would love if you would get a life and leave me alone unless you would like to be my free editor which I would like. 

Friday, February 5, 2021

NEW CATHEDRALS OR CATHEDRALS WRECKOVATED TO ACCOMODATE THE PRESBYTERATE OF A DIOCESE CONCELEBRATING MASS WITH THEIR BISHOP AND ALL GATHERED TOGETHER LIKE A NEAT CLERICAL CLUB

 When I looked at this photo of the new Tapestry of Our Lady of the Angels in Los Angeles' Cathedral, I was struck by something else. Do you see it?

It is all the chairs in the sanctuary which are for the diocesan presbyterate or other bishops who might concelebrate with their Archbishop an ordination or Chrism Mass or some other large diocesan event.

Of course the configuration is for the concelebrants to be facing the peons in the pew, facing them directly on as though on a performing stage. 

And it is clear that they are completely different than the laity in the nave of the Cathedral. But the theology behind having the bishop's priests around him is to emphasize clericalism in a liturgical way. Perhaps is hearkens back to an earlier age of building cathedrals, wisely dropped in an organic way over the course of centuries.

Now look at this Cathedral at a large Bishop's Mass from prior to Vatican II:

Apart from the artwork above the altar being far superior to the new one in Los Angeles' Cathedral, I see priests in choir dress, cassock and surplice sitting in the congregation with the laity. And they participate in the Mass in the same way as the laity do, standing, sitting and kneeling as the laity. And when it is time for Holy Communion, the priests, just like the laity, go to the Communion Railing and kneel to receive Holy Communion (and just the Host) and on the tongue, just like the laity do.

They aren't up there with their Bishop who is the celebrant and placed around the altar to concelebrate as though the male version of the Rockets. They don't receive Holy Communion first and consume together to Sacred Host and then go to the chalice. 

It isn't as clerical or pretentious is it as what might happen in most new cathedrals or ones wreckovated?

Discuss


ISN'T ART AND THE COST OF SHOPPING MALLS, SKY SCRAPPERS AND THE LIKE, NOT TO MENTION CATHEDRALS AND SPORTS' STADIUMS, SUPPOSE TO CREATE CONTROVERY, DIVISION AND A SCREAM FOR SENSIBITY IN SPENDING, EXCEPT FOR SPORTS' STADIUMS, SHOPPING MALLS AND SKY SCRAPPERS?


 Let me be up front, for the amount of money spent on this Cathedral in Los Angeles, what a shame they chose not a "mission" style of architecture but the bizarre architecture that it is. If the people give to the construction of a cathedral or any Catholic religious building, thank God, as they are also giving through expensive material goods the building of sports' stadiums, shopping malls and sky scrappers. So if you complain about how much a cathedral or church costs and don't give, then by God, don't buy sport's tickets, clothes or other merchandise or go to banks, insurance buildings or any other type of office building. Be consistent. 

But the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels placed the last tapestry into the cathedral recently. I have been to the cathedral and I like the tapestries. When I saw the image of the new one on Praytell which critiques it and  not positively, I thought it was the Risen Lord with a trimmed beard. Of course the photo was from a distance. But it looked to me almost transgendered, but I think it was my eyes. On closer inspection it is indeed "Our Lady of the Angels."

There are more photos in the Praytell article below. What do you think? It does add some warmth to this barn or stadium of a building.

Anyway, here is Praytell's critique. The comments are good especially the shocking one from my good friend from my Praytell days, Bill Dehass:

It Is Finished: LA Cathedral adds new tapestries

It is finished. Probably it shouldn’t have been. Well enough should have been left alone. This past month the Roman Catholic Cathedral of Los Angeles, Our Lady of the Angels, announced the completion of its tapestry cycle.

The original tapestries by artist John Nava, installed for the dedication of the cathedral in 2002, are rightly considered among the most salient, sensitive, and sophisticated pieces of contemporary liturgical art in the United States.

 

 READ THE REST THERE

Thursday, February 4, 2021

THE 1965 ROMAN MISSAL'S VERSION OF CANDLEMAS, WHY OR WHY NOT?

Distribution of Blessed Candles:

On Tuesday I celebrated the Extraordinary Form's Mass for the Purification of the Blessed Virgin Mary also known as Candlemas.

It was a sung Mass with two cantors and truly beautiful and without accompaniment.

I was like a cat on a hot tin roof about this Mass as I could find no resources in English to explain the rubrics of the rite of blessing the candles and subsequent procession. 

Thus I went to my handy dandy 1965 Roman Missal which has the rubrics in English and I got a better sense of how to do the candle blessing. But the 1965 Missal allows the priest to pick one of the five candle blessing prayers whereas the 1962 missal prescribes all five. I found all five a bit much not only because it was a bit much, but also because I had injured my back and was in absolute agony and thus I untied my sufferings to the Sacrifice of Jesus Passion on the Cross celebrated at Mass. I got many souls out of purgatory and did penance for much innumerable sins. Jesus is a good untier of knots as is His Blessed Mother.

And the 1965 Roman Missal had the prayers translated into English and if I did all five in English, it would not have seemed so tedious. 


IN ONE WEEK BLOGGERS AND OTHERS TOUTED CARDINAL CUPICH'S PRIVATE MEETING WITH THE POPE AS A KIND OF SMACK DOWN OF THE USCCB PRESIDENT, ARCHBISHOP GOMEZ FOR CRITICIZING THE NEW PRESIDENT'S ABORTION STANCE BUT SAID NOTHING ABOUT THE NOD THAT POPE FRANCIS GAVE ARCHBISHOP GOMEZ BY SENDING A VIDEO MESSAGE TO THE LOS ANGELES RELIGIOUS EDUCATION CONFERENCE TO BE HELD SOON


 

It is a matter of interpretation, of course, since no one knows, but I choose to believe my personal truth that Pope Francis' personal meeting with Cardinal Cupich was a smacked down of the Cardinal  for his indelicate tweets concerning the USCCB's president, Archbishop Gomez correct and right-on statements concerning President Biden's rejection of the Magisterium of Vatican II of which no concessions can be made, that of abortion and infanticide, gender ideology, marriage and other moral issues. 

But here is the good news that confirms Archbishop  Gomez's prophtetic words and the Holy Father applauding him for showing no concessions to a Catholic President who goes his own way on these moral issues that are a part of Vatican II's Magisterium:

At Last, Pope Makes “Big Dance”: long global Catholicism’s largest ministry gathering – and the sacred cow that funds Religious Ed in US’ largest diocese ever – in a first (and a palpable nod to besieged +Gomez), Francis to deliver video word at Feb 18th opening of LA Congress:


 

DURING A HOMILY, I DON’T THINK THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA OR ANY CATHOLIC SHOULD BE CASTIGATED PUBLICLY NOR DO I THINK THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WHEN HE ENTERS CHURCH FOR MASS SHOULD BE APPLAUDED

 On a blog like mine, people can respond with their comments when I instigate religious or political commentary. That is not the case with a homily. A homily should not castigate fellow Catholics by name even the President of the USA.

This seems to be a good and balanced newscast by ABC about the controversy that President Biden has created by be the most vociferous  pro-abortion, pro choice Catholic President. He is clearly opposed to Vatican II’s Magisterium on abortion and infanticide of which Pope Francis says about Vatican II's magisterium we should not allow any concessions for rejecting this Magisterium and this presumably applies to the president of the USA too. 

One of the priests during his homily castigates the president for the good parts of his Catholic Faith, like going to Mass. He should have thanked God for that part of Biden's faith and perhaps show the disconnect between his faith of "comfort and solace" and the prophetic teachings of the Church concerning Social justice for the innocent unborn children and those who have no voice. He could have thanks Biden for his other social justice initiatives fully in accord with Catholic social teaching. 

But the scenes in this news story of priests at Mass castigating the president in angry voice are not good. That would be better on a blog or in a classroom setting where others can respond. 

What say you?

Wednesday, February 3, 2021

THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RELIGION OR DOES IT? BECAUSE YOU NEVER KNOW WHEN THE LAST FOUR THINGS WILL LOOM

 Jean Harlow in one scene with Hattie McDaniels of Gone With the Wind Fame:

Body double playing filming Harlow's role after her death:


 

Monday is my day off and this past Monday was cold, cloudy and very windy. So I watched Turner Classic Movies. And for the first time I watched Clark Gable and Jean Harlow in the 1937 movie, Saratoga.  

I looked for a summary of the plot on the internet as I watched only to discover this was Jean Harlow's last motion picture and see died unexpectedly before the completion of the film. MGM thought of scrapping the movie or re-filming the parts with Harlow in them, but then they decided to use a double that looked like her, film her with binoculars over the double's face for the race course scenes and from a distance in other scenes or with her back to the camera or a large hat hiding her. Her voice was doubled too.

She died of kidney failure and some other mishaps at the age of 26, a rising star at MGM. 

But it was a lesson on how movies are made too. There were two major scenes where she is written out altogether and the actors explain she's not there because she had other business to attend. This, of course, compromised the scenes as her role was central.

It was obvious too that various scenes are filmed out of context or the order in which they will appear.

There is a scene of a ball had a large house. Harlow's double is clearly in the house, but on the porch "outside" the house, Harlow is with another co-stair Lionel Barrymore. He was in the show earlier and it is clear that all the scenes with Harlow and Barrymore were filmed together no matter the sequence in the film. So the inside scene in the house, Harlow has died and a double portrays her, but outside the house, filmed before her death she is alive. 

It was a good film, and Harlow was a great actress who was like May West in her personality except much softer. The scenes without her but with her double clearly are not what they would have been if she were alive to have done them. 

It was sad watching the first part of the film with her good acting knowing that while this was filmed she would be dead in about a month before she completed the movie. 

One irony is that the last scene before her actual demise, she is playing a very sick person with a high fever and in fact while playing this scene she was actually sick.  

But the very last scene of the movie, Harlow is in it clearly filmed before her illness and death but as the last scene.

What is the religious point?  You will die, young or old. You will be judged and you will go to your eternal reward, heaven or hell, the four last things. 

And when you die, someone will replace you, maybe not as well as you would have done it, but replaced you will be.  

But in real life, everything happens in sequence.

CANDLEMASS EYE CANDY FROM SAINT ANNE CHURCH, RICHMOND HILL, GEORGIA

 Not in order but you get the idea:

















WHAT IS WORSE? BREAKING COMMUNION WITH THE POPE OVER VATICAN II OR BREAKING COMMUNION WITH THE POPE OVER ABORTION?

 UPDATE! UPDATE! Vatican II's teaching on abortion cannot be ignored. President Biden's local bishops as well as other bishops who are dancing around the issue of President Biden's support for abortion, even late term abortions must heed the words of Pope Francis: NO CONCESSIONS TO THOSE WHO REJECT VATICAN II!

 Pope Francis recently said that no concessions should be made toward those who reject the Magisterium of Vatican II. NO CONCESSIONS! This is what Vatican II taught about the grave evil of abortion:

The Second Vatican Council on its Pastoral Constitution "Gaudium et Spes" (The Church in the Modern World) stated when discussing married love and respect for human life:

"The Church wishes to emphasize that there can be no conflict between the divine laws governing the transmission of life and the fastening of authentic married love.

"God, the Lord of Life, has entrusted to men the noble mission of safeguarding life, and men must carry it out in a manner worthy of themselves. Life must be protected with the utmost care from the moment of conception: abortion and infanticide are abominable crimes. Man's sexuality and the facility of reproduction wondrously surpass the endowments of lower forms of life. Therefore the acts proper to married life are to be ordered according to authentic human dignity and must be honoured with the greatest reverence." (Ch 51 (A Flannery "Vatican II" 1981 Ed p. 955).


Schism in the Catholic Church is described as breaking Communion with the pope and thus the Church. When one is in schism, one is forbidden from receiving Holy Communion in a Catholic Church in union with the pope.

Is that using Holy Communion as a weapon? No! Holy Communion means that the person receiving Holy Communion is in a state of grace and in full Communion with Jesus Christ and the Church He founded whose visible head is the Vicar of Christ, the pope. 

Yet, a small cabal of well placed bishops don’t want to use Holy Communion as a “weapon” against President Joseph Biden and will not censure him by denying him Holy Communion although this president is exporting the democrat party’s ideology of abortion through the 9th month throughout the country and in an imperialistic way throughout the world. 

President Biden is in schism with the pope and the Catholic Church and thus with Jesus Christ over his mortal sin as it concerns facilitating abortion worldwide and by law in this country. 

Wouldn’t it be best for the immortal soul of the President, that out of love his bishops in Washington and Delaware warn him not to jeopardize his salvation by exacerbating his mortal sin by receiving Holy Communion in a public state of mortal sin.

And what about those Catholics who see President Biden receiving Holy Communion although he is promoting abortion here and worldwide and thus think that abortion isn’t a mortal sin.

What about their eternal salvation bishops?

HIGH PROFILE NIGERIAN ARCHBISHOP CALLS OUT PRESIDENT BIDEN’S AMERICAN IMPERIALISM AND CONTEMPT FOR THE LIFE OF A CHILD IN HER MOTHER’S WOM

 FROM CRUX:

African prelate laments Biden’s disregard for ‘human dignity’

Archbishop Ignatius Kaigama of Abuja. (Credit: CNS/Nancy Phelan Wiechec.)

ROME – One of Nigeria’s most powerful prelates has opened up about the spate of clergy kidnappings and murders plaguing the country, the coronavirus, and new US President Joe Biden’s move to increase funding for international abortions.

In an interview with Crux, Archbishop Ignatius Kaigama of Abuja said, “It is intriguing that one of Biden’s first official acts is to promote the destruction of human lives domestically and in developing nations.”

In Biden’s first few weeks of office, he issued an executive order rescinding the Mexico City Policy, which bans U.S. aid from supporting NGOs which either provide or promote abortions abroad, and there has been talk that he will also repeal the 1976 Hyde Amendment, which bars federal funding for abortion except in cases of rape or incest, or when the mother’s life is in danger, but which must be approved by Congress.

READ THE REST AT CURX

THE NCR REPORTS THAT THE NUNS AT A TRUMP RALLY, IN TRADITIONAL HABIT, AIN’T NUNS—BUT ARE THEY BEING UNECUMENICAL?

 It turns out these nuns are not in full communion with the Catholic Church. But the NCR says they are not nuns. Is that fair? In Augusta there is a full convent of Episcopalian nuns at the Convent of Saint Helena. Are they not nuns? There are nuns of the Orthodox Church, are they not nuns? 

Come on NCR, can’t you be more ecumenical. Don’t forsake Vatican II for your ideologies! There will be no concessions for you as Pope Francis recently pointed out. Vatican II is the Magisterium of the Church:

For the record: Michigan nuns at Trump rally aren't really nuns

by Christopher White

AP Dominican Sisters Hartland c.jpeg

Dominican Sisters of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, based in Hartland, Michigan, and who do not have canonical standing with the Catholic Church, applaud as then President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally Oct. 30, 2020. (AP/Alex Brandon)
Members of the Dominican Sisters of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, based in Hartland, Michigan, and whose community do not have canonical standing with the Catholic Church, applaud as then President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally at Oakland County International Airport, Oct. 30, 2020, in Waterford Township, Michigan. (AP/Alex Brandon)

Monday, February 1, 2021

MY PARISH IN RICHMOND DOES NOT SUFFER FROM SOUNDS OF SILENCE AND EMPTY PEWS, THANK GOD.

 It is a very fertile parish which nine months since the pandemic shutdown, is showing.


Just a year ago, a few weeks before the pandemic:






THIS COULD EASILY BE THE SPIRIT OF VATICAN II CROWD REUNION TODAY

 


BOMBSHELL: THE NATIONAL CHISTMATIC REPORTER (NCR) REPORTS THE TRUTH!

 


I’ve already written about this in another post. But now the National Chismatic Reporter even reports it although with a skewed example, which is a stupid example, but at least they report what the pope actually said (WTPAS). 

Francis: 'No concession' to those who deny Vatican II teachings

by Joshua J. McElwee
 

Francis told the catechists that the church is living through a problem of "selectivity" with regard to the Council's teachings, and said it was a similar problem to one experienced after earlier church councils. 

The pope mentioned a group of Catholic bishops who decided to create their own church because of disagreements after the First Vatican Council, held in Rome from 1869-70, in an apparent reference to what is now known as the Old Catholic Church.

"I think often about a group of bishops who, after Vatican I, left … to continue the 'true doctrine' that wasn't that of Vatican I," said the pontiff. 

"Today, they ordain women," the pope continued, adding: "The severest attitude, to guard the faith without the magisterium of the church, brings you to ruin."

My comments: Please note the example the pope uses from Vatican I. The Old Catholics break away because they disagree with Vatican I’s definition of papal infallibility apart from an ecumenical council. Thus, kind of like Archbishop Lefebrev, bishops and laity breakaway to form a “pure” “Church.” Today, they ordain women as priests, meaning they would not have lost apostolic succession if they had remained in the true Church. They went out on their own and democratically swayed with the wind and collectively decided to ordain women, a kind of synodality gone wild, no?

The SSPX are not in complete schism today, but they reject most of Vatican II. I think they might remain as the Eastern Orthodox, highly orthodox as it concerns the Church frozen in a time right before Vatican II. The Eastern Orthodox are frozen in time since the last Ecumenical Council prior to the Great Schism. 

The Old Catholics, though, moved forward and now ordain women. What forces affected them that did not and do not affect the Eastern Orthodox and the SSPX? Of course, the SSPX do have a group or subset that states there hasn’t be a true pope since Pope Pius XII. They say the See of Peter is vacant, an absurd, out of control extreme. 

So, was the pope referring to the SSPX? Or was he referring to liberal bishops in Germany and elsewhere who are promoting women’s ordination, gender ideology, same sex marriage, contraception and abortion linked to women’s health and euthanasia while their pro-life position is truncated to ending the death penalty for criminals but not for innocent, unborn children. 

Aren’t they the ones that are spiraling out of control and will one day ordain women? In fact that has occurred on a smaller basis but no high powered bishop, like Lefebrev, has done so incurring excommunication and the forming of a new church, similar to how the Old Catholics came about. 

The National Chismatic Reporter teaches the very things these German bishops want and none of these absurd desires whatsoever (teachings) can be found in the documents of Vatican II and how the Council has been interpreted since that time by the popes, Paul VI; John Paul I, John Paul II, Benedict XVI and Francis I!

They are the schismatics that threaten the Church, the heterodox liberals. 

Unfortunately, Joshua McElwee uses this example of his own rather than my examples, which are far more apropos:

The Council's effect has been hotly debated by Catholics in the decades since the event, with some movements now even choosing to go back to a Latin-language celebration of the Mass.