DO PROGRESSIVE TO HETERODOX CATHOLICS EVER EVEN ENTERTAIN THE POSSIBILITY OF THIS NUMBER OF CHILDREN FOR THEMSELVES OR OTHERS??????
The two young men, holding my chasuable up and devoutly adoring the Body of Christ at the elevation are brothers. They have three other brothers and five sisters for a total of 10 siblings…
I know which is why I provocatively said it! It was the first thing that came to mind.
Is it a sacrifice or good fortune if you want a large family and can afford it? I’d say it’s more self sacrifice if you want a larger family but forgo it because you can’t afford it!
Francis may have clumsily articulated himself but I’m sure that’s what he meant.
“In relation to physical, economic, psychological and social conditions, responsible parenthood is exercised both in the duly pondered and generous decision to have a large family, and in the decision, made for serious reasons and in respect of the moral law, to avoid for a time or even indeterminately a new birth” (Paul VI, Encyclical Letter Humanae Vitae, 10: AAS 60 (1968), 487; cf. Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes, 50: AAS 58 (1966), 1070-1072.)
12 comments:
Very admirable life choice if you can afford it but you don’t need to breed like rabbits to be Catholic, eh?
Only the heterodox left would use that denigrating name for parents who make such a sacrifice!
And I was just thinking, "Now we have a pope who might not mockingly refer to parents of large families as breeding like rabbits."
Wow.
Nick
Pope Francis, of unhappy memory, used just that term!
He called homosexuals faggots too!
Yet there are delusional types who still worship him!
I know which is why I provocatively said it! It was the first thing that came to mind.
Is it a sacrifice or good fortune if you want a large family and can afford it? I’d say it’s more self sacrifice if you want a larger family but forgo it because you can’t afford it!
Francis may have clumsily articulated himself but I’m sure that’s what he meant.
That's just being an no-filter, asinine provocateur, then. It was common from 2013-2025; next you'll be talking about "faggotry" in the seminaries.
Nick
“In relation to physical, economic, psychological and social conditions, responsible parenthood is exercised both in the duly pondered and generous decision to have a large family, and in the decision, made for serious reasons and in respect of the moral law, to avoid for a time or even indeterminately a new birth” (Paul VI, Encyclical Letter Humanae Vitae, 10: AAS 60 (1968), 487; cf. Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes, 50: AAS 58 (1966), 1070-1072.)
Francis also criticised couples who forego children for a better financial and social position, choosing instead to have pets!
Paul VI's solution was abstinence for married couples. Too bad he did not apply that solution to gay priests
Not sure many married couples think abstinence is healthy for their relationship. Easy for a celebrate to recommend such!
Post a Comment