A FEW SHOCKING THINGS HERE, THE LEAST OF WHICH, A CATHOLIC DEACON IS ONE OF THESE!
THE DEACON’S BENCH IS REPORTING THAT A DEACON IN GOOD STANDING, PRESUMABLY PERMANENT NOT TRANSITIONAL, UNLESS HE IS TRANSITIONING, IS A MEMBER OF THIS PAINTED WOMAN-FACE ORDER OF HABITED “NUNS” BUT NO REAL NUNS ARE!
1. YOU CAN MOCK WOMEN BY PUTTING ON A WOMAN FACE BUT DON’T YOU DARE PUT ON A BLACK FACE IF YOU IDENTIFY AS WHITE
2. FOR PROGRESSIVE CATHOLICS, MORE SHOCKING THAN THE WOMAN FACE IS THAT THESE NUNS ARE WEARING HABITS.
3. FOR PROGRESSIVE CATHOLICS, MORE SHOCKING IS THAT NO REAL NUNS ARE IN THIS GROUP ONLY PATRIARCHY OF A CATHOLIC DEACON. AND NO BIOLOGICAL WOMEN ARE INCLUDED, EXCLUSIVITY!
5 comments:
But the TLM is the problem!
No kidding, TJM!
So is anybody going to look into why the deacon was still deaconing between blasphemous crossdressing events? My theory is that the Church would rather have a cheap and shoddy product than miss out on revenue. So keep the parishes open and hope no one notices the sexual deviance as long as there is a collection point for money. Just my thought.
I was wondering the same. I can’t imagine either the archbishop of San Francisco or the bishop of Oakland permitting it. San Diego is another story unfortunately. I don’t know the diocese of this deacon.
I was listening to Timothy Gordon, who was discussing the way major league sports literally bullies its players into going along with all of this perversion. He listed a few courageous athletes who dared to speak out against it. Too few.
Post a Comment