Press title for The Pillar’s full report:
Candid talk from senior cardinal on Pope Francis, Benedict XVI—
And All I HAVE TO SAY IS DUH!
Cardinal Camillo Ruini thinks Benedict XVI’s resignation was a mistake. Ruini also found himself flummoxed by the Francis pontificate and unsure whether the reign of the late Argentinian pontiff will prove to have done more harm or good.
“I found myself in difficulty with Pope Francis,” Ruini said in response to a question asking whether the late pontiff had disappointed him. “The change was too great and sudden,” Ruini said.
“More than disappointed,” Ruini said he was “surprised.”
Asked for his measure of the Francis pontificate, whether it did “more good or more harm to the Church,” Ruini said his would be “a complex assessment, with very positive aspects and others much less so.”
“It’s too early to judge which of them prevail,” he said.
He acknowledged things red hats and curial officers – along with the rank and file in the Church’s central governing apparatus and bishops around the world have whispered privately for years: that Benedict’s resignation was a mistake and Francis’s reign was not easy for the Church.
MY COMMENTS: I am glad that Cardinal Ruini confirms my own feelings about Benedict and Francis. I too felt that Pope Benedict XVI made a mistake in resigning and should have persevered in his papacy. Would he have lasted ten more years? I doubt it but things would have worked out differently for the Church.
But, the Holy Spirit always repairs mistakes in the Church but not on our timeline.
I feel the same way as Cardinal Ruini feels about Pope Francis’ papacy. I think it was a disaster and now I know I am not alone and that many felt it was a disaster, including Cardinal Pell.
But of course there were good things but the bad seem to overwhelm me because some of the bad things were so mean-spirited:
1. How he berated those who desired the way the Church was going under Pope Benedict—renewal in continuity, respect for Tradition and traditions. Those who like liturgical and clerical refinery. The worst thing he did was to call into question their mental health and sincerity—a horrible judgment for someone who others touted as non-judgmental. In reality Pope Francis was the most judgmental pope ever and mean in his judgements.
2. Canceling, for the most part, the papacies of St. John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI especially the liturgical magisterium of Pope Benedict XVI and doing so while His Holiness was the Emeritus Pope, still living and not even giving Pope Benedict a courtesy call concerning Traditionis Custodis.
3. Beginning processes that might have led to heterodox and heretical changes in Doctrine, Morals and the Faith of the Church. Francis’ synodal way was laying the foundation for this and Fiducia Supplicans is a virus, too, to regularize as virtue sexual sins of whatever degree and type. Both Francis’ synodal way and FS were processes to lead to the collapse of the doctrines of the Sacraments along with their anthropology and substitute an inversion of these.
4. Chipping away at the foundation of the Church as being the True Church and necessary for salvation and that Christ and His Church are the exclusive ways of salvation. It seem to me , in my most humble opinion, that Pope Francis was more interested in a Church that makes this world a utopian experience where all are embraced and nothing is sinful but exclusion. Heaven and hell as a just reward were relegated to obscurity.
What is good about Pope Francis papacy? He showed two or more new generations of Catholics, who have no living memory of Vatican II and its aftermath in the 1960’s well into the 80’s, what that period was like, with its confusion, experiments, ambiguity and that everything about traditional Catholic identities was up for grabs and open to change, even doctrines and morals. These new generations got to see how ugly it was because it was still ugly under Pope Francis’ direction.


12 comments:
Queue the PF Pollys in 3… 2… 1… 🙄
Some of the obscenities Francis directed at others could boom-a-rang back at Francis
Unless one wishes to place words into Cardinal Ruini's mouth, it is impossible to declare that he has viewed Pope Francis' (requiescat in pace) Pontificate as a "disaster."
Cardinal Ruini declared that he was more "surprised" than "disappointed" by Pope Francis' Pontificate. Cardinal Ruini declared as well that "it' too early" to judge Pope Francis' Pontificate.
Therefore, it is impossible to weaponize Cardinal Ruini's opinions into the claim that he has confirmed that Pope Francis' Pontificate was disastrous.
Interestingly, as The Pillar noted: "Ruini was less circumspect regarding the pontificate of Benedict XVI..."
Cardinal Ruini denounced Pope Benedict XVI as a "weak" Church Governor. The Cardinal also denounced Pope Benedict XVI's decision to resign as Pope.
Cardinal Ruini said of Pope Benedict XVI: “He knew his circumstances better than I did, so I don’t want to judge.”
Nevertheless, additional news media outlets reported that Cardinal Ruini declared that he was not "persuaded" by Pope Benedict XVI's explanation in regard to his (Pope Benedict XVI) decision to resign as Pope.
The Pillar article did not report that.
There are additional declarations from Cardinal Ruini that The Pillar article had failed to report...
...such as the Cardinal Ruini's trashing of the movement to restore the TLM...
...Cardinal Ruini trashed President Trump...
Pax.
Mark Thomas
Beside The Pillar's article in question, additional news media outlets reported on Cardinal Ruini's interview in question.
Among said reports...
From: Catholic Culture:
Questioned about the restoration of the traditional Latin Mass, the cardinal is even more negative:
“Certainly not.
"It’s very important for people to understand the language in which they celebrate.”
Pax.
Mark Thomas
Summary
Cardinal Camillo Ruini has expressed support for the Summorum Pontificum, which allows for the celebration of the traditional Latin Mass. He has emphasized the importance of this liturgical form in the life of the Church, particularly in light of recent controversies surrounding its practice. Ruini's advocacy reflects a broader desire among some clergy and laity for a return to traditional liturgical practices that they believe foster a deeper spiritual connection and reverence in worship.
Recent Statements
In a recent interview, Ruini called for unity and adherence to solid doctrine within the Church, suggesting that the Summorum Pontificum can play a role in this effort
.
He has also urged the faithful to gather in support of the Holy Father, indicating a desire for solidarity within the Church community during challenging times
As Crux reported, Cardinal Ruini was keen to have commented upon politics.
Example: From: Crux:
https://cruxnow.com/news-analysis/2026/02/senior-italian-cardinals-remarks-may-be-valuable-advice-for-u-s-political-hopefuls
-- Senior Italian cardinal’s remarks may be valuable advice for U.S. political hopefuls
An interview with a senior Italian prelate appeared late in the week, and it contained several observations regarding political figures including U.S. President Donald Trump, which both readers and U.S. politicians would do well to note.
Particularly significant – and potentially telling – were the reasons the long-serving cardinal gave for the negative personal and political opinion Ruini expressed for Trump.
Considering all that, then, it may be surprising – at first – to hear Ruini express a very different and much less favorable judgment of Trump.
“I have a judgement that is not positive,” Ruini replied.
“Trump has disrupted American and world politics,” he said, adding that Trump has taken not only the U.S. but the world “in a very questionable direction.”
“And I don’t like his unscrupulousness,” Ruini added...
Pax.
Mark Thomas
Council yes, post-council no
The cardinal rejects the simplistic reading that identifies the Second Vatican Council with the subsequent crisis. For him, the problem was not the Council, but the period that followed it.
After the conciliar closure, he explains, even central truths such as the divinity of Christ or fundamental aspects of Catholic morality came to be questioned. In the face of that drift, he affirms having reacted firmly.
Infovaticana has also noted Cardinal Ruini's negative assessment in regard to the TLM's restoration:
From: Infovaticana:
"The cardinal rejects the simplistic reading that identifies the Second Vatican Council with the subsequent crisis.
"He does not define himself as a traditionalist in a nostalgic sense.
Nor does he defend a return to the liturgy in Latin, since he considers it essential that the faithful understand the language in which it is celebrated.
"Tradition does not mean going back. ‘Tradere’ means to transmit. Tradition is the continuity of the Church."
Pax.
Mark Thomas
If he had a favorable opinion of Biden, he is a fraud.
I still think MT Suit is K, they both know more than the experts and have a nasty streak.
He means that in the exclusive sense. He supports SP as the TLM is the exception rather than the rule or norm.
English translation of Cardinal Ruini's interview in question. Click "English"top right of the page.
https://www.corriere.it/cronache/26_febbraio_19/cardinale-ruini-intervista-56706d76-92e7-4c63-9b48-6e0ad7cd2xlk.shtml
Pax.
Mark Thomas
You called that one right.
Post a Comment