Yes, you read that correctly. The new President used the”N” word in what certainly most enlightened democrats would call hate speech.
He called the Texas governor and other courageous states who are no longer mandating masks Neanderthals. That was not a compliment and denigrated everyone who identifies as LBGTQN and add your own initial group!
SHOCKING TO SAY THE LEAST IN OUR MOST ENLIGHTENED ERA!
11 comments:
takes one to know one
So bigoted! So unfair! Neanderthals, may they rest in peace, likely had more common sense and a greater concern for human life than the governor of Texas.
Couch of K,
Lol - you vote for the Party that fundraises on the premises that killing the unborn is dandy. You have zero credibility with the sentient
I would have to say that any person calling for greater concern for human life and voting for a candidate or party that promotes abortion on demand and even the gruesome partial birth abortion obscenity, as well as euthanasia and bodily mutilation to fulfill a gender ideology has no room to castigate anyone else, especially as it concerns masks which for the great majority of people are not sufficient to stop anything.
Sophia here: Way to go Father! Thank you!
"Courageous states". Really? I guess it is too much to ask them to follow Biden's advice to wear masks for the first 100 days of his administration. I notice that in that really liberal state of Alabama, their Republican governor is keeping a mandate for a little longer, and I notice Georgia's governor is not calling off all guidelines yet either. Maybe some sanity here in Georgia? It might be overdue among Republicans given the Democratic gains of last year.
Anonymous K,
But I bet you have NO problem with Biden releasing illegal aliens into the US who have tested positive for covid into the US. Your morality stinks. It is strictly along party lines.
Connecticut, a Dem run state, just joined the Neanderthal club, so 1, 2, 3, Coach K will flip his position
Anonymous at 851:
Your respondent of 926 the previous night is not "Anonymous K". I have never met the Rev. K so perhaps you should have proof that I am "Anonymous K' before claiming I am. As for claiming my morality "stinks"---really? Based on what? Heck, I have never backed a Democrat for president ever. As for Biden and illegal aliens, both his party and Republicans have played games with the immigration issue for decades. There has not been a comprehensive bill addressing the matter in about 35 years. The Senate passed a bipartisan bill in or around 2013, but House Republicans---led by careerist then-Speaker John Boehner---never allowed a vote on it, not because there were afraid it would fail, but rather because they were worried it would pass. And of course Trump was never interested in addressing it in a comprehensive way, just his simplistic wall strategy. In short, I am willing to criticize both parties. Are you?
Anonymous at 9:43 PM,
The Chamber of Commerce thanks you and so does the Dem Party, but the ordinary worker vehemently disagrees with your approach. If the wall is a simplistic strategy why has Nancy Pelosi constructed one around the Capitol Building?
Uh, Anonymous at 908, building a wall around the Capitol building (and did Pelosi REALLY construct it---like got herself dirty doing it?) is a bit simpler than building a 2,000-mile one along the border which is subject to leakage anyway. As for the chamber of commerce thanking me, well I am glad to hear that as I used to work at one. Unless one addresses the root causes of the northward migration---government malfeasance in much of Central America, drugs and the like---people will continue coming north. They will build tunnels under it, sneak thru on trains or in vehicles, maybe even a boat. A wall is not a substitute for a comprehensive immigration strategy---and if Trump ever proposed addressing the matter in a comprehensive way, well, I'd like to hear about it. I won't hold my breath though...
Post a Comment