Translate

Monday, January 16, 2012

MARRIAGE EQUALITY?

When I read this article on MARRIAGE EQUALITY, I thought at first it was written by a very conservative Catholic who disagreed with the bishops of Washington State who were using secular arguments against same sex marriage rather than religious arguments. Then I realized that the writer was mocking the bishops stand on heterosexual marriage and would have done so whether or not the arguments were secular or religious. It is just more Catholic bashing and bigotry but politically correct bashing and bigotry, the kind that political and religious liberals like.

I think bishops and all Catholics have to use reason to promote the Church's understanding of marriage which has also been secular society's understanding of marriage for thousands of years. I don't think secularists are going to be persuaded by religious arguments and what God wants or what God's laws are. But they might be persuaded by secular logic if that secular logic is good. I think a combination of both are necessary.

However within Church settings, Catholic bishops, priests and deacons should not use only secular arguments but the full force of the faith and morals of the Church including divine law revealed in natural law and Scripture as well as the Tradition of the Church. If that doesn't convince Catholics, then we have a whole set of other problems, the loss of Catholic identity and the secularization of Catholics in the pews, what one might call their being "born again" not as Catholics but as heathens. That's a problem, boys and girls!

We might not be successful in this spiritual battle with secularists who wish to remove God from the public square to promote their twisted vision of utopia, but we are called as Catholics, both clergy and laity, to be faithful to God and His Holy Church and avoid utopian ideologies at all costs. The dictatorship of secularism is promoting marriage utopia as they once promoted communism as utopia and fascism as utopia. Obedience to God and Church anyone?

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

When I was in the 6th grade our school had a debate contest. I was invited to enter and at the conclusion was a finalist. The final vote was actually open to the student body and I recall one classmate remarking, as he cast his ballot, that he was voting for the other position because I was on the opposing team. I was not offended personally, but aghast that he would be willing to align himself with an obviously inferior position simply out of spite.

It is surprising that so many people in prominent positions of public life or the media spend a lot of time defending positions with arguments that at their heart are based on the person's hatred of the Church. This sort of logical fallacy, once it is spotted, can save us a lot of time, because it lets us know that we are not engaged in the discussion topic we though we were. It can also give is ease of mind because whatever the person's grievance with the Church may be, it does not alter facts of another argument.

Again, this points to either the not so hidden agenda of the editors, or their incompetence. There is a line of thinking that one should engage these people in argument so as not to surrender the pint through acquiescence and perhaps even defeat their claims. After that episode in 6th grade, I discovered that the continued engagement approach has a limited value. I engaged the person, and several of his brothers, after school for an extended period that failed to resolve the issue to anyone's satisfaction except mine.

When a person is acting irrationally, then a rational appeal to that person has limited value. The person is under the influence of something greater than he can manage. Therefore, prayer, for you and him, is the first order of battle. Secondly, establish the context of the engagement within larger boundaries for your own freedom of movement. This person is an expert at this particular engagement, he is devoting all of his waking moments and whatever intellectual skills he possesses to it. So be careful trying to play 'Dueling Banjos' with gay activists; they have been practising. Don't let yourself be drawn into arguing details that are distractions and are only there to waste your time.

One of the great aspects of Christian faith and Catholicism is that you must be drawn into your own place and make up your own mind to accept the Grace that is given. We can set the field and provide the tools, but we cannot argue the other person into salvation.

rcg

Gene said...

RCG, "Dueling banjos???" Is that what the gay activists call it now? LOL!!!

Anonymous said...

Just 'Macon' sure you were paying attention.....

rcg

Gene said...

RCG, I was just making fun of guys
Dayton each other...