Translate

Thursday, February 14, 2019

THIS IS A BOMBSHELL AND SPEAKS OF THE GREAT SCHISMS IN THE MAGISTERIUM UNDER POPE FRANCIS AND FOMMENTED BY HIM--THIS IS BUT ONE


PRESS TITLE FOR FULL, LONG ARTICLE FROM THE WALL STREET JOURNAL:

‘It Will Cause a Scandal.’ The Pope and a Trusted U.S. Cardinal Clash Over Sex-Abuse Crisis

The once-warm relationship between Pope Francis and Cardinal O’Malley has become strained over the Vatican’s stance on sex abuse 

 These are excerpts:

 

VATICAN CITY—Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston, chief adviser to Pope Francis on protecting children from sexual abuse, called a meeting with top papal aides in 2017, concerned the Vatican wasn’t living up to its promise of “zero tolerance.”


An appeals panel set up by the pope had reduced the punishments of a number of Catholic priests found guilty of abusing minors. In some cases, the panel canceled their dismissal from the priesthood and gave them short suspensions instead.

“If this gets out, it will cause a scandal,” Cardinal O’Malley told Cardinal Secretary of State Pietro Parolin, in effect the pope’s prime minister, and other Vatican officials, according to a person present. No action was taken to address the issue.

-------


Today, interactions between the pope and the cardinal, previously friendly and spontaneous, have become noticeably formal and terse, says a person who has observed them together.
The Boston cardinal’s influence has declined to the point where, in November, the pope excluded him from the organizing committee of next week’s summit, which had been Cardinal O’Malley’s idea.

----------------


Cardinal O’Malley used his role in the new pontificate to push for stronger Vatican leadership on sex abuse. He persuaded the pope to create an advisory panel on child protection, led by himself, tasked with proposing changes to church policies and procedures.

In 2015, the panel recommended a special tribunal to try bishops who ignore or cover up abuse. At a Council of Cardinals meeting, Cardinal O’Malley won the pope’s agreement. The following year, the pope changed his mind.

Peter Saunders, a former abuse victim on the panel, asked Cardinal O’Malley what had happened to the tribunal plan. The visibly frustrated cardinal shrugged, rolled his eyes, and said: “I really don’t know the answer. I wish I did,” according to Mr. Saunders.

------------

On a trip to Chile in January 2018, the pope defended a local bishop accused of covering up sex abuse. The victims’ persistent allegations, he said, were “calumny” without proof.

ardinal O’Malley issued a public statement criticizing the pope—an unusual action for any cardinal to take, let alone one so close to the pope. “It is understandable that Pope Francis’s statements yesterday…were a source of great pain for survivors of sexual abuse,” he said. “Words that convey the message ‘if you cannot prove your claims then you will not be believed’ abandon those who have suffered…to discreditable exile.”

The cardinal mitigated the chastisement by adding that Pope Francis was committed to zero tolerance of sex abuse. The pope, talking to reporters, seized on that part of the cardinal’s statement and thanked him for it.

The pope also repeated his view that allegations without evidence are “calumny,” and said the victims had never approached him.

The Associated Press soon reported that Cardinal O’Malley had handed the pope a detailed letter from a Chilean victim telling his story in 2015.

Pope Francis’ troubles grew last summer when a former Vatican diplomat accused him of ignoring earlier reports of sexual misconduct with adults by retired Archbishop Theodore McCarrick of Washington. The pope declined to respond to the allegations at news conferences last year.

BOMBSHELL: POPE FRANCIS SPEAKS ABOUT THE LITURGY


ANYTHING WRONG WITH THIS ACTUAL TEXT?


Audience with participants in the Plenary of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, 14.02.2019

After the meeting with participants in the Assembly of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) at the premises of the FAO in Rome, the Holy Father Francis returned to the Vatican where at midday, in the room adjacent to the Paul VI Hall, he received in audience the participants in the plenary of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments.
The following is the Pope’s address to those present:

Address of the Holy Father
Cardinals,
dear brothers in the episcopate and in the priesthood,
dear brothers and sisters!
I am pleased to meet you on the occasion of your Plenary Assembly. I thank the Cardinal Prefect for the words he has addressed to me and I greet you all, members, collaborators and consultors of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments.
This Plenary comes at a significant time. Fifty years have passed since, on 8 May 1969, Saint Paul VI wished to establish the then Congregatio pro Cultu Divino, in order to give shape to the renewal desired by Vatican Council II. It was a matter of publishing the liturgical books according to the criteria and decisions of the Council Fathers, with a view to fostering, in the People of God, “active, conscious and pious” participation in the mysteries of Christ (cf. Constitution Sacrosanctum Concilium, 48). The praying tradition of the Church needed renewed expressions, without losing anything of its millennial wealth, even rediscovering the treasures of its origins.

In the first months of that year the first fruits of the reform accomplished by the Apostolic See flourished for the benefit of the People of God. On precisely this date the Motu proprio Mysterii paschalis was promulgated regarding the Roman calendar and the liturgical year (14 February 1969); then, the important Apostolic Constitution Missale Romanum (3 April 1969), with which the Holy Pope promulgated the Roman Missal. In the same year the Ordo Missae and various other Ordowere issued, including those relating to the baptism of the children, marriage and funerals. They were the first steps of a journey, to be continued with wise constancy.
We know that it is not enough to change the liturgical books to improve the quality of the liturgy. To do this alone would be a deception. For life to be truly a praise pleasing to God, it is indeed necessary to change the heart. Christian conversion is oriented to this conversion, which is an encounter of life with the “God of the living” (Mt 22: 32). This is also the purpose of your work today, aimed at helping the Pope to carry out his ministry for the benefit of the Church in prayer all over the earth. In ecclesial communion both the Apostolic See and the Bishops’ Conferences operate in a spirit of cooperation, dialogue and synodality. In fact, the Holy See does not replace the bishops, but works with them to serve, in the richness of the various languages and cultures, the prayerful vocation of the Church in the world. The Motu proprio Magnum principium (3 September 2017) follows in this line; in it, I intended to promote, among other things, the need for “a constant collaboration filled with mutual trust, vigilant and creative, between the Episcopal Conferences and the dicastery of the Apostolic See which performs the task of promoting the sacred liturgy”. The hope is to continue on the path of mutual collaboration, aware of the responsibilities involved in ecclesial communion, in which unity and variety are united. It is a question of harmony.

Here we find also the challenge of formation, the specific object of your reflection. Speaking of formation, we can not forget, first of all, that the liturgy is life that forms, not an idea to be learned.

It is useful in this regard to remember that reality is more important than the idea (see Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii gaudium, 231-233). And it is good therefore, in the liturgy as in other areas of ecclesial life, not to end up favouring sterile ideological polarizations, which often arise when, considering our own ideas valid for all contexts, we tend to adopt an attitude of perennial dialectic towards who does not share them. Thus, starting perhaps from the desire to react to some insecurities in the current context, we risk then falling back into a past that no longer exists or of escaping into a presumed future.

The starting point is instead to recognize the reality of the sacred liturgy, a living treasure that can not be reduced to tastes, recipes and currents, but which should be welcomed with docility and promoted with love, as irreplaceable nourishment for the organic growth of the People of God. 

 

The liturgy is not “the field of do-it-yourself”, but the epiphany of ecclesial communion. Therefore, “we”, and not “I”, resounds in prayers and gestures; the real community, not the ideal subject. 

 

When we look back to nostalgic past tendencies or wish to impose them again, there is the risk of placing the part before the whole, the “I” before the People of God, the abstract before the concrete, ideology before communion and, fundamentally, the worldly before the spiritual.

In this sense, the title of your assembly is valuable: The liturgical formation of the People of God. The task that awaits us is indeed essentially that of spreading among the People of God the splendour of the living mystery of the Lord, Who makes Himself manifest in the liturgy. Speaking of liturgical formation in the People of God means first and foremost being aware of the indispensable role the liturgy holds in the Church and for the Church. And then, concretely helping the People of God to interiorize better the prayer of the Church, to love it as an experience of encounter with the Lord and with brothers who, in the light of this, rediscover its content and observe its rites.

Since the liturgy is an experience extended to the conversion of life through the assimilation of the Lord’s way of thinking and behaving, liturgical formation can not be limited to simply offering knowledge – this is a mistake – though necessary, on liturgical books, nor even to protect the dutiful fulfilment of the ritual disciplines.

In order for the liturgy to fulfil its formative and transforming function, it is necessary that the pastors and the laity be introduced to their meaning and symbolic language, including art, song and music in the service of the mystery celebrated, even silence. The Catechism of the Catholic Church itself adopts the mystagogical way to illustrate the liturgy, valuing its prayers and signs. Mystagogy: this is a suitable way to enter the mystery of the liturgy, in the living encounter with the crucified and risen Lord. Mystagogy means discovering the new life we have received in the People of God through the Sacraments, and continually rediscovering the beauty of renewing it.

Regarding the stages of formation, we know from experience that, in addition to the initial phase, it is necessary to cultivate the ongoing formation of the clergy and laity, especially those who are involved in the ministries serving the liturgy. Formation not once, but continuing. As for the ordained ministers, also in view of a healthy ars celebrandi, the Council’s appeal is valid: “A prime need, therefore, is that attention be directed, first of all, to the liturgical instruction of the clergy” (Apostolic Constitution Sacrosanctum Concilium, 14). First of all. The educational responsibilities are shared, even if the individual dioceses are more closely involved in the operational phase. Your reflection will help the dicastery to develop guidelines and indications to offer, in a spirit of service, to those – episcopal conferences, dioceses, training institutes, journals – who have the responsibility of taking care of and accompanying the liturgical formation of the People of God.

Dear brothers and sisters, we are all called to deepen and revive our liturgical formation. The liturgy is in fact the main road through which Christian life passes through every phase of its growth. You therefore have before you a great and beautiful task: to work so that the People of God may rediscover the beauty of meeting the Lord in the celebration of His mysteries and, by meeting Him, have life in His name. I thank you for your efforts and I bless you, asking you to always reserve for me a place – a large one! – in your prayer.

EVEN REPTILES LOVE SAINT VALENTINE’S DAY IN THE LOW COUNTRY OF SOUTH CAROLINA


IT’S EASIER TO LEAD COLORING BOOK CATHOLICS ASTRAY AND THEN YOU CAN CONVINCE THEM THAT 2 + 2 = 5!

Cardinal Kaspar castigated Cardinal Mueller for his clarity of doctrine which leads to division.

Now Jesuit Father Reese castigates 1990’s reforms of seminaries that teaches the catechism to seminarians which then makes them authoritarian and rigid priests. He prefers the seminary style I attended in the 1970’s. No thank you Fr. Reese. We don’t need coloring book priests who promote a heterodox Catholicism that then abuses children and vulnerable adults with lies.

Progressives hated and hate the clarity of Pope John Paul’s Cathechism of the Catholic Church and the new clarity it brought to catechesis and to seminaries.

They prefer the Dutch Catechism and the liberal catechisms of the 1970’s, such as Anthony Wilhelm’s heterodox and widely used 1960’s Christ Among Us, and the coloring book era that produced only 12% of Catholics in the liberal northeast attending Mass and Catholics like Gov. Cuomo.

What Fr. Reese’s wants is a backwards pilgrimage to the corrupt 1970’s. Press title for NCR agenda:


The Catholic Church's US seminaries need reform


Wednesday, February 13, 2019

IT MUST BE HARD FOR A CELEBRITY IN TODAY'S HOLLYWOOD TO BE AN ACTIVE, PRACTICING ROMAN CATHOLICS


Here is an excerpt from a longer article on Gary Sinise and his wife's conversion to Catholicism from Catholic News Service. You can read the full article HERE.

CNS

For the next year, his wife was in the Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults program. "We started going to Mass," Sinise said. "My wife was confirmed in Easter 2000. ... The following year that little church became a sanctuary, a place of great comfort" following the 9/11 terror attacks in 2001.

Oh, and "our kids started attending the school there," he added.

 

Sinise himself joined the church in 2010.

 

"I surprised my family. I'd gone through the confirmation classes and whatnot myself behind everybody's back and I didn't tell anybody that I was doing it," he said.

 

"On Christmas Eve 2010 I told the family I was taking them to dinner at Morton's Steakhouse and have Christmas Eve dinner," he said. "And on the way there, I pulled into the church, and everybody asked, 'What are we doing here?' I said come on in. We walked into the church. The priest was there, and he confirmed me. It was beautiful."

ARE THERE ANY PARISHES NAMED COMPASSION CATHOLIC CHURCH?

Compassion Christian Church is a mega church in the Savannah area and has satellite meeting places in various communities in about a 40 mile radius of Savannah. All the various branches have worship leaders, but there is only one pastor for all of the branches and he normally preaches via live stream to all the branches.  They recommend that you attend the branch closest to you.

It's a novel concept isn't it, although it sounds vaguely familiar to me?

Here are two videos that explain their approach and their compassion. Can we Catholics learn anything from them as it regards their compassion and fellowship?





Here are their beliefs from their webpage. Oddly enough, their IT person lives next to me and he seems like a very compassionate kind of guy.  Their beliefs are very conservative and there isn't much that a Catholic could disagree upon except for what isn't included.

However, they do rebaptize Christians from other denominations. Many Catholics have jumped shipped and joined this mega church because of its compassion, rock music worship and its compassion. Did I say compassion? But they are re-baptized.

If you join, or are accepted by them, you must sign an agreement form that you agree with what they teach and will live accordingly.

For a comprehensive Statement of Faith, click here.


Jesus

We believe that Jesus of Nazareth is the Messiah, the Son of the Living God and God in human form.  We believe that the virgin-born Son of God died for our sins, was buried, rose from the dead and is coming again.  We believe He is both fully God and fully man.
Philippians 2:5-7, John 14:19, John 8:58, John 1:1, 14, Colossians 2:9

The Bible

We believe that the Bible is the inspired Word of God, the written record of His supernatural revelation of Himself to man, absolute in its authority, complete in its revelation, final in its content, without any error in its teaching and is “living and active,” ever speaking to our present circumstances.
Hebrews 4:12, 2 Timothy 3:16-17, 2 Peter 1:20-21

Sin and Salvation

We believe that all people are guilty of sin because all people are born with a sin nature which leads all people to sin.
Jeremiah 17:9, Romans 3:23
We believe the substitutionary death of Jesus on the cross is the sole basis of atonement for the sins of mankind.
Isaiah 53:3-6, 2 Corinthians 5:21, Romans 5:8
We believe that the forgiveness of sins and the gift of eternal life are promised to those who trust Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior.
John 3:16-17, Ephesians 2:8-9
We believe the Bible teaches that the pattern to follow to receive Jesus as Savior is to believe in Jesus as God’s Son and Savior of the world, to repent of personal sin, to confess Jesus as Lord and to be immersed in baptism.
Romans 10:9, Acts 2:38-39, Romans 6:3-4 

The Church

We believe the mission of the church is to reach the spiritually lost for Christ, to teach with the goal of “forming Christ in them” and then to mobilize believers to accomplish God’s purposes in the world.
Matthew 28:18-20


Tuesday, February 12, 2019

OFF PUTTING?????????????

Many people find this off-putting, the manner of consecration, not the aging priest, but him too. Why would this cause Catholics to get rid of a priest in their parish who did this? 



CHRIS PRATT SOUNDS A LOT LIKE GOV. CUOMO


What  do you think about this celebrity who witnesses to his faith publicly, defending himself from another celebrity preacher who castigated him for belonging to an "anti-LGBTQ" mega church. And what would this preaching celebrity and her Magisterium say about the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church? How well would a celebrity who belongs to the SSPX branch of the Catholic Church do as a celebrity?

Celebrities and their dogmatic Magisteriums are soooooo important for building our culture. Certainly we must bow in humble obedience and deference!

This is Chris Pratt's response. I am not so sure Catholics should respond the same way, but I could be wrong since I am not infallible like celebrities are!

“I go to a church that opens their doors to absolutely everyone,” Pratt wrote on an Instagram story Monday.


While the church’s official stance on LGBTQ issues is unclear, Pratt added that, though his faith is important, “no church defines me or my life, and I am not a spokesman for any church or any group of people.”


“My values define who I am,” he said. “We need less hate in this world, not more. I am a man who believes that everyone is entitled to love who they want, free from the judgment of their fellow man.”

Monday, February 11, 2019

JUST A PERFECT ADJUSTMENT FOR THE ORDINARY FORM! WHAT COULD GO WRONG?


I HOPE I DON'T GET REMOVED FROM THE CATHEDRAL FOR THIS

Yours truly and the fifth Sunday after Ephiphany, more to come:





SIX LONG YEARS AGO, A SAD SHOCKING DAY


It was early in the morning and I was on my day off in Augusta and my parochial vicar called to tell me that Benedict has abdicated the papacy. I honestly thought someone would be elected to continue the restoration of Catholic identity--NOT!

Benedict XVI six years later: the relevance of a Magisterium

On February 11th 2013, Pope Benedict XVI announced his resignation. Vatican News’ Editorial Director looks back at this event and suggests it would be a mistake to remember the Pope Emeritus for this reason only.
By Andrea Tornielli
Six years have passed since that bolt from the blue: the announcement of the first papal resignation for reasons of health and old age. After eight years as Pope, Benedict XVI announced his intention to resign from the Petrine ministry at the end of February, because he no longer felt able, physically and spiritually, to carry the weight of that ministry – one that has changed greatly over the past century in the way it is exercised: in terms of celebrations, commitments, and international journeys.

Testimony of Benedict XVI

Much has been said and written about that papal resignation. The result is that we risk focusing exclusively on the gesture itself, being distracted from the personal testimony and, above all, the Magisterium of Pope Benedict XVI.  In a few days, the Meeting for the Protection of Minors will take place in the Vatican, with the participation of Presidents of Bishops’ Conferences from around the world, together with Pope Francis. In terms of Pope Benedict’s testimony, it is worthwhile remembering that he was the one who began meeting with victims of abuse. Meetings that always took place far from the cameras, and that involved listening, praying, and tears. Accompanying these meetings were clearer and more decisive rules to combat the terrible plague of abuse. Today there is no doubt that the necessary change of mentality, on the part of bishops and religious superiors first of all, passes through this ability to meet with victims and their families. It requires participating in the pain of their dramatic stories, being aware that this phenomenon can never be fought with norms, codes or best practices alone.

Magisterium of Benedict XVI

The Magisterium of Pope Benedict XVI is all too often trivialized by simplistic interpretations and prefabricated clichés, unable to comprehend the richness, complexity and fidelity to the teachings of the Second Vatican Council. How can we fail to remember his insistence that the Church "has nothing of her own to offer to Him who founded her, such that she might say: here is something wonderful that we did! Her raison d’etre consists in being a tool of redemption, in letting herself be saturated by God’s word and in bringing the world into loving unity with God".  A vision that is the opposite of trusting in strategies and projects. In a speech given at the Concert Hall in Freiburg im Breisgau, in September 2011, Pope Benedict XVI continues to describe his vision of the Church: "When she is truly herself, she is always on the move; she constantly has to place herself at the service of the mission that she has received from the Lord. And therefore she must always open up afresh to the cares of the world, to which she herself belongs, and give herself over to them, in order to make present and continue the holy exchange that began with the Incarnation".
In that same speech, Pope Benedict XVI warns against the opposite tendency: a Church that “becomes self-satisfied, settles down in this world... Not infrequently she gives greater weight to organization and institutionalization than to her vocation to openness towards God, her vocation to opening up the world towards the other". In that speech, the Pope Emeritus demonstrates the positive side of secularization, which has "contributed significantly to the purification and inner reform" of the Church, by expropriating her goods and eliminating her privileges. Because, he concludes, "once liberated from material and political burdens and privileges, the Church can reach out more effectively and in a truly Christian way to the whole world, she can be truly open to the world. She can live more freely her vocation to the ministry of divine worship and to the service of her neighbor".

WHILE THERE IS NO DEFENSE OF PRIESTS DOING IT,, THERE IS NO DEFENSE FOR ANYONE DOING IT, BUT IT IS A HUMAN SEXUAL DISORDER NOT JUST A CELIBATE PRIEST SEXUAL DISORDER


Keep in mind that Baptists do not keep meticulous secret archives (personnel files) on their clergy like the Catholic Church does. Baptists are a loose confederation and highly congregational. If a congregation quietly fires a minister for sexual abuse and yes they would cover it up too, if they were able to do so, they would not write anything down or warn the next congregation that would hire him. They certainly did not send them for treatment! Most members would never sue their own congregation! This is Congregationalism after all.

Baptists can't go back 70 years and more to discover credible accusations either. THERE ARE NO RECORDS and members of congregations will do everything to protect their church family from scandal becoming public.

From The Washington Post:  “20 years, 700 victims” So reads part of the headline of a sweeping investigation that has found years of sexual abuse perpetrated by hundreds of Southern Baptist church leaders against an even larger number of victims. The Houston Chronicle and the San Antonio Express-News reported that nearly 400 Southern Baptist church leaders and volunteers have faced sexual misconduct allegations in the past two decades. As many as 700 victims — some as young as 3 — were sexually abused, some raped… 

KUDOS TO THESE HIGH SCHOOL KIDS AND THEIR NOD TO TRADITION

Two high kids designed a blessed Sacrament Chapel in a small space at a Catholic Middle School in Michigan. Please note that the altar can only be used ad orientem.

In our previous Catholic Pastoral Center a chapel with the Blessed Sacrament was placed in a similar size room, but with all 1970's minimalism, ugliness and blah. I think clergy designed its horribleness!

Unfortunately I don't have a picture for it to compare!


BOMBSHELL: CLARITY WILL LEAD TO CONFUSION AND DIVISION AND ANOTHER PROTESTANT REFORMATION

Cardinal Kasper says Mueller’s manifesto spreads ‘confusion and division’

Cardinal Kasper says Mueller’s manifesto spreads ‘confusion and division’
German Cardinal Walter Kasper in a file photo. (Credit: Paul Haring/CNS.)

And Cardinal Mueller is the new Martin Luther!

MUNICH, Germany - Cardinal Walter Kasper has released a criticism of Cardinal Gerhard Müller’s “Manifesto of Faith,” accusing it of containing half-truths and blanket statements that could lead to division and confusion in the Church.
In a statement on katholisch.de, Kasper said that while the manifesto “contains many statements of faith that every upright Catholic can wholeheartedly affirm,” some of the truths in it “are pointed out so pointedly that it fades out the other half.”
On Feb. 8, Müller, former prefect of the Vatican’s doctrinal office, published a “Manifesto of Faith,” which he described as a response to Catholics who have requested that he issue a “public testimony about the truth of revelation” in response to “growing confusion about the doctrine of the Faith.”
The manifesto addresses five areas of Catholic doctrine: Christology, ecclesiology, sacraments, morality, and eschatology, the branch of theology that addresses death, judgment, heaven, and hell. Each section draws heavily from references to the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
In his document, Müller quotes the catechism, noting that “Anyone conscious of a grave sin must receive the sacrament of Reconciliation before coming to communion.” He adds that “from the internal logic of the sacrament,” that norm applies to “divorced and civilly remarried persons, whose sacramental marriage exists before God, as well as those Christians who are not in full communion with the Catholic Faith and the Church.” He also reiterated that the Church cannot ordain women to the priesthood and affirmed Church teaching on the existence of heaven and hell.
Kasper, who has been an outspoken advocate of the admission of the divorced-and-remarried to Holy Communion, accused Müller of making “unacceptable blanket statements,” such as the assertion that “the conscience of the faithful is not sufficiently formed.”
“It is undoubtedly true that the confession of the Triune God constitutes a fundamental difference in belief in God and the image of man from other religions. But are there not similarities, especially with the Jews and the Muslims, in the belief in the one God? 

And are not these similarities today fundamental to peace in the world and in society? Half the truth is not the Catholic truth!” Kasper said. (And doesn't this sound like Neville Chamberlain's Hitler appeasement:) How horrible, fantastic, incredible it is, that we should be digging trenches and trying on gas-masks here, because of a quarrel in a faraway country between people of whom we know nothing... However much we may sympathise with a small nation confronted by a big and powerful neighbour, we cannot in all circumstances undertake to involve the whole British Empire in war simply on her account. If we have to fight, it must be on larger issues than that. I am myself a man of peace to the depths of my soul; armed conflict between nations is a nightmare to me... War is a fearful thing, and we must be very clear before we embark on it, that it is really the great issues that are at stake.
Neville Chamberlain
He also said that he was “totally horrified” to read Müller’s statement that failing to teach the truths of the Catholic faith “it is the fraud of Antichrist.”
Kasper suggested that Müller was following the path of Martin Luther: “One who rightly advocates reforms in the Church, but wants to pursue these behind the pope’s back and enforce them in opposition to him? I would find that hard to believe. For that could only lead to confusion and division. That could unhinge the Catholic Church.”

Sunday, February 10, 2019

DO PRACTICING YOUNG CATHOLICS HAVE THE SAME HATRED OF HUMANAE VITAE AS MY GENERATION OF CATHOLICS (THE 1960'S)?


My new parish in Richmond Hill, Georgia is a very young parish and quite diverse. We have a huge number of army people from all over the country.

We have about 800 registered households. We have 50 children preparing for First Holy Communion and another 50 or so for Confirmation.

Our young Catholic families have four, five and six and more children!

We are NOT an EF parish and our Liturgies are quite middle of the road with all the things that most ultra conservative Catholics despise. But our liturgies are reverent and according to the GIRM and rubrics.

So what's up with younger Catholics having so many children today and not just EF Catholics? 

WERE DISSINTING BISHOPS AGAINST POPE PAUL VI'S HUMANAE VITAE TREATED IN THE SAME WAY AS THOSE WHO ARE DISSINTING FROM POPE FRANCIS' AMBIGUITIES AND THE CONFUSION AND POLARIZATION HE HAS SOWED?


Maybe Pope Paul VI and his implementation of Vatican II caused a great deal of polarization in the Church. But both Popes John Paul II and Benedict quelled most of that for the most part.

Pope Francis has reignited the flames of polarization in a way no modern pope has ever done, not even Pope Paul VI who ultimately was rather clear in his teachings. This is not the case with Pope Francis, especially concerning his incessant off-the-cuff statements and horrible gaffs.

Thus this article from Rueters illustrates how even the hierarchy is in disarray because of this pope and I would venture to guess more so than it was when Pope Paul VI issued Humanae Vitae which also had some dissenting cardinals and bishops.

Of course today dissenters have the social media to get their word out unlike the 1960's.

So what do you think of the bias in this article:

Sacked cardinal issues manifesto in thinly veiled attack on pope

THE NEW AND IMPROVED REFORMED MASS HAS DONE WONDERS FOR CATHOLICS WHO ACTUALLY PARTICIPATE BY COMING TO MASS,; OF THE 12% WHO ACTUALLY BOTHER TO ATTEND MASS, MAYBE HALF OF THEM ACTUALLY PARTICIPATE




Praytell provocateur Fr. Anthony, OSB writes this:

And however much you esteem tradition, you have to acknowledge that the Council saw the preconciliar liturgy as inadequate and in need of reform.

Of course he provokes discussion then gets mad at those who disagree with him, castigating them with his own snarky comments or simply deleting the ones he doesn't like and banning others who make more sense than he does. So much for academic open-mindedness!

But what does he mean by "the preconciliar liturgy as inadequate and in need of reform?" This of course means that the laity weren’t actually participating in the Mass prior to Vatican II. They were either in a trance or praying other devotions.

But in this country nearly 90% of Catholics actually attended the Mass in need of reform in the 1950’s, to include Catholics on the fringes of the Church and society, those in immoral situations and others who might have disagreed with this, that or the other. The mafia attended.   In the reformed Mass today some parts of the country see only 12% of Catholics actually participating in the Mass by simply attending. There is a small percentage from the fringes but not like the percentages we saw prior to Vatican II.

So 90% of all Catholics actually went to The Mass in need of reform because of its problems with so called clericalism and lack of verbal participation. Interesting, no?

But does Fr. Anthony acknowledge the areas where the reformed Mass is corrupt not only in attracting only 12% of actual participation but where there is lack of reverence, sacrilege concerning the Eucharistic elements, Hosts taken home, discarded, dropped and Precious Blood spilled, contaminated and gulped. And the supercreativity that makes Masses different from parish to parish and priest to priest.

What other problems with the new and improved Mass could there possibly be? You report your experiences.

Saturday, February 9, 2019

THE PATH TO HELL IS PAVED WITH GOOD INTENTIONS


This is the manifesto written by the young priest concerning HIS plans for HIS parish. I personally think he was trying to do too much too quickly. I think too that the liberal, post Catholic types in the laity, a la Gov. Cuomo, objected to homilies that appeared political-- challenging their political allegiances especially to their sacrament of abortion.

Please note how many times he uses the pronoun "I" and the word "mine".


Opening Statement from Meeting at Our Lady of Peace Parish.
JANUARY 22 · PUBLIC
*Tonight at my parish was a meeting for folks to address their concerns about changes I have made. This is the statement I prepared so that folks could have in writing those decisions, and to curtail rumors*
Thank you all for meeting with me tonight to discuss the direction of Our Lady of Peace (OLP) parish. I want to let you know that I am hear to talk with you, and not at you. I realize that reading a written statement may not feel like that, but I have also learned that written statements reduce confusion, and increase clarity. In this statement I would like to address concerns about the direction of this parish that I have learned of in one way or another. The concerns are addressed in no particular order. I do not assume that this is an exhaustive list. After I finish, I would like us to have a respectful conversation about these matters.
The Why: As I mentioned in my homily for the Second Sunday of Advent this past year, the numbers in the Diocese of Saginaw are declining, and declining at a rapid rate. When we look around most parishes, we also see a lack of young adults attending. If we do not change to attract younger folks, parishes will continue to close, including ours. I’m on the border of GenX, and the Millennials, and work with the post-Millennials in campus ministry. Younger generations, overall, react very positively to more traditional, and more quiet worship. When my assignment to OLP was first made known, a handful of young adults in Bay City reached out to me with relative quickness. They simply asked how they could be of help to me. I told them that when I arrived, I would like to meet with as many young adult Christians as they could find who were willing to meet with me, and they did so. Several times over the summer I met with them on Midland street to discuss what they wanted to see, and what would help them evangelize. Without exception they all wanted to see more use of tradition, and clearer catechesis in preaching. They were all willing to help as well, so I began to use that help. The combination of declining numbers, few young Catholics, and the enthusiasm of that few for tradition is what is fueling my decisions to make changes.
Mass Times: I have discussed among the staff, and the parish council the possibility of moving the 10:30am Mass on Sundays to 11am. This would be done to offer Religious Education between the Masses. According to Genny, our Religious Ed. coordinator, this is quite popular among the parents of our students. She also states that other parishes that have done this have seen an increase of attendance at Mass, and in the classes. I am seriously considering this, and every mom and dad I have talked to about this said it would make religious education tremendously easier on their schedules. I have not made a decision yet, as the staff and I are trying to consider difficulties that may arise with this change. I can say, however, that I am strongly leaning to making this change after July 1rst. For this reason I will use the term “late Sunday Mass” throughout the remainder of the statement.
Overall direction of the liturgy: The major changes will take place at the late Sunday morning Masses. The Saturday evening Masses, and the early Sunday morning Masses will remain pretty similar to how they stand now in terms of music, and degree of solemnity.
Latin in the Liturgy: I do intend to use more Latin Mass parts (i.e. Angus Dei/Lamb of God, Sanctus Sanctus Sanctus/Holy Holy Holy). I will do so slowly, and with proper catechesis. This is in keeping with the call of Vatican II to preserve Latin in the liturgy (Sacrosanctum Concillium, 36.1), and the General Instruction of the Roman Missal (GIRM, 41). This will be done at the late Sunday morning Mass over time. There will be less use of Latin Mass parts to the 4pm Sunday, and 8:30am Sunday Masses, and will not be used as frequently. My thoughts for those two Masses is to employ a small amount during Advent, and Lent. This would be something as simple as the Kyrie (Greek not Latin), and the Angus Dei, but nothing more.
The Pre-VCII Mass: This is otherwise known as the Tridentine Mass, or the Extraordinary Form of the Mass. I have no intention of offering this Mass at all in the near future. I do not know how to offer it, and I do not see a pastoral advantage to learning it at the moment. I have only been to three of these Masses in my life thus far. I have stated publicly that I do believe it would be advantageous of this diocese to permit this Mass somewhere on a weekly basis. I have also made it clear that I am not the one to offer it.
Ad Orientem Mass: The post-Vatican II Mass, or the Novus Ordo Mass, or the Ordinary Form of the Mass, may be offered Ad Orientem in which the priest faces the apse of the Church during various prayers. I do offer this from time to time at SVSU, and have since my rookie year, as the students react to it quite positively. This past Advent I offered it for the first time on a Sunday there, as the students had been asking, and took care of all I told them they needed to take care of for me to offer this Mass. I have no intention of offering Ad Orientem Mass at OLP. I am open to the idea of doing so, but that would need to be a ground up movement, and, if that were to happen, I would do so at the late Sunday morning Mass.
Music: I have hired Jason Payne to offer chant at all of our late Sunday morning Masses starting in July. An anonymous benefactor inquired as to how much this would cost. I gave him an estimate, and he stated he would pay for half of it. When I discussed the payment terms with Mr. Payne, he agreed to them. Other anonymous benefactors (a married couple) have since approached me, and are considering paying the other half. None of these benefactors are his future family-in-law who belong to this parish. I have hired him because of his unique talent, and professional training regarding ancient chant. This is not a slight to our current cantors, but an employment of an asset we can afford. Since his debut in Advent no less than five young adults have asked me about learning this chant. Younger Catholics have told me how much they enjoy that music, and look forward to its regular use. We will still employ the use of some hymns at those Masses, which may mean also having other cantors lead those hymns. The 4pm, and 8:30am Masses will not employ this chant.
I do want to purchase new hymnals, as I do not like spending the amount of money we spend every year on disposable ones. I am, however, going to take my time on this change. I am currently planning to purchase “Breaking Bread” for 2020 while I consider other options for the future.
Incense: Incense is another favorite among younger Catholics, but not just them. Older Catholics have told me how much they appreciate the smells of their childhood faith returning to the church. I anticipate using it quite frequently at our late Sunday morning Mass. I do not plan to use it with any frequency at the other Masses. On high feast days, however, I do plan to use it at all the Masses to add to greater solemnity, but this will depend if I have the servers to help or not. I am looking into hypoallergenic blends, and better coal. I am also looking into seating for those who may struggle with incense. As always, incense will be used at funerals.
Bells: I plan to use bells during the Eucharistic prayer for all the Masses, so long as we have the servers to do it. All the servers, old and young, seem to like this responsibility, and I want to encourage that enthusiasm. Like incense, many Catholics of older generations have told me how their use brings them joyful memories of their childhood in the Church.
Homilies: I have never preached about how to vote. I went out of my way to say that my homily was not about voting. I was preaching about our spiritual responsibility to fight against the evil of abortion. The closest thing I said to anything about voting is that we will be held accountable for how, and why we voted in the next life. The overarching point of my homily is that Christ is King over all matters: Church, state, and otherwise. I have the text of this homily.
I preached a homily about divorce, marriage, and annulments. I several times spoke that I was not preaching about anybody’s particular situation, and that if folks were in various situations, to talk to me one on one. I was preaching about what marriage, divorce, and annulments are. I have the text of this homily as well.
SVSU Students: I employed the use of SVSU students in large numbers for one Sunday in August. I did this because my predecessor’s time was not split between the parish and a campus ministry. I wanted folks in the parish to see the ministry that would be occupying a decent amount of my focus and time. There are two SVSU students who regularly serve at the altar at our parish. One is a 25 y/o Army veteran who is also a recent convert to Catholicism. He told me over the summer that he was feeling too old for campus ministry, and that he wanted to join a parish. I told him he was welcome at mine, and that other places would welcome him as well. He attended a few Masses over the summer, and was warmly embraced by several of our parishioners, so he know belongs to this parish. Another regular SVSU student-server is a young man who lives in Bay City, and commutes to SVSU for classes. It is simply better for his schedule most weekends to attend Mass here, and I’m not going to turn down his eagerness to serve.
In Conclusion: I am making major changes to one of our three Sunday Masses. I am doing so to embolden young Catholics, and reach out to traditional Catholics who have not felt as if they have had a home in a long time. The late Sunday morning Mass seems to have more young families attending, and I know there are young singles who are inviting their friends to it. The other two Masses on the weekends will not see the use of incense (except holy days), or chant.
Thank you.

LEAVE IT TO A NOVA SCOTIAN'S COMMON SENSE TO SAVE THE DAY BY GETTING RID OF THE COMMON CHALICE' CESSPOOL THAT IT IS

Drink from this? Hell no!



This is an NCR letter to the editor:


The issue in drinking from a shared Communion cup is cultural, not medical. We live in a North American culture which has long abhorred drinking or eating from shared utensils, be they cups, glasses, plates, spoons, whatever. When I was a boy in Missouri, there were tin cups hanging by a string from all the public water faucets and everybody used them. Today that is not done; it is not even legal.
If parents today found out that kids in the grade school were regularly drinking from the same cups or glasses, there would be a holy uproar and it would stop in a twinkling. Bottom line: it is intensely against the grain of our culture to drink from a shared cup and has been for a long time. (And, I might add, not without reason.)
We Catholics cannot change that. We should not even want to change that! I do not think that it is our role as Catholics to correct the public health conceptions of our culture, or any culture (unless they are dangerously harmful). Historically, we follow the way, formed by Jesus, who himself respected a high-profile public health perception of a specific (first century Jewish) culture: no pork for him. 
The church is always an incarnate community: it lives in this place and in this time. I don't think we should be setting up a situation in which being seen as a good or real Catholic requires one to violate one of the major taboos of our own culture. The results are predictable: I have watched many parents over the years discourage their children from sharing the wine, because they are so uncomfortable with the particular way in which we Catholics insist it must be done. In fact, because of that discomfort, many folks in our parish no longer share in the wine. It need not be that way.
Instead, let us follow the lead of other Christian churches who have found multiple respectful and effective ways of sharing the wine without violating the taboo against drinking out of the same cup. Let us follow their example. A healthily incarnate and ecumenical Christian community can do no less.
JOSEPH FOY
Hantsport, Nova Scotia, Canada