Former President Bill Clinton said it. Speaking about migration, he stated that migrants need to be vetted and there should not be open boarders where there is no screening of those trying to "break" in.
What he said next, and this was in Georgia, near my former parish in Macon, was stunning but true.
He said we need migrants because Americans are not conceiving and giving birth to babies to keep up with what we need to do in America and the people we need to do it.
Low birth rates among Americans, and many places in Europe, to include Rome and all of Italy, is causing a need for migrants and a generous allowance of numerous migrants entering these "barren, birthless" places.
The Democrat party is the party of birth control and abortion on demand by the mother until and up to the end of the 9th month. They want no laws to protect the innocent unborn. They want the mother to make the decision about murdering or allowing to live the child they carry, completely dependent upon her mother! Absurd to say the least.
It would be like me saying that I don't want any laws to stop me from driving recklessly. Every driver should be able to make their own decision about how they are going to drive with no laws to curtail their murderous driving ways. The way I drive must be my decision made with the automobile I drive--no government intervention please!
Why isn't the current magisterium of the Church, the pope and bishops in union with him, promoting Humanae Vitae to the nth degree? Why??????
2 comments:
I think it likely that the reason that the Encyclical is not promoted is because it conflicts with immoral lifestyle choices made by some of our ecclesial leaders. In my diocese, there was a Priest who would tell the faithful that the use of artificial contraception was not proscribed by the church and was a moral choice. Perhaps not unexpectedly, he was an active homosexual and I think was following the logic of humanae vitae that if artificial contraception were permitted, all sorts of sexual acts logically also would have to be. Unfortunately, he became the Vicar General of our diocese and spent his time spending money and managing the decline of the diocese.
Ideology has become paramount at the expense of the overall mission??
Post a Comment