Translate

Thursday, December 19, 2019

IS HE CRAZY OR A PROPHET? PARANOID OR SANE?

Archbishop Vigano concerns me more and more and I am afraid it is his mental health. He needs to come out in the open and state his case publicly and face to face with the one he accuses. I fear something is wrong and not only what he writes.

Like those in our country who have Trump Derangement Syndrome, perhaps His Excellency has Bergoglio Derangement Syndrome?

Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano Edward Pentin, National Catholic Register

Abp Viganò defends Virgin Mary in response to new remarks by Pope

ROME, December 19, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) — Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò today launched a strong defense of the Virgin Mary and a forceful indictment of Pope Francis, in response to the pope’s controversial homily on the feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe in which he called the doctrine of Mary as co-redemptrix “nonsense.”

Archbishop Viganò’s statement, titled “Mary Immaculate Virgin and Mother – Acies Ordinata, ora pro nobis,” is prefaced by a stirring passage from the prophet Isaiah that speaks of the Lord’s will to no longer keep silent in the face of the sin of idolatry.

Read the rest there of the summary! 

Here's Google Translate text of his actual article from Corrispondenza romana:

 "Is there anything other than the Name of Our Lord Jesus Christ in the heart of the Virgin Mary? We also want to have only one name in our hearts: that of Jesus, like the Most Holy Virgin. "

The tragic parable of this Pontificate advances with a succession of urgent twists. There is no day that passes: from the highest throne the Supreme Pontiff proceeds to dismantle the See of Peter, using and abusing the supreme authority, not to confess but to deny; not to confirm but to mislead; not to unite but to divide; not to build but to demolish.

Material heresies, formal heresies, idolatry, superficiality of all sorts: the Supreme Pontiff Bergoglio does not cease to humiliate the highest authority of the Church stubbornly, "demitizing" the Papacy - as perhaps the illustrious comrade Karl Rahner would say. His action aims at violating the Sacred Deposit and scarring the Catholic Face of the Bride of Christ, with saying and doing, with dissimulations and lies, with his blatant gestures, of ostentatious spontaneity, but meticulously planned and planned , through which he exalts himself, in a continuous narcissistic self-celebration, while the figure of the Roman Pontiff is humiliated, that of the Sweet Christ on earth is obscured.

His action uses magisterial improvisation, that magisterium with arm, liquid, treacherous like quicksand, not only at high altitudes, at the mercy of journalists from all over the world, in those ethereal spaces that can highlight a pathological delirium of illusory omnipotence, but also within the framework of the most solemn functions that should inspire sacred tremor and reverent respect.

On the occasion of the Memory of the Virgin of Guadalupe, Pope Bergoglio once again gave vent to his evident Marian impatience, which evokes that of the Serpent in the story of the Fall, in that Proto-Gospel that prophesies the radical enmity posed by God among the Woman and the Serpent, and the declared hostility of the latter who, until the consummation of the times, will try to undermine the Calcagno of the Woman and to triumph over her and her posterity. That of the Pontiff is a manifest aggression towards the sublime prerogatives and attributes that make the Immaculate Mother of God the feminine complement to the mystery of the incarnate Word, intimately associated with Him in the Economy of Redemption.

After having downgraded her to "next door neighbor", or to the fleeing migrant, or to the simple lay woman with the defects and crises of any woman marked by sin, or even to the disciple, who obviously has nothing to teach us; after having trivialized and desacralized them, in the same way as those feminists who are gaining ground in Germany with their movement "Maria 2.0", aimed at modernizing the Madonna to make it a simulacrum, in their image and likeness, Pope Bergoglio has further raged on the Augusta Queen and Immaculate Mother of God, who "got involved with humanity ... and put God himself". With a couple of jokes, he struck at the heart the Marian and Christological dogma connected to it.

The Marian dogmas are the seal affixed to the Catholic truths of our faith, defined in the councils of Nicaea, Ephesus and Chalcedon; they are the unbreakable bastion against the Christological heresies and against the furious unleashing of the Gates of the underworld. Those who "hybridize" and profane them show that they are on the side of the Enemy. Attacking Mary is pouncing against Christ himself; attacking the Mother is rising up against the Son and rebelling against the very mystery of the Holy Trinity. The Immaculate Theotokos, "terrible as hosts and unfolded banners" - ordered acies - will give battle to save the Church and will destroy the army of the Enemy dissolved by the chains that have declared war on it, and with it all the demonic pachamamas will return definitively to the hell.

Pope Bergoglio seems to no longer contain his impatience with the Immaculate, nor can he hide it under that apparent but ostentatious devotion, still in the spotlight of the cameras, while he is deserting the solemn celebration of the Assumption and the recitation of the Rosary with the faithful, who filled the courtyard of San Damaso and the upper loggia of St. Peter's Basilica with St. John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI.

Pope Bergoglio uses pachamama to defeat the Guadalupana. The enthronement of that Amazonian idol up to the Altar of Confession in St. Peter's was nothing less than a declaration of war on the Lady and Patroness of all the Americas, who with her appearance to Juan Diego destroyed demonic idols and has conquered to Christ and to the adoration of the "True and Unique God" the Indians, thanks to his maternal Mediation. And this is not a legend!

A few weeks after the epilogue of the synodal event that marked the investiture of pachamama in the heart of "The Most True and Unique God" the Indians, thanks to his maternal mediation. And this is not a legend!

A few weeks after the end of the synod event that marked the investiture of pachamama in the heart of Catholicism, we learned that the conciliar disaster of the Novus Ordo Missae undergoes further modernization, including the introduction of the "Rugiada" in the Eucharistic Canon instead of the mention of the Holy Spirit, the third Person of the Most Holy Trinity.

This is a further step in the direction of regression towards naturalization and the immanentization of the Catholic Cult, towards a Novissimus pantheon and idolatrous Ordo. The "Dew", an entity present in the "theological place" of the Amazonian tropics, - as we have learned from the synod fathers - figure as the new immanent principle of fertilization of the Earth, which the "transubstantiation" in a pantheistically connected Whole, to which men they are assimilated and submissive, to the glory of pachamama. And here we are again in the darkness of a New Paganism, globalist and eco-tribal, with its demons and its perversions. From this umpteenth liturgical upheaval, the divine Revelation decays from fullness to archaism; from the hypostatic identity of the Holy Spirit one slips down towards the symbolic and metaphorical evanescence proper to the dew, which the Masonic gnosis has made his own for some time.

But let us return for a moment to the idolatrous statuettes, of rare ugliness, and to the declaration of Pope Bergoglio the day after their removal from the church in Transpontina and from their drowning in the Tiber. Also this time, the words of the Pope have the hint of a colossal lie: he made us believe that the figurines were promptly exhumed by the filthy waters thanks to the intervention of the carabinieri. One wonders astonished why a VaticanNews troupe, coordinated by Tornielli and Spadaro of Civiltà Cattolica, with reporters and cameramen of the court press, did not come to film the exploits of divers and capture the rescue of pachamama. The fact that such a spectacular operation has not caught the attention of some passer-by, equipped with a mobile phone to film and then relaunch the scoop on social networks, is also quite incredible. We are tempted to turn the question over to the person who made the statement. Certainly, this time too, he would answer us with his eloquent silence.

For more than six years now we have been poisoned by a false magisterium, a sort of extreme synthesis of all the dubious conciliar formulations and of the post-conciliar errors that have unstoppably spread, without most of us realizing it. Yes, because the Vatican II has opened not only the Pandora's Box, but also the Overton Window, and in such a gradual way that we did not realize the upheavals put in place, the authentic nature of the reforms, their dramatic consequences, and not even the suspicion of those who really came to the management of that gigantic subversive operation, which the cardinal modernist Suenens called "1789 of the Catholic Church" came to us.

Thus, over the last few decades, the Mystical Body has been slowly drained of its lifeblood through an unstoppable haemorrhage: the sacred Deposit of the Faith has been gradually dilapidated, the Denatured Dogmas, the secularized and gradually profaned Worship, the Moral sabotaged, the reviled Priesthood, the Eucharistic Sacrifice Protestantized and transformed into a convivial Banquet ...

Now the Church is lifeless, covered by metastasis, devastated. The people of God grope, illiterate and robbed of his Faith, in the darkness of chaos and division. In recent decades, the enemies of God have progressively burned two thousand years of Tradition. With unprecedented acceleration, thanks to the subversive charge of this pontificate supported by the powerful Jesuit Apparatus, a deadly coup de grace is being launched on the Church.

With Pope Bergoglio - as with all modernists - it is impossible to seek clarity, since the distinctive mark of modernist heresy is precisely dissimulation. Masters of error and experts in the art of deception, "work to make universally accept what is ambiguous, presenting it from its harmless side, which will serve as a passport to introduce the toxic side, which at the beginning was kept hidden" (P. Matteo Liberatore SI). Thus the lie, obstinately and obsessively repeated ends up becoming "true" and accepted by the majority.



Typically modernist is also the tactic of affirming what one wants to destroy, using vague and imprecise terms, promoting error without ever clearly formulating it. This is exactly what Pope Bergoglio does, with his dissolving amorphism of the Mysteries of the Faith, with the doctrinal approximation that is proper to him, through which he "hybridizes" and demolishes the holiest dogmas, as he did with the Marian ones of the Evergreen Mother of God.

The result of this abuse is what we now have under our eyes: a Catholic Church that is no longer Catholic; a container emptied of its authentic contents and filled with excise goods.

The advent of the Antichrist is inevitable, it is part of the epilogue of the History of Salvation. But we know that it is the premise for the universal triumph of Christ and his glorious Bride. How many of us have not let themselves be deceived by these enemies of the Church, enfeoffed in the ecclesial body, they must unite and make a common front against the evil one, long defeated, yet still able to harm and provoke the eternal perdition of multitudes, but to which the Blessed Virgin, our Leader, will definitely crush her head.

Now it's our turn. Without misunderstanding, without letting ourselves be driven away by this Church of which we are legitimate children and in which we have the sacrosanct right to feel at home, without the hateful horde of the enemies of Christ making us feel marginalized, schismatic and excommunicated.

Now it's up to us! The triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary - Coredemptrix and Mediatrix of all graces - passes through her "little", certainly fragile, and sinners, but of sign absolutely contrary to the members enrolled in the army of the Enemy. "Small" consecrated, without any limit, to the Immaculate Conception, to be his heel, the most humiliated and most despised part, most hated by hell, but which together with her will crush the head of the infernal Monster.

Saint Louis Marie Grignion de Montfort asked himself: "But when will this triumph occur? God alone knows it. "Our task is to watch and pray as ardently recommended by Saint Catherine of Siena:" Alas! I die and I can't die. Do not sleep in negligence anymore; use what is possible in the present time. Comfort yourself in Christ Jesus sweet love. Drown yourself in the Blood of Christ crucified, place yourself on the cross with the crucified Christ, hide in the wounds of the crucified Christ, bathe in the blood of the crucified Christ "(Letter 16).

The Church is shrouded in the darkness of modernism, but victory belongs to Our Lord and to his Bride. We want to continue to profess the perennial faith of the Church in the face of the roar of Evil that besieges it. We want to watch with you and with Jesus, in this new Gethsemane of the end of time; to pray and do penance in reparation for the many offenses inflicted on them.

+ Carlo Maria Viganò

Archbishop. tit. of Ulpiana

Apostolic Nuncio

19 December 2019

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

I certainly am no expert on the various formal titles of Mary. To this uninformed reader, I had thought the Popes recent comments on Mary were an argument against "those feminists who are gaining ground in Germany with their movement "Maria 2.0", aimed at modernizing the Madonna to make it a simulacrum, in their image and likeness." I was surprised so may traditional leaning priests took offense at his remarks. No on ever explained clearly where that title "Mary Coredemptrix" originated from. I was lost for much of those conversations. Regarding Archbishop Vigano's text: I thought it a bit of a rant and maybe just a little unhinged. Again,I certainly am no expert.

God is love said...

GOD BLESS VIGANO.
WE ARE WINNING.
BLESSED MOTHER IS WITH US
AND FOR US FOR REAL!!!
What a surprise!!!

John said...

The only comment I would make is AB Vigano makes a heartfelt defense of the Church's magisterium that would have been applauded under the rein of the last two popes. The fact that it may seem intemperate to some is just the sign of the times, to paraphrase a one time Republican pol, extremism in defense of the truth is not a crime. Were it a crime, St. Jerome would not be a saint in good standing either.

60's Survivor said...

"As I told you, if men do not repent and better themselves, the Father will inflict a terrible punishment on all humanity. ...The work of the devil will infiltrate even into the Church in such a way that one will see cardinals opposing cardinals, and bishops against other bishops. The priests who venerate me will be scorned and opposed by their Confreres. The Church and altars will be vandalized. The Church will be full of those who accept compromises and the demon will press many priests and consecrated souls to leave the service of the Lord." -Our Lady of Akita, October 13, 1973

The messages of Fatima and Akita are "essentially the same"-Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger to Philippine Ambassador Howard Dee.

"We are not obliged to believe private revelations."--Modernist Catholics of the 21st Century.

"You're absolutely right. And you ignore them at your own peril, especially when they unfold right before your eyes." -Me.

John Nolan said...

The idea of Mary as Co-redemptrix has been kicked around since the Middle Ages - the Franciscans pushed it, the Dominicans opposed it. Popes have consistently declined to define it dogmatically, and Benedict XVI explained why the term could lead to misunderstanding. Mary's co-operation was essential to the work of Redemption, and she was chosen by God for that purpose. She is an Advocate who intercedes for us with her Son. But in most languages Co-redemptrix implies equality with the one Redeemer, and would be an occasion for scandal.
Pope Francis did not describe it as 'nonsense'; he merely said that to consider adding to the existing Marian dogmas would amount to 'foolishness'.

Many of us have serious misgivings concerning this papacy, but demonizing Francis in the way that Vigano does is counter-productive.

Anonymous said...

Are you referring to people who want to hold Trump accountable for the crimes he has committted or the deranged people who believe he is the Messiah, can do no wrong, was sent by God to lead us as our new moral exemplar? Please explain?

Anonymous said...

I don't know if he is crazy, but a lot of the problems he writes about were around during the time of Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict, dissenting theologians, liturgical abuse, bad instruction in the faith and on and on. This all did not start with Pope Francis.

Marc said...

From Pope Pius IX through Pope Pius XII, the Apostolic See joyfully proclaimed Mary as Co-Redemptrix through documents and indulgenced prayers. That Francis so casually and contemptuously dismisses this long-held title for the Blessed Virgin as "foolishness" is impious. Though, it is in keeping with his prior blasphemous statements against the Blessed Virgin.

As for the teaching itself: Is it possible that people may misunderstand Mary's role as co-Redemptrix? Surely, it is. But, the response to the possibility that people might not understand some teaching is not to undo the teaching itself, but to properly explain it to the people.

The real scandal occurs when the Church dismisses her teachings in the face of potential "scandal" on the part of non-Catholics. If they wish to understand the teachings, the Holy Ghost will enlighten them. Until then, we know from the Apostle that the Truth is "unto the Jews indeed a stumblingblock, and unto the Gentiles foolishness."

Mark Thomas said...

The Church of Rome last year invited Archbishop Viganò to retrieve communion with the Vicar of Christ.

Unfortunately, Archbishop Viganò's has opted to continue to mutiny against His Holiness Pope Francis, and, ultimately, God, and His Holy Catholic Church.

It is preposterous for Archbishop Viganò, a mutineer against against God, to pretend that he stands with, and defends, the Blessed Virgin Mary.

I pray for Archbishop Viganò's deliverance from Satan.

Pax.

Mark Thomas

Fr Martin Fox said...

I agree with John Nolan about not demonizing the pope regarding a new title for our Lady.

That said, I must also say that I disagree with the Holy Father when he dismisses the subject as "foolishness." Maybe the title should not be formalized; however, the subject is a legitimate one, and these intemperate remarks by the pope only play into the hands of those who misunderstand or misrepresent Catholic teaching and devotion regarding our Lady.

Mark Thomas said...

In 2018 A.D., via his third "testimony" (actually, an attack against God), Archbishop Viganò revealed the reason as to why he had spoken via his "testimonies."

He did not come forward to speak primarily on behalf of McCarrick's victims...or those abused sexually by this or that priest.

Instead, Archbishop Viganò had emerged to attack the Vicar of Christ as the Archbishop despised Pope Francis' teachings in regard to theology — moral theology.

Archbishop Viganò said last year that Pope Francis had been "negligent in exercising his principal mission, which is to confirm the brothers in the faith and in sound moral doctrine. When he then exacerbates the crisis by contradictory or perplexing statements about these doctrines, the confusion is worsened."

"Therefore I spoke."

Via his recent Satanic sick verbal assault against Pope Francis — against God, ultimately — Archbishop Viganò's has confirmed that his "testimonies" were initiated to defame and denounce His Holiness Pope Francis.

There isn't anything noble in Archbishop Viganò's hateful, Satanic "testimonies."

As he is at war with Pope Francis, Archbishop Viganò is at war with God (as well as Holy Mother Church).

Archbishop Viganò stands with Satan.

God's Holy People stand with Pope Francis.

Thanks to the promise of Jesus Christ, Pope Francis has preserved immaculate the Catholic Religion.

Pax.

Mark Thomas

Anonymous said...

Good job fellow bloggers! Keep ignoring the troll.

Anonymous said...

papolatry: noun; excessive veneration or worship of the pope. — papolatrous, adj.

Anonymous said...

There is no pressing need to define the title of Mary as co-redemptrix. Mary's titles derive from her son and only from her son. Her titles are all given in order to support defend and Advance the Dogma regarding Jesus Christ.

Nothing about the truth of Jesus Christ is Advanced, defended, or supported by proclaiming Mary to be co-redemptrix.