Folks we are at a major turning point in this papacy and in the Church. Prayer is required!
Cardinal O’Malley Says “More Than Apologies” Needed in Cardinal McCarrick Scandal
“It is my conviction that three specific actions are required at this time...”
On Tuesday, Cardinal Sean O’Malley, archbishop of Boston and chairman of the Vatican’s sexual abuse commission, issued the following statement regarding the unfolding sex abuse scandal involving Cardinal Theodore McCarrick:
“My experience in several dioceses and my work with the members of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors have brought me to this conclusion. The Church needs to swiftly and decisively take action regarding these matters of critical importance. In every instance of claims made by victims of sexual abuse, whether criminal violations or the abuse of power, the primary concern must be for the victim, their family and their loved ones.
“For the past several days, articles in the national media have reported accusations of Cardinal Theodore McCarrick’s sexual improprieties with several adults and his criminal violations of the sexual abuse of minors. These alleged actions, when committed by any person, are morally unacceptable and incompatible with the role of a priest, bishop or cardinal.
“I am deeply troubled by these reports that have traumatized many Catholics and members of the wider community. In one case involving a minor the Archdiocese of New York, after investigation, has found the accusation to be credible and substantiated. While another accusation concerning a minor is yet to be investigated, the reports are devastating for the victims, their families and for the Church itself. Each new report of clerical abuse at any level creates doubt in the minds of many that we are effectively addressing this catastrophe in the Church.“These cases and others require more than apologies. They raise up the fact that when charges are brought regarding a bishop or a cardinal, a major gap still exists in the Church’s policies on sexual conduct and sexual abuse. While the Church in the United States has adopted a zero tolerance policy regarding the sexual abuse of minors by priests we must have clearer procedures for cases involving bishops. Transparent and consistent protocols are needed to provide justice for the victims and to adequately respond to the legitimate indignation of the community. The Church needs a strong and comprehensive policy to address bishops’ violations of the vows of celibacy in cases of the criminal abuse of minors and in cases involving adults.
“My experience in several dioceses and my work with the members of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors have brought me to this conclusion. The Church needs to swiftly and decisively take action regarding these matters of critical importance. In every instance of claims made by victims of sexual abuse, whether criminal violations or the abuse of power, the primary concern must be for the victim, their family and their loved ones.
The victims are to be commended for bringing to light their tragic experience and must be treated with respect and dignity. Recent media reports also have referenced a letter sent to me from Rev. Boniface Ramsey, O.P. in June of 2015, which I did not personally receive. In keeping with the practice for matters concerning the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors, at the staff level the letter was reviewed and determined that the matters presented did not fall under the purview of the Commission or the Archdiocese of Boston, which was shared with Fr. Ramsey in reply.
“These accusations are understandably a source of great disappointment and anger for many. These cases, involving a cardinal, must be viewed in light of the last two decades of the Church’s experience with clerical sexual abuse. It is my conviction that three specific actions are required at this time. First, a fair and rapid adjudication of these accusations; second, an assessment of the adequacy of our standards and policies in the Church at every level, and especially in the case of bishops; and third, communicating more clearly to the Catholic faithful and to all victims the process for reporting allegations against bishops and cardinals. Failure to take these actions will threaten and endanger the already weakened moral authority of the Church and can destroy the trust required for the Church to minister to Catholics and have a meaningful role in the wider civil society. In this moment there is no greater imperative for the Church than to hold itself accountable to address these matters, which I will bring to my upcoming meetings with the Holy See with great urgency and concern.”
26 comments:
As a lay person who was in the seminary back in the late 1980’s I can say that the entire seminary knew about McCarrick back then. When students were taking turns working at the shore house for the retired priests (from another diocese) we were warned to stay clear of “Uncle Teddy” if we ran in to him. Everybody knew. I find the cardinals denial laughable. They all knew. And worse yet it’s still going on. The filth that Pope Benedict spoke of in the clergy is true. And they are all coming out of the woodwork under Francis. Look at the tolerance for degenerate behaviour and blasphemy at the recent Met “gala”. And what about Fr. James Martin. And cardinals....CARDINALS inviting active homosexuals into to the Church, celebrating their way of life. Never once calling them to accept their cross and ask Christ to help them carry it. YES without question should most of the cardinals and bishops resign but the first should be Francis. Francis called Cardinal Danneels out of retirement to participate in that phony Synod on the Family. Cardinal Daneels who protected a priest who molested his own nephew. The fish stinks from the head down.
The Pope should resign. Now!
The next conclave should include only those Cardinals who have never been credibly accused of violating secular or cannon law. The St Gallen conspirators definitely should be excluded.
The next Pope must also retire any bishop who protected abuse of any kind.The Spirit of the Council should be officially condemned also.
Back in 1999, I began writing for a now-defunct "alternative" Catholic newspaper in another city that reported everything my diocese's "official" newspaper didn't want people to know about. I did this because of my extreme disappointment at where I saw the Church heading. It had reached the point where the Church didn't seem to stand for anything any longer. There were many other problems going on, and at least 50 percent of those problems involved similar issues to what is just beginning to be revealed about Cardinal McCarrick. I honestly believed that the only way to get the Church to clean up its act was the expose the bad stuff in the light of day. We uncovered financial misdeeds at the parish and diocesan level, blatant abuses of authority, liturgical abuses, abuses of the Catholic education of young people from elementary through the college level and many, many stories about inappropriate relationships between priests and fellow priests and priests and others. This last category was the most discouraging.
I REACHED THE POINT WHERE I WISHED I HAD NEVER HEARD ABOUT ANY OF THESE THINGS.
Some of the most horrible things we learned about we were never able to publish for various reasons: Innocent children and families would have been harmed, lawsuits too expensive to fight would ensue, reputations of innocent people would be questioned, innocent people could have lost gainful employment, etc.. Anyway, my point was, as bad as the stories were that we uncovered, what we didn't publish was even worse. I believe in the indefectibility of the Catholic faith, so I never lost my faith in the Church, but much of what I uncovered made me lost a great deal of faith in some of the people leading the Church and created an unhealthy level of cynicism that I often wish I could shake.
So when we see stories like the one above, I can only say that most of us really don't want to know just how bad it REALLY is. Unfortunately, I still don't think it's going to get better until we actually do know.
I have a VERY hard time believing for one minute that Farrell was shocked by the info on McCarrick.
I don't find Cardinal Farrell believable either, although the Irish have an ability to deny the elephant in the room with things sexual.
More concerning to me are Pope Francis very progressive as well as tainted and possibly corrupt advisors to include his ghost writer for AL who recently was made an archbishop in an Argentine archdiocese replacing a very orthodox predecessor.
Worst of all, Pope Francis relied on McCarrick in naming Farell, Tobin and Cupich cardinals all closely link to McCarrick and his progressive outlook from the 70's.
There is a huge aging swamp from the 70's who have Francis ear for he is enamoued not by Vatican II, BUT ITS CORRUPY SPIRIT WHICH HAS DEFORMED THE TRUE Church and nearly destroyed religious life and the Cultic priesthood along with the liturgy.
Pope Francis will be gone soon enough. Hopefully the College of Cardinals will elect someone who was not ruined by the Spirit of Vatican Disaster II. Deus Vult!
ABDICATE IMMEDIATELY, re-consecrate the other Pope as the reigning Pope.
This is the same question as nukes and social justice with a reverse vector. The Pope should not resign, the world won’t end. The Pope needs to rapidly come up with a model for dealing with the bad apples when they are found. Just like dealing with homosexuals in the pews: they don’t need to be persecuted or killed, but they have to be restricted in their behavior and outlets for it. The Cardinals might need legal punishment, they might not. But they might need removal anyway. They can be moved to some other job and watched closely or maybe just retired early. Could it be the crisis in the clergy shortage is due to piss-poor leadership examples? Find a guy who is a good cardinal and I think the right people will flock to work along side him.
Hey, lefties! Here's your tolerant, fake catholic update for today! Pelosi, the gift that keeps on giving.
https://pjmedia.com/faith/nancy-pelosi-leads-democrats-in-slamming-faith-based-adoption-as-a-license-to-discriminate/
Not sure about Cardinal O'Malley being elected Pope. I'll leave that to the Holy Spirit but this situation is an abomination and HFPF seems asleep at the switch. I just don't understand the pace here. Anemic in Chile. Seemingly nothing learned. Now this.
TJM, Nancy Pelosi should have had Canon 915 involved on her a long, long, long time ago---not 10 years ago or even 15, but 20 or more. And it should be invoked immediately on New York Governor Andrew Cuomo (remember his dad, "I'm personally opposed but....") who wants to codify Roe V Wade into New York state law.
Has there ever been a time where either has supported just a single abortion restriction? Just one? Heck, Pelosi would not even vote for the 20-week ban proposal in the House within the last year.
Some other candidates for 915---Virginia's Tim Kaine (Hillary's running mate), Ed Markey of Massachusetts, Pat Leahy of Vermont, heck, why not Joe Biden while we are at it? Of course, this is just a partial listing!!!!!!
Maybe both could join the declining Episcopal Church, which at its recent convention pretty much gave "carte blanche" to same-sex "marriages" in every diocese, even if the diocesan bishop is opposed. Don't have to worry about crowded parishes---the Church has little more than a million and a half members, and the more liberal it gets, the more people who head for the doors....
I just wish Archbishop Cordileone would live up to his name: Lion Hearted.
The heirarchy has done untold damage to the Church by not dealing with these cheap, two-bit nothings long ago. Why would a young, pregnant girl take the Church's teaching on abortion seriously when the heirarchy gives rich, connected fake catholics like Pelosi etal a pass?
Cardinal O'Malley, "Corrector of Pope Francis," has taken a beating on many a Catholic blog/Twitter feed.
As the news report reads:
Cardinal O'Malley addressed news reports that say he received a letter from Dominican Father Boniface Ramsey on June 25, 2015, about McCarrick's conduct with seminarians.
Cardinal O'Malley said he did not "personally receive" the correspondence and a review "at the staff level" did not determine that its contents were under "the purview of the (pontifical) commission or the Archdiocese of Boston."
===========================================================================
Nobody on the Catholic blogs/Twitter feeds that I've read has accepted Cardinal O'Malley's claim in question.
Cardinal O'Malley, Cardinal Farrell...one Cardinal and bishop after another has taken a beating in regard to the issues of homosexuality/sexual abuse among Churchmen.
Pax.
Mark Thomas
I thought Cardinal O'Malley's response was a step in the right direction, but it was still weak. And I do not believe Cardinal Farrell's denial.
There needs to be accountability and transparency.
That said, I am definitely on alert about any moves to eject people from the College of Cardinals. That is a bad idea.
No, not Cardinal "Call me Sean" O'Malley - another opportunist and sychophant of the liberal literati and glitterati!
Tom,
O'Malley who scandalized the devout by holding a funeral for abortion king and ladykiller Teddy "Senator Oldsmobile" Kennedy in his cathedral!
Kennedy’s funeral mass was not held in Boston’s cathedral of the Holy Cross but at the Basilica of Our Lady of Perpetual Help. But a scandal nonetheless. I don’t believe O’Malley, Francis, Farrell, Tobin etc. They are all the bottom of the barrel. The Church deserves better and the laity should DEMAND an end to the filth.
Anonymous, all of them are intellectually and spiritually inferior to their predecessors - just empty suits who have no business being in care of souls. If I were dying, I would not seek out ANY of them as a confessor
I would argue one step further needs to be taken, Not only should Pope Francis resign, but the following should happen.
1. An outside investigator should come into every diocese. And by outside, I mean an Orthodox Bishop (Captialised on purpose), or an Orthodox patriarch should come in and do an investigation. (No one in the western hierarchy is to be trusted until the bottom of the filth within the west is reached, rooted out, and sent to some old school punishments that are actually substantial)....There is zero way anyone from the inside would be able to run an impartial investigation into immoral behavior within the clergy. There is nothing more that the East would want than for the West to come back to herself, and recognise where things went wrong. I think this would be a major help.
2. Yes, there should be an outside investigator in addition to an Orthodox Bishop...law enforcement of some kind to make sure these things don't happen again. This is the fact situation where having other patriarchs to help would be a good thing.
Joe Potillor -
Glory to Jesus Christ! I must agree with you. Increasingly, the Roman Church seems completely incapable of policing itself from the top down. Good at rhetoric, bad at policing, corrupt throughout.
Many years.
Yeah, that "Western hierarchy" is a mess...
"The bishop over the local Antiochian Orthodox Christian Church pleaded guilty yesterday in Traverse City, Mich., to a reduced felony criminal sexual conduct charge stemming from an assault in July in which he was accused of groping a woman s breast." (2004)
"The Chicago-based bishop of the Orthodox Church in America accused in August of "inappropriate" behavior with a woman has been found guilty of "sexual misconduct" by church investigators but he will remain at the helm of the Midwest Diocese." (2012)
"Leaders of SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, are writing to the bishops of the Orthodox Church in America (OCA) about Archbishop Seraphim Storheim, who was once the church’s highest ranking official in Canada. Storheim was suspended by his synod following his arrest in November of 2010. In January 2014, he was forced into retirement after his conviction for child sexual abuse." (2015)
I would, at very least. be uneasy about having Orthodox bishops involved in any such process. We now know that most of the Russian Orthodox bishops were KGB operatives. As much as I hate to go "secular", it should be someone complete outside the purview of the USCCB, probably a solid Catholic team of lay investigators.
ByzRC, Many years to you as well, Glory to Him forever.
Anon, yes, there have been accusations in the Orthodox Church as well, but NO WHERE near the amount that has been accused and proven in the west. I'd tend to trust them more than the Roman hierarchy at this present time.....Also notice the action, immediate suspension by the synod....Good luck getting that in the west.
Cletus ordo, ROCOR was founded exactly because of the infiltration of the KGB and as a stance against communism. I'd for sure trust the ROCOR Archbishop of San Francisco (my bishop) over virtually any member of the Roman Hierarchy.
There is zero way Rome is going to be able to clean up its own house by itself. It's a major problem far beyond what local resources are going to allow. If I were a member of the hierarchy of Rome, I would be begging for help to clean up the filth in the clergy within my own ranks' dnd, of course, those below......but that'd require humility to be able to do such a thing.
Something tells me, the pope is only going to pay lip service to this....and not do much else....May I be wrong.
I disagree that there is zero chance that Rome can clean its own house (the Council of Trent did a pretty good job) but I do agree that it is not very likely. I sadly must agree that your suspicions about what the pope will probably do are spot-on.
"...there have been accusations in the Orthodox Church as well, but NO WHERE near the amount that has been accused and proven in the west."
Your right Joe, BUT, the Latin Church is so much larger, so one must consider proportionality.
Anonymous @ 8:48 pm
"So one must consider proportionality." Would you please provide any backup that you might have for this statement? I would be curious to see as I have tried unsuccessfully to find evidence that because X% of Roman clergy have been accused/guilty, Y% of Orthodox or, Orthodox/Eastern Catholic Clergy have experienced the same.
While no church immune to abusers, perhaps none has done more to minimize, hide, transfer and discredit than the Roman Church. As I've said before, the body cannot heal until the cancer is removed. Given recent events, it would appear that this institution is far from being in remission.
Post a Comment