Pope Leo is appointing a variety of theologians of various theological factions for the listening Church that eventually filters. This appointee needs a listen about TC!
Press the title for the complete article, money byte below it;
"Pedro, the rock, begins to roll": a layman highly critical of Traditionis Custodes joins the Theological Commission
The 2021 article appeared on July 22 in the Swiss daily Neue Zürcher Zeitung(NZZ), six days after the publication of the motu proprio, under the title “No to the Old Mass: Pope Francis repeals a decision of his predecessor and thereby endangers the authority of the office.” Tück recalled that Francis had once remarked that he might go down in history as the pope of division, and wrote that “last Friday he almost made that word come true,” because with the decree he had withdrawn “without blinking” the license granted by his predecessor. In his view, by openly correcting Benedict XVI instead of striving for coherence and consistency in the magisterium, the Pope gave many the impression that a pontiff can correct and revise the teaching of his predecessors at will, and that irruption of contingency into magisterial statements, visible to all, threatened to undermine papal authority.
The text acknowledged that there are partial tensions between the ecclesiology of the Council and the Tridentine Mass, and occasional overlaps with the milieu of the political right, but maintained that the argument of instrumentalization applied globally only to the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X. To the Fraternity of Saint Peter and the other groups that expressly recognize the Council and the primacy, he wrote, precisely they were being deprived of “the papal protective roof,” so that they were being punished for their fidelity to the Pope “by the Pope himself.” He also criticized the requirement of Roman authorization for new priests as contradicting the “healthy decentralization” that Francis himself preached, and that leaving the matter to each bishop would produce a mosaic of permissions and prohibitions. “A ban on the old Mass is ultimately an expression of weakness,” he concluded, because it does not trust that the renewed liturgy will impose itself as the best option. At the same time, Tück defended the liturgical reform of the Council, calling it its most visible fruit and, in his judgment, something that “cannot and must not be called into question,” and ended by warning that excluding that tradition ignores its cultural strength and is “tendentially prone to division.”

6 comments:
Brick by brick as they say!
In regard to certain claims that he has promoted;
The appointment of German theologian Jan-Heiner Tück will enrage certain folks here.
Various trad sites, such as Rorate Caeli, have noted that he is a staunch supporter of Amoris Laetita, as well as married priests.
In particular, he trashed Cardinal Sarah's argument against married priests.
Jan-Heiner Tück trashed the preposterous claim that footnote 351 had marred the beautiful Amoris Laetita.
Jan-Heiner Tück trashed the dubia that that Cardinal Burke (as well as three additional Cardinals) had fomented against Pope Francis.
The article that Father McDonald promoted had noted:
Jan-Heiner Tück "described as a “subversive procedure” that of Cardinals Brandmüller, Burke, Caffarra and Meisner in making their dubia public, and wrote that those who placed the Pope under suspicion of heresy, like the 62 theologians and philosophers who signed the Correctio filialis, behaved “like bulldogs of orthodoxy.”
"Priestly celibacy is another of his fronts.
"In September 2019, on the eve of the Amazon Synod, he replied in the NZZ to Cardinal Robert Sarah, who had described the ordination of viri probati as a monstrosity.
“Celibacy is not a dogma, but an ecclesiastical law,” he wrote;
"he called the idea that the continence of clerics has ruled without interruption since Jesus and the apostles “a fiction of continuity that is historically unsustainable,” recalled that Ratzinger had foreseen in 1970 that the Church of the future would ordain “proven Christians who exercise a profession” and concluded that tradition “can also be betrayed by freezing it.”
=======
Various trads/conservatives here, as well as elsewhere, would insist that Jan-Heiner Tück has promoted modernism.
Pax.
Mark Thomas
National Catholic Register.
Edward Pentin:
"Another German-language dogmatic theologian appointed to the commission is Jan-Heiner Tück..."
"He is a firm proponent of synodality as listening and consultation...
"...has criticized the German Synodal Way for aiming to take away governing authority from bishops."
"Tück is a proponent of married priests...
"...has firmly rejected calls for women’s ordination.
"Similarly, he supported footnote 351 in Amoris Laetitia allowing access to the Eucharist for some civilly-remarried-and-divorced Catholics...
"...opposes proposals for Protestant spouses to receive Communion at Catholic Masses.
"He has called for a clarification of the relationship between the Society of St. Pius X and the Vatican and sees the society as “more papal than the Pope.”
"...and has warned against the proximity of traditionalist circles to politically right-wing circles."
Pax.
Mark Thomas
AI Overview:
"Jan-Heiner Tück...became highly visible in Catholic discourse for his sharp critique of Cardinal Raymond Burke and the other conservative cardinals who issued the dubia (formal questions seeking doctrinal clarification) to Pope Francis.
"Tück strongly criticized the strategy of Cardinal Burke, Cardinal Brandmüller, and others for making their dubia public.
"He labeled their actions a "subversive procedure" and argued that by placing the Pope under suspicion of heresy, they were acting like "bulldogs of orthodoxy".
"Tück defended the controversial footnote 351 in Amoris laetitia (which opened a pastoral path for some divorced and civilly remarried Catholics to receive the sacraments), viewing it as a legitimate development of Church doctrine rather than a rupture of tradition.
========.
One brick at a time.
Tückpointing.
Pax.
Mark Thomas
Mark, you are changing the subject of this post and thus I ask you, did Jan-Heiner Tuck criticize Pope Francis over Traditionis Custodis or not? My post isn’t on the other things that Tuck supports. But he was critical, very critical of suppressing another Pope’s decision. Please stay on subject. Thank you.
Father McDonald, you had promoted the article in question.
But sure, on point.
Jan-Heiner Tück is not thrilled with Traditionis Custodes. Okay.
However, Pope Leo XIV has made Traditionis Custodes his document. Said document is Church teaching.
Pax.
Mark Thomas
Post a Comment