We need to hear from our bishops, not just the Washington Post! The last word in the headline should be SHAMELESSLY.
Cardinal Wuerl knew about Theodore McCarrick. And he lied about it.
WHEN ALLEGATIONS came to light last year of sexual abuse and inappropriate conduct involving children and seminarians by Archbishop Theodore McCarrick, Cardinal Donald Wuerl, who succeeded Mr. McCarrick as leader of
the Washington archdiocese, expressed shock and denied prior knowledge. Now it turns out Mr. Wuerl was presented in 2004 with an account of Mr. McCarrick’s alleged misconduct, which he relayed to the Vatican. Then: nothing.
In the ongoing tsunami of revelations about the Catholic Church’s willful blindness, conspiracy of silence and moral bankruptcy on clergy sex abuse, this particular revelation may count as little more than a droplet — although it does involve two of the highest-ranking and most prominent American prelates. However, it also encapsulates characteristics that continue to dog the church nearly two decades after the scandal burst into the open: callousness directed at victims; an insistence on denial and hairsplitting; and the hierarchy’s preference for treating allegations as internal matters, as if the world’s 1.2 billionlay Catholics were an irrelevance.
In response to the revelation that Mr. Wuerl was fully aware of, and handled, an allegation from a former priest about Mr. McCarrick’s misconduct more than 14 years ago, the Washington archdiocese issued a statement suggesting that his previous flat denials were merely “imprecise.” Those previous statements referred only to sexual abuse of a minor, the archdiocese said.
In fact, the cardinal’s comments last summer were unequivocal. In response to a broad question about “long-standing rumors or innuendos” posed by a reporter for the archdiocesan newspaper Catholic Standard, he said, “I had not heard them” before or during his tenure in Washington. That was untrue.
As it happens, Mr. Wuerl, then-bishop of Pittsburgh, not only was presented with allegations of Mr. McCarrick’s misconduct by a former priest named Robert Ciolek. To his credit, he also swiftly brought that information to the Vatican’s attention in a meeting with the pope’s ambassador in Washington at the time, Archbishop Gabriel Montalvo.
Yet Mr. McCarrick remained as archbishop of Washington for nearly two more years and suffered no discipline until last year, when the allegations against him were reported. At that point, the Holy See removed him from ministry; his final punishment is now being weighed in Rome.
Meanwhile, Mr. Wuerl, though forced to resign as archbishop last fall following revelations by a Pennsylvania grand jury that he had mishandled numerous clergy sex abuse cases in Pittsburgh, continues to oversee the Washington archdiocese pending appointment of a successor.
Understandably, Mr. Ciolek is outraged that Mr. Wuerl, having known of his allegations for years, denied knowledge of them last year. “It’s as if I don’t exist,” he told The Post’s Michelle Boorstein.
Pope Francis himself has displayed a gaping blind spot on the issue of clergy sex abuse, at times condemning it and taking resolute action, at other times directing contempt and lip service at victims. He has convened a meeting of top bishops in Rome next month. Actions and policies, not ringing declarations, will be the measure of the church’s success in grappling with a scandal that has shamed it.
13 comments:
Bee here:
I'm glad they are reporting this, but why the use of "Mr." when referring to Archbishop McCarrick and Cardinal Wuerl?
God bless.
Bee
What else would you expect from an archbishop who gives Holy Communion to take catholic pro-abortion politicians?
Here's a question:
Who benefited from Wuerl's denial last year?
Clearly -- and foreseeably -- not Wuerl.
Fr. Fox, that is a sobering thought and I think we all are aware that there is a conspiracy going on here and it will come out one way or the other. It will take other bold cardinals or bishops to bring it to the light as Archbishop Vigano did. Vigano's flaw is that he allowed emotion to overtake him and overstate things.
"THE PRESS HAS BEEN THE MORAL VOICE IN THIS HORID SEX ABUSE SCANDAL SINCE BEFORE 2002!"
Father, one study/expert after another has found that the sexual abuse scandal peaked long before the secular news media had, during the 1980s, initiated its coverage of the disgraceful sexual abuse problem that involved a microscopic amount of Catholic priests.
One expert (Catholic and non-Catholic), as well as study after another, declared that the news media misrepresented in tremendous fashion the story in question.
However, from the 1980s to date, the news media pretended each year that the problem in question increased among priests.
Pax.
Mark Thomas
"THE PRESS HAS BEEN THE MORAL VOICE IN THIS HORID SEX ABUSE SCANDAL SINCE BEFORE 2002!"
Father, contrary to that which the press would like us to believe...
Thomas G. Plante Ph.D., professor psychology on the faculty of Santa Clara University and adjunct clinical professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University School of Medicine:
"The recent release of the Pennsylvania grand jury report on clergy sexual abuse in the Roman Catholic Church during the past 70 years has unleashed another round of headline news and sadly, much misinformation about this critically important problem."
-- "The incidents of clerical abuse in recent years (i.e., since 2002) are down to a trickle."
-- "And in the recent Pennsylvania grand jury report only two cases were reported in the past dozen years that were already known and dealt with by authorities (thus the grand jury report is about historical issues and not about current problems of active clerical abuse now)."
Again, the news media would have us believe otherwise.
Pax.
Mark Thomas
Father McDonald said..."Vigano's flaw is that he allowed emotion to overtake him and overstate things."
That...and the undeniable fact that he provided false testimony against Pope Francis and additional Churchmen.
Example: He fueled anti-Pope Francis forces within the Church and world via his (ViganĂ²'s) false claims about the non-existent "canon sanctions"...then "sanctions"...that Pope Francis had lifted supposedly against then-Cardinal McCarrick.
Pax.
Mark Thomas
MT,
You need to drop your hero worship of PF, a very flawed pope and man. It is not helping your argument on bit.
MT what about Wuerl lies?
No one else will say it out loud, so I will.
To my question: "who benefits from Wuerl's denial last year?
The answer: Pope Francis.
Discuss.
I agree that all roads point to Rome and there is a lot of black smoke there that points to a fire. That is why I reference ViganĂ². However the NC Register has a piece on Wuerl and Card. Wright who may have been actively homosexual and the links between the two. Sad!
Also, to get back to the clericalism that Pope Francis repeats over and over, without nuance is that it isn’t heterosexual clericalism but homosexual clericalism that is at issue reaching high places.
Father McDonald,
There is an old photo from the 1960s on the internet which shows Wuerl and Wright looking very "cozy." Birds of a feather
Post a Comment