Saturday, August 31, 2013


Is this the next Pope? The final pope? The pope of the Apocalypse name Pietro, POPE PIETRO? Even John Allen seems to think so! Cue the Twilight Zone Music!

At least he has good taste in miters, Pope Peter, I mean, Archbishop Pietro Parolin:

John Allen, that orthodox plant in the heterodox National Chismatic Reporter, NCR, has more news about the Vatican and our Holy Father's other appointments, things my mind, like a crystal ball, did not see coming:

Here are some excerpts from this morning's communique from John Allen, that orthodox reporter from the heterodox NCR:

A veteran Vatican diplomat, Parolin has served for the past four years as the papal nuncio, or ambassador, to Venezuela, and has been on the front lines of shaping the Vatican’s response to virtually every geopolitical challenge of the past two decades. By naming a consummate insider, Francis appears to want to "reboot" the Vatican's operating system back to a point when it was perceived to operate efficiently, rather than scrapping it entirely.

Pope Francis this morning also confirmed that the other top officials of the Secretariat of State will remain in their jobs, including Italian Archbishop Giovanni Angelo Becciu, the substitute, or top official for internal church affairs, and French Archbishop Dominique Mamberti, the Vatican’s top official for foreign relations, as well as American Monsignor Peter Wells, the assessor, who has key responsibilities for day-to-day administration.

Francis also confirmed that German Archbishop Georg Gänswein, the key aide to Pope Benedict XVI, will remain head of the papal household.

Over the years, the former number three official in the Vatican’s diplomatic service has come to be seen as one of the “best and brightest” of his generation of ecclesiastical leaders. Admirers regard Parolin as hard-working, well informed, and gifted with the capacity to see issues from multiple points of view.

In 2006, Inside the Vatican magazine named Parolin one of its Top Ten people of the year, citing his work on nuclear disarmament, dialogue with Iran and North Korea, and the fight against human trafficking. The magazine called Parolin “one of the church’s most tireless and effective diplomats.”

The pick has been keenly anticipated, given that frustration with perceived breakdowns in governance under Bertone was part of what led the cardinals in March to elect a Latin American outsider to the papacy, handing him a clear reform mandate. Parolin now profiles as a key figure in that effort.

At the same time, longtime Vatican-watchers caution that Parolin may not wield quite the same power as his immediate predecessors, Bertone under Benedict and Cardinal Angelo Sodano under John Paul II.

Francis is a pope who takes the reins of government into his own hands, making him less dependent on aides, and the creation of a council of eight cardinals from around the world to assist him means that key decisions may be hammered out by that body rather than in the Secretariat of State.

In effect, the Secretary of State under Francis may profile more as a chief of staff rather than a sort of “vice-pope.”

Parolin was ordained to the priesthood in 1980, and did his academic work in canon law. He entered the Vatican’s diplomatic service in 1986 and spent time in embassies in Mexico and Nigeria before returning to Rome, initially as the Secretariat of State’s desk officer for southern Europe.

Parolin also fits the profile many Vatican-watchers had regarded as the ideal candidate to become Francis’ Secretary of State: Someone who knows the system from the inside but who isn’t associated with the perceived dysfunction of the Bertone years.

Though Parolin served under Bertone and moved up the ladder on his watch, he was already a fixture in the Secretariat of State before Bertone was given the top job by Benedict XVI in 2006. When he was shipped off to Caracas in 2009, some took it as a sign that Parolin had fallen out of favor with Bertone – a perception seen as damaging then, but ironically helpful now.

Italians with long memories are reading the appointment as a sign that Francis wants to take the Secretariat of State back to its perceived glory days, under powerful and über-competent figures such as Giovanni Benelli, who served Paul VI, and Agostino Casaroli, who held the same position under John Paul II.

Indirectly, it’s also being taken as a backhanded admission that the “Bertone experiment” – bringing in a complete outsider as Secretary of State, counting on his loyalty and decency to make up for his lack of experience – really didn’t work.

Parolin is fluent in French, Spanish and English in addition to Italian.

Standing back from the details, the choice of Parolin would seem to offer at three insights about the kind of pope Francis intends to be.

First, Francis does not appear determined to dismantle the bureaucratic structures of the Vatican, but rather to make them work. If he wanted to blow things up, Francis would hardly have reached out to a career Vatican official, as well as an Italian churchman who hails from the Veneto region – two strong indicators of continuity.

In effect, this outsider pope has acknowledged he needs some insider help. In that sense, his reform shapes up not as a wholesale rejection of previous ways of doing things, but rather as a sort of “system restore" operation.

Second, by naming a veteran diplomat, Francis has signaled that he doesn’t want the church’s political and cultural relevance to dim while he puts out fires and fixes internal problems.

In Parolin, Francis didn’t just hire a CEO but also a statesman.

Third, Francis has also confirmed the moderate and pragmatic stamp of his papacy. Parolin profiles as basically non-ideological, a classic product of the Vatican’s diplomatic corps who prizes flexibility and realism.

It’s telling that during Parolin’s four years in Venezuela, which coincided with the final years of Hugo Chávez, Parolin never engaged in the testy back-and-forth with the leftist strongman associated with many of the country’s bishops, preferring to practice quiet, behind-the-scenes diplomacy.

The Secretary of State is a cardinal’s job, so for now Parolin will technically be named “pro-secretary” until the next consistory, when Francis presumably will elevate him to the College of Cardinals.

Though being Secretary of State is a prestigious gig, a mini-boom of speculation on the Internet back in 2006 had Parolin in line for an even higher position. A note about the papal prophecies of the medieval Abbot Malachy posted on the Wikipedia website speculated that Parolin might be the Petrus Romanus, or “Peter the Roman”, whom Abbot Malachy predicts will be the last pope before the end of the world. (“Pietro” means “Peter” in Italian.)

Whether Parolin will ever be elected pope, and whether that triggers the apocalypse, obviously remains to be seen, but already this particular Peter is now a very big deal. (MY COMMENT, as I blush!, Does John Allen who wrote this last sentence intend what he wrote about "this Peter is now a very big deal" certainly I'm reading things into this crass statement? :) )


John Nolan said...

Let's scotch this 'Peter the Roman' nonsense once and for all. The last pope to have the baptismal name Peter was Benedict XIII (1724-1730). Before that we have Alexander VIII (1689-1691), Paul II (1464-1471), Boniface IX (1389-1404), Gregory XI (1370-1378), Clement VI (1342-1352), Celestine V (1294, resigned), John XXI (1276-1277), Innocent V (1276), Sergius IV (1009-1012), and John XIV (983-984).

I hope you're all paying attention - there'll be a short quiz next session!

George said...

From the Web...

Pope Francis is a G K Chesterton fan. While archbishop of Buenos Aires, then-Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio expressed support for Chesterton’s sainthood cause. He was an honorary member of the Argentine Chesterton Society, celebrated a Mass for their annual Chesterton conference, and approved the text of a private prayer for Chesterton's canonization.

Sainthood for G K Chesterton?

G. K. Chesterton Prayer (approved by Pope Francis)

If he were ever to be canonized, he would be one of the larger ones at
6' 4 300 or so pounds.

Gene said...

Anon 5 and I already had this discussion about Saint Chesterton. I concur with his appraisal..."That's just weird." Although I am a huge Chesterton fan, canonization seems a bit much. Why not Flannery O'Connor, as well?

John Nolan said...

You can't canonize only one half of the Chesterbelloc. It would have to be Saint Gilbert and Saint Hilaire.

The thought of Cardinal Bergoglio declaiming 'Lepanto' at a Chesterton dinner is an intriguing one. You know what they say about the Argies - Italians who speak Spanish and think they're English. There are even Argies in Patagonia who speak Welsh (unlike most of the inhabitants of Wales).

Seriously, Argentina is a place I'd like to visit. It's been a democracy for thirty years now, thanks to Margaret Thatcher. There must be a statue of her in downtown BA. If not, I would be happy to start a subscription.

George said...

A most unlikely saint he would be.

There are many lay saints of course and so Mr Chesterton wouldn't be the first. He
certainly doesn't fit the mold, I'll agree.

It would be as unlikely as hearing the Holy Father say prior to the announcement of canonization

"And now for something completely different..."

If nothing else, we can hope in all this that it will spur more people to read Mr Chesterton's writings.

Cameron said...

i wonder what Chesterton's Collect would be

Gregorian Mass said...

Venezuela being the only country in Latin America that does not have a Tridentine Mass.