Translate
Monday, March 16, 2026
IT SEEMS TO ME THAT ADVOCATING FOR WOMEN IN HOLY ORDERS, AS THE “WHERE PETER IS” AKA, “WHERE FRANCIS WAS” BLOG HAS OPINED, IS MORE SCHISMATIC THAN WHAT CARDINAL ELK CELEBRATED ON LAETARE SUNDAY—WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Rorate Caeli reports this:
Cardinal Willem Eijk, of Utrecht, celebrated his public Latin Mass (Pontifical High Mass) yesterday, at the Church of the Immaculate Conception (better known as Grote Kerk, the Great Church) in Oss, in the Netherlands.
A large number of faithful was present for the Laetare Sunday Mass. Ad multos annos, Cardinal!
I might add that it appears the good Cardinal is wearing the true color of Laetare Sunday, that is, rose! What do you think?
So, I ask “Where Peter is” aka, “Where Francis Was” which is more schismatic? The photo below with a well-respected Cardinal celebrating the Pontifical TLM or advocating for women priests and doing so in a serious, schismatic way?
Sunday, March 15, 2026
ROSE BY ANY OTHER COLOR ISN’T ROSE
Did your priest wear rose this Laetare Sunday?
The various rose iterations foisted upon me over the decades:
HETERODOX AND SCHISM FOMENTING NATIONAL cATHOLIC REPORTER LAMENTS POPE LEO’S POMPOUS LIFESTYLE…
AND WE’LL LEAVE ON THE LIGHT FOR YOU…
This is a screenshot of the NcR’s webpage:
Money bytes from Associated Press article which you can read in full HERE:
Francis chose not to live in the apartment because he said he wanted to be surrounded by other people. Instead, he lived in the Vatican's Santa Marta residence, the institutional-style hotel where visiting priests stay and where cardinals are sequestered during conclaves.
Francis' choice was in keeping with his simple taste and disdain for the pomp of the papacy. But the practical effect also meant that the entire second floor of the hotel was turned over to the pope, reducing its capacity for paying guests.
Leo, history's first U.S.-born pope, has made clear he is more comfortable using the traditional garb and accoutrements of the papacy. His decision to move into the Apostolic Palace has been praised in particular by conservative commentators who see it as a sign of respect for the papacy.
A group of Romans who learned from OSV News that the pope was moving into the apostolic palace that day were very excited to hear the news.
And yet another bombshell tradition returns, the little light indicating the pope is in!
And though Leo's bedroom — for reasons of security and privacy — won't be as public as that of his predecessors, a small light in the palace was visible from the square — an indicator that the space officially is in use once again. Or is it a homage to the Vatican Motel 6: “And we’ll leave the light on for you”?
Saturday, March 14, 2026
FINALLY AND THANK GOD!
Saying no, no, no to the Vatican Motel 6, Pope Leo has finally moved in to His Holiness’ Palace, fit for a pope and His Holiness’ papal court.
Pope Leo takes possession of apartment in Apostolic Palace
Vatican News
On Saturday afternoon, March 14, Pope Leo XIV will take possession of the apartment in the Apostolic Palace, as he moves, with some of his closest collaborators, into the rooms used by his predecessors. The news was confirmed by Matteo Bruni, Director of the Holy See Press Office.
The Pope lived in the Vatican’s Palazzo del Sant’Uffizio, where he had already resided while serving as Prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops.
The papal apartment, which has now been renovated, is located in the Third Loggia of the Apostolic Palace. It includes several rooms, among them the private study room, where the Pope appears at the window for the Angelus in St. Peter’s Square, a library, and a small chapel.
On 11 May 2025, Leo XIV removed the seals that had been placed on the door of the papal apartment in the Apostolic Palace on 21 April, following the death of Pope Francis, who had chosen to live at Casa Santa Marta.
The first Pope to reside in these rooms in the Third Loggia was Saint Pius X (1903–1914).
WHY IN THE NAME OF GOD AND ALL THAT IS SACRAMENTAL, CAN’T THE CHURCH, AT LEAST IN THE USA, HAVE A COMMON AGE FOR THE SACRAMENT OF CONFIRMATION?
Ever since Vatican II there has been major confusion about the Sacrament of Confirmation, what it is, when it should be celebrated and if it isn’t already celebrated when a baby is smeared with Sacred Chrism at his baptism.
Some dioceses have put the three sacraments of Initiation together, like the Eastern Churches, baptism, confirmation and Holy Eucharist offered at infancy.
Other dioceses have combined Confirmation with First Holy Communion normally in the Second grade.
Most dioceses celebrate Confirmation in the 8th grade, others earlier and still others later, like the 10th grade.
Most dioceses use the Sacrament of Confirmation as a hook to keep kids in catechetical programs.
And now Baltimore is mandating that Confirmation be celebrated at the age of 9 years old, or grade 4.
I was confirmed in 1962, prior to Vatican II, in the 4th grade at the age of 8.
But, with Americans highly mobile, moving from diocese to diocese, state to state, many kids miss Confirmation because of the various ages that each bishop mandates.
Let’s follow Baltimore’s lead. Put it back to the 4th grade and nationally! Let’s go back to the Pre-Vatican II custom in this country! At least there is no post-Vatican II confusion about anything!
UGH! IS THIS THE BEST WAY TO PREVENT THE TREND TO DESECRATE THE ALTAR AT SAINT PETER’S BASILICA?
Sileri non possum has a vendetta against the Cardinal Gambetti who runs St. Peter’s Basilica. They think he’s incompetent. Under his watch a number of unfortunate things have happened to the basilica. At least three times, someone has gotten on top of the altar, through the candlesticks and crucifix to the floor and undressed and one urinated. It was all caught on cell phone cameras.
It seems that security was absent or very slow to act.
This this is the way Cardinal Gambetti has decided to end the nonsense of altar desecration:
Maybe there might be some other options? I missed it in the photo until I looked closer, but there is plexiglass above the red panels, like a fence.
Friday, March 13, 2026
POPE LEO GIVES A GREAT CATECHESIS ON CONFESSION, SIN, THE NEED FOR CONFESSION, REQUIRED AT LEAST.ONCE A YEAR AND THE DELETERIOUS EFFECTS OF SIN AND LIVING IN SIN!
ADDRESS OF THE HOLY FATHER LEO XIV
TO THE PARTICIPANTS IN THE 36th COURSE ON THE INTERNAL FORUM
ORGANIZED BY THE APOSTOLIC PENITENTIARY
Clementine Hall
Friday, March 13, 2026
______________________________
In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.
Peace be with you!
Eminence, Excellency, dear priests, deacons, and others accompanying us: good morning and welcome!
I am very pleased to meet those who—whether in the early stages of their priestly ministry or awaiting ordination—are refining their formation as confessors through the Course on the Internal Forum, offered annually by the Apostolic Penitentiary.
I extend a cordial greeting to His Eminence, Cardinal Angelo De Donatis, Major Penitentiary; to the Regent, Monsignor Nykiel; to all the members of the Penitentiary; to the Ordinary and Extraordinary Penitentiaries of the Papal Basilicas; and to all of you, participants in this Course. This initiative was strongly desired by Saint John Paul II, who supported it with his pastoral passion; it was confirmed by Pope Benedict XVI with his theological wisdom, as well as by Pope Francis, who has always shown great care for the merciful face of the Church.
I, too, exhort you to persevere in this service, deepening and expanding the scope of this formation, so that the fourth Sacrament may be ever more profoundly understood, fittingly celebrated, and—consequently—serenely and effectively lived out by the entire holy people of God.
The Sacrament of Reconciliation—as we know—has undergone significant development throughout history, both in its theological understanding and in its liturgical form. The Church, Mother and Teacher, has progressively recognized its meaning and function, thereby broadening the possibilities for its celebration. And yet, the reiterability of the Sacrament is not always matched—on the part of the baptized—by a corresponding eagerness to avail themselves of it. It is as if the infinite treasury of the Church’s mercy were to remain “unused,” due to a widespread distraction among Christians who, not infrequently, remain for long periods in a state of sin rather than approaching the confessional—with simplicity of faith and heart—to receive the gift of the Risen Lord.
It was the Fourth Lateran Council, in 1215, that established that every Christian is bound to make a sacramental confession at least once a year; and the *Catechism of the Catholic Church*, following the Second Vatican Council, confirmed this norm (cf. CCC, no. 1457), which is also a law of the Church: “Every member of the faithful who has reached the age of discretion is bound by the obligation of faithfully confessing his or her grave sins at least once a year” (CIC 989).
Saint Augustine affirms: “Whoever acknowledges his sins and condemns them is already in agreement with God. God condemns your sins; and if you, too, condemn them, you unite yourself to God” (*In Iohannis evangelium tractatus* 12, 13: CCL 36, 128). To acknowledge our sins—especially during this season of Lent—therefore means to “come into accord” with God, to unite ourselves to Him.
The Sacrament of Reconciliation is, then, a “laboratory of unity”: it re-establishes unity with God through the forgiveness of sins and the infusion of sanctifying grace. This generates the interior unity of the individual and unity with the Church; consequently, it also fosters peace and unity within the human family. One might ask: do those Christians who bear grave responsibility in armed conflicts possess the humility and courage to undertake a serious examination of conscience and go to confession?
But—we ask ourselves once again—can man, a small and simple creature, truly “break his unity” with the Creator? Is this image not perhaps partial and, ultimately, demeaning to the Revelation of God that Jesus has given us?
Upon closer examination, sin does not sever unity—understood as the ontological dependence of the creature upon the Creator; even the sinner remains totally dependent upon God the Creator, and this dependence, when acknowledged, can pave the way for conversion. Rather, sin severs spiritual unity with God: it is a turning of one’s back upon Him. This dramatic possibility is just as real as the gift of freedom that God Himself has bestowed upon human beings. To deny the possibility that sin can truly sever one’s unity with God is, in reality, to fail to recognize the dignity of the human person—who is, and remains, free, and therefore responsible for his or her own actions.
Dearest young priests and those preparing for ordination: always maintain a vivid awareness of the sublime task that Christ Himself, through the Church, entrusts to you—namely, to rebuild the unity of individuals with God through the celebration of the Sacrament of Reconciliation. The entire life of a priest can find its full realization in the assiduous and faithful celebration of this Sacrament. Indeed, how many priests have attained sanctity within the Confessional! Let us think only of Saint John Mary Vianney, Saint Leopold Mandić, and—more recently—Saint Pio of Pietrelcina and Blessed Michał Sopoćko.
Unity restored with God is also unity with the Church, which is the Mystical Body of Christ: we are members of the "Total Christ." The theme of your Course this year—"The Church Called to Be a House of Mercy"—would be incomprehensible were it not grounded in its very root: the Risen Jesus Christ. The Church welcomes individuals as a "House of Mercy" because, first and foremost, she ceaselessly welcomes her Lord—in the Word that is heard and proclaimed, and in the grace of the Sacraments. For this reason, in the celebration of sacramental Confession—while penitents are reconciled with God and with the Church—the Church herself is built up, enriched by the renewed holiness of her repentant and forgiven children. In the confessional, dear brothers, we collaborate in the continuous building up of the Church—one, holy, catholic, and apostolic—and in doing so, we also infuse new energy into society and the world.
Finally, unity with God and with the Church is the prerequisite for the inner unity of the individual—a unity so necessary today, in this era of fragmentation in which we live. It is an inner unity that manifests itself as a genuine desire, particularly among the younger generations. The unfulfilled promises of unbridled consumerism, and the frustrating experience of a freedom detached from the truth, can—through divine mercy—be transformed into opportunities for evangelization: by bringing to light a sense of incompleteness, they allow for the awakening of those existential questions to which only Christ offers a full answer. God became man to save us; He does so, in part, by educating our religious sense—our irrepressible yearning for truth and love—so that we may embrace the Mystery in which "we live and move and have our being" (Acts 17:28).
This dynamic of unity—with God, with the Church, and within ourselves—is a prerequisite for peace among individuals and nations: only a reconciled person is capable of living in a manner that is both unarmed and disarming! Whoever lays down the weapons of pride, and allows themselves to be continuously renewed by God’s forgiveness, becomes an agent of reconciliation in their daily life. In such a person, the words attributed to Saint Francis of Assisi find their fulfillment: "Lord, make me an instrument of Your peace." Dearest ones, never fail to approach—with faithful constancy—the Sacrament of Forgiveness, so that you may always be the first beneficiaries of the Divine Mercy, of which you have become—or will become—ministers. May Mary, Mother of Mercy, always accompany your journey and enlighten your steps. Upon you and upon your daily endeavors, I cordially impart the Apostolic Blessing. Thank you.
HOW DOES A GOOGLE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DESCRIBE THE FAMOUS AND INFAMOUS BLOGGER OF SOUTHERN ORDERS—LET ME COUNT THE WAYS
THIS IS WHAT AI HAS TO SAY ABOUT ME!WOW! AND, YES, “YIKES”!
Allan J. McDonald is a retired Catholic priest of the Diocese of Savannah and the author of the popular blog Southern Orders. He was ordained in 1980 at the Cathedral of Saint John the Baptist in Savannah and served as a pastor for many years, most notably at St. Joseph Catholic Church in Macon, Georgia.
- Liturgical Focus: He is known for his deep interest in "organic development" of the liturgy and often advocates for a synthesis of the Ordinary Form (Novus Ordo) and the Extraordinary Form (Traditional Latin Mass).
- Content: His posts frequently address the implementation of Vatican II, the "Reform of the Reform," and critiques of modern liturgical abuses.
- Perspective: While remaining in good standing with his bishop, he often provides a conservative or traditionalist-leaning commentary on contemporary issues within the Church.
- Retirement: He retired from administrative parish duties but remains active in his spiritual calling.
- Location: He currently resides on Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, in the Diocese of Charleston.
- Active Presence: He continues to assist at local parishes, such as St. Gregory the Great in Bluffton, SC, and Holy Family Church and Saint Francis by the Sea Church on Hilton Head Island and also at Sacred Heart Church in Savannah.
- Based on his writings on theSouthern Orders blog, Fr. Allan J. McDonald is generally considered a traditionalist or conservative Catholic rather than a progressive.Key points regarding his views and blog stance include:
- Support for Traditional Liturgy: Fr. McDonald often writes in support of the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM) and has expressed appreciation for both the 1962 Missal and the modern Roman Missal.
- Criticism of Progressive Trends: He has referred to his 1970s seminary training as a "liberal" experience and frequently champions orthodoxy against what he considers liberal Catholic excesses.
- Focus on Identity and Doctrine: He highlights that younger Catholics and those seeking deeper identity are drawn to "smells-and-bells," Latin, and doctrines that are often considered difficult or traditional.
- Stewardship Focus: He is a strong proponent of the "stewardship way of life" in parishes.
While he sometimes celebrates the Traditional Latin Mass, he mostly celebrates the modern mass (Novus Ordo) and maintains a "moderate-traditional" stance, his blog, Southern Orders, is known for supporting traditional liturgical practices and defending orthodox Catholic doctrine.He is a papist but not blindly so.Based on his writings, his stance can be summarized as follows:Stance on Pope Francis- Criticism of Style and Governance: Fr. McDonald has expressed discomfort with Pope Francis’s "off-the-cuff" remarks and "papal magisterium by interview". He has characterized the Francis papacy as a period of increased polarization and a return to "progressive" trajectories from the 1960s and 70s that he believes were previously settled.
- Accusations of Pride: In recent posts, he has suggested that Pope Francis's papacy suffered from "the deadly sin of pride" and described the state of the Church under Francis as being "in crisis".
- Liturgical Disagreement: A major point of contention for Fr. McDonald is Pope Francis’s restrictions on the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM) via the motu proprio Traditionis Custodes. He has advocated for the reversal of these policies under future leadership.
- Early Support vs. Later Disillusionment: While he initially showed some cautious optimism or attempts to read Francis in "continuity" with tradition during the first year of his papacy, he later moved toward more consistent criticism.
Support for the Papacy- Institutional Loyalty: Despite his criticisms of any Pope, Fr. McDonald remains a committed Roman Catholic priest who upholds the office of the papacy itself. He frequently discusses the importance of the Pope as a symbol of unity and "normalcy" when the occupant aligns with traditional liturgical and theological views.
- Enthusiasm for Successors: His blog has recently featured hypothetical or anticipatory commentary on a "Pope Leo XIV," whom he praises for returning to traditional papal symbols (like the mozzetta and ornate stoles) and "coherent" speech, explicitly contrasting this with Pope Francis’s style.
In summary, Fr. McDonald is a traditionalist who supports the authority of the papacy but has spent much of the last decade critiquing the specific theological and liturgical direction of Pope Francis.
THE SYNODAL CHURCH GOING OFF RAILS AND TRADITIONALISM, WHILE ELITIST, STAYING THE COURSE
When I read documents from the leaders in Rome of the synodal Church, seldom is God and His salvation spoken of. Sometimes these documents don’t even mention Jesus Christ.
I am not sure what authority these documents have, if any.
But it seems to me that the synodal Church is more interested in the following, than Jesus and His salvation:
They want women in Holy Orders more than they want Jesus and His salvation.
They want inclusivity of all kinds of people and their sinful behavior without calling them to repentance, conversion and a new way of life, rather than Jesus and His salvation.
They want to talk things to death rather than Jesus and His salvation.
They want to listen to every thing but Jesus and His salvation.
They want a different Church rather than Jesus and His Church and His salvation.
When it comes to Traditionalists with their elitist tendencies, they want Jesus and His salvation.
Enough said.
Thursday, March 12, 2026
SWEET MYSTERY OF LIFE, I MEAN, COLOR, YOU FINALLY CONFUSED ME…
Sweet mystery of life, I mean, colors…is the vestment with the designed middle panel the redder hue of purple or the purpler hue of red????? The photo of it next to the bright red vestment is closer to what I actually perceive in person. But I can’t tell if it is a red or violet vestment! So when red or violet is mandated for a particular Mass, I don’t choose it everrrr….I can’t tell 🧐
These are Holy Family Church, on Hilton Head Island, vestments:
Monday, March 9, 2026
NOBLE AND IGNOBLE SIMPLICITY…
Quite noble simplicity:
Ignoble and confused 😕 simplicity— whoever put that picnic table altar in there should be fired or perhaps it is what they think of the Bugnini Mass:





















