Translate

Thursday, July 31, 2025

BOMBSHELL! THE LEO EFFECT: POPE LEO APPROVES OF NAMING ST. JOHN HENRY NEWMAN A DOCTOR OF THE CHURCH, THUS REFINING POPE FRANCIS’ EMPHASIS ON DEVELOPMENT OF DOCTRINE


Once again we are seeing the Pope Leo effect in clarifying what the “development of doctrine” means by elevating St. John Henry Newman to the status of Doctor of the Church.

Pope Francis wasn’t always clear on this matter as it concerns synodality. It appeared to many that the post-Vatican II concept of dissenting theologians about the development of doctrine was to change it not deepen it consistent with its roots, but rather to transplant it into something else.

St. John Henry Newman would scoff at such a proposal and be aghast as he converted to Catholicism in the pre-Vatican II Church in England and the pre-Vatican II concept of development of doctrine was logical and also prevented the corruption of doctrine as it developed through the teaching authority of the Magisteriun of the Church, both ordinary and extraordinary. He was very much an Augustinian in this regard.

Thus one can see why Pope Leo is bestowing the title of Doctor of the Church upon this great Catholic convert as Pope Leo knows we live in precarious times with synodality in its Catholic infancy and be used or manipulated by those who know nothing about orthodox development of doctrine.

It also is a corrective to Eastern Orthodoxy as it concerns doctrinal developments post the Great Schism in 1054.

And The Pillar and its readers are ecstatic over this development. Pope Leo XIII named him a cardinal, pope Benedict XVI beatified him and gave a fantastic homily about Newman at the beatification. Ratzinger of course, is an Augustinian at heart in his brilliant theology! Read the Pillar article HERE.

Even Rorate Caeli is ecstatic over THE LEO effect of this development:

Saint John Henry Newman, Doctor of the Church - Proclamation by Pope Leo XIV -- "For fifty years, I have resisted Liberalism in religion. Never did Holy Church need champions against it more sorely than now!"

Here’s an AI description of St. John Henry Newman’s development of doctrine once he became a Roman Catholic in the pre-Vatican II Church:

Google AI Overview

John Henry Newman's theory of doctrinal development, as outlined in his An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine, proposes that Christian doctrines evolve and deepen over time while remaining fundamentally consistent with their originsThis means that later elaborations of Christian teachings are not necessarily corruptions of the original faith, but rather logical extensions and deeper understandings of the initial revelation. 
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects:
  • Living Doctrine:
    Newman viewed Christian doctrine as a living reality that grows and matures, rather than a static set of beliefs established at the beginning. 
  • Logical Progression:
    He argued that genuine developments are not arbitrary but rather logically connected to earlier teachings, like an acorn developing into an oak tree. 
  • Not Corruption:
    Newman distinguished between healthy development and corruption, emphasizing that a true development preserves the original type, principles, and organization while deepening understanding. 
  • Avoiding Extremes:
    His theory aimed to avoid both the "primitivist" view that doctrine was fully formed at the start and the "relativist" view that doctrine constantly changes. 
  • Examples:
    Examples of doctrinal development include the Trinity, Purgatory, and the Immaculate Conception, all of which, according to Newman, can be seen as logical expansions of earlier teachings. 
  • Seven Notes of Development:
    Newman outlined seven "notes" or characteristics to distinguish healthy developments from corruptions, including the retention of the same type, a conservative action on the past, and a power of assimilation and revival. 
  • Conversion and Influence:
    The concept of doctrinal development was crucial to Newman's own conversion to Catholicism and has significantly influenced Catholic theology according to the Homiletic & Pastoral Review and Wikipedia

WHERE LEO IS…


Poor Mike Lewis commentator on “Where Peter Is”. He’s so wet behind the ears. He doesn’t know that the invention of dissent from papal and dogmatic teachings of the Church was invented in the post-Vatican II era by a cabal of liberal, progressive bishops and theologians. Bishops, in particular, dissented from Paul VI’s Humanae Vitae and in the most virulent ways. And certainly, bishops, theologians, especially women theologians, despise the dogmatic teachings of the pope and the Ordinary Magisterium of the Church on who can and can’t be ordained. 

Mike Lewis would even follow a heretical pope that “ordained” women as deacons in the theoretical sense. Mike Lewis helps us to understand what was at the root of the Great Schism-uncheck papal power. So, it’s okay to dissent from Humanae Vitae, question the wisdom of Pope Paul VI and argue for Women’s ordination and a marriage-like solution for the LGBTQ++ members of the Church to welcome them and their sins. 

But question the ambiguity and the sowed confusion of Pope Francis? OUTRAGEOUS DISSENT! Wow, Mike Lewis, just WOW!

(Crisis Magazine): Mike Lewis, editor of Where Peter Is, who was accurately described in a recent article in the National Catholic Register as being “known for his harsh criticism of those he perceives as disloyal to the late pontiff,” asserted (and the author who knows the situation first hand says the assertion is dead wrong) that the three (fired laymen from Sacred Heart Seminary in Detroit, without due process and usurping the role of the rector of the seminary to hire and fire, and who did so in the most autocratic and non synodal way possible): 

…openly violated the doctrine taught in the Vatican II document Lumen Gentium (no. 25), the Catechism (no. 892), Canon Law (can. 752), and the Professio Fidei (third paragraph) which teaches that religious submission of intellect and will must be granted to the pope’s ordinary magisterial teachings on faith and morals, even when he is not teaching definitively, according to his manifest mind and will. This leaves no room for devising creative interpretations that are more palatable.

Wednesday, July 30, 2025

MUTUAL ENRICHMENT…


In the photo above, the good bishop celebrates a Modern Mass, but one being enriched by the TLM. Do you detect what that enrichment is?

Did you know that the original 1970 Roman Missal in the instruction or rubric prior to the Eucharistic Prayer states the following? “The Eucharistic Prayer may be proclaimed in a loud voice.” What does that also allow? Mutual enrichment anyone?



THE LEO EFFECT: HIGH PAPAL PROTOCOLS RESTORED!



Please note the formal, majestic escort this head of state receives as he enters the Apostolic Palace to meet the pope in mozzetta and papal stole.

I think this kind of fabulous papal escort was crushed under Pope Francis, but I am not certain.

VIEW THE FACEBOOK VIDEO HERE

Tuesday, July 29, 2025

THE YOUTHFUL FACE OF THE MODERN ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH!

 The young love the Modern Catholic Mass. But Holy Father, give them the one thing that they really want for the Catholic Mass, more important than ad orientem, kneeling for Holy Communion.

I celebrate Mass on an Island with a huge tourist population. Young visitors to the beach, and there are a bunch of them, attend Mass while here, some for daily Mass. And you know what? They are the ones kneeling on the floor to receive Holy Communion. Nine times out of ten, when a young person approaches me for Holy Communion I predict they will kneel and they do!

The portable altar for the Mass isn’t the mega sized one for Papal Masses. The odd thing is that the facade of the altar has two images of the papal tiara!

This is a synopsis of the opening Mass for the Jubilee of Youth. At the end the Holy Father makes His Holiness tumultuous appearance and he’s a rock star. But you can see that the Holy Father is kind of amazed at such a scene and he’s the cause of it! Very endearing. 

I wonder if the Eastern Church, either the one in union or the schismatic one, have anything like this?

The Leo Effect:

CENTRAL CRUCIFIX

 



There was a super mega Hoy Mass in Saint Peter’s Square to open the Jubilee of Young People. And I mean St.Peter’s Square was packed, packed, packed with young people. Archbishop Fishichella was the celebrant. Pope Leo will celebrate an even more mega sized Mass on Sunday outside of Rome to conclude the week for the young. 


But, the central crucifix was back. I guess the Vatican will keep me amused by the dancing crucifix and where it will end up next:


AN EASTERN RITE-LIKE STATUS FOR THE SSPX?

 


The Eastern Rites of the Catholic Church have many concessions when it comes to the Filoque Clause, the Dormition of the BVM, liturgical concessions, etc. 

they don’t have to dot the i or cross the t on every ecumenical council, to include Vatican II and on every papal utterance.

Wouldn’t that be the best way to make the SSPX completely regular with the Church? Make them their own Rite, with their own bishops and code of canon law. 

And as with the Anglican Ordinariate, allow any Catholic priest properly prepared to fill in at an SSPX Mass in the absence of an SSPX priest. 

As a cardinal, Pope Benedict reportedly called Marcel Lefebvre ‘the most important bishop of the 20th century’

LET THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES BEGIN! POPE FRANCIS SIGHTING AT SAINT GREGORY THE GREAT CHURCH IN BLUFFTON, SC, DIOCESE OF CHARLESTON ON THE FEAST OF SAINTS MARTHA, MARY AND LAZAROUS!

 



THE BENEDICT XVI, MCDONALD, KWIATKOWSKI, LEO XIV EFFECT!


On the the Feast of Saints Anne and Joachim at my former parish of Saint Anne in Richmond Hill, Georgia, their now pastor celebrates the Modern Vernacular Mass, with a Polish accent, every Sunday and every day ad orientem.  Savannah’s bishop has approved of ad orientem at the Sunday Mass as long as one of the three Sunday Masses is facing the nave. It is wonderful to have episcopal participation and approval for this kind of thing. 

Of course, yours truly softened the ground for this by celebrating the daily Mass there ad orientem and a few special Masses for Solemnities ad orientem. 

The lay faithful receive Holy Communion at the new altar railing in the new church, either kneeling or standing. Savannah’s bishop has distributed Holy Communion to kneeling parishioners at parishes in the diocese that use the altar railing and all of those parishes I had an influence upon, Most Holy Trinity in Augusta, St. Jospeh in Macon and Saint Anne in Richmond Hill. How odd.

Of course my own ethos for ad orientem comes from the ancient tradition of the Catholic Church, with a blip of facing the nave from about 1967 to 2005 when Pope Benedict XVI encouraged ad orientem for the Modern Mass in word and example. 

Pope Leo, although in his infancy papacy, seems to appreciate the Pope Benedict effect as it regards ad orientem for the modern Mass.



Monday, July 28, 2025

THE LEO EFFECT: HOPEFULLY IT WILL RUB OFF ON CHARLOTTE, DETROIT AND SAN ANTONIO…THE LEO EFFECT

 Although named a bishop by Pope Francis, the new bishop celebrates Holy Mass ad orientem, emboldened by Pope Leo’s recent example!

Read the Pillar interview here. 

And miracles of miracles, he recently taught at my seminary in Baltimore. There are some 1970’s Sulpicians turning in their grave, God willing, ad orientem!


COMPUTER INTELLIGENCE POINTS OUT CLEARLY THE CONTINUITY OF POPE LEO XIV WITH POPE BENEDICT XVI AND ALSO WITH POPE FRANCIS I…



Pope Leo XIV's election signals a desire for continuity with Pope Benedict XVI's emphasis on tradition and reform within the Church, while also acknowledging the legacy of Pope Francis. His choice of name, opting to honor Pope Leo XIII, and his early addresses suggest a focus on building upon past teachings, particularly in addressing social issues and the challenges of the modern world. 
While Pope Leo XIV is seen as building on the work of his predecessors, this does not mean a simple return to the past. His approach is described as a "hermeneutic of reform in continuity," meaning that he seeks to move forward while remaining rooted in tradition. This involves acknowledging the contributions of both Pope Francis and Pope Benedict XVI, and finding ways to integrate them into the ongoing development of the Church. 
Here's a more detailed look at the points of continuity and change:
  • Choice of Name:
    Pope Leo XIV's decision to take the name Leo, echoing Pope Leo XIII, signals a connection to the past and a desire to address contemporary issues with the wisdom of previous teachings, particularly on social justice. 
  • Emphasis on Tradition:
    His early addresses emphasize the importance of the Church's social teaching and the need to address modern challenges like artificial intelligence, echoing Pope Leo XIII's encyclical Rerum Novarum. 
  • Continuity with Pope Francis:
    While opting for a more traditional approach, Pope Leo XIV also acknowledges the importance of solidarity and reaching out to the marginalized, which were central to Pope Francis's papacy. 
  • Balancing Act:
    Some observers note that Pope Leo XIV's actions signal a desire to balance the more progressive aspects of Pope Francis's papacy with a return to some traditional practices and a focus on order and management. 
  • Addressing Internal Challenges:
    The new Pope is expected to continue addressing issues like clergy sex abuse and Vatican finances, which were also major challenges during Pope Francis's pontificate. 

ARE THE HETERODOX PSEUDO-TRADS ON THE RIGHT, MORE DIABOLICAL THAN THE HETERODOX LEFT, PSEUDO 60’S LIBERALS? DEPENDS ON WHO YOU ASK, BUT IF YOU ASK ME…..

 


When I entered major seminary in Baltimore in August of 1976, I did not know that I was going to a very progressive seminary. In fact, I really didn’t understand the major two factions in the Church at that time, the conservative, who wanted to conserve the Catholic Faith and Morals of the Church and the progressives who didn’t want to conserve anything from the pre-Vatican II Church and were “reimagining” the Catholic Church to make it post-Catholic.

I JUST THOUGHT MYSELF AS CATHOLIC AND OTHERS THOUGHT LIKE ME!

I was brought up in a parish and home that respected the pope, bishops, priests and religious of the Church. I was shocked, just shocked, I tell you, when I got to Baltimore and the radical left in my seminary, mostly priests theologians despised poor old Pope Paul VI because he had issued Humanae Vitae only a eight years earlier in 1968. And I remember the uproar in the seminary from faculty and seminarians when Pope Paul VI insisted that only men could be ordained as Jesus only chose men as his apostles. The vitriolic words and names from these radical liberals was diabolical, but acceptable to the Archbishop of Baltimore at that time, a radical liberal himself as well as the others liberal bishops who sent men there.

The theologians at my seminary thought of theologians as a separate magisterium and a kind of magisterium in loyal opposition to the Pope Paul VI and later, in an even more vitriolic way, in opposition to Pope John Paul II. The things they would say about those two popes make me blush even today! Diabolical leftists remain with us to this day!

The difference back then was there was no social media for the diabolical left to spew their hatred of the pope(s) as there is now. But today the radical liberals are as disorganized and all over the place as they have ever been and can’t really find common ground to be a more powerful influence in the social media.

Not true for rad trads who have borrowed from the rad liberals of the 70’s a vitriolic approach to Pope Francis and put it on social media. They are organized and more interesting than the radical liberals who are really, really silly and boring. 

But social media has made the radical trads more diabolical than the radical liberals who are like reeds swaying in the wind. 

What is really sad about the radical left today, is that they are straining to make Pope Leo XIV as a clone of Pope Francis and they grasp at every straw that might indicated that Pope Leo is really Pope Francis II. 

But the poor rad trads did the same thing when Pope Francis was elected. I did too and I am not radical. We thought Pope Francis was going to be in continuity with Pope Benedict but that he shed the trappings of the papacy, was more like the crazy uncle you could invite to your home for lunch in order to rally the radical left to become more centered. 

Eventually the rad trads stopped trying to make Pope Francis into Pope Benedict XVII. 

When will the diabolical leftists in the Church give up the ghost about Pope Leo being Pope Francis II?

Here’s a time capsule article from June 2013 about the continuity between Pope Benedict XVI and Pope Francis. It’s funny to read now, but we really tried hard to find that continuity at the beginning of Pope Francis papacy.

 READ IT HERE.

Saturday, July 26, 2025

I’VE WRITTEN THIS BEFORE AND I’LL WRITE IT AGAIN! WHY IN THE NAME OF GOD AND ALL THAT IS HOLY DOES THE VATICAN NEED A NEWS DEPARTMENT THAT HAS EDITORS WRITING EDITORIALS ABOUT THIS,THAT AND THE OTHER?


I might be wrong, but it seems to me that every instrument of the Vatican from the Curia to the Vatican News Website should contribute to what the pope is saying and doing without editorializing on it! 

Why does the Vatican need Andrea Tornielli to write an editorial for the pope at the Vatican News website????? Editorials are opinions. The Vatican should be teaching the truth, not opinions.

Did Pope Leo XIV ask for an editorial so His Holiness can put his finger in his mouth and then place his finger in the air to see if he agrees or disagrees with Vatican News? Will he send a letter to the editor to be printed?

This is the theater of the absurd. Vatican News should only contain what the pope teaches without editorializing on his teachings or editorializing on this, that or the other as is the case with secular newspapers. 

Just my most humble editorial opinion.

The State of Palestine and the responsibility of the International Community

The ongoing tragedy in Gaza calls for a surge of humanity and the urgency of a shared response to the plight of the Palestinian people, which the Holy See has been consistently advocating for decades.

By Andrea Tornielli


NEWLY APPOINTEDITIS…



Over the years, bishops have told newly appointed pastors not to make any major changes in their parish for at least one year. Bishops recommend that the pastor get to know his staff and parishioners first and during that year evaluate what is good and working and what isn’t so good and thus not working. 

As far as interior decorating, bishops really emphasized not changing around any furniture in the sanctuary and not spending big bucks to remodel the rectory and buy new stuff for it in their first year.

What these bishops were addressing is called “newly appointeditis ” meaning the new pastor cannot keep his OCD in check and makes changes compulsively and without regard to what preceded him, good or bad. It is also a problem with “control freaks” who think their authority allows them to trample upon people and do away with their “due process.” 

It isn’t Catholic and certainly not Christian in the broad sense and does little to nothing to maintain peace and tranquility in parishes or dioceses or even the Universal Church for that matter. 

I am not going to comment on the debacles currently happening in a compulsive way in the Archdiocese of Detroit other than to say an OCD personality tending towards dictatorial control without regard to due process and consulting with those who should be consulted in personnel matters isn’t helpful for the unity of a parish, diocese of the Universal Church, a unity Pope Leo XIV truly wants to restore after 12 years of polarization, most of that based on what is happening now in Detroit. 

And bishops need to keep in mind that the world is smaller and smaller than ever thanks to social media and instant communications. 

I know, first hand, when I have had just cause to fire someone on my staff, that the firing of that person causes people to take sides. Those who sided with the one fired only approached the difficult decision from the perspective of the one fired. Firing someone is very difficult, but due process needs to take place.

And the “boss” who does the firing has to observe confidentiality whereas the one fired can stir up all kinds of hornets’ nests. 

Sometimes these things go to litigation and agreements reached in a court with a confidentiality clause cannot be communicated to the public. 

Finally, Pope Leo XIV does not have newly elected appointeditis. He is moving methodically and slowly to establish his staff and vision for the Church. Of course he has quickly reversed many of the papal protocols that Pope Francis dumped. But that has had a healing effect on the Church and applauded by most and bringing about some sense of peace, unity and tranquility in the Church. There is a whole lot of good will right now on all sides of the ideological perspective for Pope Leo XIV.

I don’t think that is true of what is happening in Detroit. It is sad and tragic for the Church there and throughout the world. 

Detroit, Charlotte and other dioceses could learn much from Pope Leo XIV!

Since I am Italian, I like making connections where none may exist, it’s simply coincidental.  However, at the papal website for Saturday, July 26, Pope Leo XIV sends a brief message to Pax Christi which is having a convention in Detroit 

Tell me there isn’t a message in this communication from Pope Leo to Pax Christi and by way of them to the Archbishop of Detroit:

MESSAGE OF THE HOLY FATHER LEO XIV 
TO THE PARTICIPANTS IN THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY 
OF PAX CHRISTI USA

[Detroit, Michigan, 25-27 July 2025]

___________________________________________

I extend cordial greetings and good wishes to those participating in the semi-annual National Assembly of PaxChristi USA, taking place in Detroit, Michigan this July.

In the midst of the many challenges facing our world at this time, including widespread armed conflict, division among peoples, and the challenges of forced migration, efforts to promote nonviolence are all the more necessary. We do well to remember that after the violence of the Crucifixion, the risen Christ’s first words to the Apostles offered peace, one “that is unarmed and disarming, humble and persevering” (First Blessing “Urbi et Orbi”, 8 May 2025).

Jesus continues to send his followers into the world to become creators of peace in their daily lives. In parishes, neighborhoods, and especially on the peripheries, it is all the more important for a Church capable of reconciliation to be present and visible (cf. Address to the Italian Episcopal Conference, 17 June 2025).

I pray in a particular way that your gathering will inspire all in Pax Christi USA to work to make their local communities into “‘houses of peace’ where one learns how to defuse hostility through dialogue, where justice is practiced and forgiveness is cherished” (ibid.). In this way, you will enable many more people to embrace Saint Paul’s invitation to live at peace with their brothers and sisters (cf. Rom 12:18).

With these sentiments, I entrust the Assembly to the intercession of Mary, Mother of the Church, and I gladly impart my Apostolic Blessing as a pledge of abundant heavenly graces.

From the Vatican, 20 July 2025

LEO PP. XIV

Friday, July 25, 2025

PREFACE OF THE APOSTLES TO THE APOSTLES—SAINT MARY MAGDALENE

 I mentioned in a previous post that St. Gregory the Great’s parish has a brand new up to date Roman Missal. On Tuesday I was flustered because it looked like the preface for St. Mary Magdalene’s Feast on her page was for the Apostles .

I have Friday’s St. James Feast there too and so I checked the missal and I read it wrong. It says Preface for the Apostle to the Apostles and it is in the very last page, and I mean last page of this new Roman missal! The ordo , though, said to use the Preface of Saints, I or II.



THIS TALK CERTAINLY INDICATES A MAJOR THEME OF POPE LEO’S PONTIFICATE!


 My valuable insights into what Pope Leo has said in this speech, embedded in the text in RED!

ADDRESS OF POPE LEO XIV

TO TWO GROUPS OF PRIESTS: TO PARTICIPANTS IN THE COURSE FOR FORMATORS IN SEMINARIES 
AND TO PARTICIPANTS IN THE GENERAL CHAPTER OF THE XAVERIAN BROTHERS

Clementine Hall
Friday, 25 July 2025

[Multimedia]

____________________________________

In the name of the Father, of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.

Peace be with you!

Dear formators, dear Xaverian brothers,

I am pleased to meet you at the conclusion of two important events in which you have participated here in Rome: the Course for Seminary Formators, promoted for many years now by the Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum, and the General Chapter to which some of you were delegates.

These are certainly two different events, yet we can see a common thread that unites them because, in different ways, we are called to enter into the dynamism of mission and to face the challenges of evangelization. This call requires of us all, ordained ministers and lay faithful alike, a solid and integral formation, which is not limited to specialized knowledge, but must aim to transform our humanity and our spirituality so that they reflect the Gospel, and so that we have “the same mind” as Christ Jesus (cf. Phil 2:5). (Pope Leo hits the nail on the head. Intellectual knowledge about the Catholic Church, her history, teachings and spirituality is important but never disembodied from living the Catholic Faith in all its orthodox glory.)

To you who are responsible for the formation of formators, and to you Xaverian brothers who are particularly committed to the missio ad gentes, I would like to offer some thoughts for reflection.  Recently, the Dicastery for the Clergy hosted an international gathering dedicated to priests on the theme, “Joyful Priests.”  We can add that to be enthused by the joy of the Gospel is not just for priests, but for everyone, and so we can speak of happy Christians, happy disciples and happy missionaries. (Yes, there needs to be a joy, an infectious joy in the clergy that inspires the laity to follow suit! The laity’s role is minuscule in “Churchy, institutional realities” but profound in a majority sense in the world, at home, at work, in politics and the public square, where an orthodox and joyful Catholic Faith is a most powerful form of mission and evangelization lived out by the laity!)

If this hope is not to remain a mere slogan, formation is essential.  Indeed, it is necessary that the “house” of our life and vocational journey, whether priestly or lay, be founded on “rock” (cf. Mt 7:24-25), that is, on solid foundations with which to face the human and spiritual storms from which even the lives of Christians, priests and missionaries are not exempt.  How can we build our house on rock?  In this regard, I would like to offer you three brief suggestions. (Of course, the rock is Jesus Christ, crucified, Risen and Glorified and living now in the now in relationship to every individual as well as the communal charism of the institutional Church!)

The first is to cultivate friendship with Jesus.  This is the foundation of the house, which must lie at the heart of every vocation and apostolic mission.  We need personally to experience the closeness of the Master; to know that we have been seen, loved and chosen by the Lord by pure grace and without merit on our part, because it is above all our own personal experience that we then exude in our ministry.  Moreover, when we form others in the priestly life and, according to our specific vocation, proclaim the Gospel in mission lands, we first radiate our personal experience of friendship with Christ, which shines through in our way of living, in our attitude, in our humanity, and in how we are capable of living out healthy relationships. (This is extremely important for the vision of synodality that Pope Leo will promote, it is powerfully Christo-centric and based upon relationships, first the one of unconditional love Jesus has for us and by His grace, our ability to reciprocate to Him and our neighbor and how the Holy Spirit unites us in the joy of Orthodox Catholicism and the ortho-praxis of our Catholic Faith.)

Recalling the words of Evangelii Nuntiandi during a General Audience, Pope Francis said: “Evangelization is more than just simple doctrinal and moral transmission.  It is, first and foremost, witness... witness of the personal encounter with Jesus Christ, the Incarnate Word in which salvation is fulfilled... It is not transmitting an ideology or a “doctrine” on God, no.  It is transmitting God who is living in me” (General Audience, 22 March 2023). (Say what you want about the confusion that Pope Francis’ non-magisterial gestures produced, His Holiness was Christo-centric too, but unfortunately his off-the-cuff statement, some of his public gestures and printed interviews undermined what was good in His Holiness’ Christology and personal relationship with his Savior.)

This entails a continuous journey of conversion.  Formators, and those responsible for them, must not forget that they themselves are on a journey of permanent evangelical conversion.  At the same time, missionaries must not forget that they are always the first recipients of the Gospel, the first to be evangelized.  This means that we are constantly to work on ourselves.  A concerted effort is needed to look into our hearts in order to see the shadows and wounds that mark us, and then to have the courage to abandon our masks and cultivate an intimate friendship with Christ.  In this way, we will allow ourselves to be transformed by the life of the Gospel and become authentic missionary disciples. (We all know that agnostics and atheists can know and even love all that the Catholic Church teaches and they might know these teachings far better than most clergy and laity, but still remain an agnostic and an atheist. They live in the realm of academic pursuit and the love of learning, but don’t allow it to touch them personally! In other words, there isn’t conversion. This can happen to believing Catholics who in the pursuit of intellectual Churchy pursuits lack conversion to Catholic orthodoxy and orthopraxis, but drift towards heterodoxy and heteropraxis!)

The second suggestion is to live an effective and affective fraternity among ourselves.  When Pope Francis spoke about priestly life and the crises to be prevented, he liked to emphasize four kinds of closeness: closeness to God, to the bishop, to fellow priests, and to the people (cf. Address to Participants in the Symposium “Towards a Fundamental Theology of the Priesthood,” 17 February 2022).  In this sense, it is necessary to learn to live as brothers within the presbyterate, as well as in religious communities and with our bishops and superiors.  We must work hard on ourselves in order to overcome individualism and the desire to overtake others, which makes us competitors, so that we learn gradually to build human and spiritual relationships that are both healthy and fraternal.  In principle, I think everyone agrees on this, but in reality there is still a long way to go. (Very good point. Today, because of social media a priest who distances himself from his brother priests and his bishop, and also the pope, becomes a Lone Ranger, a kind of cult figure either in his parish or on social media. We have examples of that all over the Church! My deceased bishop who ordained me, Bishop Lessard, used to warn against congregationalism, where priests and parishes did their own thing independent of the leadership of the bishop and the common thread in diocesan parishes.)

The third and final aspect is to share the mission with all the baptized.  During the first centuries of the Church, it was usual for all the faithful to be like missionary disciples and to commit themselves personally to evangelization.  The ordained ministry was at the service of this mission shared by all.  Today, we feel strongly that we must return to this participation of all the baptized in witnessing to and proclaiming the Gospel.  Brothers of the Society of Saint Xavier, in the lands where you carry out your mission, you will certainly have seen firsthand how important it is to work together with the sisters and brothers of those Christian communities.  At the same time, I would like to say to the formators that priests must also be trained in this, not to think of themselves as lone leaders, nor to live out the ordained priesthood with a sense of superiority.  We need priests who are able to discern and appreciate in lay people the grace of Baptism and the charisms that flow from it, perhaps even helping them to open up to these gifts and then to find the courage and enthusiasm to commit themselves to help the life of the Church and society.  In concrete terms, this means that the preparation of future priests must be increasingly immersed in the reality of the People of God and carried out with the contribution of its members: priests, laity, and consecrated men and women. (What I appreciate the most about Vatican II is its call to holiness for all the laity. And Vatican II made clear that the primary role of the laity is in the world, where the Church and her orthodox ethos is brought to the world, at home, in the work place, at play, in politics and the public square. But malformed Catholics, individualistic in their heterodoxy, bring not the pristine Catholic Faith to where they find themselves, but a heterodoxy, a toothless Catholicism or a manipulation of Catholicism for political purposes opposed to Catholic teaching. Think of all the heterodox Catholic politicians we have in the USA and the heterodox example they give to fellow Catholics and the world. This compromises the call to laity to be holy and orthodox and to be missionaries and evangelizers in the world! Often, unfortunately, they have been formed in their heterodoxy by heterodox clergy and religious! In addition to this dismal situation, more attention is paid to the laity doing “churchy” things, as Bishop Lessard used to say, rather than how they are to live holy lives in the world in their own secular lives. The vast, vast, vast majority of lay Catholics don’t have Church jobs, aren’t on committees, are not Eucharistic Ministers, lectors, ushers, choir members or working in the Curia of the Vatican! But that is were the energy has been placed for the last 60 years, on giving power to a small minority of laity, especially laywomen, not lay men, in churchy and institutional settings! Pope Leo is correct in getting back to enabling the laity to live and proclaim the Gospel in the secular realm, the realm of their life and where their Catholic expertise and personal holiness should be exercised!)

Dear friends, I thank you for this opportunity to be together, but above all, I thank you for your service, for your care in carrying out priestly formation, and for your missionary work in evangelizing lands that are often wounded and in need of the hope of the Gospel.  I encourage you to continue on your journeys.

May the Virgin Mary accompany you and intercede for you!

Thank you!