Sunday, May 31, 2015


When I use the term "save the Church," I mean all the baptized people of  God. But the term also refers to saving the institutional aspects of the Church for these are the sacramentals that draw people to Holy Mother Church and keep them in the fold.

In a sense I am referring to Church as a "sacrament" not in a dogmatic way but as a Sign of Christ. While the vernacular liturgies of the Church could have made the liturgies of the Church more intelligible to the laity and clergy, the sloppy reorientation of the Sacraments, to include the Mass, along with extremely sloppy and a flawed hermeneutic for translating the Latin into all the vernaculars caused a further dumbing down of the Church and her sacraments.

As much as some may protest, there is a direct link or causation between this dumbing down of the sacraments and of the Church that has led to the demise of the Catholic Church in Western Europe, the latest being Ireland. When 88% or more of Catholics are not engaged in the Church or in fact have left the Church, we have a problem.

Thank God for those God gives us in this dearth to call us back to basics and the true nature of Catholicism found in her liturgies traditionally celebrated. The first step is a complete reorientation of the flawed renewal after Vatican II toward what was even if all remains in the vernacular in most places.

The new Prefect for the Congregation of Divine Worship, Cardinal Robert Sarah understands what needs to be done and he is giving direction and creating excitment once again in the Liturgy world where cold water has been thrown upon them in the last two and a half years.

Read what the good Cardinal Sarah recently said. Is he going to be the first African pope in modern Church history? I think His Eminence would get some votes!

I copy this from the Rorate Caeili website:

Cardinal Sarah: "[New] Rite of Baptism doesn't even mention word 'Faith' - there's a big problem right there." | "Don't deceive people with 'mercy' without repentance."

Matteo Matzuzzi
Il Timone
May 30, 2015
“If the Eucharist is considered [simply] a meal we share in and that nobody can be excluded from it, then the sense of Mystery is lost”. So says Cardinal Robert Sarah, the new Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments, in an intervention given at the John Paul II Pontifical Institute for the Studies on Marriage and the Family, at his presentation of: “The Family – a work in progress”, a compilation of essays published by Cantagalli, in view of the upcoming Synod in October. A compilation intent on stimulating a discussion which touches on the “hot issues” of homosexuality, sexuality, divorce, in-vitro-fertilization, euthanasia and celibacy. Three volumes make up the collection, two of which are written by professors of the John Paul II Pontifical Institute: “The Eucharist and divorce: does the doctrine change?” by José Granados (who has also been nominated consultant to the Synod of Bishops) and “Different Families: imperfect expressions of the same ideal?” by Stephan Kampowski. The third, “What does Jesus think of the divorced and remarried?” is the work of Luis Sanchez Navarro, Ordinary of the New Testament at San Damaso University in Madrid. Il Foglio had anticipated ample extracts of Professors Granados and Sanchez’s books on April 15th of this year.

“The West – said Cardinal Sarah, in an ‘off the cuff’ response to some questions posed to him from the auditorium – is adapting to its own illusions”. The main problem, the prelate noted several times, is faith. (Il Foglio anticipated this last March 13th in a long extract from the book ”Dieu ou rien” published in France by Fayard). “If you consider that the word “faith” is no longer mentioned even in the Rite of Baptism, when the parents are questioned about what they ask of the Church of God for their child, the significance of the problem is very clear”, added the Cardinal who also blamed the teaching of Catechism today, “The children do drawings and don’t learn anything – they don’t go to Mass.”
[The new rite and the most vacuous and obvious response in the history of the liturgy (which, as always, is optional and replaceable, even by 'faith').]
Regarding the upcoming Synod, an invitation came from Cardinal Sarah [for us] to have no illusions about epochal changes: “People think that there will be a revolution, but this cannot happen. Doctrine belongs to no-one, it is Christ’s alone”. After last October’s meeting, noted the Cardinal in his presentation of the three volumes, “it was clear that the real crux of the matter was not only the question of the divorced and remarried”, but “whether the doctrine of the Church is to be considered an unreachable ideal - an impossibility, which would therefore necessitate adapting to a downward trend to propose it to present-day society. If this is the situation, we need a clarification as to whether the Gospel is the good news for man or a useless burden no longer viable”. The riches of Catholicism – he added – “cannot be revealed through ideas dictated by a kind of pragmatism and some mutual feelings in common. Revelation shows humanity the way to wholeness and happiness. Ignoring this fact would mean affirming the need to re-think the very foundations of the redeeming action of the Church itself, which is accomplished through the Sacraments.”

The problem is also those “priests and bishops” who contribute to “contradicting the word of Christ” by their own words. And this said Cardinal Sarah, “is extremely grave”. To permit at some diocesan levels what has not yet been authorized by the Synod (the allusion was to the practices followed in many situations of centre-north Europe) is to “profane Christ”. It is of little worth invoking mercy: “We are deceiving people when we talk of mercy without knowing what the word means. The Lord forgives sins, but only if we repent of them”. The divisions that were seen last October, “…were all from the West. In Africa, we have remained steadfast, as there have been many people in that continent who have lost their lives for the faith.”

The Cardinal launched an appeal against those members of the clergy who use imprecise language: “ It is wrong for the Church to use the vocabulary of the United Nations. We have our own vocabulary.” He then wanted to make a clarification on one of the maxims that has become very popular since 2013 i.e. the one about ‘going out to into the peripheries’. A correct intention, obviously, but on one condition: “It’s easy to go out into the peripheries, but it depends on whether we are taking Christ [to them]. Today it is more courageous to be with Christ on the Cross which means martyrdom. Our duty is to go against the mainstream” as regards the fashions of the time, and “what the world is saying”. And besides, “if the Church stops preaching the Gospel, it is finished. It can do so with present day fashions, but with firmness.”

And lastly, a note on the decline of priestly vocations in the world: “The question is not that there are few priests, inasmuch as whether these priests are true priests for Christ.

[Rorate translation by contributor Francesca Romana. Source.]


Anonymous said...

No, Cardinal Sarah will not be the next pope. Although I think he would be a wonderful pope. Unfortunately look at the make up of the present college of cardinals. Not exactly a bastion of knowledge or strength. Look who they elected the last time. The next pope will be worse than the present one. I can see the ne t pope coming out on the balcony in a tab shirt and clam diggers. The Catholic Church as we new it for 2000 years is gone. The reality is modernism has won. Nobody in the college of cardinals seems to care with the exception of a small, small minority. The reality is the future isn't bright but very very dark. The next pe will probablly be somebody who the media will endorse and the not very smart cardinals will listen, obey and pay homage to the altar of modernity again.

jolly jansenist said...

Modernism won in the Garden.

Vox Cantoris said...

I'm not so sure; I'm not saying it will be Cardinal Sarah but I don't think we will have another Pope like this one. I think many went along for the ride and are regretting it. I also think that there may very well be a falling away very soon that will scare the devil out of these men and an act of God that will bring them back to their senses.

Annuntio vobis gaudium magnum:
Eminentissimum ac reverendissimum Dominum,
Dominum Raymundus Sanctæ Romanæ Ecclesiæ Cardinalem Burke,
Qui sibi nomen imposuit Leo XIV.

jolly jansenist said...

Vox, I certainly pray that you are correct.

Anonymous said...

Vox Cantoris I cannot agree more with your next choice for a new Pope, His Grace Cardinal Burke in my humble opinion is the ONLY man who can save the Holy Roman Catholic and Apostolic Church and restore the Traditional Latin Mass to its proper place. Dear Holy Ghost we beg and beseech thee to choose this Holy and humble man named Raymond Cardinal Burke as the savior of the Roman Church and Latin Mass!!!

Lefebvrian said...

I cannot agree that Cardinal Burke is the only man who can save the Church. I'd suggest that His Excellency Bishop Tissier de Mallerais has precisely the understanding of the underlying philosophical problems that are at the root of the Church's problems to be able to root out the errors from their very base.

qwikness said...

Tissier de Mallerais? The SSPX Bishop? Will be Pope? Are you serious or just trying to stir the pot?

Dialogue said...

The SSPX's increasingly seem so self-deceived that they have a difficult time participating constructively in conversations about the future of the Church.

Lefebvrian said...

This commenter proposed that Cardinal Burke is the only man who could save the Church by being elected pope. I proposed another such person.

Let's be real, none of these men will actually be elected -- I'd say they all have the same odds.

Dialogue, do you know a lot of SSPX priests there where you are? You engage them regularly in conversation? And after that, you have determined that they are self-deceived?

John Nolan said...

The Traditional Latin Mass (aka the Roman Rite) was never abrogated and with a far longer pedigree than the Novus Ordo does not require papal fiat to maintain its proper place. It's up to us, folks.

In just over a week's time there will be a Solemn Requiem Mass for the soul of Richard III in the (Anglican) parish church of Fotheringay, Northants, the king's birthplace. It's organized by the Richard III Society and the Friends of Fotheringay church, neither of which is a Catholic organization. Yet it will be a Catholic Mass in the older rite, celebrated by a Catholic priest, not a historical re-enactment by Anglican antiquarians, as would probably have been the case 20 years ago.