Vatican updates guidelines for educating priests Catholic News Service OSV Newsweekly
12/7/2016
VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- The Catholic Church needs holy, healthy and humble priests and that requires prayers for vocations and the careful selection and training of candidates, said the Congregation for Clergy.
Updating 1985 guidelines for preparing men for the Latin-rite priesthood and ensuring their continuing education, training and support, the Congregation for Clergy Dec. 7 released "The Gift of the Priestly Vocation," a detailed set of guidelines and norms for priestly formation.
The updated document draws heavily on St. John Paul II's 1992 apostolic exhortation on priestly formation, as well as on the teaching of and norms issued by now-retired Pope Benedict XVI and Pope Francis and by Vatican offices over the past three decades.
It reaffirms an instruction approved by Pope Benedict in 2005, which said, "the church, while profoundly respecting the persons in question, cannot admit to the seminary or to holy orders those who practice homosexuality, present deep-seated homosexual tendencies or support the so-called 'gay culture.'"
The document insists that through courses in pastoral theology, the example of priests and practical experience, candidates for the priesthood learn that priestly ministry involves -- as Pope Francis says -- being "shepherds 'with the smell of the sheep,' who live in their midst to bring the mercy of God to them."
Highlighting lessons learned over the past 30 years from the clerical sexual abuse scandal, the new guidelines state, "The greatest attention must be given to the theme of the protection of minors and vulnerable adults, being vigilant lest those who seek admission to a seminary or to a house of formation, or who are already petitioning to receive holy orders have not been involved in any way with any crime or problematic behavior in this area."
Seminars and courses on the protection of children and vulnerable adults must be part of both seminary education and the continuing education of priests, it says. And bishops must be very cautious about accepting candidates for the priesthood who have been dismissed from other seminaries.
In the end, each bishop is responsible for determining which candidate for priesthood he will ordain, but the guidelines strongly encourage bishops to accept the judgment of seminary rectors and staff who determine a certain candidate is unsuitable.
"Experience has shown that when ordinaries (bishops) have not accepted the negative judgment of the community of formators, it has been the cause of great suffering in many cases, both for the candidates themselves and for the local churches," the document says.
Reaffirming the requirement that seminarians study Catholic social teaching, the document says the education must include a study of climate change and other environmental threats.
"Protecting the environment and caring for our common home -- the Earth -- belong fully to the Christian outlook on man and reality," the document says. Catholic priests must be "promoters of an appropriate care for everything connected to the protection of creation."
Seminarians should be encouraged to use social media to build relationships and for evangelization, the guidelines say, but seminary personnel will need to help the students use the media wisely and in a way that is healthy.
Psychologists, whether or not on the staff of the seminary, can provide valuable help to the seminary rector and diocesan bishop "in the assessment of personality, expressing an opinion as to the psychological health of the candidate and in therapeutic accompaniment, in order to shed light on any problems that may emerge and to assist in growth in human maturity," the document says.
The Congregation for Clergy recommends that women be on the staff of seminaries or teach at the universities where the candidates study and that seminarians' ability to relate to and work with women be considered in the candidate's evaluation, since the majority of parishioners with whom the future priest will work are women.
The guidelines, which are to be adapted by national bishops' conferences, include an outline of the stages, prayer life and specific subjects to be studied during the six or more years of preparation for priestly ordination.
But the guidelines also acknowledge that many of the skills needed to be a good priest cannot be learned in a classroom. They are the result of prayer, self-discipline and seeking to model one's behavior on that of Christ, the document says.
"The call to be pastors of the people of God requires a formation that makes future priests experts in the art of pastoral discernment, that is to say, able to listen deeply to real situations and capable of good judgment in making choices and decisions," it says. "To make pastoral discernment effective, the evangelical style of listening must take central place. This frees the pastor from the temptation of abstraction, to self-promotion, to excessive self-assurances and to that aloofness that would make him a 'spiritual accountant' instead of a good Samaritan."
- - -
The text of the document in English can be found at: http://www.clerus.va/content/dam/clerus/Ratio%20Fundamentalis/The%20Gift%20of%20the%20Priestly%20Vocation.pdf
33 comments:
"A study of climate change and environmental threats." What utter, absolute nonsense. The Church is still catering to socio-political fads and rationalistic philosophy. It is a reflection of a theology that is ultimately humanistic and Pelagian. The only climate and environmental change the Church needs to be concerned about is the one spoken of in Matthew and in the rest of the NT that explains how this culture and this earth we worship and so want to preserve is already passing away and will, ultimately, be destroyed and made new, not by recycling, thinking "green" and counting dolphins, but by God's righteous wrath and the Son's two edged sword of judgement. The theological climate prediction is "Hot." It is souls we need to be saving, not aluminum cans, glass bottles, and a whale here and there. Sheesh!
It looks good enough to me. The continuation of "candidacy" seems either unnecessary or in need of a more meaningful ritual and definition. The inclusion of ecology as a study requirement seems odd, since priests cannot minister to the air or seas, except perhaps by exorcising and blessing them. Otherwise, the document is so sound that I doubt Pope Francis had anything to do with it, bless his heart.
This is an admission that they feel the Church is irrelevant.
The National Anti-Catholic Reporter and the rest of the left-wing loon media will go bonkers. Now they will turn on the Pope big-time!!!
However, the environmental sop was ridiculous.
Sometimes it's useful to see how non-believers in Christianity deal with the claims of man-made global climate change.
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/154082416051/the-non-expert-problem-and-climate-change-science
Jusadbellum,
For lefties, Global Warming is their religion and don't you dare challenge their dogmas!
"The inclusion of ecology as a study requirement seems odd, since priests cannot minister to the air or seas,..."
They do, of course, minister to the people who make the decisions regarding how we treat or, as the case may be, mistreat the air and seas. In doing do, the priests can and should 1) be aware of the Church's teaching regarding the environment, which is a matter of proper stewardship, and 2) encourage good stewardship, explaining how this is a moral mandate.
It will also be helpful to priests to have some understanding, or at least exposure to, these aspects of science.
Fr. Kavanaugh,
Will the Faith collapsing, this should be the least of Santita's worries. It's a sop to the looney left for whom Global Warming has become the State Religion.
Mary Immaculate, the New Eve
The first Eve was fashioned by God from a man, and this man we know as Adam. | The Son of God, the new Adam, was fashioned according to God's plan from a woman, who we honor as the Blessed Virgin and the New Eve.
The first Eve was created without sin. | The second Eve was conceived without sin.
The first Eve was created directly by God, from a man, without the aid of a human mother; | the second Adam was created by God from a woman, the New Eve, without the aid of a human father.
The first Eve was seduced by the serpent and was complicit with the first Adam in bringing sin and death into the world. | The second Eve never knew sin and would, being the obedient instrument and servant of the Divine Will, crush the head of the serpent.
The first Eve was driven from Paradise because of her disobedience to God. | The New Eve would be first among those in the Heavenly Paradise because of her willing obedience to God.
The first Eve spoke her assent to a Fallen Angel and this brought sin and darkness into the world. | The New Eve spoke her assent to a Glorious Angel and this would bring Salvation and the Divine Light into the world.
The first Eve disobeyed God and so her life would be one of sin and its deathly consequences. | The New Eve, conceived immaculate and being ever obedient to God, would escape sin and its deathly consequences.
The first Eve is known as the Mother of the all who are Earthly born. | The Blessed Virgin, the New Eve, is the Mother of All who are spiritually re-born.
Just as the waters of the Nile were parted to the allow the Israelites to pass through untouched, so was the temporal flow of Original sin through the power of God, parted at the Blessed Virgins conception. By a singular grace of God, she was untouched by that Sin of Adam which is our unfortunate inheritance..
Before a farmer plants, does he not prepare the soil? Before an artist paints, does he not prepare the canvas? Before a builder puts up a structure, does he not prepare the building site? Likewise, the Blessed Virgin was prepared by a singular privilege of God to be free of sin and thereby worthy for her awaited role as the Mother of the Son of the Living God.
'Psychologists, whether or not on the staff of the seminary, can provide valuable help to the seminary rector and diocesan bishop "in the assessment of personality, expressing an opinion as to the psychological health of the candidate and in therapeutic accompaniment, in order to shed light on any problems that may emerge and to assist in growth in human maturity," the document says.'
Here we go again, giving psychologists an influential role in assessing people. Psychology, like the social "sciences" are not real sciences, but pseudo-sciences as they, like the recent election of Donald Trump showed, predict almost nothing. Even in psychiatry, the current debate is whether psychiatry should not be better classified as belonging to the humanities rather than some "science" or medicine.
Psychology had a large responsibility in the scandalous clergy child abuse of the 1970's and 1980's since, without a notion of sin, it merely placed sinful actions as behavioural issues that could be "treated", indeed without any repentance on the part of the sinner.
I think if we are going to discuss the proper formation of the priest in the 21st century we need to start with a man who has been brought up by loving parents in a loving Catholic ethos, having lived all the basic aspects of Catholic devotion for years prior to entering the seminary so he doesn't study Catholicism as though he was an outsider and thus only theoretically.
He needs to have had a Marian devotion, a Eucharistic devotion, a sense of the corporal and spiritual works of mercy from the 'inside'.
Then he should have a basic liberal arts background including the classics.
He should have more than theoretical grasp of budgets and balancing checkbooks.
A priest will soon inherit a million dollar parish so he should understand hard work, how to scrimp and save, how to handle large sums wisely. How to spend money to make money and when to save for a rainy day.
He'll be called on for spiritual direction so he needs to have a spiritual director!
He'll be called on for confession so he needs a robust life of going to confession.
He probably should attend a few AA meetings in seminary to experience that part of the population (probably 20-30% of all Americans are either personally addicted or are close relatives to those who are).
He should attend some En-Courage meetings too (and of course not himself have SSA tendencies).
A priest today is going to be thrown to the lions so to speak so having as well rounded an education as possible is a plus.
I think most laity have little clue (and thus most seminarians at first have little clue) what the normal 'day in the life' of a parish priest is like. I'd imagine an inordinate amount of time is spent in meetings and handling administrative tasks or learning how to delegate to qualified laity. So learning how to hire and fire wouldn't be a bad skillset to acquire either!
Learning how to best make use of meetings, agendas, etc. might also be a good skill to acquire.
We might insist or give pride of place to Eagle Scouts or the equivalent in the new Trail Life or Troops of St. George outfits.
Victor is absolutely correct. Most pyschologists are flaming libs, anyway. They are the last people I'd consult about anything, including what time it is.
Father Kavanaugh,
Since Pope Francis wants priests to preach only the "kerygma", avoiding "complex doctrines", it's not clear to me where ecological preaching should fit.
At the end of the day, seminary training should focus on grounding the priest in authetic Catholicism, both doctrine and liturgy, and help the candidate develop a solid prayer life. People are hungry for a holy priest who loves Christ and his Church.
Dialogue - There is nothing complex about understanding our moral obligation to be good stewards of the material gifts we have received.
There's nothing complex about preaching it, or including it in homilies about moral obligations, especially in the context of social justice.
From the USCCB's Social Justice Scripture Guide:
In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth and set humans as his stewards to care for his creation. Care for God’s creation was God’s fruitful commandment to humanity and a fundamental requirement of our faith. Moreover, creation witnesses to God’s existence. God reveals himself in creation and we see in nature the fingerprints of God. Creation is always an object of praise in Israel’s prayer and the prayers of the early Christians. We are called to honor and protect our planet and its people—to live in relationship with all of God’s creation. At the dawn of creation, God commanded us not only to be fruitful and multiply, but also to use for his good creation.
Genesis 1:1-31 God made the heavens and the earth and it was good.
Genesis 2:15 Humans are commanded to care for God’s creation.
Leviticus 25:1-7 The land itself must be given a rest and not abused.
Deuteronomy 10:14 All of heaven and earth belong to the Lord.
Psalm 24:1-2 All the earth is the Lord’s.
Daniel 3:56-82 Creation proclaims the glory of God.
Matthew 6:25-34 God loves and cares for all of creation.
Romans 1:20 Creation reveals the nature of God.
1 Corinthians 10:26 Creation and all created things are inherently good because they are of the Lord.
Dialogue, RE: Kerygma. A very ironic and interesting statement coming from this Pope. Also, a very protestant statement. The theological meaning of "kerygma" means essentially the earliest expressions and preaching of belief about Jesus Christ, much of which was oral tradition. This, of course, eliminates most of the NT (with the exception of, perhaps, Mark's Gospel, Acts, and some of Paul's writings) and also tosses pretty much the entire Catholic tradition and doctrine. So, old Francis just wants a bunch of people running around saying "Jesus loves you." Interesting hermeneutic, that. Or, it is quite possible that he does not know what "kerygma" means. Maybe he thinks it means pancake syrup or that it is a dog's name or something.
Fr. Kavanaugh,
Let's cut the crap. We are all familiar with those scriptures, but you know and I know, that the environmental leftists wanted to regulate and tax and exert power over the masses based on bogus science and the Church, including the USCCB, beclowns itself by falling into their trap and parroting their language. It's just like all of their social justice "schemes" which are based on social engineering, excessive taxation, and government coercion. Jesus called US to be charitable and assist our fellow man, not for the government to coerce us into "charity." In the pre-Vatican Disaster II days, the Church built orphanages, schools, hospitals and clinics with contribution from the faithful to pursue its mission. Sadly, because of wrong-headed governance, the Church has reduced itself to a state of weakness that it can no longer continue much of its mission.
Encouraging preaching based on the kerygma does not "eliminate most of the NT" since the NT includes and is based on the kerygma, the initial and essential proclamation of the Gospel.
Also, since "pretty much the entire Catholic tradition and doctrine" is also based on the kerygma, this too, is not eliminated.
Tee Jay, I don't consider the USCCB's suggestions regarding the scriptural bases for understanding or moral obligation to be good stewards of the material world to be "crap.".
Neither do I share your views regarding taxation, environmental science, social engineering, government coercion, or, I am sure, a host of other topics.
Kavanaugh, you need to review the definition of kerygma, not to mention a good NT theology book. You are an expert at missing the point...but, you have had a lot of practice.
Father Kavanaugh,
If one advocates the principal that preaching should be limited to the kerygma, but then one also insists that all doctrine is sufficiently related to the kerygma to prevent its exclusion from preaching, then what is the point of the principal itself?
Fr Kav,
I know, because you're a left-winger who drinks the Catholic hating (and abortion loving) government's kool-aid. You are masquerading as a Catholic priest, while being a Democrat operative with pulpit. Fortunately, your kind's shelf life is about up.
Merry Festivus!
Gentlemen, I suggest we stay on topic and not engage in priest bashing or "ad hominems" by 'mind-reading' intentions into Fr. K's heart.
If he's wrong on something then we can prove it without knocking his motives.
As for stewardship of the environment - to paraphrase St. Mother Theresa, if we as a society and a church cannot protect the unborn babies, we're not going to care much about the planet. The only value the planet has comes from the people who live on it...ergo, if the post-Christian secular hedonist culture we're party to broadcasts 'abortion on demand' it is declaring that individual human beings have no intrinsic value. They matter on a sliding scale based on who might happen to desire them (usually formulated as 'a woman and her doctor').
So what happens? Places further advanced on the anti-Christian Socialist spectrum also are wildly out of control polluters of air and water and environment with nary a peep from Western socialist 'environmentalists' who reserve their ire only for western free capitalist polluters (who pollute an order of magnitude less than the Chi-coms, Indians, Indonesians and others.
In the West it really is straining the gnat and ignoring the camel.
If we don't care about the intrinsic worth of the unborn or the poor souls in IVF petri dishes, why would we care about the homeless or any other 'unspoken for' poor human individual? Why would we care about the human trafficked, the drug or sex addicted? WE WOULDN'T AND HENCE WE DON'T.
But do go on and preach concern and hyperventilating worry for "the planet"!
This is why pro-lifers are so frustrated with the SJWs.... by ignoring the utterly defenseless and innocent among us, by holding themselves aloof from this titanic evil of our age which is far and away more egregiously evil than slavery, the 60% of the Church that dissented on Humane Vitae and abortion have no metaphysical platform to base their 'concern' for the planet's value. How can one be pro-abortion (tacitly) but then be terribly concerned about capital punishment? How can one be awfully concerned about "hate speech" - mere words that might be unpleasant - and yet completely oblivious to the egregious and murderous assault on the unborn?
It's not so much that the post-Christian Left or the dissenters of Humane Vitae are merely wrong, it's that they seem oblivious and ignorant of the very bedrock on which any morality and thus any moral judgment is based: unless human beings have intrinsic and inalienable rights/value regardless of "a woman and her doctor" or "the state" or "the times (i.e. what the elite happen to desire)", then no human has dignity and value and neither does the planet we live on.
Gene - My definition of kerygma is entirely Catholic. We could begin with, "The kerygma is the word of God who solemnly proclaims the salvation of humanity through the Incarnation, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. It is the announcement of the mirabilia Dei actualized in us. It is the announcement of the paschal mystery of Christ: the mystery of his person and his mission, but especially his death, resurrection, and exaltation to Lordship. The kerygma is the inauguration of the Kingdom of God and the proclamation of the beginning of the period of waiting for its definitive manifestation. For that reason it always involves the urgency of conversion." (Cardinal Baum, Address to the Federation of Catholic Scholars
Given on 28 April 1978. It's a good talk - you would do well to read it.)
Dialogue - Cardinal Baum notes, "The normative character and primacy of the apostolic proclamation should not be obscured." Consistently making the kerygma the basis of one's preaching is not, in fact, limiting. It is directive and should keep the preacher in the pulpit from straying too far afield in his thoughts and words.
Yikes, guys. No need to do Satan's work for him.
The discussion of recruitment was great until it called out the environmental concerns. I have to snark a bit and ask if that is what the Vatican is going harp about instead of abortion? That statemnt totally derails the recruitment theme by making the reader wonder if that is the focus of the priesthood? It also defeats its intent, if I am to understand it as a Catholic, by implying that we will take direction concerning natural sciences from the clergy which seems almost like superstition.
Why do you have a fake picture of Stan Laurel dressed up like a bishop at the top of this article? Is it supposed to be funny.
Fr. Michael J. Kavanaugh said, regarding this:...
"The inclusion of ecology as a study requirement seems odd, since priests cannot minister to the air or seas,..."
They do, of course, minister to the people who make the decisions regarding how we treat or, as the case may be, mistreat the air and seas. In doing do, the priests can and should 1) be aware of the Church's teaching regarding the environment, which is a matter of proper stewardship, and 2) encourage good stewardship, explaining how this is a moral mandate.
It will also be helpful to priests to have some understanding, or at least exposure to, these aspects of science.
There are LOTS of areas of science that priests could benefit from knowing more about. I think an excellent case can be made for concern if a priest is not reasonably familiar with all of these:
- Economics
- Physics
- Psychology
- Medical sciences, particularly child development, adolescence and issues of aging
...And no doubt others could be added.
When I was in the seminary (ordained 14 years ago), we had some discussion of human development and sexuality, some psychology in counseling courses, and we had an optional business management course, which was good, but hardly said much about economics.
If issues of climate and environment are to be added, then you also have to cover natural sciences much more broadly. Add it up, and it sounds like a pretty full semester, just covering these science topics.
Gee, if only seminarians were required to have certain educational attainments before entering graduate studies! Oh, wait -- they are: they must have a bachelor's degree (and a fair amount of philosophy to boot).
Well, Kavanaugh, Cardinal Baum has a most enhanced definition of kerygma, which is not understood that way by NT scholars and theologians. What he says is fine as a theological interpretation of kerygma...in fact, I agree with it. But, it is not the original understanding of it.
The 2 paragraphs below were separated by one about “smelling like the sheep”. These should always be together because they make up the majority of abuse cases the Church has suffered through. I doubt if many of the homosexual men who abused children did so before they were ordained. Rather, they waited until later, and when they gained control of seminaries and monasteries, then they admitted men of likewise persuasion while rejecting good candidates. At this point they no longer had to worry about being exposed for their behavior. I have heard that some seminaries/monasteries interpret “deep-seated homosexual tendencies” in a way that allows them to admit men that this paragraph was trying to keep out. We need to be vigilant or else we will again have seminaries/monasteries filled with perverts. It would also be nice to clean out the ones that still exist. (ei, St. John’s in Collegeville, MN)
"the church, while profoundly respecting the persons in question, cannot admit to the seminary or to holy orders those who practice homosexuality, present deep-seated homosexual tendencies or support the so-called 'gay culture.'
"The greatest attention must be given to the theme of the protection of minors and vulnerable adults, being vigilant lest those who seek admission to a seminary or to a house of formation, or who are already petitioning to receive holy orders have not been involved in any way with any crime or problematic behavior in this area."
Vianney1100
Martin, as one who majored in biology at a liberal arts college, Belmont Abbey, I favor, of course, requiring ALL seminary candidates to follow the same course of studies.
Although I avoided all accounting/business classes, that technical/liberal arts background was very broad. Adding the sciences introduces a person to a methodology for thinking/reasoning that is, in my experience, extremely useful in just about any walk of life.
According to Let's Talk Science, (Let's Talk Science is award-winning, national (Canadian), charitable organization, focused on education and outreach to support youth development. It creates and delivers unique learning programs and services that engage children, youth and educators in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)) the reasons we all need science are;
Science crosses subjects
Science develops literacy skills
Science develops numeracy skills
Science develops general and technical skills
Science is powerful and important in daily life and decisions
The expansive redefinition of "kerygma" is like the redefinition of "evangelization" from apostolic proclamation of the Kingdom for the purpose of saving souls, to basically anything anyone does with a smile or a tear. I once heard a fellow from Catholic Relief Services discussing a meal he shared with some East African Moslims, a meal which he later and profoundly concluded was a "true eucharist as Christ envisioned".
Dialogue, you are indeed correct. These new issue "priests" like Kavanaugh, along with their protestant counterparts, do not even pretend, anymore, to understand and reflect good NT theology. Even such neo-prot lib Biblical scholars as Rudolph Bultmann, C. H. Dodd, and James Crenshaw insist upon a proper understanding of the term "kerygma." They also have some understanding of the implications of the true meaning of kerygma for Christology and for our subsequent understanding of the Incarnation. Although agnostic and thoroughly neo-prot, Bultmann's signal work, "Kerygma and Myth," makes very clear the delineations of the term...if you can stand it.
I'm happy to be on board with Cardinal Baum on kerygma.
The notion that an expanded understanding is an erroneous understanding is odd, given that that is precisely what has taken place with almost all things theological over the centuries.
Post a Comment