You can see the FOX video HERE!
Is it a sign of America's collapse as well? But what I find truly fascinating in the video is that no one seems overly startled by what is happening to poor Hilary, as though this is par for the course? Do you notice the lack of concern or shock at what is happening form those around her??????? Odd, no?
This is on the heels of Hilary's sweeping condemnation of many of Trump's supporters in the most Vatican II way possibles. Seem that religous progrressives and poltical progressives demonize their opponents to gain an upper hand and to intimidate. But that playbook doesn't seem to work for them any more.
The phobia demonization meme of Hilary and the demonization of Catholics as pre-Vatican II as a form of intimidation are over!
FASTEN YOUR SEAT BELTS, THIS ELECTION IS COLLAPSING!
O, by the way pray for Hilary! Now I'm off to our every other Sunday Lifeteen Mass, a favorite of so many who comment here.
30 comments:
maybe you should be more concerned about the impending collapse of the Catholic Church. Today, fake catholic Kaine, her running might, has opined that Rome will eventually approve gay marriage! Worry about. Are you going to contact the papal nuncio or Kaine's bishop with this outrageous claim?
"...proves that Donald Trump is correct about her health situation."
No, it doesn't. It proves she collapsed.
"Is it a sign of America's collapse as well?"
No, there's no causal relation between Clinton's malady and the "collapse" of America.
"...no one seems overly startled..."
The Secret Service is trained not to be "overly startled." Her aides, as would any candidates assistants, did not want to make the situation worse by being overly dramatic.
"Odd, no?"
No.
"But that playbook doesn't seem to work for them any more."
Oh, it's working. The latest: "Clinton led Trump among likely voters in the ABC News/Washington Post poll, 51 percent to 43 percent. When Gary Johnson of the Libertarian Party and Jill Stein of the Green Party were included, Clinton was ahead of Trump, 46 percent to 41 percent, with the third-party candidates polling 11 percent between them."
Or, if you prefer: "The latest Rasmussen Reports weekly White House Watch national telephone and online survey shows Clinton with 43% support to Donald Trump’s 39%. Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson gets nine percent (9%) of the vote, and Green Party candidate Jill Stein earns two percent (2%). Another two percent (2%) like some other candidate, and five percent (5%) are undecided."
I see a link between the manner in which the liberal establishment dismissed the right-wing's concerns about Hillary Clinton's coughing fits, freezing in front of an audience, unsteadiness on her feet, talk about the medical injector pen, and uncontrollable head bobs, and the manner in which the liberal (and even conservative elements) establishment within the Church has long dismissed the Catholic right-wing's concerns about the liturgical and ecumenical revolutions.
The Washington Post, just five days ago, shilled for Hillary Clinton via the following column:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/06/the-questions-about-hillary-clintons-health-are-absurd/
-- Can we just stop talking about Hillary Clinton’s health now?
by Chris Cillizza September 6
"Here's the thing: This is a totally ridiculous issue — for lots of reasons — and one that if Trump or his Republican surrogates continue to focus on is a surefire loser in the fall.
"Let's start here: Clinton has released a detailed letter from her personal physician attesting to her overall good health — and making specific reference to her 2012 fall.
"What Trump cannot — or, at least, should not — do is continue to engage with these wacky theories that emerge out of the fever swamps on the very fringe of the conservative movement. Every single person who believes in the Clinton health conspiracy is already for Trump."
Right-wing Catholics experienced the same arrogant dismissal decades ago, within and without the Church, when they noted the horrific damage that the liturgical and
ecumenical revolutions had inflicted upon the Church.
I realize that the right-wing, within and without the Church, is fixated upon conspiracy theories. The Jews, Bilderbergers, Illuminati, Rockerfellers, Club of Rome, Trilateral Commission, Bohemian Grove, Monsignor Bugnini, Pope Benedict XVI is the real Pope, but he's drugged ("look at his eyes, look at his eyes"), blackmailed, and held prisoner by "Anti-Pope" Francis, homosexuals control the Vatican and every diocese on earth...
But it's not a conspiracy theory when the liturgical reform deformed the Roman Liturgy. It is not a conspiracy theory when one novelty after another introduced into the Liturgy has watered-down the powerful sense of Catholicism that should flow from liturgy.
It is not a conspiracy theory when Catholic participation in the Ecumenical Movement has watered-down the powerful manner in which the Church had always and everywhere presented Herself, via holy teachings, symbols, and practices, to the Faithful and world.
It is not a conspiracy theory when Hillary Clinton has time and again experienced public episodes that a rational person would have linked to medical issues.
Anyway, I believe that the liberal news media have realized that following today's medical "event," — Hillary Clinton's physical collapse in public — they are unable to continue to dismiss supposed conspiracy theories related to questions about Hillary Clinton's health.
By the way, Chris Cillizza, of the Washington Post, was forced to eat today a large plateful of crow. He acknowledged the following via his Twitter
account:https://twitter.com/TheFix/status/775087198899142656
"Hillary Clinton's health just became a real issue in the presidential campaign."
Now, when will liberals within the Church cease to pretend that the right-wing is wrong about the liturgical and ecumenical revolutions that have inflicted serious
damage upon the Church?
Pax.
Mark Thomas
Do more young people come to the Lifeteen mass or to the Latin Masses you had in Macon?
Right to the second that Hillary Clinton collapsed physically today, the "mainstream" news media had bashed right-wingers who insisted that Mrs. Clinton's public "medical episodes" constituted a legitimate campaign issue.
Now, the "mainstream" news media have changed their tune in that regard.
Mrs. Clinton is a legitimate campaign issue, according to the "mainstream" news media. Why did liberal news media shills for Mrs. Clinton change their tune today? I believe that the disdain that Mrs. Clinton's "handlers" directed today at the liberal shills angered the news media.
That is, as news reports noted: "Clinton's departure from the event was not witnessed by the reporters who travel with her campaign, which did not offer any information about why she left and her whereabouts for more than an hour.
"The campaign also did not take reporters in the motorcade after Clinton's departure from her daughter's apartment, and it was unclear where she was headed from there."
Hillary Clinton's "handlers" stiffed reporters. But despite their having shilled for Mrs. Clinton, the liberal news media don't take kindly to being treated with disdain.
The liberal news media have developed sudden interest in Hillary Clinton's public medical "events," which, until this morning, they had ignored or dismissed arrogantly as non-stories.
Even though they will vote for her, the powerful left-wing news media will attempt to show Hillary that nobody prevents them from gaining access to anybody they please.
Nobody blocks the news media from attempting to trail this or that person...from forming a human ring around a Hillary to prevent the news media from filming/photographing her.
In a matter of seconds today, the liberal news media anointed as a major news story Hillary Clinton's health. Only when they have been kept out of the loop do liberal news media types anoint as a "legitimate" campaign issue that which they had dismissed arrogantly as the focus of right-wing conspiracy "nuts" — that is, Hillary Clinton's public medical "events."
How on earth could liberal reporters, after having watched for months Mrs. Clinton stumble, wobble her head uncontrollably, freeze at times during addresses, and hack constantly, not have addressed the issue of her health (other than to have bashed right-wingers who had addressed her health status)?
The "mainstream" news media are useless as they shill for their masters and causes. Who trusts the "mainstream" news media? Said folks distort one thing after another, including Catholic-related news.
May God grant Mrs. Clinton good health. May Mrs. Clinton embrace God's will via her conversion to the True Religion.
May the "mainstream" news media become instruments of truth. (I believe in miracles.)
Pax.
Mark Thomas
One of your readers is unfamiliar with the Lifeteen Mass. On one of your posts maybe you could give an explanation as to what they are about.
In politics, I don't think it is a collapse. I do think it is a major shuffle or shift though. I especially wonder of there will not be a shift in the Republican agenda occurring in the future. I would not be surprised that in the next presidential election if the republican candidate shares much of Mr. Trumps primary agenda, and a little less of his eccentricities.
I wish I was a teen just to see you do a Life Teen mass! We miss you so much in Macon. But onto politics: this is definitely a bigger issue than the Clinton campaign wants to admit. She has some obvious and serious health issues. Her campaign will do anything to try and cover up her illness, whatever it may be. No matter the problem, she clearly is in no position to run the country. This whole scenario and their lack of explanation just causes more questions. The agenda to get her elected no matter what makes me wonder "what do they have up their sleeves next?" This whole election cycle has been a complete mess. God help us all if she wins. Hopefully she will drop out and take care of herself and pray and reflect on how she can really help. By retiring from public office for good. This country needs a strong leader with Christian values and common sense.
Hilary: "Do more young people come to the Lifeteen mass or to the Latin Masses you had in Macon?"
Of course, it's a commonplace that young people predominate at a traditional Latin Mass. But your question is perhaps misdirected--The Lifeteen Mass is not for young people, but for aging over-the-hill guitar-slapping types trying to relive their salad days in the 1970s. If you can stand it, take in a Lifeteen Mass and look around to see for yourself.
the evil, corrupt, anti-Catholic media will do everything it can to push Hillary across the finish line, the public be damned. And we have fake catholic priests and bishops who will help.
Here's the very weak, girlieman statement, from the "Bishop" of Richmond:
http://www.richmonddiocese.org/sites/default/files/files/Catholics%20in%20Elected%20Office%202016%207_22_16.pdf
Please note, there is no mention of consequences or ecclesiastical penalties for fake catholics
TJM, is the "bishop" of Richmond not a "legitimate" bishop? Was he invalidly ordained? As for "the public be damned" on Hillary, well, voters do have a choice, and I suspect most of them are well aware of the stances of the candidates. Unless one lives under a rock, one knows how liberal the Democratic party is especially on social issues, while Trump---at least for now (though not always in the past) is more on the pro-life side.
As a fan of neither candidate (but especially not one of Clinton), both candidates at their age should release detailed records. Voters have either been lied to in the past or denied such access, perhaps most notoriously FDR's doctor, Adm. Ross McIntire, who concealed the president's congestive heart failure from the public even though insiders knew FDR could not live through a fourth term.
"Girlieman statement"? Wow TJM...you sound like a real badass tough dude. Is that what you are? Do you pack a big bad "piece" like Gene? (What ever happened to Gene BTW? He may have assumed a new identity. Maybe YOU'RE Gene....)
TJM:
“[T]he evil, corrupt, anti-Catholic media will do everything it can to push Hillary across the finish line, the public be damned.”
Maybe, too, some (many?) people just don’t particularly care for Donald Grump (does he_ever_smile or laugh by the way?).
+and how these Christians love each other......now who said that? .and how is it practised in 2016? In the world.....in the good old USA or good old deep south or on this blog and other RC blogs?Paul.
Anonymous 2, Hillary cackles and laughs at fools like you who will vote for her (and other fake catholics like you)
And of course these days the NCAA is in the politically correct mode, punishing the State of North Carolina for invalidating Charlotte's "bathroom ordinance." WE hear a lot about "inclusion" at the NCAA, but clearly that does not include persons or entities with traditional Judeo-Christian values. Thankfully the state's 2 Catholic bishops have not caved into the PC mode up there---unlike, of course, the liberal and dying "mainstream" Protestant Churches up there---especially the Methodists, Presbyterians and Episcopalians. I don't know how this country can last...maybe Texas can become an independent country...the way this country is going, we might want to head there...
Anonymous,
Lefties politicize everything, including sports. They are absolutely nuts and if Hillary is elected, we will get more of the same. I am not wild about Trump, but he will not tolerate any more of this insane nonsense from the totalitarian left.
TJM, yes, Trump not the ideal candidate from many perspectives---the lesser or lesser in terms of evil---but yes, the Left is imposing its will often through a rigged court process (as opposed to the ballot box), where activist judges find all sorts of rights I never knew existed. Right to abortion? I still can't find the word "abortion" in the Constitution. Maybe my new pair of glasses will help me find it. States almost everywhere vote to ban state recognition of same-sex marriages, but activist judges find that to be a right too. Unfortunately, we can't blame the activist judges on just Democrats---Republican appointees have betrayed us too many times. Remember RobertsCare? We can blame Mr. Roberts for all the problems Obamacare is causing (not just from a financial standpoint---I'm thinking moral standpoint, like contraception and abortion). In my ideal world, if liberal states up North or along the Pacific want a libertine, anything goes lifestyle, that should be their business (even if I don't like it). But the more conservative South and Plains states should be allowed to have their own codes too. But no, activist judges say "one size fits all"---and that "size" is invariably secular and hostile to our Judeo-Christian ethics. This election is probably the last chance to turn things around, or at least slow down our road to moral destruction.
TJM:
Your deplorable willingness to vilify anyone who dares to say something negative about your candidate by questioning their Catholic bona fides clearly indicates that you are a Trump supporter. Moreover, it makes one wonder who is the real fake Catholic.
I almost wish Trump will be elected so that I can see your reaction when he betrays everything you think he stands for.
Anonymous 2,
Take your own advice. You started this, like all libs do, with snark: "Donald Grump.." Obamacare may pay for counseling. You need it because you are suffering from a serious disease called "projection."
TJM:
Your mind games will not work with me. Read your posts and look in the mirror. Your comments are a symptom of the sorry, uncivil times in which we live.
Anonymous 2,
Thanks for the laugh. I guess "being liberal means never having to say you're sorry." They are not mind games at all, just pointing out that people who live in glass houses shouldn't be throwing stones
Heard someone up here in Atlanta speak this morning about the importance of this presidential election in terms of the future Supreme Court---if Hillary is elected, we get more judges who believe the Constitution is a "living, breathing" document that "evolves" with the times, and say good bye to religious liberty and any restrictions on abortion. Maybe with Trump, despite his flaws (and he was neither my first or second choice in the primary), we can at least slow down the descent into the moral abyss. With Hillary in office, it is basically over---the Court is gone for years, and all sorts of rights that go against our Judeo-Christian heritage are out the door.
TJM:
“I guess ‘being liberal means never having to say you're sorry.’”
Say sorry to whom? You? Donald Trump? And for what? For making a mildly unflattering pun at the expense of your great hero, a public figure who has debased our political conversation with egregious lies, insults, and vitriol like no-one else in living memory?
But granting your premise, you must be extremely liberal because your typical modus operandi on this Blog is to insult people whenever they challenge something you say and yet you never say sorry.
Anonymous 2,
After the Abortion Party's candidate, Hillary, came out with the "deplorables comment" I would think you would have a bit more introspection. Guess not.
TJM:
If some of those squealing the loudest about her “deplorables comment” had a bit more introspection they might discover that her comment was not that far wide of the mark in their own case. This said, she should not have said what she said.
TJM:
By the way, I do not for the life of me understand what you and others who use similar language hope to achieve by continually referring to the Democratic Party as the Abortion Party. Perhaps it satisfies some emotional or psychological need you have. It surely is not calculated to persuade anyone to oppose abortion. You should know that to use deliberately provocative and incendiary language in that manner will only cause those who are pro-choice to reject what you say and to double down on their position. If you really do want to reduce the number of abortions instead of satisfying some emotional or psychological need of your own, I suggest that you tone down your rhetoric and stop demonizing those with whom you disagree. You will likely reach more people and save more babies that way.
TRUMP 2016!!! This man is our last hope as a nation, is he flawed yes, but I will vote with gusto for Mr. Trump any Roman Catholic who votes for Clinton is committing a SIN!!
I am certain Trump will win this election. I think in the US and in fact world-wide people are waking up to the liberal trick of political correctness which vilifies anybody, calls them racists, etc, for speaking out about the serious danger to citizens by the unfettered swamping of countries with people whose backgrounds are not able to be checked and who come from countries that threaten the security of the US and the west. It doesn't take an Einstein to see that when Trumps says there will be further attacks on American soil because so many Islamists have been let into the US. That is completely obvious with all the bombs set in New York in past days.
One has to question the foolhardiness of the Obama administration for letting in so many Islamists in the current climate when it is obvious from what is happening in France, Germany and other countries that have allowed their countries to be swamped with Islamists. Hillary Clinton has said she wants more of the same and so I think the majority of American citizens will be wise enough not to vote her in. The only sane and sensible move is to stop wholesale and unvetted immigration until papers can be properly checked.
The Washington Post has reported:
"Hundreds of illegal immigrants from terrorist hotbeds who were supposed to have been deported were instead granted citizenship because Homeland Security didn’t have fingerprints on file to check their identity, the department’s inspector general said in a stunning new report Monday.
At least two of those approved are now being investigated by the FBI for links to terrorism, investigators said."
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/sep/19/dhs-granted-citizenship-illegals-terrorist-nations/
Anonymous:
Just because so-called liberals are wrong to play the racist card and engage in political correctness (which is also practiced by so-called “conservatives” just with a different content, by the way—i.e., same process, different content) doesn’t mean that Trump is right.
Post a Comment