Saturday, October 24, 2015

JUST STATING THE OBVIOUS NO BOMBSHELLS HERE AND NO ZINGERS!

Synod15 – 18ma Congregazione generale: Discorso del Santo Padre a conclusione dei lavori della XIV Assemblea generale ordinaria del Sinodo dei Vescovi, 24.10.2015

Dear Beatitudes, Eminences and Excellencies,
Dear Brothers and Sisters,

I would like first of all to thank the Lord, who has guided our synodal process in these years by his Holy Spirit, whose support is never lacking to the Church.

My heartfelt thanks go to Cardinal Lorenzo Baldisseri, Secretary General of the Synod, Bishop Fabio Fabene, its Under-Secretary, and, together with them, the Relator, Cardinal Peter Erdő, and the Special Secretary, Archbishop Bruno Forte, the Delegate Presidents, the writers, consultors and translators, and all those who have worked tirelessly and with total dedication to the Church: My deepest thanks!

I likewise thank all of you, dear Synod Fathers, Fraternal Delegates, Auditors and Assessors, parish priests and families, for your active and fruitful participation.

And I thank all those unnamed men and women who contributed generously to the labours of this Synod by quietly working behind the scenes.

Be assured of my prayers, that the Lord will reward all of you with his abundant gifts of grace!
As I followed the labours of the Synod, I asked myself: What will it mean for the Church to conclude this Synod devoted to the family?

Certainly, the Synod was not about settling all the issues having to do with the family, but rather attempting to see them in the light of the Gospel and the Church’s tradition and two-thousand-year history, bringing the joy of hope without falling into a facile repetition of what is obvious or has already been said.

Surely it was not about finding exhaustive solutions for all the difficulties and uncertainties which challenge and threaten the family, but rather about seeing these difficulties and uncertainties in the light of the Faith, carefully studying them and confronting them fearlessly, without burying our heads in the sand.

It was about urging everyone to appreciate the importance of the institution of the family and of marriage between a man and a woman, based on unity and indissolubility, and valuing it as the fundamental basis of society and human life.

It was about listening to and making heard the voices of the families and the Church’s pastors, who came to Rome bearing on their shoulders the burdens and the hopes, the riches and the challenges of families throughout the world.

It was about showing the vitality of the Catholic Church, which is not afraid to stir dulled consciences or to soil her hands with lively and frank discussions about the family.

It was about trying to view and interpret realities, today’s realities, through God’s eyes, so as to kindle the flame of faith and enlighten people’s hearts in times marked by discouragement, social, economic and moral crisis, and growing pessimism.

It was about bearing witness to everyone that, for the Church, the Gospel continues to be a vital source of eternal newness, against all those who would “indoctrinate” it in dead stones to be hurled at others.

It was also about laying closed hearts, which bare the closed hearts which frequently hide even behind the Church’s teachings or good intentions, in order to sit in the chair of Moses and judge, sometimes with superiority and superficiality, difficult cases and wounded families.

It was about making clear that the Church is a Church of the poor in spirit and of sinners seeking forgiveness, not simply of the righteous and the holy, but rather of those who are righteous and holy precisely when they feel themselves poor sinners.

It was about trying to open up broader horizons, rising above conspiracy theories and blinkered viewpoints, so as to defend and spread the freedom of the children of God, and to transmit the beauty of Christian Newness, at times encrusted in a language which is archaic or simply incomprehensible.

In the course of this Synod, the different opinions which were freely expressed – and at times, unfortunately, not in entirely well-meaning ways – certainly led to a rich and lively dialogue; they offered a vivid image of a Church which does not simply “rubberstamp”, but draws from the sources of her faith living waters to refresh parched hearts.1

And – apart from dogmatic questions clearly defined by the Church’s Magisterium – we have also seen that what seems normal for a bishop on one continent, is considered strange and almost scandalous for a bishop from another; what is considered a violation of a right in one society is an evident and inviolable rule in another; what for some is freedom of conscience is for others simply confusion. Cultures are in fact quite diverse, and each general principle needs to be inculturated, if it is to be respected and applied.2 The 1985 Synod, which celebrated the twentieth anniversary of the conclusion of the Second Vatican Council, spoke of inculturation as “the intimate transformation of authentic cultural values through their integration in Christianity, and the taking root of Christianity in the various human cultures”.3 Inculturation does not weaken true values, but demonstrates their true strength and authenticity, since they adapt without changing; indeed they quietly and gradually transform the different cultures.4

We have seen, also by the richness of our diversity, that the same challenge is ever before us: that of proclaiming the Gospel to the men and women of today, and defending the family from all ideological and individualistic assaults.

And without ever falling into the danger of relativism or of demonizing others, we sought to embrace, fully and courageously, the goodness and mercy of God who transcends our every human reckoning and desires only that “all be saved” (cf. 1 Tm 2:4). In this way we wished to experience this Synod in the context of the Extraordinary Year of Mercy which the Church is called to celebrated.

Dear Brothers,

The Synod experience also made us better realize that the true defenders of doctrine are not those who uphold its letter, but its spirit; not ideas but people; not formulae but the gratuitousness of God’s love and forgiveness. This is in no way to detract from the importance of formulae, laws and divine commandments, but raather to exalt the greatness of the true God, who does not treat us according to our merits or even according to our works but solely according to the boundless generosity of his Mercy (cf. Rom 3:21-30; Ps 129; Lk 11:37-54). It does have to do with overcoming the recurring temptations of the elder brother (cf. Lk 15:25-32) and the jealous labourers (cf. Mt 20:1-16). Indeed, it means upholding all the more the laws and commandments which were made for man and not vice versa (cf. Mk 2:27).

In this sense, the necessary human repentance, works and efforts take on a deeper meaning, not as the price of that salvation freely won for us by Christ on the cross, but as a response to the One who loved us first and saved us at the cost of his innocent blood, while we were still sinners (cf. Rom 5:6).

The Church’s first duty is not to hand down condemnations or anathemas, but to proclaim God’s mercy, to call to conversion, and to lead all men and women to salvation in the Lord (cf. Jn 12:44-50).

Blessed Paul VI expressed this eloquently: “”We can imagine, then, that each of our sins, our attempts to turn our back on God, kindles in him a more intense flame of love, a desire to bring us back to himself and to his saving plan… God, in Christ, shows himself to be infinitely good… God is good. Not only in himself; God is – let us say it with tears – good for us. He loves us, he seeks us out, he thinks of us, he knows us, he touches our hearts us and he waits for us. He will be – so to say – delighted on the day when we return and say: ‘Lord, in your goodness, forgive me. Thus our repentance becomes God’s joy”.5

Saint John Paul II also stated that: “the Church lives an authentic life when she professes and proclaims mercy… and when she brings people close to the sources of the Saviour’s mercy, of which she is the trustee and dispenser”.6

Benedict XVI, too, said: “Mercy is indeed the central nucleus of the Gospel message; it is the very name of God… May all that the Church says and does manifest the mercy God feels for mankind. When the Church has to recall an unrecognized truth, or a betrayed good, she always does so impelled by merciful love, so that men may have life and have it abundantly (cf. Jn 10:10)”.7

In light of all this, and thanks to this time of grace which the Church has experienced in discussing the family, we feel mutually enriched. Many of us have felt the working of the Holy Spirit who is the real protagonist and guide of the Synod. For all of us, the word “family” has a new resonance, so much so that the word itself already evokes the richness of the family’s vocation and the significance of the labours of the Synod.8

In effect, for the Church to conclude the Synod means to return to our true “journeying together” in bringing to every part of the world, to every diocese, to every community and every situation, the light of the Gospel, the embrace of the Church and the support of God’s mercy!

Thank you!

8 comments:

JBS said...

Whatever else we think, it seems to me that we should acknowledge the synod's genuine attempt to apply the mercy of God to the confused lives of secularized Catholics. Granted, bishops, priests and religious have all contributed to the confusion for decades, but our first concern right now must be to keep as many souls as possible as far away as possible from eternal damnation.

Gene said...

He said they have a year to go before all of this is sorted out. LOL! I read his speech and it said absolutely nothing encouraging other than a few platitudes and truisms, with a quote or two from Pope Benedict. This is far from over. It will now intensify since the lines have been more clearly drawn.

Marc said...

I'd say that allowing Communion for the divorced and remarried is a bombshell since it is a negation of the Catholic doctrine. If that practice is put into place, it seems to me that it demonstrates the Roman Church to be man-made, a false religion, not the Church founded by Christ since it will show an inherent discontinuity in doctrine.

So, I'd respectfully disagree that this isn't a bombshell.

JBS said...

Unrepentant adulterers should certainly not receive Holy Communion, but our first concern must be the salvation of souls. It is more important to save souls from eternal damnation than to protect the Most Blessed Sacrament. We should be on our knees pleading for those in adulterous unions to repent and convert, before it's too late.

John Nolan said...

One or two barbs against the opponents of the liberal agenda; otherwise the usual Francis waffle. At least the BBC won't have any headlines about reactionary bishops thwarting his pro-gay agenda.

When my bishop (Peter Doyle) gets back I hope he reads my letter which should already be in his in-tray. I suspect he's going to get plenty of flak for his remarks on Vatican Radio. He can't claim he was misquoted, either. He's what Prince Philip would call a 'dentopedologist' - someone prone to opening his mouth and putting his foot in it.

I predict we'll hear a lot less from the Holy Father in the coming year as his faux-popularity evaporates. But he's saved his papacy, or rather the bishops have saved it for him.

Jan said...

JBS, it is not a matter of the Blessed sacrament it is that fact that he or she who eats and drinks of the Lords' body and blood unworthily eats and drinks damnation unto themselves. The message is clear.

Jan

JBS said...

Jan,

A catechized but unconverted adulterer will go to hell even if he doesn't receive Holy Communion. If God were more concerned with protecting Himself than with saving sinners, He would never have submitted Himself to the Cross.

George said...

JBS

A catechized adulterer will go to hell only if he or she doesn't repent with true contrition for their sin. We are missing something here. Scripture is clear about receiving the Body and Blood unworthily and what the consequences of that are.
The objective truth is plain; what we do not know is the subjective reality. How many Catholics today who go up to receive communion do not believe and therefor do not have the proper appreciation for and disposition toward the Real Presence? Far too many it seems. And what of the state of soul of those who have little or no catechesis? If a non practicing Catholic or even a non Catholic comes to Mass and
goes up to receive, I can't see how this can be characterized as good. We should pray more frequently and fervently that people convert and treat the Divine King with the due respect, reverence and honor that is owed to Him. While a priest cannot always know who is worthy to receive, he can always pray for conversion of sinners, and those who out of ignorance or poor catechesis, do not know any better..

God doesn't need to be protected. He does need to be respected, however.