Unfortunately Pope Benedict did not rule the Church as this doctored picture indicates His Holiness could have:
Pope Benedict certainly had the remedy for the liturgical chaos that followed the 1970 Roman Missal. Unfortunately his leadership style was not that of a Jesuit General, thus he did not mandate much of his remedy. However, His Holiness may well have set into motion, in a mustard seed fashion, the organic development needed to be faithful to Sacrosanctum Concilium without denigrating the Mass that is sought to revise.
Eleven Great Quotes from Pope Benedict XVI on Liturgy and the Holy Mass
by
Like most of you, I have enjoyed reading the Holy Father’s thoughts
on the liturgy and the Holy Mass over the years. Pope Benedict was
undeniably prolific in his theological reflection on Liturgy and the
Eucharist prior to his election as Supreme Pontiff of the Catholic
Church. Even before I became Catholic, I was impressed by his
forthrightness and clarity on what constitutes genuine and God-honoring
liturgy.
A previous post on the Pope’s condemnation of clapping at Holy Mass was popular, so here are eleven more Ratzinger-zingers on the Holy Mass. Please read them carefully, and digest what His Holiness is saying.
These are only the tip of the iceberg. I’d encourage you to read the books when you have time. Tell then, here goes:
Ratzinger on the Liturgical Reformers Creating a ‘Fabrication, Banal Product’
The liturgical reform, in its concrete realization, has distanced itself even more from its origin. The result has not been a reanimation, but devastation. In place of the liturgy, fruit of a continual development, they have placed a fabricated liturgy. They have deserted a vital process of growth and becoming in order to substitute a fabrication. They did not want to continue the development, the organic maturing of something living through the centuries, and they replaced it, in the manner of technical production, by a fabrication, a banal product of the moment. (Ratzinger in Revue Theologisches, Vol. 20, Feb. 1990, pgs. 103-104)
The liturgical reform, in its concrete realization, has distanced itself even more from its origin. The result has not been a reanimation, but devastation. In place of the liturgy, fruit of a continual development, they have placed a fabricated liturgy. They have deserted a vital process of growth and becoming in order to substitute a fabrication. They did not want to continue the development, the organic maturing of something living through the centuries, and they replaced it, in the manner of technical production, by a fabrication, a banal product of the moment. (Ratzinger in Revue Theologisches, Vol. 20, Feb. 1990, pgs. 103-104)
Ratzinger on Those Who Appreciate the Latin Mass being Wrongly Treated Like ‘Lepers’
“For fostering a true consciousness in liturgical matters, it is
also important that the proscription against the form of liturgy in
valid use up to 1970 [the older Latin Mass] should be lifted. Anyone who
nowadays advocates the continuing existence of this liturgy or takes
part in it is treated like a leper; all tolerance ends here. There has
never been anything like this in history; in doing this we are despising
and proscribing the Church’s whole past. How can one trust her at
present if things are that way?” (Spirit of the Liturgy, 2000)
Ratzinger on the Degeneration of Liturgy and ‘Liturgical Fabricators’
“[W]e have a liturgy which has degenerated so that it has become a
show which, with momentary success for the group of liturgical
fabricators, strives to render religion interesting in the wake of the
frivolities of fashion and seductive moral maxims. Consequently, the
trend is the increasingly marked retreat of those who do not look to the
liturgy for a spiritual show-master but for the encounter with the
living God in whose presence all the ‘doing’ becomes insignificant since
only this encounter is able to guarantee us access to the true richness
of being.” (Cardinal Ratzinger’s preface to the French translation of Reform of the Roman Liturgy by Monsignor Klaus Gamber, 1992).
Ratzinger on the ‘Disintegration of the Liturgy’
“I am convinced that the crisis in the Church that we are
experiencing today is, to a large extent, due to the disintegration of
the liturgy.” (Milestones: Memoirs 1927-1977)
Ratzinger against ‘Homemade Liturgy’
“It is also worth observing here that the ‘creativity’ involved in
manufactured liturgies has a very restricted scope. It is poor indeed
compared with the wealth of the received liturgy in its hundreds and
thousands of years of history. Unfortunately, the originators of
homemade liturgies are slower to become aware of this than the
participants…” (Feast of Faith p. 67-68)
Ratzinger on the Latin Mass as the ‘Holiest and Highest Possession’
“I am of the opinion, to be sure, that the old rite should be
granted much more generously to all those who desire it. It’s impossible
to see what could be dangerous or unacceptable about that. A community
is calling its very being into question when it suddenly declares that
what until now was its holiest and highest possession is strictly
forbidden and when it makes the longing for it seem downright indecent.”
(Ratzinger Salt of the Earth (1997)
Ratzinger on the Danger of Creative “Presiders” at the Mass
In reality what happened was that an unprecedented
clericalization came on the scene. Now the priest — the “presider”, as
they now prefer to call him — becomes the real point of reference for
the whole Liturgy. Everything depends on him. We have to see him, to
respond to him, to be involved in what he is doing. His creativity
sustains the whole thing.
Ratzinger on the Danger of ‘Creative Planning of the Liturgy’
Not surprisingly, people try to reduce this newly created role by
assigning all kinds of liturgical functions to different individuals and
entrusting the “creative” planning of the Liturgy to groups of people
who like to, and are supposed to, “make a contribution of their own”.
Less and less is God in the picture. More and more important is what is
done by the human beings who meet here and do not like to subject
themselves to a “pre-determined pattern”. (Spirit of Liturgy, ch. 3)
Ratzinger on Why the Priest Should Not Face the People During Mass
The turning of the priest toward the people has turned the
community into a self-enclosed circle. In its outward form, it no longer
opens out on what lies ahead and above, but is locked into itself. The
common turning toward the East was not a “celebration toward the wall”;
it did not mean that the priest “had his back to the people”: the priest
himself was not regarded as so important. For just as the congregation
in the synagogue looked together toward Jerusalem, so in the Christian
Liturgy the congregation looked together “toward the Lord”. (Spirit of
Liturgy, ch. 3)
Ratzinger on the Priest and People Facing the Same Direction
On the other hand, a common turning to the East during the
Eucharistic Prayer remains essential. This is not a case of accidentals,
but of essentials. Looking at the priest has no importance. What
matters is looking together at the Lord. (Spirit of Liturgy, ch. 3)
Ratzinger on the ‘Absurd Phenomenon’ of Replacing the Crucifix with the Priest
Moving the altar cross to the side to give an uninterrupted
view of the priest is something I regard as one of the truly absurd
phenomena of recent decades. Is the cross disruptive during Mass? Is the
priest more important than Our Lord? (Spirit of Liturgy, ch. 3)
6 comments:
Pope Benedict's "fabrication" quote is well-known, but I've never been sure whether that's referring to the Missal as such, or just to the abuses of it that people associate with it. I know he said elsewhere (somewhere in his "Collected Works" on the liturgy—a series of interviews) that he finds a lot to like about the current missal, and is generally thankful for it. So that leaves me wondering: are those who use the quote about fabrication as a condemnation of the Novus Ordo, as such, quoting him out of context? Personally, I feel like his quote applies to the whole missal, but I'm not sure if that's how *he* meant it.
(And yes, I'd love to see the papal tiara restored, if even just for the Pope to wear at the commencement of his Pontificate and never again, but hey, God's will be done. It's really, really low on my list of things the Church should be attending to.)
It seems clear from the context that then-Cardinal Ratzinger was talking about the process of development of the Novus Ordo missal itself, not merely the Novus Ordo Mass in typical parish practice:
"In place of the liturgy, fruit of a continual development, they have placed a fabricated liturgy. They have deserted a vital process of growth and becoming in order to substitute a fabrication. They did not want to continue the development, the organic maturing of something living through the centuries, and they replaced it, in the manner of technical production, by a fabrication, a banal product of the moment.” (Ratzinger in Revue Theologisches, Vol. 20, Feb. 1990, pgs. 103-104)"
I can't recall having heard it here yet, but couldn't we blame the extinction of the Papal Tiara on VII? q.........ult seems to think it's God's will. I think that the most recent four popes might have tried one on and looked in a mirror and realized how comical they looked. Lots of things don't hold up for 2000 years, no matter how badly some want them to.
My comment wasn't necessarily meant to imply the abandonment of the tiara was God's will—it was simply a resignation to whatever God's will might be on the matter, if He cares one way or the other. And for future reference, because this name is indeed a long one, people might want to know my actual name.
~Michael
"Pope Benedict's 'fabrication' quote is well-known, but I've never been sure whether that's referring to the Missal as such.."
It's the Missal itself that he called "fabricated", although he much favors the Novus Ordo Offertory Prayers, which he said Pope Paul VI himself helped compose, patterned after the Jewish table prayers.
You can read it all in Pope Benedict XVI's book, "Feast of Faith."
Post a Comment