Wednesday, November 17, 2010

THIS IS THE LOGICAL CONCLUSION TO THE "SPIRIT" OF VATICAN II THAT INFECTS THIS GENERATION OF CATHOLICS IN THE SECOND PICTURE

Not a few Catholics think this form of the Mass is obsolete and against what Vatican II envisioned for the Church. They think the picture below this one is what Vatican II really wanted for the Mass. YIKES!

This man thinks he's a priest and he's celebrating "Mass" in Belgium. In his "catholic" church, anyone can celebrate the "Mass." Aren't they cool and neato?

On the heals of the article below this post, where Cardinal Biffi decries the "spirit" of Vatican II that took a firm hold on many in the Church following the Second Vatican Council, the New York Times has a report on "churches" springing up in Belgium where "Mass" is "celebrated" by "laity" who are not "ordained" priests. You can read the article here in the New York Times.

When I was in the seminary between 1976 and 1980, the theology that has produced the "churches" in this New York Times story was seen as the wave of the future for the entire Catholic Church. Anyone could be selected to celebrate "Mass." It didn't have to be an ordained priest because we're all "priests" by virtue of our baptism which is the end all and be all of all sacraments. Obviously, this aberrant "spirit" of Vatican II theology has become important for a small minority of aging "hippies" who embraced the "spirit" of Vatican II and can't believe that the entire Church, meaning also that part which is the hierarchy hasn't come around to their gnostic tendencies and beliefs.

Let me conclude by printing once again what Cardinal Biffi writes about "stuff" like this:

With such a theological and historical methodology – never expressed in such a clear fashion, but no less relentless for this reason – it is easy to imagine the results: what is adopted and exalted in an almost obsessive manner is not the Council that in fact was celebrated, but (so to speak) a "virtual Council"; a Council that has a place not in the history of the Church, but in the history of ecclesiastical imagination. Anyone who dares to dissent, however timidly, is branded with the infamous mark of "preconciliar," when he is not in fact numbered among the traditionalist rebels, or the despised fundamentalists.

And because the "counterfeit distillates" of the Council include the principle that by now there is no error that can be condemned in Catholicism, except for sinning against the primary duty of understanding and dialogue, it becomes difficult today for theologians and pastors to have the courage to denounce vigorously and tenaciously the toxins that are progressively poisoning the innocent people of God
.

3 comments:

pinanv525 said...

Honestly, there are so many of these kook Priests running around out there that I am not confident of lasting reform until the Pope or some Church body begins severely disciplining these people as an example. Then there are the 200 Irish Priests meeting to push female ordination, homosexuality, and other issues clearly counter to Church teaching. My suspicion is that nothing of consequence will be done about it. I just do not believe a strong enough message is being sent to these people and their supporters by the Pope and the church. Of course, we could just send the Irish Priests enough whiskey...

Templar said...

Dont those toxins include such novelties as communion in the hand, vers populum mass, EMHC, and folk music masses?

Anonymous said...

I actually feel sorry for the poor fellow in the photo. He probably has to listen to 'Wind Beneath MY Wings' during communion.

rcg