But in January a new sheriff entered town and he is restoring law and order of authentic 2014 Catholicism.
The new bishop is enforcing only bishops, priests and deacons preaching at Mass. Lay preachers began in the 1970's and the tome warp frozen in the Rochester tundra is only now thawing!
READ ON:
For the better part of 40 years in churches across the Roman Catholic Diocese of Rochester, clergy ceded the floor to laypeople for the delivery of the homily — the sermon that follows the reading of the Gospel at Mass.
The practice, which dated to the mid-1970s and was simultaneously derided by the faithful for running afoul of church law and praised for its inclusiveness, has come to an end.
In an extensive interview, Bishop Salvatore Matano said he has been confronting the issue on a case-by-case basis since his installation in January and is now drafting guidelines to clarify that homilies are reserved for ordained priests and deacons, as prescribed by canon law.
"It is not a policy shift as regards to the universal law of the church," Matano said. "I am trying to help the faithful understand what is the universal law of the church and how important it is that in the celebration of Mass, we do what the church asks of us."
The reversal is perhaps the starkest example yet of the contrasting stewardship of Matano with his predecessor, Bishop Matthew Clark, under whom the diocese earned a reputation as among the most liberal in the country.
Although laypeople were giving the homily before Clark's time as bishop, it was during his tenure from 1979 to 2012 that such preaching blossomed into a regular occurrence in multiple churches.
Matano called the ubiquity of the practice "a bit perplexing" and attributed it to a misinterpretation of canon law.
"In the life of the church today, there are many interpretations that people might give to a particular ruling with no malintent present, but that do need clarification," Matano said.
Many in the church have welcomed the shift as a long-awaited return to doctrine. Indeed, Matano said he began addressing the matter in response to complaints from parishioners.
But it also has been received with disappointment, particularly among women, who made up the majority of lay homilists and viewed the practice as a way to play a more active role in their faith.
"It really enriched me, and I have to say I'm struggling with it," said Diane Porcelli of Gates, who did not preach but is active at St. Mary's Church in downtown Rochester. "It's challenging my faith and I'm struggling with the exclusion."
It is estimated that 20 women, most of them pastoral administrators or associates in the diocese with divinity and theology degrees, comprised the bulk of lay homilists.
No one, including Matano, could pinpoint precisely how many churches permitted the practice, but Matano said he has corresponded with "a significant number" from which he fielded parishioner complaints.
On the matter of homilies, canon law is straightforward. "Among the forms of preaching, the homily, which is part of the liturgy itself and is reserved to a priest or deacon, is pre-eminent," the law states.
Citing the law, lay homilists were careful to describe their preaching at Mass as a "reflection" on scripture rather than a homily. For all intents and purposes, however, their preaching served as a homily.
It was why Diane Harris, a writer for cleansingfiredor.com, a website that has been critical of what many Catholics view as lapses in orthodoxy in the Diocese of Rochester, avoided churches at which it was practiced.
"It made me very uncomfortable because I knew it was against church law," Harris said of lay homilists. "It felt like I could be talking to this person anywhere else, and it was taking time away from what I really wanted to hear: Preaching from a priest or deacon."
The change comes as Pope Francis is calling for both broader opportunities "for a more incisive female presence in the church" and for priests to spice up their homilies.
Last year, Francis lamented that clergy and laypeople suffer through homilies: "The laity from having to listen to them, and the clergy from having to preach them!"
Supporters of lay homilies described them as often being more attuned to modern families than those delivered by priests, who take a vow of celibacy and are prohibited from marrying.
"It was a way to have a woman's voice and a woman's experience reflect on the readings for the day," said Gloria Ulterino, an author and religious scholar who gave reflections in various churches for 30 years. "Everybody knows that not every priest has a gift for preaching."
Matano acknowledged that many women share pastoral responsibilities with priests and numerous ministries across the diocese. He said he encourages women and laypeople to preach at prayer groups and other parish functions outside the homily.
Cathy Kamp, the pastoral associate at St. Joseph's Church in Penfield, announced in a church bulletin in March that she would no longer preach during the homily but wrote that she was grateful for the experience and looked forward to preaching in other capacities.
"Humbly, I seek your prayers as I reflect on what this change means for me and other lay ministers in the Catholic church," she wrote.
Like other lay homilists, Nancy DeRycke, the pastoral associate at Our Lady of Lourdes and St. Anne Church in Brighton, said she remains committed to the church but questions whether it can and should be more flexible.
"It's a 40-year-old custom that's been part of the tradition of our local church, and people are saddened, people are frustrated and people are asking, 'Why can't you do this?' " DeRycke said. "They're not satisfied with saying, 'Because it's the law.' "
DANDREATTA@Gannett.com
Twitter.com/david_andreatta
36 comments:
Father, you don't know the half of what has been going on in Rochester over the past 3 decades; much is downright scandalous, but not well-known. TBTG for this new direct confrontation. A little light shining in on the ever-worsening darkness, a little hope is always a good thing.
As long as the diocese docks the priests' pay and makes them repay the diocese for the expense of the homiletics training they received in the seminary, I suppose this practice could be tolerated.
Some may dispute this, but I have probably heard more sermons/homilies than most on this blog....and I believe I can count the good Catholic-Priest-preachers who I have ever heard on less than ten fingers. Maybe less than five... I say that we should seek out the best preachers we can find and be thankful to let them preach.
Ever notice how hard it is for these people who are okay with breaking Canon Law to be obedient when corrected?
Anon - 5:58 - I tend to agree about the state of preaching that is found in many Catholic parishes.
Some priests are simply have no gift for public speaking and have never been given the help needed to develop any ability. Some simply don't put enough effort into preparation, expecting to be given the right words to say when they step up to preach. Some think that a homily is a lecture about some point of doctrine or canon law. Some, suffering from the Messiah Complex, forget that it is the Holy Spirit that is the source of inspiration. A few I have heard are simply perpetually angry with something or someone, and that anger gets dumped on the congregation.
I recently was paid what I consider a high compliment by a member of our parish. She handed me a little devotional book, pointed to the passage for July 12, and said "This is why you are a good preacher." The passage:
"Before Isaiah began to prophesy for the lord, a seraphim took a burning coal from the altar to cleanse Isaiah's lips with it. I have always cringed at that image of Isaiah's mouth being burned.
To some extent we are all called to speak God's word to one another. I have noticed that the people who speak it most effectively are those who have somehow been seared by life. They don't speak in platitudes or give us condescending advice 'for our own good.'
They speak with a kind of humility and humor that only comes from having gone through significant challenges on the journey. There is a resonant authenticity in their encouragements to trust God's love because they have found God trustworthy despite their being burned by failure, physical suffering, or tragic loss. Their inspiration gives me hope that my struggles won't just scar me, but will help me to share God's message of love" - Patricia Livingston.
I think that that compliment will easily make my year!
Pater Ignotus is one of the ten...no, one of the five of whom I spoke earlier.
Another memorable (top five) Catholic-Priest-preachers that I have heard was in the Oakland, CA cathedral, the old one, before the earthquake wrecked it and they tore it down and built a new one. There was a mariachi band and choir, a deacon with African vestments and a (Caucasian) celebrant-preacher, who began his homily by saying "My name is Robert and I am an alcoholic."
Reread PI's paragraph which begins "They speak with a kind of humility and humor etc...."
If nothing else, the appointments of Matano to the see of Rochester and Scharfenberger to the see of Albany (replacing Howard Hubbard, Matthew Clark's partner in ecclesial deconstruction) make me want to invite Pope Francis out for a yerba mate at the Argentinian steakhouse of his choice when he visits these shores next year!
Slam...dunk!
Gaudete in Domino Semper!
Good for the Bishop to correct the practice.
PI, I'm with you on the state of preaching...I'm a bit of a spoiled one out here, as I know several good preachers. One of your better comments.
I would not walk across the street to hear a homily by Ignotus...LOL!
I sometimes wonder whether a inspiring homilist might detract from spiritual concentration on the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. Rare indeed have been the sermons I've heard--even from the finest homilists I recall--that have not been distractions from prayerful worship.
I find that priests who lament the poor quality of preaching are usually very confident in the quality of their own. The reality is that no matter how bad a priest is at preaching, there's always someone who will complement him.
I find that priests who lament the encroachment of lay people, particularly women, into their turf as lectors, communion ministers, altar girls, preachers etc...often do so because they see them as a threat to the power, prestige, control that they feel is rightly theirs. They resent attempts by the un-ordained masses to scale the pedestal upon which they have been placed...or placed themselves.
My wife was a nurse for many years. I can remember quite an uproar from some doctors when nurses began performing procedures that the docs wanted to reserve for themselves...giving shots was one, I think.
So Henry...the Church should strive for mediocre, dull, boring preaching? Great idea!
@Anonymous
Oh please, this is a old talking point and it doesn't reflect the reality of the state of lay preaching in Rochester. I live here and was subjected to laity preaching. None were any good, and were universally of questionable orthodoxy or value. All of the new priests that I have heard preach are very good preachers and orthodox. It is a fact that these men are getting much more training in preaching and teaching than their predecessors ever did. That is what was really needed, not clericalism of the laity.
I'm totally for good preachers...priests and lay.
If the lay preachers in Rochester were no good find them something else to do.
Lay preaching is to preaching as military music is to music.
Anonymous: "So Henry...the Church should strive for mediocre, dull, boring preaching? Great idea!"
Better less emphasis on any preaching at all. Too many homilists have nothing worth saying, but proceed to say it badly, evidently feeling an obligation to give a sermon anyway.
My "idea" is that most sermons are an interruption to the liturgy rather than a contribution to it. However excellent or mediocre it may be, the typical sermon dissipates the sacrificial atmosphere that has been established by the introit and penitential prayers at the foot of the altar, the Kyrie and collect.
I appreciate the beautiful sung high Mass with all the bells and smells and torches, chant, polyphony and glorious motets (as well as a sermon) that I attend every Sunday. But some of the most spiritually rewardimg Masses I've ever attended have been quiet weekday low Masses with no sermon at all.
Anonymous,
I've never met a priest who lamented the "encroachment of lay people, particularly women, into their turf". Quite the opposite. Where have you found such priests?
And, you say these priests "do so because they see them as a threat to the power, prestige, control...". Have you heard these priests give this as an explanation, or is this just a hunch of yours?
Gene:
“I would not walk across the street to hear a homily by Ignotus...LOL!”
As some of the other comments on this thread testify and as I can also testify, this is yet another of doubtless many ways in which you impoverish your life and cheat yourself, even though you will of course deny it. As the pithy expression goes, “Your loss.”
Anon 2, Just how is it my loss to avoid listening to a homily by a modernist Priest who will not answer the question as to whether he believes in the Real Presence and the Bodily Resurrection of Jesus? Seriously, you must not be very discerning in your tastes. I have heard more sermons and homilies in my time than most people, many preached by those considered by theologians and other homilists to be among the best. Why should I sully those memories and waste my time listening to some two-bit, angry punk Priest with a progressivist ax to grind?
"no matter how bad a priest is at preaching, there's always someone who will complement him."
Students invariably praise the teaching of any teacher who waters down the content and is an easy grader. Not to imply any parallel with preaching and shriving.
Gene:
Because, by your own admission, you have never heard a homily by Pater Ignotus. Your attitude in this, as in much else, is classic prejudice – you pre-judge and speak of what you do not know. Anyway, as I said, I thought you would deny it.
Anon 2, I do not have to have heard a homily by someone who, in effect, denies the Real Presence and the Resurrection of Jesus to know that I do not want to hear anymore from him. I would not go to a lecture by a Communist, a sermon by a Mormon, a talk by a feminazi, or a speech by a que...er, "gay rights activist."
You must waste a lot of time trying to be open minded...
I wish everyone would watch this beautiful, touching music video: http://youtu.be/nWsY_sqMMBo
Pin/Gene - I have never, in effect or otherwise, denied the Real Presence or the Resurrection of Jesus. That is a lie.
I have refused to subject myself and my faith to your judgment. I am subject to judgment by the Bishop of this diocese, not to you. And I have faculties from him to preach and teach in this diocese.
I have repeatedly said that I accept and believe all that the Church teaches. But because your aim is to belittle anyone who dares to disagree with you, you continue to repeat lies about me.
JBS, Just say go to Youtube and type in the name of the song. It is boring trying to type in all the web addresses. Please tell me it isn't the Coca Cola song.
JBS....Of course priests have not told me that they "see them as a threat", nor is there an official document from the Vatican to that effect.
You are a grownup....right?
Gene:
“You must waste a lot of time [learn a lot] trying to be open minded...”
The amended statement above applies to your comments too! =)
P.S. I had struck through the phrase “waste a lot of time.” That editing did not make it through to the page for some reason (I imagine the technology does not pick it up).
Speaking of the technology, how are some of you able to post enabled links (assuming that is the correct jargon)? I don’t know how to do that. Does one need a special computer program, or is it some type of special command? I assume other Bloggers who also don’t post enabled links may have the same question.
Anon 2, I am not hung up on being open minded. I do not see that as necessarily a virtue.
It's simple you just type
[a href="http://www.thesiteyouwanttolinkto.com">the word or words you want to serve as your link< instead of the opening [ and with > instead of the closing ]. For instance to produce
Knoxville Latin Mass Community
you type
[a href="http://www.knoxlatinmass.net">Knoxville Latin Mass Community</a]
and then make the two changes above before publishing your comment.
The instructions above somehow got garbled. The first 3 lines should be:
It’s simple. You just type
the word or words you want to serve as your link
EXCEPT with < instead of the opening [ and with > instead of the closing ]. For instance, to produce
My goodness, it should be possible to get this posted right. The first 3 lines should be:
It’s simple. You just type
[a href="http://www.thesiteyouwanttolinkto.com">the word or words you want to serve as your link< instead of the opening [ and with > instead of the closing ]. For instance, to produce
(I had to type square brackets, instead of angle brackets, to make it display as text, rather than as a link with the detailed instruction hidden. But you simply type angle brackets to start with. It’s a good idea to preview you comment to make sure the link appears correctly when posted.)
Ignotus, It was not me, it was another blogger who asked you the direct question regarding your belief in those articles of the Creed. It is not my judgement that began this. You refused to answer, saying it was a trap. Your back tracking now is kind of empty, don't you think? And having the sanction of a Bishop is sort of like winning the Good Conduct Medal in the army. All it means is you did not try to mount the CO's wife in the Base Exchange.
Well, it is indeed simple to produce and imbedded link, but I give upon making this combox accept the HTML trick necessary to display the instructions correctly.
In short, just do it as in my original example, illustrating how tp display the phrase Knoxville Latin Mass Community linked to the site www.knoxville.net.
You need only insert you own phrase and your desired link.
Thank you, Henry. I will certainly try the next time I post a link. Of course, I am probably the most technologically challenged here (my cell phone is 11 years old and I have only been using a computer for four years). So, even if I do not succeed myself, I am sure that others will, thanks to your generous efforts.
Post a Comment