UPDATE: Some video of Pope Francis Mass this morning. Please note he is celebrating Mass in the Pauline chapel. Pope Benedict would celebrate Mass at this altar ad orientem although it is also designed for facing the people. Pope Francis is not about to celebrate Mass ad orientem, but please note that there is the "Benedictine Altar Arrangement" with the crucifix and Bishop's candle dead center, just as Pope Benedict indicated in one of his books is a very powerful way to pray "ad orientem" even when facing the congregation. The hermeneutic of continuity at work in a pope quite different than Pope Benedict, but quite hierarchical. He also used Pope Benedict's staff this morning. I think the one with the crucifix would be better for Lent, Pope Benedict's better for the Easter Season and perhaps a third better for Ordinary Time. What do you think? I personally like Pope Paul VI's staff.
Some trends in trendy theology that has gotten not a few theologians into trouble with past popes is when they say that Christ can be found independently of the Church or Christ is not the only way to salvation, a sort of revising of the heresy of "universalism." Thank God Pope Francis in continuity with his predecessors is on the side of orthodoxy and continuity not only with the history of the Church but with his immediate predecessor also on such things.
Here is his homily for today's Feast of the Martyr Saint George, which is Pope Francis' patron saint "Jorge."
The [first] reading today makes me think that the missionary expansion of the Church began precisely at a time of persecution, and these Christians went as far as Phoenicia, Cyprus and Antioch, and proclaimed the Word. They had this apostolic fervor within them, and that is how the faith spread! Some, people of Cyprus and Cyrene - not these, but others who had become Christians - went to Antioch and began to speak to the Greeks too. It was a further step. And this is how the Church moved forward. Whose was this initiative to speak to the Greeks? This was not clear to anyone but the Jews. But ... it was the Holy Spirit, the One who prompted them ever forward ... But some in Jerusalem, when they heard this, became 'nervous and sent Barnabas on an "apostolic visitation": perhaps, with a little sense of humor we could say that this was the theological beginning of the Doctrine of the Faith: this apostolic visit by Barnabas. He saw, and he saw that things were going well.
And so the Church was a Mother, the Mother of more children, of many children. It became more and more of a Mother. A Mother who gives us the faith, a Mother who gives us an identity. But the Christian identity is not an identity card: Christian identity is belonging to the Church, because all of these belonged to the Church, the Mother Church. (MY COMMENT: POPE FRANCIS ORTHODOX AND IN CONTINUITY BOMBSHELL, OF COURSE NOTHING NEW ABOUT A POPE BEING ORTHODOX!:)Because it is not possible to find Jesus outside the Church. The great Paul VI said: "Wanting to live with Jesus without the Church, following Jesus outside of the Church, loving Jesus without the Church is an absurd dichotomy." And the Mother Church that gives us Jesus gives us our identity that is not only a seal, it is a belonging. Identity means belonging. This belonging to the Church is beautiful.
And the third idea comes to my mind - the first was the explosion of missionary activity; the second, the Mother Church - and the third, that when Barnabas saw that crowd - the text says: " And a large number of people was added to the Lord" - when he saw those crowds, he experienced joy. " When he arrived and saw the grace of God, he rejoiced ": his is the joy of the evangelizer. It was, as Paul VI said, "the sweet and comforting joy of evangelizing." And this joy begins with a persecution, with great sadness, and ends with joy. And so the Church goes forward, as one Saint says - I do not remember which one, here - "amid the persecutions of the world and the consolations of the Lord." And thus is the life of the Church. If we want to travel a little along the road of worldliness, negotiating with the world - as did the Maccabees, who were tempted, at that time - we will never have the consolation of the Lord. And if we seek only consolation, it will be a superficial consolation, not that of the Lord: a human consolation. The Church's journey always takes place between the Cross and the Resurrection, amid the persecutions and the consolations of the Lord. And this is the path: those who go down this road are not mistaken.
Let us think today about the missionary activity of the Church: these [people] came out of themselves to go forth. Even those who had the courage to proclaim Jesus to the Greeks, an almost scandalous thing at that time. Think of this Mother Church that grows, grows with new children to whom She gives the identity of the faith, because you cannot believe in Jesus without the Church. Jesus Himself says in the Gospel: " But you do not believe, because you are not among my sheep." If we are not "sheep of Jesus," faith does not come to us. It is a rosewater faith, a faith without substance. And let us think of the consolation that Barnabas felt, which is "the sweet and comforting joy of evangelizing." And let us ask the Lord for this "parresia", this apostolic fervor that impels us to move forward, as brothers, all of us forward! Forward, bringing the name of Jesus in the bosom of Holy Mother Church, and, as St. Ignatius said, "hierarchical and Catholic." So be it.
12 comments:
All quite nice, but when he speaks of the Church, is he speaking of the institutional Catholic Church or instead the Church of Christ that subsists in the Catholic Church?
He's pretty explicit that it is the Church that is hierarchical and Catholic. I suspect he sees all other Christians who are validly baptized united to the Church although in "imperfect" communion. Nothing unorthodox about that.
I'll bet there are a lot of modernist and progressive faux Catholics running around in tiny little circles wringing their hands after that homily. Heh, heh...
I'm so glad he said this! I was kind of worried when I read his alleged remarks that, "The Universal Church needs Anglicans as Anglicans." Which could be understood in both heretical and orthodox senses. Of course there was no way we could be sure he said that, and there was no context. If he did indeed say that, this is quite the clarifying statement! God bless Pope Francis!
Well, the protestant blogs and forums are certainly going bananas about his homily and missing the boat completely.
I suppose, in the broadest sense, we might say that, as Holy Scripture says that "He shall draw all unto Him..." and Christ himself said, "other sheep I have and not of this fold...," those who are drawn to Him and are not in the Catholic Church or who join protestant churches are "in process." It doth not yet appear what they shall be...." Perhaps this will be resolved in Purgatory or later in this life. But, truly, to be in Christ is, by definition, to be in the Church He established right there in Holy Scripture...the Holy Catholic Church. This is a difficult issue for me to discuss with my former protestant brethren...evn the theologically educated ones. They are still searching for some mythical first century church of loosely structured folks wandering around the catacombs and deserts, lost in darkness..sort of like Methodists. LOL...
Gene, can you link to a Prottie blog/forum discussing Pope Francesco's homily? I'd like to read. Thanks.
Gene, I have a question that you are probably in a good position to answer: Do some or even all Protestant denominations regard themselves (or, if not, could they in principle regard themselves) as “children” of the Holy Mother Church, i.e., of the Catholic Church (even though they have had a big argument with Mom and left home)?
Since John Nolan has not noted it, I feel it incumbent upon me to do so: St. George is the patron saint of England, where of course April 23 is also celebrated as St. George’s Day.
Anon 2, in my personal experience the theologically aware and Church history educated Anglicans, Lutherans, and Presbyterians (when pushed to the wall) do understand intellectually that this is the case. I am not so certain that many of them make the personal/emotional connection, however. I can say that a lot of my friends and colleagues from seminary and grad school have made the move to the Catholic Church, in fact, a few years ago nineteen seminarians and two professors from the Lutheran School of Theology in Chicago (LSTC) left the school and began study in Catholic seminaries. Since that time, I am aware of several hard core Calvinists who, like myself, came to the awareness that Calvin can only lead to unacceptable doctrinal conclusions and to serious dogmatic questions that Calvin's logic cannot address. I think we are going to see more of this.
With all the stressing of continuity on internals it is starting to appear far reaching. Overstressed. Because it can not be denied the externals have been ruptured, once again. What makes the Catholic Church identifiable to many is the continuity between both internals AND externals.
Thanks for that explanation, Gene
ytc, Here is one such thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3011464/
St George is the patron of many nations, including England, Portugal and Ukraine. In most places it is only an optional memorial, so it was gratifying to see the Pope celebrating it.
The only institution which can officially fly the English flag is the Church of England - otherwise it has to be the Union Jack. But it is increasingly flown unofficially.
Post a Comment