Translate

Friday, October 31, 2025

IS THIS ANY WAY TO CLOSE A CHURCH????????


I was stationed at St.Joseph Church in Macon as pastor from 2004 to 2016 During my first few years there, the pastor of Riverside United Methodist Church befriended me and we did a few ecumenical things together.

The Methodist Church in Macon is of the South Georgia Methodist Conference (Diocese) and more high church than most Methodist conferences as you can see from the interior photo above.

I even preached there for an ecumenical service and joked about being so high over the people as I preached. That’s quite a pulpit. I often thought the building could easily be transformed into a beautiful Catholic Church.

The Church abruptly closed and not in a very nice way. The bishops of the Methodist Church or their conferences wield a lot of power and in some cases more than what the Catholic bishops can do.

I suspect there’s more behind this than meets the eye and more than likely they had few members as the Methodist Church is declining in a dramatic way in the south due to its aggressive and progressive LGBTQ policies. At one time, the United Methodist Church in the south, particularly Georgia, would have been the second largest Protestant denomination with Southern Baptists being first. 

Here’s a news story about the abrupt ending!

Members of Riverside United Methodist Church, located at 735 Pierce Ave, were outraged Friday afternoon when the church abruptly closed its doors and changed the locks, with no warning for the congregants.

An email went out to the members of Riverside United Methodist Church announcing its immediate closure due to unresolved financial difficulties. The closure also affects the Riverside Day Care Center, with families and staff being notified the same day. Congregants with personal belongings at the church were asked to contact church staff to arrange retrieval. 

According to the email, a final worship service will be planned to celebrate the church’s legacy, with details forthcoming. Members were encouraged to transfer their membership to another church in the South Georgia Conference.

Members acknowledged that they knew of plans to close Riverside UMC, but claim they were led to believe that it would be the second Sunday in November. Understandably, they were upset by the sudden and unexpected closure. 

“This is heartbreaking,” said one member. “We knew it was inevitable, but it wasn’t supposed to close until November, after All Saints Day. However, it abruptly closed yesterday. My mom is 88. She’s attended for 60-plus years and didn’t even get to say goodbye. I was Christened there as an infant. I’m 55. I was married there. My Dad’s funeral was there. My daughter was baptized there.”

One source close to The Reporter confirmed that the staff members also had no warning of the closure. The source revealed that parents were told that the daycare was closing at the end of the day, as they were picking up their children to leave. 

The Reporter reached out to District Superintendent Rev. Jeff Cook and Senior Pastor Rev. Dr. Nita Crump, who sent the following press release: 

“It is with heavy hearts that we announce the immediate closure of Riverside United Methodist Church. A church closure is always painful, and the grief is compounded by the immediate nature of this closure. 

Plans will be made for a final worship service in the coming weeks. This service will be a time to give thanks for the ministry, memories, and faithful witness of this congregation.

We are thankful for the support of nearby United Methodist churches who welcome the Riverside UMC congregation members.”



TO EACH HIS OWN, BUT JUST SAYING…






My personal opinion is that the TLM’s Solemn Sung Pontifical Mass with all the bells and whistles does not do any favors for those promoting the restoration of the pre-Vatican II liturgies of the Church.

While I disagree with how Blase Cardinal Cupich framed what the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council desired for the reforms of the Church’s liturgy and that it had anything to do with an exhibitionist attitude toward promoting or feigning poverty in terms of noble simplicity, I do believe that most bishops did not like the highest form of Pontifical Masses in the pre-Vatican II era.

They did not like all the ceremonial stuff prior to the Mass, the gloves, the buskins, the cappa magna. They did not like all the fussiness that certainly must have been designed and promoted by an ancient LGBTQ+++ cabal during the Renaissance or earlier. Maybe they wanted to make the Church's liturgy look ridiculous and over-the-top like what female impersonators do with women?

Who can fault them!

It is fussy!

It is pretentious!

It is bizarre, like the buskins and gloves and other ceremonies borrowed from worldly sources rather than true liturgical organic development. 

It is pretentious! Oh, I already wrote that.

With that said, in pre-Vatican II times, how many Catholics ever experienced the kind of Pontifical Mass Cardinal Burke celebrated recently at St. Peter’s. Not many and most would avoid it like a plague.

Keep in mind, in pre-Vatican II times, the Mass most attended on Sundays was the Low Mass with no chanting. And most Catholics went early with multiple early morning Low Masses, some beginning at 5 AM if not earlier. 

Why? The Church had a long fast and many people who wanted to receive Holy Communion when they went to Mass went early before breakfast time and to a short Mass. You could not even drink coffee to get the bowels working before you left for Mass! Think about that! 

Catholics also wanted to get their obligation over, with a short Sunday morning Mass and then enjoy the Sunday morning with rest, relaxation, a big breakfast and nice family Sunday dinner. 

The High Mass, and not even offered every Sunday, was always later in the morning, like at 10 AM or 11 AM—it was long, beautiful in most places and for those who loved chant, ceremony, bells and smells. Very few, though, actually received Holy Communion which made the Mass a bit shorter. 

I don’t think the Council Fathers had the normal parish Low or High Mass in mind when it called for noble simplicity. They had in mind the Pontifical Mass. And they certainly did not desire a complete overhaul of the liturgy that would appear to be more Protestant than Protestant or even post-Catholic like the liturgy in Germany recently celebrating Queerdom but without all the drag!

You can watch the video of that Mass, if you can stomach it, available here.

With all of that said, though, there is no reason to suppress the ancient liturgies of the Church or forbid them for the new and “improved”. Both should co-exist and let the Holy Spirit working synodally in the clergy and faithful make the determination which will last for the long-haul. 

Just my 2 cents worth, although pennies are no longer made! What a shame! 

Thursday, October 30, 2025

THE DIOCESE OF SAVANAH HAS A RELATIONSHIP WITH A DIOCESE IN NIGERIA WHO SUPPLIES US PRIESTS


The Bishop of the Diocese of Savannah, The Most Rev. Stephen Parkes, visiting Nigeria last week and ordained two men there as priests. I am not sure if these men will be coming to the Diocese of Savannah or not. Please note the albs that these African priests like!

This is from Bishop Parkes’ facebook page:

Traveled to Nigeria last week to honor the 25th Anniversary of Priesthood for Bishop Isaac Dugu of the Diocese of Katsina-Ala (AMORE Media) and was honored to ordain two men to the Sacred Priesthood last Saturday! 

I am grateful for the personal friendship and pastoral collaberation that our Diocese of Savannah shares with the Diocese of Katsina-Ala and with the Diocese of Gboko, which I also visited.  

Checked in with Fr. Solomon Kaanan and Fr. Theodore Agba, who are doing well!  Fr. Scott Winchel, Pastor of St. Anne Catholic Church, Columbus, Georgia and one of our Vicars General, accompanied me. 



BLOG STATISTICS FROM OCTOBER 30…

 Interesting, no?




WHERE-IN I DISAGREE AND AGREE WITH FATHER Z

The top photo a TLM Requiem and the bottom photo a Pope Paul VI Daily Mass


Speaking about the Chattanooga Basilica and eliminating the TLM in favor of a traditionally celebrated Pope Paul VI Mass, this is what Fr. Z opines:  

 Fr. Carter strives to sound pastoral and sincere, to acknowledge the inflicted pain over the transition from the Traditional Latin Mass to the Novus Ordo. Yet his core argument, that continuity is preserved if the reformed liturgy is “done well”, rests on assertion rather than proof. By blaming rupture on poor implementation, he overlooks structural discontinuities within the reform itself.

 His proposed “hermeneutic of continuity” Mass, a personalized blend of old and new elements, ironically imposes subjectivism, making worship depend on the celebrant’s discretion rather than liturgical law. 

Absurd claims, such as that the 1962 Missale leaves “no place” for the faithful, misrepresent the nature of participation and the priest’s mediating role. Though he tried to sound compassionate, his tone condescending, reducing attachment to the TLM to emotion rather than conviction. Ultimately, the homily seems to offer sympathy but not resolution. It promises harmony where unresolved theological and ritual fractures remain.

Wherein I agree about subjectivism being imposed on the Pope Paul VI Mass:

Everything about the Pope Paul VI Mass depends on how the priest wants to celebrate it. This is built into the choices and rubrics of the Mass, i.e. "In these or similar words"; a variety of Penitential Act choices or eliminate it in favor of the Rite of Blessing Holy Water and Sprinkling; which Eucharistic Prayer; a final solemn blessing or not. And when it comes to hymns chosen for the Mass, it's the wild west. And even though the Council called for a more lavish selection of Scriptures, the Pope Paul VI Missal allows for Scriptures to be eliminated at the Introit, Offertory and Communion in favor of a choir director's or the priest's personal hymn choices, good or bad, scriptural or not. 

And certainly the priest facing the congregation throughout the Mass enables him to take on the role of an MC or entertainer, his personality or lack there-of becomes front and center.

And within this context, yes, ad orientem and Kneeling for Holy Communion and making choices from the Modern Missal to make the Modern Mass more traditional, is subjectivism of the pastor or the priest doing it.

Wherein I want to challenge Fr. Z, who I believe has never been a pastor of a parish church, to sympathize with the pastor in Chattanooga rather than criticize him.    

The pastor, Fr. Carter made a promise to his bishop and his successors of obedience. That's up there with the promise of celibacy, btw!  He has to eliminate the TLM in his parish by the bishop's decree based upon what the bishop wants or does not want to do in terms of seeking an extension of the TLM in his diocese with the Vatican's Dycastery of Divine worship. That's the bishop's prerogative, fair or not. 

While it is indeed subjective, what Fr. Carter proposes for a more traditional celebration of the post-Vatican II Mass is a compromise. But, the next pastor may have other ideas--so the congregation is still a victim of clericalism when it comes to the liturgy, on steroids with the Modern Mass, not the TLM! 

I applaud Fr. Carter's pastoral approach to this debacle and I suspect he is working in union with his bishop to make a more traditional model of the Paul VI Mass available to those who love the TLM.

My conclusions:

1. We worship God, not the form of the Mass. Don't turn the form of the Mass, TLM or Modern into a false god!!!

2. Pope Leo needs to deal with all the problems of the Modern Mass with all its subjectivity of style of celebration which is clericalism on steroids. 

3. Pope Leo needs to return to the Summorum Pontificum days and Ecclesia Dei!

4. Pope Leo needs to concretize the traditional celebration of the Modern Mass by allowing all TLM Order of the Modern Mass along with all the traditional elements allowed in the Ordinariate's Missal, Divine Worship--that would take some of the subjectivity out of this option, but not all! 

By the way, this is a post I wrote on December 2, 2020, before Traditionis Custodis which has application to what is happening today. Press the title for that most humble but excellent post:

RIGIDITY OF THE EXTRAORDINARY FORM AND THE FLEXIBILITY OF THE ORDINARY FORM MASSES

 

 

 

 

Monday, October 27, 2025

ASSOCIATED PRESS HAS A STUNNING AND THOROUGH STORY ON THE TRADITIONAL LATIN MASS CELEBRATED AT SAINT PETER’S BASILICA WITH THE EXPRESSED PERMISSION OF POPE LEO XIV!

 




Nicole Winfield hits the ball out of the park with this report. Certainly, Pope Leo must know that allowing the TLM in St. Peter’s brings TLM communities a great deal of hope that Pope Leo’s attitude and openness to this Mass be celebrated there, that he will ask bishops, including Cardinal Roche, to bend down and serve TLM communities rather than lord it over them and command that they leave their rigid psychology behind as well as the Mass that was given to them in the most humble and serving way possible by Pope Benedict XVI!

Time will tell, but I can’t believe Pope Leo doesn’t understand what His Holiness has wrought in terms of joy among normal, working and belieiving TLM communities. Pope Leo, we pray, will live what he preaches, that the Church should stoop down in a humble way to serve Catholics wanting to worship as the Church has worshipped for 1,700 years or more. The Church, clergy and laity, must be of humble service not commanding and controlling others. 

By the way, The New York Times also has a very positive and long story on the TLM at St. Peter’s and how the young are attracted to this form of the Mass!

Here is a money byte from the AP story which I link below it:

May 2025

Pope Leo XIV is elected

July 2025

Leaked Vatican documents undermine Francis’ justification for restrictions, suggesting that most bishops had expressed general satisfaction with the old Latin Mass

September 2025

In his first interview, Leo says some people have used the liturgy as a political tool but expresses an openness to talk with proponents of the old Latin Mass

October 2025

Cardinal Raymond Burke, who criticized Francis’ crackdown, celebrates the old Latin Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica

“I’m very hopeful,” said RubĂ©n PeretĂł Rivas, an Argentine organizer of the pilgrimage. “The first signs of Pope Leo are those of dialogue and listening, truly listening to everyone.”

Liturgy wars a long time brewing

The latest rounds in the liturgy wars date back to the Second Vatican Council, the 1960s meetings that modernized the church. Among the reforms was the celebration of the Mass in the vernacular, rather than Latin.

In the decades that followed, the old Latin Mass was still available but not widespread. In 2007, Pope Benedict XVI relaxed restrictions on celebrating it as part of his overall outreach to traditionalists still attached to the old rite.

In one of the most controversial acts of his pontificate, Francis in 2021 reversed Benedict’s 2007 reform and reinstated restrictions on celebrating the old Mass. Francis said its spread had become a source of division in the church and been exploited by Catholics opposed to Vatican II.

Rather than heal the divisions, though, Francis’ crackdown seemed to further drive a wedge.

“We are orphans,” said Christian Marquant, a French organizer of Saturday’s pilgrimage.

Leo’s election and vows to bring peace and healing

Leo, history’s first American pope, was elected with a broad consensus among cardinals and has said his aim is unity and reconciliation in the church. Many conservatives and traditionalists urged him to heal the liturgical divisions that spread over the Latin Mass, especially.

After Leo’s election, Marquant wrote Leo a letter on behalf of some 70 traditionalist groups asking, among other things, for permission to celebrate a Mass according to the ancient rite in St. Peter’s during the traditionalists’ annual pilgrimage to Rome.

American cardinal celebrates old Latin Mass in St. Peter’s in a sign of change

|Associated Press

Sunday, October 26, 2025

AM I THE FIRST TO NOTICE THIS?

 In fact, I noticed it at the Midday Solemn Sung Liturgy of the Hours with Pope Leo XIV and King Charles II. The Basilica Choir adult members wearing their traditional red cassock and surplice, were wearing neckties instead of what always appeared to me to be a Roman collar as a priest would wear when  wearing the cassock and surplice.

This is a photo of Sunday’s morning Mass at St.Peter’s with Pope Leo. The men are wearing neckties although the boy choir members still seem to have the clerical collar or maybe a turtleneck????

I report and you decide. Has this always been the case or is it a new thing for this choir?????


THIS IS A MARVELOUS DEPICTION IN ART OF THE MODERN MASS AND CAPTURES THE TRADITION OF THE MASS IN A MARVELOUS WAY!

 But, is that a dog in front of the altar or a floral decoration, which should never be placed in front of the altar or anything else at all!

As a complete aside, as I prepare this post, I am watching TCM’s Noir Alley and they are showing the 1950 obscure film noir “Southside 1-1000”. A fascinating scene just occurred. The prison-chaplain had just celebrated the prison Mass and was in the sacristy getting ready to leave. 

The inmate-sacristan assisting the priest tells the priest that the priest made a mistake in preaching his sermon. The inmate points out that Saint Paul doesn’t say that “money is the root of all evil” which the priest had preached, but rather Saint Paul wrote that “the LOVE OF MONEY is the root of all evil!”

That’s a kind of synodality in a 1950’s pre-Vatican II movie. And the priest-chaplain graciously accepts the correction of the prison inmate-sacristan! 

POPE LEO CONTINUES HIS QUEST TO PURIFY SYNODALITY AND GET IT ON TRACK: SEEK THE TRUTH SO THAT THE TRUTH CHANGES US; DON’T SEEK TO CHANGE THE TRUTH; BUT DO ALL WITH FAITH, HOPE AND LOVE!


Pope Leo offers an eloquent cry for unity and using a purified synodal way to do it, meaning, that the synodal way must lead us to God and His Truth. And His Truth is a Divine Person: Jesus Christ, crucified and risen!

Pope Leo in his homily for synodal groups at Holy Mass at St. Peter’s, the day after the Pontifical TLM was offered there by Pope Leo’s gracious permission, is a blueprint for going forward as a synodal Church, seeking God’s will, not our own and unity in diversity, as long as that diversity is based upon Truth and Love. 

There are many divisions in the Church today and exacerbated in the last 12 years. On the left, there are those who see no sin in sexual immorality of all kinds, trying to changing the doctrines and dogmas of the Church to suit their own ideological concerns, more worldly than spiritual and who try to force their agenda onto the Church in the most authoritarian, worldly, political and cruel ways. Those that are marginalized by the left are those who maintain tradition in doctrines, dogmas, morals and liturgy. They do this marginalization by control and authoritarianism and turning the synod into a secular political free-for-all.

On the right, there are those who call out others based not on love but hate and a Pharisaical ethos, it too based on worldly ideologies of control and exclusion. They often show contempt and disrespect to people making ad hominem attacks  on their positions and very sadly upon their persons. They reject what papal magisteriums and ecumenical councils have taught. This has always happened in the Church and that threat continues to this day and on steroids.

I think it is wonderful that Pope Leo allowed the TLM at St. Peter’s with Cardinal Burke as the celebrant the day before this Mass. Many there, I am sure, are good, loving and holy people, in union with God through the pope and Catholic magisterium. They love both forms of the Mass and desire the modern Mass celebrated with reverence and by following the rubrics. Others want to do it their way and even want to crush Vatican II rather than seeking a synodal way to interpret Vatican II properly as Pope Benedict XVI gave the roadmap to do so. 

On Friday, Pope Leo answering a question during his meeting with synodal groups, stated and I loosely quote in paraphrase: I don’t want to disturb any of the leaders here, but the synodal process doesn’t inspire me, but people who love the Lord and seek Him. Ordinary people of faith and devotion who are loving, spiritual and wise inspire me, not processes!

Here’s Pope Leo’s homily for the 30th Sunday of Time and addressed to synodal teams present. I have offered my most astute but truly humble, God-oriented comments embedded in the pope’s text in red

Brothers and sisters,

As we celebrate the Jubilee of the synodal teams and the bodies of participation, we are invited to contemplate and rediscover the mystery of the Church, which is not a simple religious institution nor is it identified with hierarchies and its structures. The Church, instead, as the Second Vatican Council reminded us, is the visible sign of the union between God and humanity, of his plan to gather us all into a single family of brothers and sisters and to make us his people: a people of beloved children, all bound together in the one embrace of his love.

Looking at the mystery of ecclesial communion, generated and preserved by the Holy Spirit, we can also understand the significance of the synodal teams and the bodies of participation; they express what happens in the Church, where relationships respond not to the logic of power but to that of love. The former—to recall a constant admonition from Pope Francis—are "worldly" logics, while in the Christian community, the primacy concerns the spiritual life, which enables us to discover that we are all children of God, brothers and sisters, called to serve one another. (This is important and explicitly stated by Pope Leo, whereas those in the Vatican seldom refer to God, spirituality or prayer in their explanations of synodality—theirs is more about other things, worldly things! But for Pope Leo, he names worldliness in synodality, which needs purification. The spiritual life is most important, Catholics with faith and good works, both necessary for salvation in Christ!)

The supreme rule in the Church is love: no one is called to command, all are called to serve; no one should impose their own ideas, we must all listen to one another; no one is excluded, we are all called to participate; no one possesses the entire truth, we must all humbly seek it, and seek it together. (This resonates with me. I have been a pastor in parishes with great lay participation and leadership, not only paid ministerial positions, but also volunteers led by laity in various ministries. One of the problems I have seen in all of this is the clericalization of the laity while the clergy undergo declericalization and not in a good way. The issue is control—trying to control those who are being led and also territorialism, an inability to work with others and threatened by others who have other ideas.)

The very word "together" expresses the call to communion in the Church. Pope Francis also reminded us of this in his latest Lenten Message: "Walking together, being synodal, this is the vocation of the Church. Christians are called to journey together, never as solitary travelers. The Holy Spirit pushes us to come out of ourselves to go toward God and our brothers and sisters, and never to withdraw into ourselves. Walking together means being weavers of unity, starting from the common dignity of children of God" (Francis, Message for Lent, February 6, 2025). (In a diocese, priests are meant to be coworkers with their bishops and not into “private practice” as it were. And those in parishes should not be in conflict with their pastors, not parochial vicars with their pastor. We should work together each understanding each others’ roles and ministries and obligation, especially under canon law. Often lay leaders, paid or otherwise, try to usurp the pastor’s role and become divisive or the pastor is threatened by lay leadership and incapable of enabling it and refining it when necessary.)

Walking together. Apparently, this is what the two characters in the parable we just heard in the Gospel do. The Pharisee and the tax collector both go up to the Temple to pray; we could say they "go up together," or at least they find themselves together in the sacred place; yet, they are separated and there is no communication between them. They both follow the same path, but theirs is not a walking together; both are in the Temple, but one takes the first place and the other remains last; both pray to the Father, but without being brothers and without sharing anything, (This is a great metaphor that Pope Leo uses and I have to remember it! It has so many applications in today’s Church as well!)

This depends primarily on the Pharisee's attitude. His prayer, seemingly addressed to God, is merely a mirror in which he looks at himself, justifies himself, and praises himself. He "had gone up to pray; but he did not pray to God, but rather to praise himself" (Augustine, Sermon 115,2), feeling better than the other, judging him with contempt and looking down on him. He is obsessed with his own ego and, in this way, ends up revolving around himself without a relationship with God or with others. (This is a great exegesis of this passage at it concerns narcissism, egoism and “doing it my way rather than God’s way!)

Brothers and sisters, this can also happen in the Christian community. It happens when the "I" prevails over the "we," generating personalisms that prevent authentic and fraternal relationships; when the claim to be better than others, as the Pharisee does with the tax collector, creates division and transforms the community into a judgmental and exclusive place; when one's role is leveraged to exercise power and occupy space. (This stings, my former bishop, now deceased, Bishop Raymond Lessard, use to call out people on the chancery staff at staff meetings when they (we) used “I” rather than “we”! Pope Leo has a great point here that needs to be rediscovered on all “pastoral staffs” be it diocesan or parish.)

It is to the publican, instead, that we must look. With his same humility, even in the Church we must all recognize our need for God and one another, practicing mutual love, mutual listening, and the joy of walking together, knowing that "Christ belongs to those who feel humbly, not to those who exalt themselves above the flock" (St. Clement of Rome, Letter to the Corinthians, c. 16).

The synodal teams and the bodies of participation are an image of this Church that lives in communion. And today I would like to exhort you: in listening to the Spirit, in dialogue, in fraternity, and in parrhesia, help us understand that, in the Church, before any difference, we are called to walk together in search of God, to clothe ourselves with the sentiments of Christ; help us to broaden the ecclesial space so that it becomes collegial and welcoming.

This will help us navigate with confidence and a renewed spirit the tensions that permeate the life of the Church—between unity and diversity, tradition and innovation, authority and participation—allowing the Spirit to transform them, so that they do not become ideological conflicts and harmful polarizations. (It has to be said that polarization and ideological conflicts have grown in the past 12 years and through insults hurled at each other, even from the late pope, rather than striving for understanding and charity in our discussions of tensions and groups in the Church!) It is not a matter of resolving them by reducing one to the other, but of allowing them to be fruitful in the Spirit, so that they are harmonized and oriented toward shared discernment. As synodal teams and members of the participatory bodies, you know that ecclesial discernment requires "inner freedom, humility, prayer, mutual trust, openness to new things, and abandonment to God's will. It is never the affirmation of a personal or group point of view, nor does it resolve itself into the simple sum of individual opinions" (Final Document, October 26, 2024, n. 82). Being a synodal Church means recognizing that truth is not possessed, but sought together, allowing ourselves to be guided by a restless heart in love with Love. (Truth, meaning God, is sought not possessed and certainly Truth, Jesus, must change us, we are not to change Truth or Jesus!)

Dearest ones, we must dream and build a humble Church. A Church that does not stand erect like the Pharisee, triumphant and self-confident, but humbles itself to wash the feet of humanity; a Church that does not judge as the Pharisee judges the tax collector, but becomes a hospitable place for each and every one; a Church that does not close in on itself, but remains attentive to God so as to be able to listen to everyone equally. Let us commit ourselves to building a Church that is entirely synodal, entirely ministerial, entirely drawn to Christ and therefore striving to serve the world. (Here I would have hoped that the pope would have called for repentance where repentance is required, which is not the case with the Pharisee as he sees no sin in his life, but the tax collector does repent! Syndoality should be about hearing what God teaches the Church and has shown us in Jesus Christ. Jesus does condemn the hypocrisy of the Pharisees and in no uncertain terms. But he goes to their homes, eats at their houses and enjoys their company all the while castigating them to their faces. But He’s God. We can only correct the sinner, not by self-referential diatribes, but by knowing and using the Scripture and Tradition of the Church given to us by the Holy Spirit. We have to receive God’s Truth, not change it for our narcissistic purposes!)

Upon you, upon all of us, upon the Church throughout the world, I invoke the intercession of the Virgin Mary with the words of the Servant of God Don Tonino Bello: "Holy Mary, woman of conviviality, nourish in our Churches the yearning for communion. […] Help them overcome internal divisions. Intervene when the demon of discord creeps within them. Extinguish the fires of factions. Reconcile their mutual disputes. Defuse their rivalries. Stop them when they decide to strike out on their own, neglecting convergence on common projects" (Mary, Woman of Our Days, Cinisello Balsamo 1993, 99).

May the Lord grant us this grace: to be rooted in God's love so as to live in communion with one another. And to be, as a Church, witnesses of unity and love.

Saturday, October 25, 2025

SPEAKING ABOUT HOODIES AND MOZZETTAS….


 


Did you ever think the papal mozzetta would return?

Do you think the winter papal mozzetta will return?

Do you think the Octave of Easter mozzetta will return?

Did you know: The circled thingy in the first photo is called a “hood.” 

In ancient times it used to be larger and was worn over the head during prayer to avoid distraction. In fact, the Mozzetta of cardinals and bishops used to have hoods but they have fallen into disuse. 

Monks still retain the hoods in their clerical clothing. 

Side note: modern hoodies we all wear are from this Catholic clerical attire!


Friday, October 24, 2025

MICHAEL SEAN WINTERS OF THE "NATIONAL cATHOLIC REPORTER" ACKNOWLEGES THE FOLLEY OF HETERODOX CATHOLICISM!


The money byte I have below the title is the most common sense thing I have ever read from Sean Michael Winters and ever to be seen in the National catholic Reporter!!!!!! 

 Press the title for the NcR commentary from Michael Sean Winters:

What a new survey of US Catholic priests does, and does not, tell us

Here's the most important thing from Winters:

Most of all, conservative families still encourage and produce vocations to the priesthood. The Catholic left has failed by comparison to produce vocations, and some live in a fantasy world that thought fewer vocations would lead to a greater push for ordaining women. If the ordination of women is desired by the Holy Spirit, having fewer priests, and thus fewer opportunities for the unique grace the Eucharist provides, is not likely to help the Spirit achieve anything.

Something else is at work, however, with these younger priests, and I wish the survey had dug more deeply into it. I find that younger clergy are more focused on the other worldly promises of the Gospel than on its implications for social justice. Some are stridently political but the majority view their role as apolitical and see the church as a refuge from a culture that they find abhorrent in its excessive vice and luxury. They aspire to a simpler life and there is nothing wrong with that.

One of the more striking findings of the survey is that 88% of priests ordained after 2000 identified Eucharistic devotion as a pastoral priority, compared to 66% of clergy ordained between 1980 and 1999, and 57% of those ordained before 1980. Is there something inherently "conservative" about Eucharistic adoration? Eucharistic adoration is not a proxy for otherworldiness but it might be an antidote for excessive worldliness. There is certainly a case to be made that the Catholic left collapsed the eschaton into a variety of social causes, some with a tenuous relationship to the revelation of God in Christ contained in the Gospel. The Gospel is many things but it is not a story of sexual liberation.

POPE LEO TO JESUITS: REMAIN WITH (JESUS IN) ADORATION OF THE BLESSED SACRAMENT!


Pope Leo met with a number major superiors of Jesuits at the Vatican. They all seem to be dressed in some form of clerics for this meeting, which is good to see. If I am not mistaken, it seems that Pope Leo is requiring proper dress at the Vatican of priests and prelates and those meeting with him. Perhaps sloppiness in the Vatican is being vanquished and Pope Leo is returning to Pope Benedict's more formal expectations? 

 His Holiness had much to say, but what I print below is a bombshell, specifically for Jesuits longing for the 1970's to return and living as though the 1970's have never passed:

The urgency to proclaim the Gospel today is as great as in the time of Saint Ignatius. The Lord says through the prophet Isaiah: “I am doing a new thing; now it springs forth, do you not see it?” (Isa 43:19) Your mission, dear brothers, is to help the world perceive this newness — to sow hope where despair seems dominant, to bring light where darkness reigns.

To accomplish this, I encourage you to remain close to Jesus. As the Gospel tells us, the first disciples stayed with him “the whole day” (cf. Jn 1). Remain with him through private prayer, the celebration of the Sacraments, devotion to his Sacred Heart and adoration of the Blessed Sacrament. In a different yet still powerful way, remain with him by recognizing his presence in community life. From this rootedness, you will have the courage to walk anywhere: to speak truth, to reconcile, to heal, to labor for justice, to set captives free. No frontier will be beyond your reach if you walk with Christ.

 

Thursday, October 23, 2025

LITURGICAL ABUSE ON STEROIDS AT HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCH (NOT ON HILTON HEAD ISLAND) BUT IN THE ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO WITH BLASE CARDINAL CUPICH AS ARCHBISHOP….

 


I just watched more of the Mass at Holy Family Church in Chicago and I can’t believe what I am hearing and seeing. Press the red HERE for the Mass:

HERE !

Why in the name of God and all that is holy, are bishops implementing Traditionis Custodis in the most rigid and unpastoral way possible and completely ignoring liturgical abuse in the St. Paul VI Mass which happens in every diocese and bishops do it too or they ignore it! What’s up with that?

It is preposterous to say that the greatest threat to Church unity is the TLM! Just watch as much of this as you can take. And I fear that this is just the tip of the iceberg, melting or not, of liturgical abuse in this Archdiocese and dioceses throughout the world. 

Let me name a few of the abuses that I can remember from watching this video and yes, I feel so defiled by this that I need to go to confession!

1. The slovenly dressed interpreter for the deaf next to the priest for the entire Mass signing the Mass—put her somewhere else and put an alb on her for the love of God!!!!

2. The Introductory Rite turned into an announcement and homily prior to getting to the Penitential Act

3. The Collect not the Collect for this past Sunday but something made up! That’s a no no!

4. The homily incorporates a scene from the cartoon Shrek which is seen on screens. 

5. Glass is used as the chalices and ciboriums. 

6. This Mass is geared to children thus a children’s Eucharistic Prayer is used but a lot and I mean a lot of improvisation.

7. At the Agnus Dei the priest distributes Holy Communion to all the Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion (two of whom talk to each other during the Agnus Dei!). When the priest receives his Host the EMCs do also with him! But after the Agnus Dei, but prior to the “Behold the Lamb of God” the priest invites everyone to say a prayer composed by Pope Francis. Then the priest makes an announcement about Holy Communion that everyone should tell the minister of Holy Communion their first name because this makes Holy Communion more sacred! Yes! He said that!

9. No kneeling at all by the laity

10. The priest makes up his own rubrics for the Mass—he has a grand platform to be the star of the show—it is narcissism on steroids and truly a spectacle!

If I hear one more complaint about the TLM communities being the major liturgical problem for Pope Leo I am going to commit a mortal sin against the seamless pro-life teachings of the Church and commit suicide because if this Mass is a foretaste of heaven, hell can’t be that bad!

Please, Cardinal Cupich, do not lecture us about how wonderful the Post-Vatican II Mass is compared to what preceded it! Please don’t insult us!

GLORIOUS IN MAJESTY AS LITURGY SHOULD AND MUST BE, CARDINAL CUPICH NOTWITHSTANDING…

PLEASE NOTE THE HOOD ON THE PAPAL MOZZETTA—SINCE THE KING IS NOT CATHOLIC, THE POPE DOES NOT WEAR THE PAPAL STOLE TO MEET WITH THE KING BUT WEARS IT LATER FOR THE MIDDAY PRAYER LITURGY OF THE HOURS. BUT BACK TO THE HOOD, IS THIS NEW FOR POPE LEO TO WEAR THE MOZZETTA WITH THE HOOD???


I am not sure, in fact I am puzzled, why Vatican News called this Catholic/Anglican Midday Liturgy of the Hours an Ecumenical Prayer for Care of Creation.If you watch the video below, there isn’t a melting iceberg or a felt and burlap banner with a climate change thermometer. It is simply Solemn Sung (and beautifully so) Midday Prayer!

Ecumenical Prayer for the Care of Creation presided over by His Holiness Pope Leo XIV

I am fascinated by the papal throne, not used for Midday Prayer, and especially the two tapestries on either side of the throne. I can’t make out what these are, although the one to the left of the throne from the camera’s vantage point, seems to be the barque of Peter???? 

Why is the throne there with the tapestries????????


HERE IS THE VIDEO OF THE MIDDAY PRAYER:




I BELIEVE THE “ARCHBISHOP” OF CANTERBURY WOULD HAVE PRESIDED WITH POPE LEO BUT SHE HAS NOT BEEN FORMALLY INSTALLED AS SUCH SO ANOTHER ANGLICAN “ARCHBISHOP” CO-PRESIDED. I WONDER IF POPE LEO BREATHED A SIGH OF RELIEF!