Translate

Tuesday, April 30, 2024

RECOVER THE HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY FOR THE LITURGY AND RECOVER IT NOW, I SAY!

Pray for the day when Pope Benedict's common sense is no longer canceled but promoted by the current generation of the Hierarchy and all clergy and laity!


 I pray for the day when TC is repealed by a future pope and the pope sets into motion once again Pope Benedict’s vision for a third Roman Missal which will be “renewal in continuity” also known as the “hermeneutic of continuity”. 

Until that day arrives, I remain miffed that those in the “New Liturgical Movement” aren’t promoting the reform of the reform of the Modern Missal by “reading the black and doing the red.” 

There also needs to be a renewed emphasis on traditional piety and devotion during Mass as well as demanding that bishops and priests stop ad-libbing any part of the Mass and to keep their mouth shut when they are tempted to become chatty at any point in the Mass. They must be told that their chattiness at any part of the Mass is destructive to the trajectory of prayer, contemplation and mysticism. If it were done in the Ancient Latin Mass, that chattiness would destroy liturgical prayer too!

Bishops and priests must be trained to “read only the black and do the red”! That will go a long way in implementing the Modern Roman Missal as Vatican II envisioned it within generalities!

Apart from that, these things must be recovered:

1. Gregorian Chant for the propers of the Mass, introit, offertory and Communion antiphons

2. A recovery of the style and ethos of chanting the Mass

3. A recovery of distinctions in the style of the Mass, with the concepts of Low, High and Solemn High and what all that means

4. A recovery of kneeling for Holy Communion

5. A recovery of sacred silence while liturgical action is occurring not independent of it

6. A recovery of ad orientem at least for the Liturgy of the Eucharist

7. A recovery of appreciation and promotion of liturgies of the Church with more than a 1,000 year tradition 

8. Overcoming the Balkanization of the Liturgy by language and culture thus dividing Catholics even in the same parish rather than uniting them!

Monday, April 29, 2024

YOURS TRULY CELEBRANT AND HOMILIST AT A MODERN ROMAN MISSAL MASS IN SOUTH CAROLINA, NOTHING COULD BE FINER!



You can watch a Facebook video of the live-stream of St. Gregory the Great’s 11 AM Mass with yours truly as the celebrant and homilist. The Mass begins at minute 22 and the spectacularly stunning, inspirational, instructive and magnificent homily of yours truly begins at minute 37:40 or so. 

YOU CAN VIEW THE VIDEO HERE!

St. Gregory’s children’s choir provided the music ministry. I also celebrated the 9 AM Mass prior to the one I post.

I find the congregation at St.Gregory’s sings their parts lively, loudly and with gusto. 

Friday, April 26, 2024

A FORETASTE OF HEAVEN…


I returned to the parish that I was pastor from 1991 to 2004, for a foretaste of heaven, the wedding liturgy and banquet following. I witnessed the marriage vows of the daughter of a very good friend of mine who I have known since 1991 before he married. I married him and his wife in June of 1996 and had to privilege of celebrating their daughter’s wedding this past Saturday in the very same church.

The Church of the Most Holy Trinity in Augusta, Georgia photographs very well as does the wedding party! 

And if I do say so myself, this is how you renovate/restore a historic church as yours truly oversaw it. It was begun in 1857 and completed and consecrated in April of 1863 as the Civil War was raging. The tabernacle remained dead center, never placed on a side altar. Please note the altar—it is the original altar consecrated in 1863 and in continuous use until this day. In the late 1960’s the altar was separated from the reredos so Mass could be celebrated facing the nave. In the mid 1990’s I had the entire structure, altar and reredos, dismantled. The reredos was pushed closer to the back wall of the apse, the altar placed in its original place with supports beneath. When it was pulled forward, no supports were placed in the basement for the new location which cause the floor of the sanctuary to sag a bit. My reorientation of the altar-table also allowed for the celebration of the Mass ad orientem or facing the nave. I knew this would return even in 1996!!!! The previous set up did not allow for the Mass to be ad orientem as the altar was placed on the edge of the last step up to the altar. 

The pipe organ, also historically restored during my reign, was delayed in arriving from New York due to the war. Father Abram Joseph Ryan, the priest-poet of the Confederacy became the parochial vicar of the Church of the Most Holy Trinity in 1866 and helped to raise funds to bring the Jardine Tracker Pipe Organ to the church from New York by giving recitals of his poetry. 








POPE FRANCIS HAS REVERSED THE REFORMS OF SAINTS POPES PAUL VI AND JOHN PAUL II AND POPE BENEDICT XVI—THUS MAKING CARDINAL PAROLIN’S WORDS RING HOLLOW AS IT CONCERNS REVERSING POPE FRANCIS’ REFORMS BY A NEW POPE


It is safe to say that Pope Francis has begun a tradition of reversing three of his previous predecessors’ papal reforms. Clearly blessing mortal sins of those who live together outside of marriage undermines and reverses many, many aspects of Saint Pope Paul VI’s Humanae Vitae. Clearly many of Pope Francis’ teachings reverses so much of Veritas Splendor of St. Pope John Paul II. And certainly TC reverses Pope Benedict’s XVI reform of the reform and reform of authoritarianism in forbidding liturgies of the Church with well over a 1,000 year tradition. 

Pope Francis has gone back on papal reforms of three popes, two of whom are canonized saints. For Cardinal Parolin to say that Pope Francis’ reforms are set in concrete and future pope can’t go back and reverse these reforms is simply a joke and it is to laugh!

The following is copied from Catholic World Report with a link to the Vatican News story:  

Cardinal Parolin: no going back on Pope’s reforms

April 25, 2024

» Continue to this story on Vatican News 

CWN Editor's Note: Questioned whether the reforms begun by Pope Francis will endure, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican Secretary of State, said: “Precisely because it is the action of the Spirit, there can be no turning around.”

Cardinal Parolin offered that thought at a press conference introducing a new book about Vatican controversies by the journalist Ignazio Ingrao. In that book the author writes of “irreversible processes” of reform begun in this pontificate. 

  • Reform in the Church is always about return to the source: to the original unchangeable teachings of Jesus Christ. Reform is never about some “irreversible processes” of any particular pontificate, especially one that is brimming with scandals and controversies. 

  • Posted by: Randal Mandock - Apr. 25, 2024 5:10 PM ET USA

    Will it never end? We see it again in the cited article: "Magisterium of Pope Francis". Cults of personality, such as this one, tend to annoy after constant repetition. The article mentions "irreversible processes" and in the next paragraph, "Ecclesia semper reformanda". Do these constitute an oxymoron? The article also refers to "the Spirit". The frequent references to "the Spirit" in recent Vatican statements prompt one to ask which spirit? The Holy Spirit? "Spirit of Vatican II"? Another?

Thursday, April 25, 2024

JUST AS WE WERE GETTING TO KNOW AND LOVE HIM, FR. JUSTIN GETS LAICIZED!


Okay, I will admit it! I don’t understand AI and the threat it poses to the Church and the world. And when I do get it eventually, it will leap frog ahead of me and I will still be in the past. 

But with that said, there was some hoopla about Fr. Justin an AI “priest” who would answer all your questions based on artificial intelligence. 

Well, after two days, he was not well received and instead of being transferred he’s being laicized! But once a priest always a priest. AI told me that!

This is this morning’s sad, sad, report from the National Catholic Register:

Father Justin, we hardly knew ye.

Less than two days after debuting an artificial intelligence (AI) priest character to overwhelmingly negative reviews, Catholic Answers has given “Father Justin” the virtual heave-ho.

The lay-run apologetics and evangelization apostolate, based in El Cajon, California, told the Register that it will replace him on its app with a lay character named “Justin” within a week.

“We won’t say he’s been laicized, because he never was a real priest!” Catholic Answers said in a written statement to the Register late Wednesday afternoon.


Tuesday, April 23, 2024

BESIDES THE FACT THAT NO ONE, EXCEPT A MINUSCULE NUMBER OF VATICAN EMPLOYEES LIKE IT, EVEN THEY KNOW IT IS WORTHLESS WHEN YOU READ BETWEEN THE LINES OF THIS EXCELLENT NEWS STORY FROM OSV!

 


Cardinal Grech says ‘Fiducia Supplicans’ release won’t affect future synod session


Monday, April 22, 2024

IF THE POPE, OTHER PROGRESSIVE BISHOPS, RELIGIOUS AND LAITY WANT TO KNOW WHY WE NEED A EUCHARISTIC AND MASS REVIVAL, HERE’S A MAJOR REASON!

 It is the destruction of the pre Vatican II churches and Mass for a sterile, dumbed down Mass and sanctuary!

Sacred Heart Toledo before:

And after:



Thursday, April 18, 2024

BEAUTIFUL SSPX CHAPEL IN SWITZERLAND WITH ITS WONDERFUL SANCTUARY, FREE STANDING ALTAR AND SPACIOUSNESS FOR OTHER LITURGICAL CELEBRATIONS APART FROM THE HOLY SACRIFICE OF THE MASS…


This is the Chapel of the International Seminary of St. Pius X in ÉcĂ´ne, Switzerland. Please note how uncluttered the chapel is; how prominent and easy to see, the altar is and how beautiful the ambo/pulpit is. Please note, too, that the altar railing is on the first step up from the nave of the chapel making its use quite easy for young and old alike. 
Most modern Mass sanctuaries are cluttered with plants, flowers, fabric and banners. The altar is too low and thus makes it seem as though it is absent in a full church. There is no spaciousness for other types of liturgies be they ordinations, nuptial liturgies or funeral liturgies. 
Please note the reverence for the deceased body of a retired bishop of Chur who chose to join the SSPX and not to be buried in his former cathedral but next to Archbishop Lefebrve. You can read the Pillar story HERE.

Tuesday, April 16, 2024

IS CATHOLIC PROGRESSIVISM THE CULPRIT IN THE DECLINE OF THE CHURCH IN ITALY AND THROUGHOUT THE WORLD? IN A WORD, YES


An Italian study poses some conclusions as the why there is a catastrophic decline in the practice of Catholicism in Italy. You can read a summary of that study HERE.

In part, it states that women are ceasing to practice Catholicism the way more so than men in Italy. I am not sure this can be blamed on the liturgy, but on progressive Catholicism’s bowing to secular secularism and promoting an anthropology of marriage and Holy Orders at odds with Catholic identity. Women are told that one day they can be bishops, priests and deacons and that the LGBTQ+++ ideology will triumph over traditional Catholic morality. 

We know in liberal Protestantism which approves of all these things, especially in the inverted image of Catholicism found in the Anglican Communion, that approving of all of this has not stopped the bleeding numbers leaving that communion but increased it. They have no identity as a Christian communion any longer compared to more traditional and orthodox forms of Protestantism.

But the study also blames the revision of the Mass and the loss of Catholic liturgical identity. I found this part rather fascinating:

Exploring the possible causes of such a catastrophic abandonment of Catholicism in a land which lies at the heart of the Church, the Roman professor surmised that among the likely causes are the liturgical abuses and upheavals to which the Church in Italy has been subjected. He particularly pointed to the “progressive spectacularization of Vatican liturgies that has occurred over the past three pontificates” in Rome, as well as the liturgical innovations with which Italian clergy have scandalized faithful Catholics.  

“Many of the nominally still highly institutionalized and centralized (‘liturgy-centered’) rituals may now have been transformed, in part or entirely, into ‘performance-centered rituals.’” Diotallevi wrote. “For Catholic liturgies, a push in this direction may also have come from the progressive spectacularization of Vatican liturgies that has occurred over the past three pontificates, from the substantial deregulation of increasingly large sectors of ‘Catholic’ liturgical offerings, as well as from many of the solutions adopted by clergy during the lockdowns that have recently taken place to counter the spread of COVID-19 pandemic.” 

The public liturgical abuses that Italy has seen in recent include a Mass sacrilegiously offered on a surf board, in the water, at the beach, with the priest bare-chested, an outrage that prompted local civil authorities to consider charging the priest with the crime of a public offense against religion. Another priest offered Mass at a park in a rainbow “pride” stole and a skin-tight cycling outfit, and joked when hosts were blown by the wind onto the ground after the consecration. 

My own experience with the Modern Mass and my own changing attitudes about it are somewhat summarized in the quote above. Music is horrible and there is no tradition of Catholic music as it constantly changes. Gregorian chant is rare in the Modern Mass. Contemporary sounds constantly changing are prevalent. Liturgies are sloppy and banal. Homilies long and dismal. 

But, where the liturgy is “done well” this means you have what is written above. The Mass is “spectacularized” with triumphal music, loud instrumentation, trumpets, tympani and cymbals. I have heard this for ordinations and weddings. It’s all veneer and no substance. 

I can compare that to a EF or OF Mass celebrated with only Gregorian Chant for the propers and parts of the Mass even if the core parts of the Mass are in the vernacular.  The Traditional chanted Mass is sober, filled with spirituality and devotion and not geared toward shallow entertainment and music used to excite hormones.   

The Traditional Latin Mass bespeaks of Catholic identity now lost in the Modern Mass. The Modern Mass is so Protestantized that many can’t tell the difference between a Catholic Mass, an Anglican or Lutheran liturgy. Catholics attending a Lutheran or Episcopal Liturgy would say that there are no differences. Most Catholics now receive Protestant communion when attending a Protestant liturgy/service. And they like their music better. 

And now some Catholic parishes are trying to imitate the music and style of worship of the Non-denominational churches. Praise and worship music which is fad oriented and constantly changing and like a rock concert or any other kind of concert is mimicked in the Catholic Mass. Anyone immersed in this nonsense in a Catholic Mass would feel at home in a non-denominational setting and more than likely to prefer the Protestant version of their service verses the “catholic” one. 

Everything that progressive Catholicism has touched has ended in disaster. Think of the once great women’s religious orders who through synodality dumbed down their life, community, habits and charisma and became a collation of individuals doing their own thing, living alone in apartments and no longer identifiable as religious sisters or nuns. 

That was done to religious life is now on steroids as it concerns the Church in general, synodality, that will accelerate the demise of the Church already declining in so much of Western Europe and Italy in particular. And yet this pope and his progressive cardinals and bishops gleefully go forward with their destructive policies never looking backwards to the evidence that progressivism is the cause for the decline and fall of this particular Roman Empire. 

Monday, April 15, 2024

SILLY ME, I THOUGHT IT WAS THE THIRD SUNDAY AFTER EASTER

 



I celebrated Savannah’s 1 PM TLM on Sunday. By the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, I realized early Sunday morning that I had prepared a homily for the 3rd Sunday after Easter. In fact, I should have prepared a homily for the Second Sunday after Easter.

I had forgotten in my old age that in the Ancient Rite, the Octave of Easter including the two Sundays in that octave are just one day, Easter Sunday. Thus the Sunday after the entire Octave of Easter is considered the Second Sunday after that Octave, after Easter Sunday which has eight days and two Sundays.

I revised my homily for the 2nd Sunday after Easter, aka, Good Shepherd Sunday in the Ancient Rite!

And the ancient calander is theologically accurate compared to how wrong the modern Catholic calendar got it. Sad.







OUCH, A PROPHET SPEAKS: IS IT POSSIBLE HE COULD BECOME POPE? TIME WILL TELL…

 


African cardinal, papal critic says Western prelates have lost their nerve

|Africa Correspondent

Saturday, April 13, 2024

POPE FRANCIS HAS AN “EYE” ON THE PAST—CONCERNING OUR CITIES, BUT WHY NOT THE LITURGY?


Pope Francis had some interesting things to say about cities. I have cleverly revised it to mean our liturgies. That clever revision is in red. The original text of the Vatican News Story can be read HERE.

Vatican News: Pope: Like our (liturgies) we build future with an eye to the (liturgical) past

Meeting with members of the (liturgy) World Heritage (Liturgy) Group, Pope Francis says people build their (liturgies) and cultures by mixing faith in God with their (Liturgical) historical situations.

By Devin Watkins

Pope Francis held an audience on Saturday with members of the  (liturgy) World Heritage Group, which was set up in 1993 to defend their (liturgy’s) historic and cultural heritage.

Welcoming the representatives of various (world liturgies) to Vatican City State, the Pope said the world’s smallest state preserves a rich (liturgical)heritage, as does the (dioceses) of which they serve as (liturgical) guardians.

In his prepared remarks, he noted that humanity’s desire to protect its (liturgical) cultural heritage should encompass both the artistic-cultural field and the “integrity of the person who receives this (liturgical) legacy and of the peoples who have transmitted it to us.”

“Historical (liturgical) situations – with their lights and shadows,” he said, “speak to us of real men and women, of genuine feelings, which should be lessons of life for us, rather than of pieces in a (liturgical) museum (in a locked Vatican dungeon).”

Learning (liturgical) lessons of the past

Pope Francis prayed that God might help the guardians of the (liturgical) heritage of (the Church’s liturgy)  transmit their beauty and the “faith, hope, and charity of your people.”

“It is the sufferings and aspirations of the people who over time have built their (Liturgies in an traditional organic way with) the mixing of cultures and civilizations that have followed one another in them, and naturally their faith in God, that make their hearts beat with passion,” he said.

(Liturgies) and their (liturgical) cultural monuments invite residents and visitors alike to reflect on the strength and prudence of those who built them, (with the 1962 Roman Missal and its other liturgical patrimony persevered and promoted with that which is new out of respect for our liturgical heritage of the past). 

“May they feel challenged by the lesson of justice (of reversing previous authoritarian bans on our liturgical heritage) and temperance that each historical (liturgical) situation encompasses,” he said.

Striving toward the future

Instead of leaving the past (Liturgies) locked in a (Vatican dungeon) museum, the heritage of (the Roman Liturgy) should help people today to build a better (liturgical) future.

“We will thus speak of peoples, of persons, of a history that is not merely contemplated, but realized, with one eye on the (liturgical) past and the other on the future, to always have our hands in the present that questions us every day.”

Thursday, April 11, 2024

BOMBSHELL! DID POPE FRANCIS REPENT OF HIS CATTINESS AS IT CONCERNS ARCHBISHOP GAINSWAEIN?


 It appears to be true!
In surprise move, Pope Francis to rehabilitate Benedict XVI’s longtime aide by appointing him nuncio
In a recent interview book, Pope Francis said Archbishop Gänswein “at times made difficulties for me.” Now the former private secretary to Pope Benedict XVI will be made a nuncio in an as-yet-unnamed country.
READ MORE >

WHO TO BELIEVE? WHO TO BELIEVE? OH! WHO ARE WE TO BELIEVE? MORE ON THE HOUSEHUSBANDS OF THE VATICAN…


 I do think it odd that Pope Francis declares that Pope Benedict XVI was like a grandfather figure to him. That is questionable to say the least. They are of the same generation and Benedict was no more than nine years older, more a sibling than a grandfather nor old enough to be a father-figure except in the theological sense. But the truth is always sacrificed in self-promotion.

Where I feel for Pope Francis is that he is the first pope in quite a long time to have a beloved predecessor still living and breathing down his neck in Pope Francis’ backyard. That was sure to create resentment in the new pope and I can understand that.

Benedict XVI biographer pushes back on Pope Francis’ claim they had a ‘cordial relationship’

Peter Seewald slammed Pope Francis’ characterization of Benedict XVI as a ‘transitional pope’ and said that Francis has sought throughout his papacy ‘to break away from the continuity of the popes’ and create ‘chaos.’

Wednesday, April 10, 2024

I AM SO GLAD THAT VATICAN II DEMANDED THAT ALTAR RAILINGS BE BANNED, REMOVED AND DESTROYED…

 AND I AM SO GLAD THAT VATICAN II DEMANDED THAT HISTORIC HIGH ALTARS NO LONGER BE USED BECAUSE THESE ARE SO FAR REMOVED FROM THE PEOPLE AND NEW SMALLER AND SAFER ALTARS MUST REPLACE THESE, BUT NEVER GATED OFF WITH A GOD-SEPARATING ALTAR RAILING. 

GOD’S HOLY PEOPLE, AS VATICAN II DEMANDED, MUST NOT BE FENCED OFF FROM THE TABLE OF THE LORD AS THOUGH THEY ARE ILLEGAL ALIENS TRYING TO GAIN ACCESS ILLEGALLY TO THE ALTAR, AS VATICAN II CLEARLY TAUGHT.



Tuesday, April 9, 2024

I LIKE IT AND UNDERSTAND ITS STYLE BUT AT THE SAME TIME I DON’T LIKE ITS STYLE COMPLETELY


 The Pillar has a “live update” of its original article on DI by various theologians. You can read it HERE

It is a good and comprehensive moral document. It is very strong and unambiguous, odd for Pope Francis, in many places especially at it concerns what God has defined a the crown of His creation being humanity, created in His image and likeness, male and female he created them. 

While some areas could have been tweaked better for clarity, there isn’t much to complain about. For Pope Francis, we dodged a bullet of grotesque ambiguity. That’s a miracle!

HERE’S MY EXCEPTION:

I think the document speaks about sin only twice. That’s the fly in the ointment for me. Let me explain.

I understand that this document is aimed not only at Catholics but to a worldwide audience of believers and nonbelievers. Thus it is an apologetic for the Church’s teaching on the dignity of life trying to convince the skeptical in worldly terms and appealing to the moral good in people often tainted by politics, polls, and how people feel about this, that or the other. In other words, there are for many Catholics and for most non-believers no moral imperatives set in stone that can’t change with the times and people’s opinions. 

While I understand this approach and appreciate it to a certain extent, I think the Magisterium of the Church has to declare moral teachings that affect the world not only in the here and now, but as a preparation for heaven or, failing to follow the narrow road of God’s salvation, affecting people not only here but in the afterlife in terms of either damnation or salvation. 

Yes, the Kingdom of God is here but not yet. That’s the irony of salvation. And yes, in this life, we must be workers for Christ in bringing heaven to earth as a sign of the salvation that awaits us.

There is no warning to the world, the flesh and the devil, that failing to promote the dignity of life in all its aspects not only damages the world in which we live bringing death and destruction to those who are defenseless, but will affect the final destination of the choices they make that harm the common good and the most innocent but also the guilty, and that destination is damnation or the fires of hell.

There is no “soteriology” in this document as I understand the study of salvation apart from trying to make life better in the here and now. 

And to that end, post-Catholics like our current President Biden, are idealists too, in terms of the political ideologies which become like a fake religion in the moral realm. All that they promote that is opposed to this document, DI, they think too they are improving the world, by allowing a woman to kill her baby up to the end of her pregnancy and even afterward. They think it will create a better world to euthanize those who are compromised in any way to include assisted suicide. They think that a non-binary approach to huaman sexuality and making the choice of being sexually what ever someone feels they are is for the common good.

They are wrong, dead wrong. And for a Catholic president and any Catholic who buys into the political agenda of certain political parties throughout the world who promote these post-Christian evils, eternal damnation awaits.

There needs to be a better call to eternal salvation in Jesus Christ in this document and it is lacking. It reads like just one more political statement in a world of multiple moral, immoral or amoral political ideologies. 

ORGANIC EASTERTIDE DEVELOPMENT: BEFORE AND AFTER AT SAINT ANNE CHURCH, RICHMOND HILL, GEORGIA

 Eastertide before:

Eastertide after:



I JUST DON’T GET ALL THIS BRU-HA-HA ABOUT THE MOON HIDING THE SUN—CLOUD ECLIPSES OF THE SUN ARE JUST AS SPECTACULAR, MORE FRQUENT AND NO ONE GETS HYSTERICAL ABOUT THEM —I JUST DON’T GET IT

 In my neck of the woods, cloud eclipses of the sun are frequent and bring almost total darkness to our surroundings. Does anyone make a big deal out of these? But if the moon hides the sun, you’s think it’s the end of the world! I just don’t get it. 




Monday, April 8, 2024

NOTHING HETERODOX HERE THAT WILL CAUSE FURTHER DIVISION IN THE CHURCH, BUT NOT MUCH TIME TO REVIEW THE FOOTNOTES—TIME WILL TELL


Overall it is traditional Catholic moral theology, footnotes not withstanding. And Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI are quoted in their magisterial teachings signaling that some at the Vatican realize that the papacy did not begin with Pope Francis. Overall it is a relief, but those tricky footnotes, we’ll see.

 From Vatican News:

New Vatican document lists ‘grave violations’ of human dignity

The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith’s new document 'Dignitas infinita' took five years to complete, and builds on the papal magisterium of the last decade: from war to poverty, from violence against migrants to violence against women, from abortion to surrogate motherhood to euthanasia, from gender theory to digital violence.

By Andrea Tornielli

Three chapters offer the foundations for the fourth, which is dedicated to "some grave violations of human dignity".

That’s the structure of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith’s new Declaration "Dignitas infinita", which commemorates the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and reaffirms "the indispensable nature of the dignity of the human person in Christian anthropology " (Intro.)

The main novelty of the document, which is the fruit of five years' work, is the inclusion of a number of key themes from the recent papal magisterium that accompany the bioethical ones. In the 'non-exhaustive' list that is offered, abortion, euthanasia and surrogate motherhood are listed as violations of human dignity alongside war, poverty and human trafficking.

The new text thus contributes to overcoming the dichotomy that exists between those who focus exclusively on beginning-and-end-of-life issues, while forgetting so many other attacks against human dignity and, conversely, those who focus only on defending the poor and migrants while forgetting that life must be defended from conception to its natural conclusion.

Fundamental Principles

The first three parts of the Declaration recall fundamental principles.

"In the light of Revelation, the Church resolutely reiterates and confirms" the "ontological dignity of the human person, created in the image and likeness of God and redeemed in Jesus Christ" (1).

This is an "inalienable dignity”, corresponding to "human nature apart from all cultural change"(6). It is a "gift" and therefore present in "an unborn child, an unconscious person, or an older person in distress (9).

"The Church proclaims the equal dignity of all people, regardless of their living conditions or qualities" (17), and she does so on the basis of biblical revelation: women and men are created in the image of God.

Christ, by becoming incarnate, "confirmed the dignity of the body and soul" (19), and, in His rising, revealed to us that man's dignity man rests “above all on the fact that he is called to communion with God" (20).

The dignity of every person

The document highlights the misunderstandings of those who prefer the expression "personal dignity" to "human dignity", “since they understand a person to be only ‘one who is capable of reasoning’" (24).

Thus, according to them, "the unborn child would not have personal dignity, nor would the older person who is dependent upon others, nor would an individual with mental disabilities. On the contrary, the Church insists that the dignity of every human person, precisely because it is intrinsic, remains in all circumstances" (24).

Furthermore, the document stresses that "the concept of human dignity is also occasionally misused to justify an arbitrary proliferation of new rights … as if the ability to express and realize every individual preference or subjective desire should be guaranteed." (25).

The list of violations

The Declaration then presents the list of "some grave violations of human dignity".

This includes "all offences against life itself, such as murder, genocide, abortion, euthanasia, and willful suicide” must be recognized as contrary to human dignity ", but also "all violations of the integrity of the human person, such as mutilation, physical and mental torture, undue psychological pressures ".

And, finally, it includes "all offences against human dignity, such as subhuman living conditions, arbitrary imprisonment, deportation, slavery, prostitution, the selling of women and children, degrading working conditions where individuals are treated as mere tools for profit rather than free and responsible persons".

The death penalty is also cited, since it "violates the inalienable dignity of every person, regardless of the circumstances" (34).

Poverty, war and human trafficking

The first issue mentioned is poverty, "one of the greatest injustices in the contemporary world" (36).

Then there is war, "another tragedy that denies human dignity", and always a “defeat of humanity" (38), to the point that "it is very difficult nowadays to invoke the rational criteria elaborated in earlier centuries to speak of the possibility of a ‘just war.’"(39).

The Declaration also discusses the "travail of migrants", whose "lives are put at risk because they no longer have the means to start a family, to work, or to feed themselves" (40).

The document then dwells on "human trafficking", which is taking on "tragic dimensions" and is described as " vile activity, a disgrace to our societies that claim to be civilized ". The Declaration invites "exploiters and clients" to make a serious examination of conscience (41).

Similarly, it calls for the fight against phenomena such as “the marketing of human organs and tissues, the sexual exploitation of boys and girls, slave labour, including prostitution, the drug and weapons trade, terrorism, and international organized crime” (42).

The document also mentions sexual abuse, which leaves “deep scars in the hearts of those who suffer it”: these are “sufferings that can last a lifetime and that no repentance can remedy” (43).
Discrimination and violence against women are then discussed. Among the latter are listed "coercive abortions, which affect both mother and child, often to satisfy the selfishness of males" and "the practice of polygamy" (45). Femicide is also condemned (46).

Abortion and surrogacy

The condemnation of abortion is strong: "Among all the crimes which can be committed against life, procured abortion has characteristics making it particularly serious and deplorable", and reference is made to the fact that "defence of unborn life is closely linked to the defence of each and every other human right" (47).

The Declaration’s rejection of surrogacy, by means of which "the immensely worthy child becomes a mere object", is also strong. This is a practice that "represents a grave violation of the dignity of the woman and the child …  A child is always a gift and never the basis of a commercial contract.” (48)

The list goes on to mention euthanasia and assisted suicide, confusingly defined by some laws as " death with dignity". The document stresses that "suffering does not cause the sick to lose their dignity, which is intrinsically and inalienably their own" (51).

The Declaration then speaks of the importance of palliative care and the avoidance of “aggressive treatments or disproportionate medical procedures”, reaffirming that “Life is a right, not death, which must be welcomed, not administered” (52).

A further serious violation of human dignity is the marginalization of differently-abled persons (53).

Gender theory

The document begins the section on this topic by stressing that "every sign of unjust discrimination” against homosexual persons “is to be carefully avoided, particularly any form of aggression and violence".

It is “contrary to human dignity", the Declaration says, that in some places “not a few people are “imprisoned, tortured and even deprived of the good of life solely because of their sexual orientation" (55).

Gender theory, which is “extremely dangerous since it cancels differences in its claim to make everyone equal", is then criticised (56).

The Church, we read, recalls that "human life in all its dimensions, both physical and spiritual, is a gift from God. This gift is to be accepted with gratitude and placed at the service of the good. Desiring a personal self-determination, as gender theory prescribes … amounts to a concession to the age-old temptation to make oneself God" (57).

Gender theory "intends to deny the greatest possible difference that exists between living beings: sexual difference” (58).

Therefore, " all attempts to obscure reference to the ineliminable sexual difference between man and woman” are “to be rejected" (59).

Sex change is also judged negatively since it "risks threatening the unique dignity the person has received from the moment of conception". This does not mean, however, excluding the possibility that “a person with genital abnormalities that are already evident at birth or that develop later may choose to receive the assistance of healthcare professionals to resolve these abnormalities" (60).

Digital violence

The final item on the list is “digital violence”. “New forms of violence are spreading through social media”, we read, such as cyberbullying, and “the internet is also a channel for spreading pornography and the exploitation of persons for sexual purposes or through gambling” (61).

The Declaration ends by urging that “respect for the dignity of the human person beyond all circumstances be placed at the centre of the commitment to the common good and at the centre of every legal system” (64).