tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post7176839077055898862..comments2024-03-28T18:02:12.286-04:00Comments on southern orders: THAT ANY POPE ISN’T SHOWN DEFERENCE IS CERTAINLY ANATHAMA FOR TRADITIONALISTS, NO?Fr. Allan J. McDonaldhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16986575955114152639noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-76752843071584096072019-01-19T19:30:44.309-05:002019-01-19T19:30:44.309-05:00
There have been Saints who criticized Popes. The...<br />There have been Saints who criticized Popes. The apostle Paul wrote how he criticized Peter. I though Cardinal O’Malley did it in a charitable and appropriate manner. The fact that Pope Francis thanked him for it shows that O’Malley was right. <br /><br />Furthermore it was the straw that forced Francis to look into the matter further.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-6476097234044595512019-01-19T12:23:22.382-05:002019-01-19T12:23:22.382-05:00"Papal deference" for Catholics in forme..."Papal deference" for Catholics in former times was not an issue, particularly when popes were also secular princes. <br /><br />Pope John XII comes to mind.<br /><br />It is for this purpose that Liudprand of Cremona, a partisan of the Holy Roman Emperor Otto I, gives an account of the charges levelled against him at the Synod of Rome in 963: <br /><br /><br />Then, rising up, the cardinal priest Peter testified that he himself had seen John XII celebrate Mass without taking communion. John, bishop of Narni, and John, a cardinal deacon, professed that they themselves saw that a deacon had been ordained in a horse stable, but were unsure of the time. Benedict, cardinal deacon, with other co-deacons and priests, said they knew that he had been paid for ordaining bishops, specifically that he had ordained a ten-year-old bishop in the city of Todi ... They testified about his adultery, which they did not see with their own eyes, but nonetheless knew with certainty: he had fornicated with the widow of Rainier, with Stephana his father's concubine, with the widow Anna, and with his own niece, and he made the sacred palace into a whorehouse. They said that he had gone hunting publicly; that he had blinded his confessor Benedict, and thereafter Benedict had died; that he had killed John, cardinal subdeacon, after castrating him; and that he had set fires, girded on a sword, and put on a helmet and cuirass. All, clerics as well as laymen, declared that he had toasted to the devil with wine. They said when playing at dice, he invoked Jupiter, Venus and other demons. They even said he did not celebrate Matins at the canonical hours nor did he make the sign of the cross.DJRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18028761850444888285noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-21151744083592678032019-01-19T11:57:57.044-05:002019-01-19T11:57:57.044-05:00If a cleric loves Christ and His Church then he is...If a cleric loves Christ and His Church then he is honor bound to point out wrong, even if it points to the Pope. On the other hand, the cleric must have solid facts and do so in a constructive manner.TJMnoreply@blogger.com