tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post5888539344725385363..comments2024-03-28T20:30:10.681-04:00Comments on southern orders: THIS IS NOT ABOUT THE MAJORITY OF SISTERS WHO ARE FAITHFUL, HARDWORKING AND WONDERFUL RELIGIOUS, THIS IS ABOUT THE ELITE IN THE LEADERSHIP OF THE LCWR WHO HAVE RADICALIZED THIS ASSOCIATION--IT'S ABOUT A MINORITY OF WOMEN WHO HAVE MISSED THE MARK AND NEED TO BE CALLED BACK TO ORTHODOXY IN THE AREAS OF HUMAN SEXUALITY, ABORTION, ARTIFIICAL BIRTH CONTROL AND THE EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY IN THE CHURCHFr. Allan J. McDonaldhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16986575955114152639noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-80458047385307518502012-04-24T12:09:54.396-04:002012-04-24T12:09:54.396-04:00This topic seems to fit here for some reason: The ...This topic seems to fit here for some reason: The USCCB (Christ have mercy!) and the United Methodists have made a joint statement on...ready for this..."The Eucharist and Ecology." I am not kidding. This is not a joke. My stomach is still hurting from rolling on the floor laughing my ... off, then wrteching violently. Can anyone think of a more irrelevant group than the USCCB or the Methodist church...well, maybe Congress.Genehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06672484450736725268noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-52486469327389238902012-04-23T22:02:45.578-04:002012-04-23T22:02:45.578-04:00Ahem, I correct myself...it is an old usage of rel...Ahem, I correct myself...it is an old usage of religious to refer to a specific group as "xyz religious." So, I suggest the following amendation to their title: Womyn Religiose. That has a nice ring to it.Genehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06672484450736725268noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-31436118338284447362012-04-23T21:27:42.568-04:002012-04-23T21:27:42.568-04:00Religious is not a noun. It is the modifier in eit...Religious is not a noun. It is the modifier in either construction, BTW.Genehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06672484450736725268noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-64294367346964037372012-04-23T21:25:11.779-04:002012-04-23T21:25:11.779-04:00RE: "Women Religious" Sounds pretty affe...RE: "Women Religious" Sounds pretty affected to me...Genehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06672484450736725268noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-91404085923477815392012-04-23T18:47:27.401-04:002012-04-23T18:47:27.401-04:00I am ready to be educated on this, but it looks fr...I am ready to be educated on this, but it looks from here that the LCWR was father out of bounds than the SSPX on basic teachings and they have been allowed to stay. I say this means the Church hierarchy agrees with them more than SSPX.<br /><br />rcgAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-33940704112171850012012-04-23T16:25:21.905-04:002012-04-23T16:25:21.905-04:00Not to be pedantic, but in "women religious&q...Not to be pedantic, but in "women religious", women modifies religious; in "religious women", religious is the modifier. Hence I support ytc's take.William Meyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07461907300761131481noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-67659691588949159672012-04-23T14:32:15.919-04:002012-04-23T14:32:15.919-04:00I would like to point out to the readership that &...I would like to point out to the readership that "women Religious" has been a convention of the Catholic lexicon in English for quite some time...<br /><br />"Religious women" can just as easily refer to non-vowed, non Religious women.ytcnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-57436216803942053262012-04-23T13:50:59.754-04:002012-04-23T13:50:59.754-04:00The very name of the stupid organization reveals t...The very name of the stupid organization reveals their primary focus: "...Women Religious." Why not the more conventional sentence structure "religious women?"Genehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06672484450736725268noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-76525672602862861022012-04-23T12:43:14.829-04:002012-04-23T12:43:14.829-04:00Just a liberal whiner whose argument utterly fails...Just a liberal whiner whose argument utterly fails, as it is a massive straw man.ytcnoreply@blogger.com