tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post3452121997813807463..comments2024-03-28T20:30:10.681-04:00Comments on southern orders: UNLESS YOU ARE A COLORING BOOK CATHOLIC, CATHOLICS SHOULD UNDERSTAND THAT PAPAL INFALLIBILITY IS NARROWLY DEFINEDFr. Allan J. McDonaldhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16986575955114152639noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-69844899303119696232015-07-17T19:11:40.681-04:002015-07-17T19:11:40.681-04:00Dialogue
Right-but always in union with the Holy ...Dialogue<br /><br />Right-but always in union with the Holy Father.Georgenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-79943875824208519272015-07-17T07:16:37.306-04:002015-07-17T07:16:37.306-04:00gob,
Catholics believe that ecumenical councils, ...gob,<br /><br />Catholics believe that ecumenical councils, beginning with the Council of Jerusalem, are guided by the Holy Ghost in defining doctrines. Were it not for such definitions, we would not know which books of the Bible were inspired, or anything definitive about Jesus and salvation. Rood Screenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09816036539243214384noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-34333158674087127402015-07-16T21:06:38.201-04:002015-07-16T21:06:38.201-04:00A group of old men decided that if they got togeth...A group of old men decided that if they got together and decided something and the "head man" proclaimed it that it was impossible for him to be wrong. Really...??? gobnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-41805811605263717232015-07-15T23:37:57.360-04:002015-07-15T23:37:57.360-04:00Goober your illustration doesn't fit with Chur...Goober your illustration doesn't fit with Church teaching on infallibility which, as the heading says it is narrowly defined and limits it to Faith and morals on the rare occasion when the Pope declares an infallible teaching under the guidance of the Holy Spirit.<br /><br />Also, a Pope could not stand up, for example, at the Synod on the Family and declare infallibly that homosexuality and communion for divorced and civily remarried Catholics was now acceptable.<br /><br />Jan Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-23316895678388769802015-07-15T23:21:11.154-04:002015-07-15T23:21:11.154-04:00goober,
Faith and Morals. Faith and Morals does ...goober,<br /><br />Faith and Morals. Faith and Morals does not include levitation.Paulnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-80620207362423682512015-07-15T17:29:06.431-04:002015-07-15T17:29:06.431-04:00Nobody is infallible.... If the guys in 1870 or s...Nobody is infallible.... If the guys in 1870 or so had decreed that in certain instances the Pope can levitate...that would not have made it so.goobernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-79794291465657382422015-07-15T16:14:16.700-04:002015-07-15T16:14:16.700-04:00Dialogue, I don't really understand why you ad...Dialogue, I don't really understand why you addressed your comment to me.Lefebvriannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-39182838560630740352015-07-15T15:48:33.049-04:002015-07-15T15:48:33.049-04:00Lefebvrian,
There is more to the Church than sole...Lefebvrian,<br /><br />There is more to the Church than solemnly defined dogmas. Pastoral leadership must adjust itself to the various times and places, and we call upon the Holy Ghost to assist our pastors in this. Therefore, the faithful should follow the pastoral lead of the pope and other bishops, who exercise the ministry of "Christ the Head" as priests (worship), prophets (doctrine) and kings (pastoral leadership).Rood Screenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09816036539243214384noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-82287189090934664162015-07-15T14:43:15.419-04:002015-07-15T14:43:15.419-04:00It is good he is modeling humility. It would be a ...It is good he is modeling humility. It would be a good idea to model that in a way that does not diminish the Papacy or present an obstacle to his successor. rcghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09131930849106490711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-80770989083981243912015-07-15T14:21:21.351-04:002015-07-15T14:21:21.351-04:00Jesus is "the model". We all make mista...Jesus is "the model". We all make mistakes, even popes. I find it disturbing that so many people (especially the media) are hanging on to every bit of what "Pope Francis said" rather than what *Jesus said* and in doing so are trying to hammer their perception of what the Catholic Church should be rather that what she is from all eternity.Paulnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-87665634116371365062015-07-15T13:38:23.946-04:002015-07-15T13:38:23.946-04:00What have you got against coloring books?What have you got against coloring books?Binney N. Smithnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-3776482034176343862015-07-15T09:57:31.928-04:002015-07-15T09:57:31.928-04:00I am very concerned about the misunderstanding tha...I am very concerned about the misunderstanding that Catholics have with regard to papal infallibility. On the one hand, you have those who see everything the pope does as a model for how we should believe and practice - they are ultramontanist in that sense. This is the error of those who have become known as neo-Catholics (for lack of a better term). <br /><br />On the other hand, you have people who have an ultramontanist conception of the papacy, and they see that the pope is doing things that seen to be against the faith. So, they fall into the error of sedevacantism, concluding that no real pope could do these things.<br /><br />The neo-Catholics and the sedevacantists are two sides of the same coin, both on whom have succumbed to the error of ultramontanism.Lefebvriannoreply@blogger.com