tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post3409068823985260654..comments2024-03-28T12:59:52.914-04:00Comments on southern orders: THE PRE-VATICAN II CHURCH'S TRIUMPHALISM IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF THE CHURCH TODAY AS THIS PRE-VATICAN II TRIUMPALISM WAS APPLIED TO WHAT THE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL WOULD BRING ABOUT!Fr. Allan J. McDonaldhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16986575955114152639noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-12144719845991674032018-06-16T23:17:38.381-04:002018-06-16T23:17:38.381-04:00I would suggest that Paul is the worst pope of the...I would suggest that Paul is the worst pope of the last 100 years. Certainly, if you reach back as far as the Renaissance, there are a couple of guys who were certainly worse popes.<br /><br />Did I say Paul was the worst pope of the last 100 years? I'm not so sure anymore. I remember hearing pundits during the Obama administration say "Congratulations Jimmy Carter, you are no longer our worst president." Well, I guess a similar saying might...wait--I better not go there.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-72329020212803015852018-06-16T22:41:15.928-04:002018-06-16T22:41:15.928-04:00And exactly how should a sitting Pope, barque of P...And exactly how should a sitting Pope, barque of Peter, respond to Church “giddiness”? <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-9106643132631321832018-06-16T22:33:52.528-04:002018-06-16T22:33:52.528-04:00Good question, Henry, begging an answer...Good question, Henry, begging an answer...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-65805935651885604352018-06-16T14:00:24.328-04:002018-06-16T14:00:24.328-04:00“I disagree that Pope Paul VI was the worst pope.”...“I disagree that Pope Paul VI was the worst pope.”<br /><br />Then who do you think was worse? Benedict XVI? John Paul I/II? John XXIII? Pius XII? Pius XI? Benedict XV? Pius X? Leo XIII? Pius IX? . . . . . <br /><br />Seriously, how far back do you have to go to find a plausible candidate comparable to the two disastrous post-Vatican II papacies that are all too familiar?Henryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12780755069760197497noreply@blogger.com