tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post2645883232516444942..comments2024-03-28T20:30:10.681-04:00Comments on southern orders: CALLING ALL LAWYERS AND JUDGESFr. Allan J. McDonaldhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16986575955114152639noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-22361987189735016582018-12-30T15:16:29.778-05:002018-12-30T15:16:29.778-05:00TJM - In my world, the principles apply regardless...TJM - In my world, the principles apply regardless of the accused political persuasions. <br /><br />I imagine there are plenty of politicians of both major parties who could not be prosecuted due to the statute of limitations. In ALL cases the limitations rightly apply. I would not say the opposite in any case.Fr. Michael J. Kavanaughnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-30716526307818091722018-12-30T12:38:44.838-05:002018-12-30T12:38:44.838-05:00Kavanaugh,
In my world yes, but in lefty world no...Kavanaugh,<br /><br />In my world yes, but in lefty world no. Just look at college campuses today if you want some real life examples of double standards TJMnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-58371346648863288202018-12-29T18:48:29.597-05:002018-12-29T18:48:29.597-05:00TJM - No, the principles apply regardless of the a...TJM - No, the principles apply regardless of the accused's political persuasions.Fr. Michael J. Kavanaughnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-17144432277612827502018-12-29T10:49:10.702-05:002018-12-29T10:49:10.702-05:00If Republican politicians were involved, Kavanaugh...If Republican politicians were involved, Kavanaugh would say the opposite. <br /><br />Instead of posting here, why don't you get out there and convert some folks or round up some vocations?TJMnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-17162125734353757102018-12-29T09:14:00.320-05:002018-12-29T09:14:00.320-05:00The statute doesn’t need to be changed because the...The statute doesn’t need to be changed because the Church knew of the issue well within the time limit. They just did nothing and aparently covered up many, many cases of abuse. What the Adminstrative Church wants now is a “do-over” so that they can avoid being named to a conspiricy that was recently discovered and still within stutorial limits. <br /><br />What the Church had better beware of is firing or punishing someone for homosexual activity among (several) consenting adults. That would probably lead to a civil rights case and an even worse situation for the Church in the USA. rcghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00661998350597126663noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-56698657260332720462018-12-29T08:44:58.751-05:002018-12-29T08:44:58.751-05:00I don't think the statute should be changed.
...I don't think the statute should be changed.<br /><br />The purpose and effect of statutes of limitations are to protect defendants. There are three reasons for their enactment:<br />1. A plaintiff with a valid cause of action should pursue it with reasonable diligence.<br />2. By the time a stale claim is litigated, a defendant might have lost evidence necessary to disprove the claim.<br />3. Litigation of a long-dormant claim may result in more cruelty than justice.Fr. Michael J. Kavanaughnoreply@blogger.com