Friday, June 9, 2017

A LOSS OF THE SENSE OF HEAVEN AND ITS DESIRE BY ROMAN CATHOLICS



A cardinal observed not too long ago that “Something very strange has happened in recent years: Christians have lost touch with heaven. Of the desire for heaven, our heavenly home, we hear hardly a word. It is as if Christians have lost the orientation that for centuries defined the direction of our journey. We have forgotten that we are pilgrims and that the goal of our pilgrimage is heaven. Connected with this is another loss: we largely lack the awareness that we are on a dangerous pilgrim path and it is possible for us to miss our goal. To put it bluntly, we do not long for heaven; we take it for granted that we will get there. This diagnosis may be exaggerated, but I am afraid it is essentially true.

If I could tell the good cardinal the reason for his astute observation can be traced directly to the unprecedented shift in the direction, theology and beauty of the Catholic Mass in the Ordinary Form as compromising Catholics' desire for heaven and having LOST THE ORIENTATION THAT FOR CENTURIES DEFINED THE DIRECTION OF OUR JOURNEY, I would show His Eminence these photos:

The first set of photos do absolutely nothing but contribute to the LOSS OF THE ORIENTATION THAT FOR CENTURIES DEFINED THE DIRECTION OF OUR JOURNEY:




 Whereas the loss of this orientation in the Mass below has led to “Something very strange having happened in recent years: Christians have lost touch with heaven. However when you look at the way Mass is celebrated today in the above pictures and what was abandoned in the below pictures, in actuality THERE IS NOTHING STRANGE ABOUT WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN RECENT YEARS, CATHOLICS LOSING TOUCH WITH HEAVEN AND WHAT ORIENTED THEM TO IT!


DETERMINING WHY CATHOLICS ARE LOSING TOUCH WITH HEAVEN IS A NO BRAINER! JUST LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE FOR IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WHAT IS IT ABOUT THE ANCIENT FORM OF THE TRADITIONAL MASS THAT CAPTURES THE IMAGINATION OF THE VERY YOUNG AND NOT SO YOUNG?

I copy this Fr. Fr. Z's blog. The sacramental sign of the ancient liturgy is a foretaste of the splendid beauty of the heavenly liturgy which the modern form simply guts and thus we find in some places 88% of Catholics seeing nothing worthwhile attending. Beauty as an image of the heavenly liturgy Is lacking; ugliness, banality and irreverence abound as well as a lack of attention to detail.
Please note in the second photo the number of young people presented so modestly!

From Fr. Z:

Confirmations in the Traditional Rite followed by a Pontifical High Mass at the Faldstool took place June 7th, 2017, at the Basilica of St. Mary in Minneapolis, MN celebrated by the Most Reverend Andrew Cozzens. The music, featuring Palestrina’s Missa Papae Marcelli, was provided by the Chorus Omnium Sanctorum. Confirmands from five area parishes participated and nearly 700 were in attendance.
allsaintsconfirm2

Thursday, June 8, 2017

A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS AT PENTECOST


CARDINAL SARAH'S REMARKS ARE A BIT OF A BOMBSHELL, WOULDN'T YOU SAY? AND AGAIN, THE GOOD CARDINAL ASKS FOR THE ORDINARY FORM WHAT I HAVE BEEN PROPOSING FOR YEARS, AD ORIENTEM AND KNEELING FOR HOLY COMMUNION, TWO OF THE MOST COMMON SENSICAL AND NON CONTROVERSIAL RENEWALS OF THE ORDINARY FORM OF THE MASS POSSIBLE!

(THE GOOD CARDINAL SOUNDS LIKE A PROPHET TO ME, ONE WHO SHOULD BE HEARD, RESPECTED AND FOLLOWED! HE CERTAINLY WOULD BE A GREAT SUCCESSOR TO THE THRONE OF SAINT PETER! HE SOUNDS LIKE A CARDINAL THAT FEARS NOTHING, NOT EVEN BEING DUMPED AS THE PREFECT FOR THE CONGREGATION FOR DIVINE WORSHIP. AND HE MAKES CLEAR, THAT POPE BENEDICT'S LITURGICAL VISION WILL EVENTUALLY WIN AND BE IMPLEMENTED! IT ALSO SEEMS TO ME THAT THE CARDINAL HAS MADE SOME NOT SO VEILED CRITIQUES OF THE CURRENT MAGISTERIUM "THESE PEOPLE DEMOLISH THE CHURCH AND ITS PROFOUND NATURE.)

 

Cardinal Sarah: Criticisms of Benedict XVI are ‘diabolical’



The cardinal said some criticisms of the former pope's preface to his latest book were 'diabolical and cover the Church with a mantle of sadness and shame'

Cardinal Robert Sarah has hit out at critics of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI, accusing them of “vulgarity and baseness” in their criticisms of the former pope’s preface to the cardinal’s latest book.

“The arrogance, the violence of language, the disrespect and the inhuman contempt for Benedict XVI are diabolical and cover the Church with a mantle of sadness and shame,” Cardinal Sarah said.

“These people demolish the Church and its profound nature.”

In a preface to Cardinal Sarah’s book The Power of Silence: Against the Dictatorship of Noise, Benedict XVI wrote that Pope Francis deserves praise for appointing Cardinal Sarah to oversee the Church’s liturgy.

However, critics have accused the former pope of meddling in Church politics and trying to undermine Pope Francis.

“A Christian does not fight anyone,” Cardinal Sarah said. “A Christian has no enemy to defeat. Christ asks Peter to put his sword into his scabbard [Mt 26: 52-53]. This is the command of Christ to Peter, and it concerns every Christian worthy of the name.”

In a wide-ranging speech at the Sacra Liturgia conference in Milan, the cardinal also lamented the practice of receiving Communion standing and in the hand.

He cited how Pope John Paul II, even when he was “wracked with sickness”, always knelt in the presence of the Blessed Sacrament.

“He forced his broken body to kneel,” the cardinal said. “He needed the help of others to bend his knees, and again to stand. What more profound testimony could he give to the reverence due to the Blessed Sacrament than this, right up until his very last days.”

The Cardinal also quoted the words of St Teresa of Calcutta, who said: “Wherever I go in the whole world, the thing that makes me the saddest is watching people receive Communion in the hand.”

At his address to the Sacra Liturgia conference in London last year, Cardinal Sarah made headlines by proposing priests face east (ad orientem), urging as many as possible to do so starting at Advent.

This year, he reiterated his support for facing east, saying: “I have spoken many times about the importance of recovering this orientation, of facing east in the celebration of the liturgy today, and I maintain what I have said on those occasions.”

DAG NABIT! THE ONLY WAY TO AUTHENTIC RENEWAL OF THE ORDINARY FORM MASS IS A NATIONAL HYMNAL IMPOSED ON ALL PARISHES IN THE VARIOUS BABLE LANGUAGES OF THE ORDINARY FORM

This is a very appropriate hymn for the elimination of mediocre, superficial and banal music in the Catholic liturgy:

No matter how objective one might be about musical choices in the Mass, it still devolves to personal taste of the priest, the musician or anyone else who has an opinion, which is everyone!

What needs to take place in my most humble opinion is a reiteration of Musicam Sacram and placed in the General Instruction of the Roman Missal. No choices for the replacement of the Introit, and offertory and Communion antiphons may be allowed, although additional filler music may be allowed at the procession and at the offertory and communion to cover the action.

A national hymnal mandated for every language group must be establish as the Episcopalians, Methodists, Presbyterians and Lutherans already have--wouldn't this be a great ecumenical gesture to follow their lead?????

And this hymnal should have the propers in a simple chant setting that the congregation can learn, not to exclude more elaborate settings in chant or polyphony.

The hymnal only allows hymns that are doctrinally and dogmatically correct in Catholic theology, piety and spirituality and it should be made clear what is appropriate for the Mass and what is better suited for devotions.

Only when we get a national hymnal and put the money mongers in the Catholic music industry out of business will be see authentic post-Vatican II liturgical renewal!

Fr. Dwight Longnecker has an article in Crux which while good, still keeps that dag nabit door of personal preferences of music directors and priests, not to mention individual Catholics cracked open and thus will do nothing to move us forward and away from all the banalities that pass for music in the liturgy. His article is titled:

Catholic church music — banal and superficial?

Here are some of his "soundbites:"
It is astounding how much the parishes and pastors who have embraced “the Spirit of Vatican II” have done exactly opposite of what the documents of the Second Vatican Council actually prescribe. The Council allows for four types of sacred music: “Gregorian chant, sacred polyphony in its various forms, both ancient and modern, sacred music for the organ and other approved instruments, and sacred popular music, be it liturgical or simply religious.”
A few months ago the pope addressed a conference in the Vatican convened for the fiftieth anniversary of Musicam Sacram - “Instruction on the Music of the Liturgy”- a Vatican document following the Second Vatican Council, which discussed the “ministerial role” of sacred music.
Lovers of the the suburban “folk mass” (sarcastically referred to as “the old folks mass”) will be surprised to find that the Vatican II document calls for Catholic liturgical music to consist of four types of sacred music: “Gregorian chant, sacred polyphony in its various forms, both ancient and modern, sacred music for the organ and other approved instruments, and sacred popular music, be it liturgical or simply religious.”


When it comes to “other approved instruments” the document states, “In permitting and using musical instruments, the culture and traditions of individual peoples must be taken into account. However, those instruments which are, by common opinion and use, suitable for secular music only, are to be altogether prohibited from every liturgical celebration and from popular devotions.”


That would seem to rule out the saxophone, xylophone, cowbells, slide whistles, accordions, kazoos, bongos, banjos and guitars.

 It is astounding how much the parishes and pastors who have embraced “the Spirit of Vatican II” have done exactly opposite of what the documents of the Second Vatican Council actually prescribe.
How many parishes do you know where the liturgical music featured is Gregorian chant or polyphony?

Instead we have sentimental ditties with music that sounds like it comes from a third rate Broadway musical. Most American Catholics listen to music led by a praise band that features dubious theology, cliched music and sappy words about gathering together for a group hug.

“Mediocre, superficial and banal”? Rome has spoken. That settles it.

Firstly, the function of liturgical music is to enhance worship. St. Augustine famously said, “When we sing we pray twice.” In other words, the music serves the prayer. If this is the case, then sacred music should offer worship to God. 

When evaluating a hymn or piece of music for the choir we should ask whether the words and music are about God or about us. This should be fairly obvious and yet when you open a contemporary Catholic hymnbook you will find an extraordinary number of hymns which are not about God, but about the community, its needs and its mission.

Secondly the music should be singable. Musicam Sacram insists that full participation is the aim of liturgical music. Ironically, much of the popular church music is difficult for congregations to sing. Often the music was written for a soloist to perform rather than for congregational singing.

The rhythms are irregular, the words and music are often jarring, and when led by a guitar or a praise band the effect is one of performance rather than participation. Simple Mass settings and well constructed hymns encourage congregational participation.

Thirdly, the words should be fully Catholic and complement the liturgy. Music is not chosen just because we like this song or that song. Instead the lyrics express theology.

Not only should the words communicate Catholic truth, they should also echo the readings and themes of worship for the day. In that way the music reinforces the full participation of the worshippers.

Ultimately, liturgical music serves the liturgy, the liturgy does not serve the music. The organ, the choir and the congregational singing is all subservient to the action at the altar. Music, like every other aspect of the liturgy, should not draw attention to itself - either because it is so terrible or because it is so marvelous. 

A mediocre praise band and a sincere soloist warbling a Joan Baez number is distracting, but so is a high falutin’ choir intoning an inaccessible medieval anthem or an operatic soprano belting out a Mozart aria.

In the ordinary Catholic liturgy, however, simpler standards should apply. The music should be high quality, reverent and profound - which is the opposite of “mediocre, superficial and banal.”

Wednesday, June 7, 2017

I HAVE TO ADMIT THAT SOMETIMES TRADITIONALISTS CAN BE LIKE A WRECKING BALL WHEN IT COMES TO IMPOSING NEW ORDER IN A PARISH GONE WILD--GO SLOW, SLOW, SLOW AND DON'T ALIENTATE THOSE WHO WILL BE THERE LONG AFTER THE PRIEST IS GONE

Catholic priest whose style split NC mountain parish is leaving

The Charlotte Observer 17 hours ago

INFALLIBLY PROCLAIMED DOGMA ON OUR BLESSED MOTHER FROM POPE FRANCIS THIS SUMMER? WHAT ARE THE CHANCES?



Crux is reporting this:

 Pope Francis proclaiming a dogma of Mary as Co-Redemptrix, Mediator of all Graces and Advocate (this summer).
Assigning Mary those titles has long been a cherished cause of some elements on the Catholic right, which perhaps makes Francis an unlikely pontiff to actually deliver. On the other hand,  Francis has a strong devotion to the Blessed Mother, and, as a Latin American pastor, has a deep grasp of the centrality of Mary in traditional Catholic spirituality.
Moreover, proclaiming those Marian dogmas would also serve the political purpose of assuring the Catholic right that the pope isn’t hostile to them on principle - a point which might well do him some good in the present political climate inside the Church.

Monday, June 5, 2017

ALL THESE RIGID CATHOLICS: IS THE POPE NOW THE SUPREME PSYCHOLOGIST AND PSYCHOTHERAPIST ?

Psychologists identify why certain songs get stuck in your head


Pope Sigmund Freud? The Holy Father does seem to be preoccupied as though the same song is playing over and over again in His Holiness' head, as clerics of his age, with the rigidity of Catholics, especially seminarians and priests. The progressive seminaries of the 1970's and 80's were particularly concerned with seminarians who were rigid about doctrine, opposed to women priests, deacons and bishops as well as altar girls and female Extraoridnary Ministers of Holy Communion and lectors.

If they prayed the Rosary everyday, were pro-life and were seen praying before the Most Blessed Sacrament and agitating for Benediction of the Most Blessed Sacrament, these things didn't bode well for them.

I can only venture a guess, but the filth in the seminary amongst seminary personnel and seminarians of the 70's and 80's was not primarily the rigid conservatives, but the progressives who were irreverent, narcissistic and careless about the liturgy, morality and doctrine. The loosey-goosey progressives have corrupted the Church, not the rigid and scrupulous. And if either of these groups have psychological issues, please refer them to actual psycho-therapy by professionals.

So why the preoccupation with rigid Catholics. How many of the 12% of Catholics who actually bother to attend Mass in New York are rigid????? And the 88% who don't go certainly are not scrupulous about their Faith, are they?

Holy Father, stick to the Faith, Morals and Canon Law of the Church--your mandate is to "Teach, Rule and Sanctify" not to be Pope Sigmund Freud!

KNEELING FOR HOLY COMMUNION, EVEN IF RECEIVING IN THE HAND, IS THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT RENEWAL FOR THE ORDINARY FORM OF THE MASS, EVEN MORE IMPORTANT THAN AD ORIENTEM!

On Pentecost Sunday, I celebrated our Cathedral's EF High Mass. Once again, what struck me as most important for the actual renewal of the Ordinary Form of the Mass isn't Latin or ad orientem, it is kneeling for Holy Communion.

I was the only "Eucharistic Minister" for about 200 communicants, and the time it took for me alone going to each communicant kneeling at the railing, was about the same as four distributing to those standing single file as is Ordinary in the Ordinary Form!

But this is precisely what it appeared to look like at the Cathedral's EF Mass for Pentecost:

communion

Sunday, June 4, 2017

PENTECOSTAL GIFT: TONE DEAF POPE SINGS AT CHARISMATIC RALLY IN ROMA!




We become Christians of the “right” or the “left”, before being on the side of Jesus, unbending guardians of the past or the avant-garde of the future before being humble and grateful children of the Church.  The result is diversity without unity.  The opposite temptation is that of seeking unity without diversity.  Here, unity becomes uniformity, where everyone has to do everything together and in the same way, always thinking alike.  Unity ends up being homogeneity and no longer freedom.  But, as Saint Paul says, “where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom”

Pope Francis: homily for Pentecost, 2017

Pope Francis presides over Mass for the Solemnity of Pentecost, in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican, 04 June 2017 - ANSA
Pope Francis presides over Mass for the Solemnity of Pentecost, in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican, 04 June 2017 - ANSA
04/06/2017 12:58


(Vatican Radio) Pope Francis celebrated Mass on Sunday, the Solemnity of Pentecost, in St. Peter’s Square. Below, please find the full text of his homily in its official English translation
************************************
Homily of His Holiness Pope Francis
Solemnity of Pentecost
4 June 2017

Today concludes the Easter season, the fifty days that, from Jesus’ resurrection to Pentecost, are marked in a particular way by the presence of the Holy Spirit.  The Spirit is in fact the Easter Gift par excellence.  He is the Creator Spirit, who constantly brings about new things.  Today’s readings show us two of those new things.  In the first reading, the Spirit makes of the disciples a new people; in the Gospel, he creates in the disciples a new heart.

A new people.  On the day of Pentecost, the Spirit came down from heaven, in the form of “divided tongues, as of fire… [that] rested on each of them.  All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit, and began to speak in other languages” (Acts 2:3-4).  This is how the word of God describes the working of the Spirit: first he rests on each and then brings all of them together in fellowship.  To each he gives a gift, and then gathers them all into unity.  In other words, the same Spirit creates diversity and unity, and in this way forms a new, diverse and unified people: the universal Church.   First, in a way both creative and unexpected, he generates diversity, for in every age he causes new and varied charisms to blossom.  Then he brings about unity: he joins together, gathers and restores harmony: “By his presence and his activity, the Spirit draws into unity spirits that are distinct and separate among themselves” (CYRIL OF ALEXANDRIA, Commentary on the Gospel of John, XI, 11).  He does so in a way that effects true union, according to God’s will, a union that is not uniformity, but unity in difference.

For this to happen, we need to avoid two recurrent temptations.  The first temptation seeks diversity without unity.  This happens when we want to separate, when we take sides and form parties, when we adopt rigid and airtight positions, when we become locked into our own ideas and ways of doing things, perhaps even thinking that we are better than others, or always in the right.  When this happens, we choose the part over the whole, belonging to this or that group before belonging to the Church.  We become avid supporters for one side, rather than brothers and sisters in the one Spirit.

We become Christians of the “right” or the “left”, before being on the side of Jesus, unbending guardians of the past or the avant-garde of the future before being humble and grateful children of the Church.  The result is diversity without unity.  The opposite temptation is that of seeking unity without diversity.  Here, unity becomes uniformity, where everyone has to do everything together and in the same way, always thinking alike.  Unity ends up being homogeneity and no longer freedom.  But, as Saint Paul says, “where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom” (2 Cor 3:17).

So the prayer we make to the Holy Spirit is for the grace to receive his unity, a glance that, leaving personal preferences aside, embraces and loves his Church, our Church.  It is to accept responsibility for unity among all, to wipe out the gossip that sows the darnel of discord and the poison of envy, since to be men and women of the Church means being men and women of communion.  It is also to ask for a heart that feels that the Church is our Mother and our home, an open and welcoming home where the manifold joy of the Holy Spirit is shared.

Now we come to the second new thing brought by the Spirit: a new heart.  When the risen Jesus first appears to his disciples, he says to them: “Receive the Holy Spirit.  If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them” (Jn 20:22-23).  Jesus does not condemn them for having denied and abandoned him during his passion, but instead grants them the spirit of forgiveness.  The Spirit is the first gift of the risen Lord, and is given above all for the forgiveness of sins.  Here we see the beginning of the Church, the glue that holds us together, the cement that binds the bricks of the house: forgiveness.  Because forgiveness is gift to the highest degree; it is the greatest love of all.  It preserves unity despite everything, prevents collapse, and consolidates and strengthens.  Forgiveness sets our hearts free and enables us to start afresh.  Forgiveness gives hope; without forgiveness, the Church is not built up.

The spirit of forgiveness resolves everything in harmony, and leads us to reject every other way: the way of hasty judgement, the cul-de-sac of closing every door, the one-way street criticizing others.  Instead, the Spirit bids us take the two-way street of forgiveness received and given, of divine mercy that becomes love of neighbour, of charity as “the sole criterion by which everything must be done or not done, changed or not changed” (ISAAC OF STELLA, Or. 31).  Let us ask for the grace to make more beautiful the countenance of our Mother the Church, letting ourselves be renewed by forgiveness and self-correction.  Only then will we be able to correct others in charity.

The Holy Spirit is the fire of love burning in the Church and in our hearts, even though we often cover him with the ash of our sins.  Let us ask him: “Spirit of God, Lord, who dwell in my heart and in the heart of the Church, guiding and shaping her in diversity, come!  Like water, we need you to live.  Come down upon us anew, teach us unity, renew our hearts and teach us to love as you love us, to forgive as you forgive us.  Amen”.

Friday, June 2, 2017

YOURS TRULY CELEBRANT FOR CATHEDRAL'S EF HIGH PENTECOST MASS AT 1:00 PM IN HISTORIC DOWNTOWN SAVANNAH'S LAFAYETTE SQUARE--BE THERE OR BE SQUARE!




JUST WHEN YOU THOUGHT MARRIAGE COULD NOT BE REDEFINED EVEN MORE THAN IT HAS BEEN REDEFINED, THINK AGAIN!

Gay Man Makes History By Marrying Cop Killed In Terrorist Attack (YES YOU READ THAT RIGHT! AND 2 + 2 EQUALS 5!)

Curtis M. Wong,Huff Post 19 hours ago
Etienne Cardiles (left) spoke at an April memorial for Xavier Jugelé. A gay police officer killed by a gunman in Paris was married in a posthumous wedding that’s believed to be a historic first.

Xavier Jugelé, 37, was shot dead April 20 on the Champs-Élysées three days before the French presidential election. The Islamic State later claimed responsibility for the attack, which left two other officers wounded. The gunman, identified as Karim Cheurfi, was shot dead by security forces.
Though details of Wednesday’s nuptials are scarce, Etienne Cardiles married Jugelé in a ceremony attended by former French president François Hollande and Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo, The Guardian reports. It’s believed to be the first posthumous same-sex wedding to take place in France (where marriage equality has been the law of the land since 2013) and possibly the world, according to the BBC.

THE CATHEDRAL'S SCHOLA TO CHANT THE EF MASS AT THE MARTHA AND MARY CHAPEL OF SAINT ANNE CATHOLIC CHURCH, RICHMOND HILL FOR THE FEAST OF THE MOST SACRED HEART OF JESUS, FRIDAY, JUNE 23 AT 7 PM

This photo below is our Martha-Mary Chapel of  St. Anne Church and is the Ordinary Mass of the Church prior to Vatican II. This building was built by Henry Ford in the 1930's as a Congregationalist Church, which he attended here. He gave it the name Martha-Mary Chapel, named after his mother and mother-in-law (but I am sure they were named after the saints!).  The Diocese of Savannah acquired it in 1955 to become a Mission Parish, named St. Anne. This photo is from the late 1950's or early 60's.

On June 23, 2017 at the very same church, for the first time since the Ordinary Form of the Mass prior to Vatican II was last celebrated here, it will be freshly celebrated again as a High Mass for the Feast of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus with the Cathedral's EF Schola, MC, altar boys and me, your most humble celebrant.

And Catholic News Agency, which Crux picked up, has a wonderful, open-minded article on the 10th anniversary of Summorum Pontificum. To love and appreciate both forms of the Mass celebrated by saying the black and doing the red is an act of open-minded magnanimity. If all the clergy and laity could be so!

Looking forward to 10 years of Summorum Pontificum

Looking forward to 10 years of Summorum Pontificum
A Mass said for the Summorum Pontificum pilgrimage in Rome held Oct. 25, 2014. (Credit: Daniel Ibanez/CNA.)
A pilgrimage is being organized to mark the 10th anniversary of Summorum Pontificum, the document by Benedict XVI aimed at broadening access to the celebration of the Traditional Latin Mass. According to one of the organizers the document “was not an instrument to divide” but to unite.
ROME — Ten years after Benedict XVI broadened access to the celebration of the Traditional Latin Mass, the document by which he did so is being hailed as a means of closing the rift of division following liturgical changes made after the Second Vatican Council.

“Sometimes there are these polemics, but I think Benedict tried to overcome these polemics, saying that even in the liturgy there is a certain progress … but clearly in full continuity with the tradition of the Church,” Father Vincenzo Nuara, OP, told Catholic News Agency May 31.

Tensions were heightened after the Second Vatican Council’s reforms, and “unfortunately these situations of contrast, of opposition are created” even today, Nuara said.

In light of this situation, Benedict XVI’s 2007 motu proprio Summorum Pontificum, which widened access to the pre-Vatican II liturgy, “was not an instrument to divide” or throw further fuel on the flames, he said.

Rather, “it was an instrument to unite. To unite, and to bring again that ecclesial peace that’s needed in this time.

“I see it as a positive instrument, not negative,” Nuara said. “It’s not an instrument for going backwards. It’s an instrument to reconnect ourselves in continuity” with different ecclesial styles.

Nuara is president of the association “Priestly Friends of Summorum Pontificum” and founder and spiritual assistant of the “Youth and Tradition” association.

He is also one of the organizers of an upcoming Sept. 14-17 pilgrimage marking the 10th anniversary of Summorum Pontificum, and spoke to journalists at a working breakfast on the event.

The motu proprio was issued July 7, 2007, and went into effect September 14 of that year, the feast of the Exaltation of the Cross.

The document established that the post-Vatican II Roman Missal, first issued by Blessed Paul VI, is the ordinary form of the Roman rite, and that the prior version, last issued by St. John XXIII in 1962 and known as the Traditional Latin Mass or the Tridentine Mass, is the Roman rite’s extraordinary form.

In the motu proprio, Benedict noted that the Traditional Latin Mass was never abrogated. He awknowledged clearly the right of all priests of the Roman rite to say Mass using the Roman Missal of 1962, and established that parish priests should be willing to say the extraordinary form for groups of the faithful who request it.

Benedict also established that the faithful could have recourse to their bishop or even the Vatican if their requests for celebration of the extraordinary form were not satisfied.

The provisions of Summorum Pontificum for the use of the extraordinary form replaced those of St. John Paul II laid down in Quattuor abhinc annos and Ecclesia Dei.

According to that indult, priests and faithful who wished to celebrate the Traditional Latin Mass had to get permission from their bishop to do so. It could only be for those who requested it, could not normally be said at parish churches, and the bishop could set days and conditions for its celebration.

After the Second Vatican Council, the Missal issued by Bl. Paul VI, also known as the Novus Ordo, was widely adopted. It was widely translated into vernacular languages, and is often celebrated with the priest facing toward the congregation.

However, not a few faithful continued to be attached to the earlier form of the liturgy, and Benedict’s motu proprio was considered a generous response to these faithful.

Benedict wrote in the motu proprio that the two forms “will in no way lead to a division” in the Church’s belief “for they are two usages of the one Roman rite.”

In his letter to bishops accompanying Summorum Pontificum, Benedict also noted that “the two Forms of the usage of the Roman Rite can be mutually enriching.”

Nuara reflected that since Summorum Pontificum, “those who have permission to use the ancient form of the liturgy have also at the same time rediscovered the sanctity of the new.”

This mutual enrichment is a discovery Nuara said he himself has made in his 25 years as a priest, during which he has celebrated both the new and ancient liturgical formulas.
But it is also a discovery “that many (other) priests have made.

“Benedict is a positive man. Benedict, who reflects as a theologian and a pastor, realized that the ancient form that has grown in the history of the Church for years, can give new impetus to the new form,” he said.

The Mass “is the bridge where they meet, because the Eucharist is the point of encounter …  the sacrament of unity,” Nuara said, adding that what “must be avoided” is that people “take advantage of their particular trend or attention to one or the other liturgy, to create fences of division and separation.”

Benedict himself celebrated the new form of the liturgy “with great dignity,” but before his election as Bishop of Rome was also known to celebrate the ancient liturgy with the same esteem.

What Summorum Pontificum seeks to do then, is to work for this unity, he said, adding that at 10 years since its publication, his hope is that people from both sides will work toward this goal.

“We want to send, to communicate this message,” he said. “Because the Church is a family, the family of God.”

When the Summorum Pontificum Pilgrimage takes place in September, it will be a privileged time to show this unity, he said.

The event’s first day, held at the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas, will feature keynote addresses from Archbishop Guido Pozzo, secretary of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei; Cardinal Gerhard Müller, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and president of the PCED;  and Cardinal Robert Sarah, prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship.

Pilgrims who come will participate in various other activities throughout the rest of the three days, including adoration and a Eucharistic procession presided over by Archbishop Pozzo on September 16, followed by a Pontifical High Mass said by Cardinal Carlo Caffarra, Archbishop Emeritus of Bologna.

Titled “Summorum Pontificum: A renewed youth for the Church,” the pilgrimage is being organized by the “Priestly Friends of Summorum Pontificum” and “Youth and Tradition” associations in partnership with the Coetus Internationalis Summorum Pontificum.

Speaking of the title in comments to journalists, Nuara noted that a “truly surprising” phenomenon is that the “true protagonists” of this new “season of the Church … are the youth.”

In his letter accompanying the motu proprio, Benedict had noted that while “it has clearly been demonstrated that young persons too have discovered this liturgical form, felt its attraction and found in it a form of encounter with the Mystery of the Most Holy Eucharist, particularly suited to them.”

“Benedict XVI already in 2007 was aware that the new recipients of this liturgy, loved, desired and also sought, were the youth,” Nuara said.

Pope Francis has also commented on the fact that many of the enthusiasts for the Traditional Latin Mass are young people who never knew it growing up, but encountered it later.

“Youth can’t be nostalgic for something they didn’t know,” Nuara said, adding that “this is very nice, because by experience I can say that the youth who draw near to the ancient liturgy of the Church love it” for the reverence and silence of the celebration.

In celebrating the ancient form, “you really understand who is at the center, who the protagonist is,” the priest said, noting that “youth understand very well that this liturgy speaks of … the essential truth of the faith.”