tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post8197936871566700438..comments2024-03-28T20:30:10.681-04:00Comments on southern orders: THE WANDERER HITS ONE OUT OF THE BALLPARK: CALLS IT AS IT IS!Fr. Allan J. McDonaldhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16986575955114152639noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-12142708416219877362014-04-30T11:48:21.480-04:002014-04-30T11:48:21.480-04:00I've corrected the colors.I've corrected the colors.Fr. Allan J. McDonaldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16986575955114152639noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-75898996177117722752014-04-30T11:43:12.649-04:002014-04-30T11:43:12.649-04:00"While it is true that 'liberals' cla..."While it is true that 'liberals' claim 'good Pope John' as one of their own (despite the evidence) and regarded JP II as a reactionary,"<br /><br />Which is truly ironic. As shown clearly by the recent of NLM articles by Peter Kwasniewski on the writings of John XXIII, he was utterly traditional with regard to liturgy, ecclesiology, doctrine, and spirituality. Arguably considerably more than John Paul II. In particular, he was in particular a passionate over of the traditional Mass and its spiritual ethos.<br /><br />Not only did the liberals hijack Vatican II, they committed highway robbery in fencing John XXIII as one of their own. For his intent in convening Vatican II was to send the triumphant Church of the 1950s out to conquer the world--in a true new pentecost, rather than the collapse at the hands of liberals that followed Paul VI's council--armed with the glories of traditional faith and liturgy.<br />Henrynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-20421976729105559062014-04-30T10:48:51.816-04:002014-04-30T10:48:51.816-04:00I understand that. Just wondering is red more impo...I understand that. Just wondering is red more important than blue? qwiknesshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15439450727837308035noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-40548810065414559842014-04-30T10:48:14.816-04:002014-04-30T10:48:14.816-04:00FRAJM,
QN is quite correct. The article and commen...FRAJM,<br />QN is quite correct. The article and commentary, as modified, is illegible.Mr. Chttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09649237173680633611noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-12793822986738731262014-04-30T09:46:19.509-04:002014-04-30T09:46:19.509-04:00To draw your attention and highlight what I see as...To draw your attention and highlight what I see as important.Fr. Allan J. McDonaldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16986575955114152639noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-64096171582956325172014-04-30T09:42:02.395-04:002014-04-30T09:42:02.395-04:00I can not follow the significance of the different...I can not follow the significance of the different color of text. Is one color more important than others? It distracts me when I read.qwiknesshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15439450727837308035noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-84415110620654741352014-04-30T09:09:06.770-04:002014-04-30T09:09:06.770-04:00The Wanderer is trash.The Wanderer is trash.Pater Ignotusnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-37835979175751235842014-04-30T09:08:54.725-04:002014-04-30T09:08:54.725-04:00While it is true that 'liberals' claim ...While it is true that 'liberals' claim 'good Pope John' as one of their own (despite the evidence) and regarded JP II as a reactionary, some rad.trads seem to cordially dislike both of them.<br /><br />What we now call Vatican II isn't Pope John's council which ended with his death. It is Pope Paul's council. Ironically, had he been elected in 1958 (he technically could have been, despite Pius XII denying him a red hat) there would in all probability have been no council at all.John Nolanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09027156691859606002noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7846189835239594160.post-25119826420329505422014-04-30T08:23:27.581-04:002014-04-30T08:23:27.581-04:00While I avoid applying the 19th century political ...While I avoid applying the 19th century political terms "conservative" and "liberal" to ecclesial philosophies, I must admit that, "modernists infected with a fascination for novelty and largely driven by a desire to overturn traditional Catholic thinking, discipline, and morality" is a reasonable definition of an ecclesial liberal, if the term must be used. Rood Screenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09816036539243214384noreply@blogger.com