The Solemn Canonization Mass was glorious, reverent and sung with splendid Latin Chant and motets.
One has to look closely, but the pope once again employs the dalmatic under the chasuble and a lacy amice to boot.
I hope the Holy Father returns to the covered throne placed behind the altar by the Basilica’s front door. Pope Benedict revived that custom and Pope Francis maintained for all of his outdoor Mass when he was able to be the celebrant. I don’t know why Leo has decided against it.
I took this photo of the Papal Throne at a Mass with Pope Francis on October 13, 2013 and the actual statue of Our Lady of Fatima was present and processed at this Mass! Cool to be there for it and distribute Holy Communion:
My only complaint with Pope Leo’s style of celebrating a sung Mass is that he doesn’t chant all that would normally be chanted. Usually just the “Sign of the Cross” and “Greeting”. He does intone the Gloria and Credo. He fails to chant the Preface Dialogue and Preface—what a pity! Selective chanting with no real reason as to why something is chanted and another isn’t. (This would not happen in a TLM Sung Mass!)
Look closely for the Episcopal Dalmatic!
HOLY MASS AND CANONISATION OF THE BLESSED:
- Ignazio Choukrallah Maloyan
- Peter To Rot
- Vincenza Maria Poloni
- Maria del Monte Carmelo Rendiles Martínez
- Maria Troncatti
- José Gregorio Hernández Cisneros
- Bartolo Longo
HOMILY OF HIS HOLINESS POPE LEO XIV
St Peter's Square
29th Sunday in Ordinary Time, 19 October 2025
____________________________________
Dear brothers and sisters,
Let us begin our reflection with the question that concludes the Gospel just proclaimed: “When the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on earth?” (Lk 18:8). This question reveals to us what is most precious in the Lord’s eyes: faith, namely, the bond of love between God and man. Today we have before us seven witnesses, the new Saints, who, with God’s grace, kept the lamp of faith burning. Indeed, they themselves became lamps capable of spreading the light of Christ.
When we consider the great material, cultural, scientific and artistic treasures, faith shines not because these goods are to be undervalued, but because without faith they lose their meaning. Our relationship with God is of the utmost importance because at the beginning of time he created all things out of nothing and, at the end of time, he will save mortal beings from nothingness. A world without faith, then, would be populated by children living without a Father, that is, by creatures without salvation. (Excellent apologetic for being Catholic and having Faith and Good works—salvation from the fires of hell and eternity of nothingness based in evil.)
For this reason, Jesus, the Son of God made man, asks about faith: if it disappeared from the world, what would happen? Heaven and earth would remain as before, but there would no longer be hope in our hearts; everyone’s freedom would be defeated by death; our desire for life would fade into nothingness. Without faith in God, we cannot hope for salvation. Jesus’ question can disturb us, but only if we forget that it is Jesus himself who poses it. The Lord’s words, in fact, are always the “Gospel,” the joyful proclamation of salvation. This salvation is the gift of eternal life that we receive from the Father, through the Son, in the power of the Holy Spirit. (Pope Leo’s homilies and messages are consistently based upon soteriology!)
Dear friends, this is precisely why Christ speaks to his disciples of the “need to pray always, and not to lose heart” (Lk 18:1). Just as we never grow weary of breathing, so let us never grow weary of praying! Just as breathing sustains the life of the body, so prayer sustains the life of the soul: faith, in fact, is expressed in prayer, and authentic prayer lives on faith. (Excellent juxtaposition, breathing and praying!)
Jesus shows us this connection with a parable: a judge remains deaf to the pressing requests of a widow, whose perseverance finally leads him to act. At a glance, such tenacity becomes for us a beautiful example of hope, especially in times of trial and tribulation. Nevertheless, the woman’s perseverance and the judge, who acts reluctantly, set the stage for a provocative question from Jesus: Will not God, the good Father, “grant justice to his chosen ones who cry to him day and night?” (Lk 18:7).
Let us allow these words to resonate in our hearts: the Lord is asking us whether we believe that God is a just judge towards all. The Son asks us if we believe that the Father always wants our good and the salvation of every person. In this regard, two temptations test our faith: the first draws strength from the scandal of evil, leading us to think that God does not hear the cries of the oppressed and has no pity for the innocent who suffer. The second temptation is the claim that God must act as we want him to: prayer then gives way to a command to God, to teach him how to be just and effective.
Jesus, the perfect witness of filial trust, frees us from both temptations. He is the innocent one who, especially during his Passion, prays thus: “Father, your will be done” (cf. Lk 22:42). The Master gives us these same words in the Our Father. Let us remember that whatever happens to us, Jesus entrusted himself as Son to the Father. We are, therefore, brothers and sisters in his name, so we can proclaim: “It is truly right and just, our duty and our salvation, always and everywhere to give you thanks, Lord, holy Father, almighty and eternal God, through Christ our Lord” (Eucharistic Prayer II, Preface).
The Church’s prayer reminds us that God grants justice to all, giving his life for all. Thus, when we cry out to the Lord, “Where are you?”, let us transform this invocation into a prayer, and then we we will recognize that God is present where the innocent suffer. The cross of Christ reveals God’s justice, and God’s justice is forgiveness. He sees evil and redeems it by taking it upon himself. When we are “crucified” by pain and violence, by hatred and war, Christ is already there, on the cross for us and with us. There is no cry that God does not console; there is no tear that is far from his heart. The Lord listens to us, embraces us as we are, and transforms us as he is. Those who reject God’s mercy, however, remain incapable of mercy towards their neighbor. Those who do not welcome peace as a gift will not know how to give peace.
Dear friends, we now understand that Jesus’ questions are a powerful invitation to hope and action: when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith in God’s providence? Indeed, it is this faith that sustains our commitment to justice, precisely because we believe that God saves the world out of love, freeing us from fatalism. When we hear the cries of those in difficulty, let us ask ourselves, are we witnesses to the Father’s love, as Christ was to all? He is the humble one who calls the arrogant to conversion, the just one who makes us just. We see all this in the lives of the new Saints: they are not heroes or champions of some ideal, but authentic men and women.
These faithful friends of Christ are martyrs for their faith, like Bishop Ignazio Choukrallah Maloyan and catechist Peter To Rot; they are evangelizers and missionaries, like Sister Maria Troncatti; they are charismatic founders, like Sister Vincenza Maria Poloni and Sister Maria del Monte Carmelo Rendiles Martínez; with their hearts burning with devotion, they are benefactors of humanity, like Bartolo Longo and José Gregorio Hernández Cisneros. May their intercession assist us in our trials and their example inspire us in our shared vocation to holiness. As we journey towards this goal, let us pray without ceasing, and continue in what we have learned and firmly believe (cf. 2 Tim 3:14). Faith on earth thus sustains the hope for heaven.






18 comments:
How can this be that Pope Leo has larger crowds than Francis, the loveliest, fluffiest Pope, evah?
I concur. It is odd that Pope Leo did not chant the Preface and the customary other parts. Maybe to save time?
At this stage it’s still too early to make deductions about crowd sizes and the large attendance could just be (I) novelty of a new pontificate, (ii) the jubilee year and/or the fact that it was a multiple canonisation involving several nationalities.
A Mass like this could not or would not occur in 99% of parishes in the US.
Nick
Those extra tall candlesticks are ridiculous on top of the altar, you can’t see the flame and they’re in danger of burning the roof!
Should have been placed on the floor
A Mass like this could not or would not occur in 99% of parishes in the US.
No, because it’s a canonisation at the Vatican Rome. Even before V2, a mass like this would not have been possible in 99% of any nations parishes ( including Italy).
I have come to despise candles on the floor as though the altar is a casket at a TLM Requiem! If the altar is a square cube, maybe so then, but thanks be to God, sanity has returned to altar designs that are rectangular and long allowing for candlesticks on the altar. But yes, with this particular outdoor canopy, the candlesticks need to be a bit smaller. Under Benedict and Francis, the right size was used but Benedict’s arrangement was excellent, most excellent!
Big Benny,
Well I was around then and magnificent sung Masses did occur in the US with far, greater splendor than this one with greater care, particularly large American cities.
The typical sung Mass at the Brompton Oratory is better done than this canonization Mass. Yes, I’ve been there.
I am a (retired) deacon of the diocese of Charleston. There is no such thing as a "transitional" deacon. There is only one Order of Deacon. If a so-called "transitional deacon" never advances to the presbyterate, doesn't he remain a permanent deacon? And, similarly, if a "permanent deacon" is called to the presbyterate, was his diaconate then only transitional?
Father McDonald, this is a MUST read for you. I think you will enjoy it:
https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2025/10/by-their-fruits-you-shall-know-them.html
I think it is helpful for distinguishing between what might be called a “vocational deacon” verses a candidate for the priesthood, whose vocation is not a permanent or vocational deacon but rather the priesthood. That doesn’t mean, though, that one studying for the priesthood, might choose not to be ordained a priest but rather remain a deacon by vocation. Or a vocational/permanent deacon called to priestly ordination either as a married man or widowed.
Deacon Ed, I think those of us who go to Church understand what is meant by "transitional" Deacon. Sounds like you are more concerned about status.
https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2025/10/by-their-fruits-you-shall-know-them.htm
Another trad group turns sede!
A leading figure in the post-conciliar liturgical reforms, Archbishop Annibale Bugnini, explained the rationale of the Consilium:
They got rid of texts that smacked of a negative spirituality inherited from the Middle Ages. Thus they removed such familiar and even beloved texts as "Libera me, Domine", "Dies irae", and others that overemphasized judgment, fear, and despair. These they replaced with texts urging Christian hope and arguably giving more effective expression to faith in the resurrection
HE WAS A SILLY ICONOCLASTIC MODERNIST LITURGIEST AND WE CAN BLAME HIM AND POPE PAUL VI FOR THE LITURGY WARS WHICH FOLLOWED AND WERE WORLDWIDE. I WOULD NOT SEE THAT AS BENEFICIAL IN ANYWAY AND POOR POPE LEO XIV HAS TRY TO BRING UNITY OUT OF ALL THE DISUNITY AND CHAOS THAT THESE TWO FOMENTED IN THE CHURCH—THEY DESERVE THE BLAME.
He would've had the rosary thrown out next, if he'd had has way. After all, the Salve Regina is so negative! Sorry if I don't accept Abp. Hannibal as a credible judge of what was "overly negative."
And now, the Church's liturgy almost completely excludes any negativity, especially in practice, in the rites associated with death. It is an absurd insensitivity to the innate human need to mourn. The Dies Irae contains many beautiful prayers for mercy and salvation--at least it technically survives as an optional hymn for one day of the year, right?
Nick
It's also fortunate the Consilium didn't see fit in their zeal to edit the Scriptural bases of the Dies Irae, as well. We would have had cuts to Zephaniah, Revelation, the Gospels of Luke and Matthew, Peter's second letter, the first letter to the Thessalonians, if not more. The Bible can just be so negative, it simply isn't right!
Nick
If not Bugnini, it would have been someone else.
I don’t think you can be prescriptive. In your original church the big six were placed around the freestanding altar and looked very dignified. They would have looked too much and acted as a barrier on a freestanding altar.
There does need to be an adjustment for mass facing the people. I thought Benedict ‘s arrangement benefited from Francis’s tweak of moving the big six slightly to the side rather than being lined up.
My main qualm is overkill in an attempt to look quasi traditional. If the big six remain either side of the tabernacle then there’s no need to have another on the freestanding altar.
The Roman rite is known for noble simplicity. Except for major feasts there’s no need to crowd the sanctuary with multitudes of candles. That’s not traditional!
Post a Comment